Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products

Authors: Márta Szegedi, Tamás Zelei, Francis Arickx, Anna Bucsics, Emanuelle Cohn-Zanchetta, Jurij Fürst, Maria Kamusheva, Pawel Kawalec, Guenka Petrova, Juraj Slaby, Ewa Stawowczyk, Milan Vocelka, Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss, Zoltán Kaló, Mária Judit Molnár

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Funding of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is an increasing challenge in the European Union (EU).

Objectives

To identify the different methods for public funding of OMPs in order to map the availability for rare disease patients, as well as to compare the public expenditures on OMPs in 8 EU member states.

Methods

Information on the reimbursement status of 83 OMPs was collected in 8 countries by distinguishing standard and special reimbursements. In two consecutive years, the total public expenditures on OMPs were calculated by using annual EUR exchange rates. Annual total public expenditures were calculated per capita, and as a proportion of GDP, total public pharmaceutical and healthcare budgets. Differences between countries were compared by calculating the deviations from the average spending of countries.

Results

In 2015 29.4–92.8% of the 83 OMPs were available with any kind of public reimbursement in participant countries including special reimbursement on an individual basis. In Austria, Belgium and France more OMPs were accessible for patients with public reimbursement than in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Standard reimbursement through retail pharmacies and/or hospitals was applied from 0 to 41% of OMPs. The average annual total public expenditure ranged between 1.4–23.5 €/capita in 2013 and 2014. Higher income countries spent more OMPs in absolute terms. Participant countries spent 0.018–0.066% of their GDPs on funding OMPs. Average expenditures on OMPs were ranged between 2.25–6.51% of the public pharmaceutical budget, and 0.44–0.96% of public healthcare expenditures.

Conclusions

Standard and special reimbursement techniques play different roles in participant countries. The number of accessible OMPs indicated an equity gap between Eastern and Western Europe. The spending on OMPs as a proportion of GDP, public pharmaceutical and healthcare expenditure was not higher in lower income countries, which indicates substantial differences in patient access to OMPs in favour of higher-income countries. Equity in access for patients with rare diseases is an important policy objective in each member state of the EU; however, equity in access should be harmonized at the European level.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference McCabe C. Balancing economic, ethical and equity concerns in orphan drugs and rare diseases. EJHP Pract. 2010;16(4):22–5. McCabe C. Balancing economic, ethical and equity concerns in orphan drugs and rare diseases. EJHP Pract. 2010;16(4):22–5.
4.
go back to reference Michel M, Toumi M. Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(1):23–9.CrossRef Michel M, Toumi M. Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(1):23–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Hulstaert F, Simoens S. Critical assessment of belgian reimbursement dossiers of orphan drugs. PharmacoEconomics. 2011;29(10):883–93.CrossRef Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Hulstaert F, Simoens S. Critical assessment of belgian reimbursement dossiers of orphan drugs. PharmacoEconomics. 2011;29(10):883–93.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Myers JA, Solomon DH, Winkelmayer WC, Levin R, Avorn J. The prevalence and cost of unapproved uses of top-selling orphan drugs. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31894.CrossRef Kesselheim AS, Myers JA, Solomon DH, Winkelmayer WC, Levin R, Avorn J. The prevalence and cost of unapproved uses of top-selling orphan drugs. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31894.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Annemans L, Aymé S, Le Cam Y, Facey K, Gunther P, Nicod E, Reni M, Roux JL, Schlander M, Taylor D, Tomino C, Torrent-Farnell J, Upadhyaya S, Hutchings A, Le Dez L. Recommendations from the European working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in rare diseases (ORPH-VAL). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):50.CrossRef Annemans L, Aymé S, Le Cam Y, Facey K, Gunther P, Nicod E, Reni M, Roux JL, Schlander M, Taylor D, Tomino C, Torrent-Farnell J, Upadhyaya S, Hutchings A, Le Dez L. Recommendations from the European working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in rare diseases (ORPH-VAL). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):50.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):36–42.CrossRef Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):36–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nestler-Parr S, Korchagina D, Toumi M, Pashos L, Blanchette C, Molsen E, Morel T, Simoens S, Kaló Z, Gatermann R Redekop W. Challenges in research and health technology assessment of rare disease technologies: report of the ISPOR rare disease special interest group. Value in health. Available online 11 April 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.004 CrossRef Nestler-Parr S, Korchagina D, Toumi M, Pashos L, Blanchette C, Molsen E, Morel T, Simoens S, Kaló Z, Gatermann R Redekop W. Challenges in research and health technology assessment of rare disease technologies: report of the ISPOR rare disease special interest group. Value in health. Available online 11 April 2018 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2018.​03.​004 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Simoens S. Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transpar-ency. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6(1):42.CrossRef Simoens S. Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transpar-ency. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6(1):42.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Côté A, Keating B. What is wrong with orphan drug policies? Value Health. 2012;15(8):1185–91.CrossRef Côté A, Keating B. What is wrong with orphan drug policies? Value Health. 2012;15(8):1185–91.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rodwell C, Aymé S. Rare disease policies to improve care for patients in Europe. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852:2329–35.CrossRef Rodwell C, Aymé S. Rare disease policies to improve care for patients in Europe. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852:2329–35.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, Simoens S. Rec-onciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medici-nal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven Europe-an countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):1983.CrossRef Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, Simoens S. Rec-onciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medici-nal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven Europe-an countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):1983.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Market uptake of orphan drugs - a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37(6):664–7.CrossRef Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Market uptake of orphan drugs - a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37(6):664–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Iskrov G, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T, Stefanov R. Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: the case of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2012;108(1):10–8.CrossRef Iskrov G, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T, Stefanov R. Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: the case of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2012;108(1):10–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference O'Mahony B, Noone D, Giangrande PL, Prihodova L. Haemophilia care in Europe - a survey of 35 countries. Haemophilia. 2013;19(4):e239–47.CrossRef O'Mahony B, Noone D, Giangrande PL, Prihodova L. Haemophilia care in Europe - a survey of 35 countries. Haemophilia. 2013;19(4):e239–47.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Garau M, Hampson G, Devlin N, Mazzanti NA, Profico A. Applying a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to elicit Stakeholders’ preferences in Italy: the case of Obinutuzumab for rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Pharmacoecon Open. 2018;2(2):153–63.CrossRef Garau M, Hampson G, Devlin N, Mazzanti NA, Profico A. Applying a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to elicit Stakeholders’ preferences in Italy: the case of Obinutuzumab for rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Pharmacoecon Open. 2018;2(2):153–63.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products
Authors
Márta Szegedi
Tamás Zelei
Francis Arickx
Anna Bucsics
Emanuelle Cohn-Zanchetta
Jurij Fürst
Maria Kamusheva
Pawel Kawalec
Guenka Petrova
Juraj Slaby
Ewa Stawowczyk
Milan Vocelka
Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss
Zoltán Kaló
Mária Judit Molnár
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0927-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018 Go to the issue