Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Review

Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency

Author: Steven Simoens

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs are an issue of high priority for policy makers, legislators, health care professionals, industry leaders, academics and patients. This study aims to conduct a literature review to provide insight into the drivers of orphan drug pricing and reimbursement.
Although orphan drug pricing follows the same economic logic as drug pricing in general, the monopolistic power of orphan drugs results in high prices: a) orphan drugs benefit from a period of marketing exclusivity; b) few alternative health technologies are available; c) third-party payers and patients have limited negotiating power; d) manufacturers attempt to maximise orphan drug prices within the constraints of domestic pricing and reimbursement policies; and e) substantial R&D costs need to be recouped from a small number of patients.
Although these conditions apply to some orphan drugs, they do not apply to all orphan drugs. Indeed, the small number of patients treated with an orphan drug and the limited economic viability of orphan drugs can be questioned in a number of cases. Additionally, manufacturers have an incentive to game the system by artificially creating monopolistic market conditions.
Given their high price for an often modest effectiveness, orphan drugs are unlikely to provide value for money. However, additional criteria are used to inform reimbursement decisions in some countries. These criteria may include: the seriousness of the disease; the availability of other therapies to treat the disease; and the cost to the patient if the medicine is not reimbursed. Therefore, the maximum cost per unit of outcome that a health care payer is willing to pay for a drug could be set higher for orphan drugs to which society attaches a high social value.
There is a need for a transparent and evidence-based approach towards orphan drug pricing and reimbursement. Such an approach should be targeted at demonstrating the relative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and economic viability of orphan drugs with a view to informing pricing and reimbursement decisions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Commission: Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2000, L 18/1. European Commission: Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2000, L 18/1.
2.
go back to reference Orphanet: The portal for rare diseases and orphan drugs. Orphanet. 2011, 9-5. 2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. Orphanet: The portal for rare diseases and orphan drugs. Orphanet. 2011, 9-5. 2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
3.
go back to reference Alcimed. Study on orphan drugs: Phase I: overview of the conditions for marketing orphan drugs in Europe. Koning Boudewijnstichting. 2006, 18-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. Alcimed. Study on orphan drugs: Phase I: overview of the conditions for marketing orphan drugs in Europe. Koning Boudewijnstichting. 2006, 18-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
4.
go back to reference Denis A, Simoens S, Fostier C, Mergaert L, Cleemput I: Health technology assessment policy governing orphan diseases and orphan medicines. Brussels, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2009, Ref Type: Report. Denis A, Simoens S, Fostier C, Mergaert L, Cleemput I: Health technology assessment policy governing orphan diseases and orphan medicines. Brussels, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2009, Ref Type: Report.
5.
go back to reference Tambuyzer E: Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 921-929. 10.1038/nrd3275.CrossRefPubMed Tambuyzer E: Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 921-929. 10.1038/nrd3275.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Drugs for rare diseases - orphan designation status influences price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011, 9: 1-5. 10.2165/11531800-000000000-00000.CrossRef Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Drugs for rare diseases - orphan designation status influences price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011, 9: 1-5. 10.2165/11531800-000000000-00000.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hollis A: Drugs for rare diseases: paying for innovation. Health services restructuring in Canada: new evidence and new directions. Edited by: Beach C. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press; 2006:. Hollis A: Drugs for rare diseases: paying for innovation. Health services restructuring in Canada: new evidence and new directions. Edited by: Beach C. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press; 2006:.
9.
go back to reference Loughnot D: Potential interactions of the Orphan Drug Act and pharmacogenomics: a flood of orphan drugs and abuses?. Am J Law Med. 2005, 31: 365-380.PubMed Loughnot D: Potential interactions of the Orphan Drug Act and pharmacogenomics: a flood of orphan drugs and abuses?. Am J Law Med. 2005, 31: 365-380.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Boon W, Moors E: Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors--a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 66: 1915-1927. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012.CrossRefPubMed Boon W, Moors E: Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors--a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 66: 1915-1927. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dear JW, Lilitkarntakul P, Webb DJ: Are rare diseases still orphans or happily adopted? The challenges of developing and using orphan medicinal products. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006, 62: 264-271. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02654.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dear JW, Lilitkarntakul P, Webb DJ: Are rare diseases still orphans or happily adopted? The challenges of developing and using orphan medicinal products. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006, 62: 264-271. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02654.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Department of Health: Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme. 2010, London, Department of Health, 18-3. 2010. Ref Type: Report. Department of Health: Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme. 2010, London, Department of Health, 18-3. 2010. Ref Type: Report.
13.
go back to reference All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: AWMSG policy on ultra-orphan drugs. All Wales Medicines Strategy Group. 2011, 21-2. 2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: AWMSG policy on ultra-orphan drugs. All Wales Medicines Strategy Group. 2011, 21-2. 2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
14.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J: Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23: 36-42.CrossRefPubMed Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J: Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23: 36-42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Orphanet: The portal for rare diseases and orphan drugs. Orphanet. 2010, 11-6. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. Orphanet: The portal for rare diseases and orphan drugs. Orphanet. 2010, 11-6. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
16.
go back to reference Messori A, Cicchetti A, Patregani L: Orphan drugs. Relating price determination to disease prevalence. BMJ. 2010, 341: c4615. 10.1136/bmj.c4615.CrossRefPubMed Messori A, Cicchetti A, Patregani L: Orphan drugs. Relating price determination to disease prevalence. BMJ. 2010, 341: c4615. 10.1136/bmj.c4615.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Regnstrom J, Koenig F, Aronsson B, Reimer T, Svendsen K, Tsigkos S: Factors associated with success of market authorisation applications for pharmaceutical drugs submitted to the European Medicines Agency. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 66: 39-48. 10.1007/s00228-009-0756-y.CrossRefPubMed Regnstrom J, Koenig F, Aronsson B, Reimer T, Svendsen K, Tsigkos S: Factors associated with success of market authorisation applications for pharmaceutical drugs submitted to the European Medicines Agency. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 66: 39-48. 10.1007/s00228-009-0756-y.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Attina T, Camidge R, Newby DE, Webb DJ: Endothelin antagonism in pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and beyond. Heart. 2005, 91: 825-831. 10.1136/hrt.2004.053991.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Attina T, Camidge R, Newby DE, Webb DJ: Endothelin antagonism in pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and beyond. Heart. 2005, 91: 825-831. 10.1136/hrt.2004.053991.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Furukawa MF: Prices and availability of biopharmaceuticals: an international comparison. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006, 25: 1353-1362. 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1353.CrossRef Danzon PM, Furukawa MF: Prices and availability of biopharmaceuticals: an international comparison. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006, 25: 1353-1362. 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1353.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Clarke JT: Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006, 174: 189-190. 10.1503/cmaj.050706.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Clarke JT: Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006, 174: 189-190. 10.1503/cmaj.050706.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Owen A, Sprinks J, Meehan A, Robb T, Hardy M, Kwasha D: A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. Journal of Medical Economics. 2008, 11: 235-243.PubMed Owen A, Sprinks J, Meehan A, Robb T, Hardy M, Kwasha D: A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. Journal of Medical Economics. 2008, 11: 235-243.PubMed
24.
26.
go back to reference George B, Harris A, Mitchell A: Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomics. 2001, 19: 1103-1109. 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004.CrossRefPubMed George B, Harris A, Mitchell A: Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomics. 2001, 19: 1103-1109. 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo ST: Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?. QJM. 2005, 98: 829-836. 10.1093/qjmed/hci128.CrossRefPubMed Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo ST: Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?. QJM. 2005, 98: 829-836. 10.1093/qjmed/hci128.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Appraising life-extending, end of life treatments. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Appraising life-extending, end of life treatments. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009.
29.
go back to reference Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A: QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ. 2005, 14: 197-208. 10.1002/hec.924.CrossRefPubMed Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A: QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ. 2005, 14: 197-208. 10.1002/hec.924.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Citizens Council Report Ultra Orphan Drugs. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2005, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Citizens Council Report Ultra Orphan Drugs. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2005, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
31.
go back to reference Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Grepperud S, Kristiansen IS: Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ. 2010, 341: c4715. 10.1136/bmj.c4715.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Grepperud S, Kristiansen IS: Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ. 2010, 341: c4715. 10.1136/bmj.c4715.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Littlejohns P, Garner S, Doyle N, Macbeth F, Barnett D, Longson C: 10 years of NICE: still growing and still controversial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10: 417-424. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70077-4.CrossRefPubMed Littlejohns P, Garner S, Doyle N, Macbeth F, Barnett D, Longson C: 10 years of NICE: still growing and still controversial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10: 417-424. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70077-4.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E, Mans A, Dretzke J, Fry-Smith A: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry's disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess. 2006, 10: iii-113. Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E, Mans A, Dretzke J, Fry-Smith A: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry's disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess. 2006, 10: iii-113.
34.
go back to reference Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R: Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008, 26: 551-556. 10.2165/00019053-200826070-00002.CrossRefPubMed Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R: Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008, 26: 551-556. 10.2165/00019053-200826070-00002.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Scottish Medicines Consortium: Orphan Drugs Risk Share. Scottish Medicines Consortium. 2010, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. Scottish Medicines Consortium: Orphan Drugs Risk Share. Scottish Medicines Consortium. 2010, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
36.
go back to reference Department of Health: Cost effective provision of disease modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis. 2002, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Report. Department of Health: Cost effective provision of disease modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis. 2002, 19-3. 2010. Ref Type: Report.
37.
go back to reference Raftery J: Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: a costly failure. BMJ. 2010, 340: c1672. 10.1136/bmj.c1672.CrossRefPubMed Raftery J: Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: a costly failure. BMJ. 2010, 340: c1672. 10.1136/bmj.c1672.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Maurer SM: Choosing the right incentive strategy for research and development in neglected diseases. Bull World Health Organ. 2006, 84: 376-381. 10.2471/BLT.06.029835.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Maurer SM: Choosing the right incentive strategy for research and development in neglected diseases. Bull World Health Organ. 2006, 84: 376-381. 10.2471/BLT.06.029835.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency
Author
Steven Simoens
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-6-42

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2011 Go to the issue