Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Dabigatran | Research article

A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty in Australia

Authors: Rafael Torrejon Torres, Rhodri Saunders, Kwok M. Ho

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication following surgery. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are efficacious but come with inherent bleeding risk. Mechanical prophylaxis, such as intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), does not induce bleeding but may be difficult to implement beyond the immediate post-operative period. This study compared the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved of commonly used VTE prophylaxis regimens after lower limb arthroplasty.

Methods

A previously published cost-utility model considering major efficacy and safety endpoints was updated to estimate the 1-year cost-effectiveness of different VTE prophylaxis regimens. The VTE strategies assessed included apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, LMWH, IPC, IPC + LMWH and IPC + apixaban. Efficacy data were derived from studies in PubMed, and cost data came from the 2017 Australian AR-DRG and PBS pricing schemes.

Results

Costs for VTE prophylaxis including treatment of its associated complications over the first year after surgery ranged from AUD $644 (IPC) to AUD $956 (rivaroxaban). Across 500 simulations, IPC was the cheapest measure in 73% of simulations. In 97% of simulations, a DOAC was associated with the highest resulting QALYs. Compared to IPC, apixaban was cost-effective in 76.4% of simulations and apixaban + IPC in 87.8% of simulations. For VTE events avoided, the DOACs and IPC were on par. LMWH and LMWH + IPC were negatively dominated.

Conclusions

Apixaban, IPC or a sequential/simultaneous combination of both is currently the most cost-effective VTE prophylaxis regimens. The choice between them is best guided by the relative VTE and bleeding risks of individual patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council. Preventing venous thromboembolism in hospitalised patients: Summary of NHMRC activity 2003–2010. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011. National Health and Medical Research Council. Preventing venous thromboembolism in hospitalised patients: Summary of NHMRC activity 2003–2010. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Towards national indicators of safety and quality in health care. 2009. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Towards national indicators of safety and quality in health care. 2009.
3.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. OECD health-care quality indicators for Australia 2015. 2016. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. OECD health-care quality indicators for Australia 2015. 2016.
10.
go back to reference Noel SE, Alasdair Millar J. Current state of medical thromboprophylaxis in Australia. Australas Med J. 2014;7:58–63.CrossRef Noel SE, Alasdair Millar J. Current state of medical thromboprophylaxis in Australia. Australas Med J. 2014;7:58–63.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guideline for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to Australian hospitals. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2009. National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guideline for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to Australian hospitals. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2009.
12.
go back to reference ANZ Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: best practice guidelines for Australia & New Zealand, 4th edn. 2007. ANZ Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: best practice guidelines for Australia & New Zealand, 4th edn. 2007.
19.
go back to reference Gómez-Outes A, Terleira-Fernández AI, Suárez-Gea ML, Vargas-Castrillón E. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement: systematic review, meta-analysis, and indirect treatment comparisons. BMJ. 2012;344:1–16.CrossRef Gómez-Outes A, Terleira-Fernández AI, Suárez-Gea ML, Vargas-Castrillón E. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement: systematic review, meta-analysis, and indirect treatment comparisons. BMJ. 2012;344:1–16.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, Phatak H, Liu X, Bird A, et al. Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–14. Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, Phatak H, Liu X, Bird A, et al. Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–14.
21.
go back to reference Haac BE, O’Hara NN, Mullins CD, Stein DM, Manson TT, Johal H, et al. Patient preferences for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after injury: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–7.CrossRef Haac BE, O’Hara NN, Mullins CD, Stein DM, Manson TT, Johal H, et al. Patient preferences for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after injury: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Warwick D, Friedman RJ, Agnelli G, Gil-Garay E, Johnson K, FitzGerald G, et al. Insufficient duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement when compared with the time course of thromboembolic events: findings from the Global Orthopaedic Registry. J Bone Jt Surg - Br. 2007;89–B:799–807. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B6.18844.CrossRef Warwick D, Friedman RJ, Agnelli G, Gil-Garay E, Johnson K, FitzGerald G, et al. Insufficient duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement when compared with the time course of thromboembolic events: findings from the Global Orthopaedic Registry. J Bone Jt Surg - Br. 2007;89–B:799–807. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1302/​0301-620X.​89B6.​18844.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pavon JM, Adam SS, Razouki ZA, McDuffie JR, Lachiewicz PF, Kosinski AS, et al. Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:524–32.CrossRef Pavon JM, Adam SS, Razouki ZA, McDuffie JR, Lachiewicz PF, Kosinski AS, et al. Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:524–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cohen A, Drost P, Marchant N, Mitchell S, Orme M, Rublee D, et al. The efficacy and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following elective knee or hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb. 2012;18:611–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029612437579.CrossRef Cohen A, Drost P, Marchant N, Mitchell S, Orme M, Rublee D, et al. The efficacy and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following elective knee or hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb. 2012;18:611–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1076029612437579​.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dequen P, Sutton AJ, Scott DA, Abrams KR. Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery. Value Heal. 2014;17(4):416–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.013. Dequen P, Sutton AJ, Scott DA, Abrams KR. Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery. Value Heal. 2014;17(4):416–23. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2014.​02.​013.
26.
go back to reference Mirkazemi C, Bereznicki LR, Peterson GM. Thromboprophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty. Intern Med J. 2013;43:124–9.CrossRef Mirkazemi C, Bereznicki LR, Peterson GM. Thromboprophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty. Intern Med J. 2013;43:124–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pow RE, Vale PR. Thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a review of current practices in an Australian teaching hospital. Intern Med J. 2015;45:293–9.CrossRef Pow RE, Vale PR. Thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a review of current practices in an Australian teaching hospital. Intern Med J. 2015;45:293–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty in Australia
Authors
Rafael Torrejon Torres
Rhodri Saunders
Kwok M. Ho
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1124-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019 Go to the issue