Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virology Journal 1/2020

01-12-2020 | SARS-CoV-2 | Research

Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand

Authors: Chutikarn Chaimayo, Bualan Kaewnaphan, Nattaya Tanlieng, Niracha Athipanyasilp, Rujipas Sirijatuphat, Methee Chayakulkeeree, Nasikarn Angkasekwinai, Ruengpung Sutthent, Nattawut Puangpunngam, Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri, Orawan Pongraweewan, Suebwong Chuthapisith, Yongyut Sirivatanauksorn, Wannee Kantakamalakul, Navin Horthongkham

Published in: Virology Journal | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world. Hence, there is an urgent need for rapid, simple, and accurate tests to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Performance characteristics of the rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be evaluated and compared with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases.

Methods

The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test, Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag kit (SD Biosensor®, Republic of Korea), was compared with the real-time RT-PCR test, Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene®, Korea) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens. Four hundred fifty-four respiratory samples (mainly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs) were obtained from COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals, including pre-operative patients at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand during March–May 2020.

Results

Of 454 respiratory samples, 60 (13.2%) were positive, and 394 (86.8%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The duration from onset to laboratory test in COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals ranged from 0 to 14 days with a median of 3 days. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 98.33% (95% CI, 91.06–99.96%) and 98.73% (95% CI, 97.06–99.59%), respectively. One false negative test result was from a sample with a high real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), while five false positive test results were from specimens of pre-operative patients.

Conclusions

The rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection showed comparable sensitivity and specificity with the real-time RT-PCR assay. Thus, there is a potential use of this rapid and simple SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test as a screening assay.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Okada P, Buathong R, Phuygun S, Thanadachakul T, Parnmen S, Wongboon W, Waicharoen S, Wacharapluesadee S, Uttayamakul S, Vachiraphan A, Chittaganpitch M, Mekha N, Jaenjai N, Iamsirithaworn S, Lee RTC, Maurer-Stroh S. Early transmissions patterns of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in travelers from Wuhan to Thailand, January 2020. Surveill. 2020;25(8):pii=2000097. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.8.2000097. Okada P, Buathong R, Phuygun S, Thanadachakul T, Parnmen S, Wongboon W, Waicharoen S, Wacharapluesadee S, Uttayamakul S, Vachiraphan A, Chittaganpitch M, Mekha N, Jaenjai N, Iamsirithaworn S, Lee RTC, Maurer-Stroh S. Early transmissions patterns of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in travelers from Wuhan to Thailand, January 2020. Surveill. 2020;25(8):pii=2000097. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2807/​1560-7917.​ES.​2020.​25.​8.​2000097.
12.
go back to reference Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau C, Lam ET, et al. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104500. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau C, Lam ET, et al. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104500. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Rachid ZZ, Othman SN, Najihan M, Samat A, Ali UK, KonKen W. Diagnostic performance of COVID-19 serology assays. Malays J Pathol 2020;42(1):13–21. Rachid ZZ, Othman SN, Najihan M, Samat A, Ali UK, KonKen W. Diagnostic performance of COVID-19 serology assays. Malays J Pathol 2020;42(1):13–21.
15.
go back to reference Thailand Ministry of Public Health. Diagnostic detection of Novel coronavirus 2019 by real-time RTPCR. 2020. Thailand Ministry of Public Health. Diagnostic detection of Novel coronavirus 2019 by real-time RTPCR. 2020.
19.
go back to reference Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177–9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177–9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand
Authors
Chutikarn Chaimayo
Bualan Kaewnaphan
Nattaya Tanlieng
Niracha Athipanyasilp
Rujipas Sirijatuphat
Methee Chayakulkeeree
Nasikarn Angkasekwinai
Ruengpung Sutthent
Nattawut Puangpunngam
Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri
Orawan Pongraweewan
Suebwong Chuthapisith
Yongyut Sirivatanauksorn
Wannee Kantakamalakul
Navin Horthongkham
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Virology Journal / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1743-422X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Virology Journal 1/2020 Go to the issue