Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Protocol

Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway

Authors: Åslaug Helland, Hege G. Russnes, Gro Live Fagereng, Khalid Al-Shibli, Yvonne Andersson, Thomas Berg, Line Bjørge, Egil Blix, Bodil Bjerkehagen, Sigmund Brabrand, Marte Grønlie Cameron, Astrid Dalhaug, Dalia Dietzel, Tom Dønnem, Espen Enerly, Åsmund Flobak, Sverre Fluge, Bjørnar Gilje, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Kari Grønås, Tormod Guren, Hanne Hamre, Åse Haug, Daniel Heinrich, Geir Olav Hjortland, Eivind Hovig, Randi Hovland, Ann-Charlotte Iversen, Emiel Janssen, Jon Amund Kyte, Hedda von der Lippe Gythfeldt, Ragnhild Lothe, Jo-Åsmund Lund, Leonardo Meza-Zepeda, Monica Cheng Munthe-Kaas, Olav Toai Duc Nguyen, Pitt Niehusmann, Hilde Nilsen, Katarina Puco, Anne Hansen Ree, Tonje Bøyum Riste, Karin Semb, Eli Sihn Samdal Steinskog, Andreas Stensvold, Pål Suhrke, Øyvind Tennøe, Geir E. Tjønnfjord, Liv Jorunn Vassbotn, Eline Aas, Kristine Aasebø, Kjetil Tasken, Sigbjørn Smeland

Published in: Journal of Translational Medicine | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Matching treatment based on tumour molecular characteristics has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers and has given hope to many patients. Although personalized cancer care is an old concept, renewed attention has arisen due to recent advancements in cancer diagnostics including access to high-throughput sequencing of tumour tissue. Targeted therapies interfering with cancer specific pathways have been developed and approved for subgroups of patients. These drugs might just as well be efficient in other diagnostic subgroups, not investigated in pharma-led clinical studies, but their potential use on new indications is never explored due to limited number of patients.

Methods

In this national, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, non-randomized combined basket- and umbrella-trial, patients are enrolled in multiple parallel cohorts. Each cohort is defined by the patient’s tumour type, molecular profile of the tumour, and study drug. Treatment outcome in each cohort is monitored by using a Simon two-stage-like ‘admissible’ monitoring plan to identify evidence of clinical activity.
All drugs available in IMPRESS-Norway have regulatory approval and are funded by pharmaceutical companies. Molecular diagnostics are funded by the public health care system.

Discussion

Precision oncology means to stratify treatment based on specific patient characteristics and the molecular profile of the tumor. Use of targeted drugs is currently restricted to specific biomarker-defined subgroups of patients according to their market authorization. However, other cancer patients might also benefit of treatment with these drugs if the same biomarker is present. The emerging technologies in molecular diagnostics are now being implemented in Norway and it is publicly reimbursed, thus more cancer patients will have a more comprehensive genomic profiling of their tumour. Patients with actionable genomic alterations in their tumour may have the possibility to try precision cancer drugs through IMPRESS-Norway, if standard treatment is no longer an option, and the drugs are available in the study. This might benefit some patients. In addition, it is a good example of a public–private collaboration to establish a national infrastructure for precision oncology.
Trial registrations EudraCT: 2020-004414-35, registered 02/19/2021; ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04817956, registered 03/26/2021.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garraway LA. Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15):1806–14.CrossRef Garraway LA. Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15):1806–14.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lawrence MS, et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature. 2014;505(7484):495–501.CrossRef Lawrence MS, et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature. 2014;505(7484):495–501.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Macconaill LE, Garraway LA. Clinical implications of the cancer genome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5219–28.CrossRef Macconaill LE, Garraway LA. Clinical implications of the cancer genome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5219–28.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rafii A, et al. Where cancer genomics should go next: a clinician’s perspective. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(R1):R69-75.CrossRef Rafii A, et al. Where cancer genomics should go next: a clinician’s perspective. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(R1):R69-75.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Andre F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):267–74.CrossRef Andre F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):267–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Von Hoff DD, et al. Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients’ tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(33):4877–83.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, et al. Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients’ tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(33):4877–83.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jardim DL, et al. Impact of a biomarker-based strategy on oncology drug development: a meta-analysis of clinical trials leading to FDA approval. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(11):djv253.CrossRef Jardim DL, et al. Impact of a biomarker-based strategy on oncology drug development: a meta-analysis of clinical trials leading to FDA approval. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(11):djv253.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Le Tourneau C, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–34.CrossRef Le Tourneau C, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–34.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marquart J, Chen EY, Prasad V. Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who benefit from genome-driven oncology. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(8):1093–8.CrossRef Marquart J, Chen EY, Prasad V. Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who benefit from genome-driven oncology. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(8):1093–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rodon J, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):751–8.CrossRef Rodon J, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):751–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ree AH, et al. Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer—the MetAction study. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(7):733–40.CrossRef Ree AH, et al. Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer—the MetAction study. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(7):733–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flaherty KT, et al. Molecular landscape and actionable alterations in a genomically guided cancer clinical trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3883–94.CrossRef Flaherty KT, et al. Molecular landscape and actionable alterations in a genomically guided cancer clinical trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3883–94.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li Y, et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2020;578(7793):112–21.CrossRef Li Y, et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2020;578(7793):112–21.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(1):1–10.CrossRef Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(1):1–10.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jung SH, et al. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Stat Med. 2004;23(4):561–9.CrossRef Jung SH, et al. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Stat Med. 2004;23(4):561–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference van der Velden DL, et al. The Drug Rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs. Nature. 2019;574(7776):127–31.CrossRef van der Velden DL, et al. The Drug Rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs. Nature. 2019;574(7776):127–31.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference van de Haar J, Hoes L, Voest E. Advancing molecular tumour boards: highly needed to maximise the impact of precision medicine. ESMO Open. 2019;4(2): e000516.CrossRef van de Haar J, Hoes L, Voest E. Advancing molecular tumour boards: highly needed to maximise the impact of precision medicine. ESMO Open. 2019;4(2): e000516.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Seymour L, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143–52.CrossRef Seymour L, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143–52.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rajkumar SV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–48.CrossRef Rajkumar SV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–48.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cheson BD, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–68.CrossRef Cheson BD, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–68.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wen PY, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–72.CrossRef Wen PY, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–72.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rustin GJ, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419–23.CrossRef Rustin GJ, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419–23.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mandelker D, et al. Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1221–31.CrossRef Mandelker D, et al. Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1221–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway
Authors
Åslaug Helland
Hege G. Russnes
Gro Live Fagereng
Khalid Al-Shibli
Yvonne Andersson
Thomas Berg
Line Bjørge
Egil Blix
Bodil Bjerkehagen
Sigmund Brabrand
Marte Grønlie Cameron
Astrid Dalhaug
Dalia Dietzel
Tom Dønnem
Espen Enerly
Åsmund Flobak
Sverre Fluge
Bjørnar Gilje
Bjørn Tore Gjertsen
Bjørn Henning Grønberg
Kari Grønås
Tormod Guren
Hanne Hamre
Åse Haug
Daniel Heinrich
Geir Olav Hjortland
Eivind Hovig
Randi Hovland
Ann-Charlotte Iversen
Emiel Janssen
Jon Amund Kyte
Hedda von der Lippe Gythfeldt
Ragnhild Lothe
Jo-Åsmund Lund
Leonardo Meza-Zepeda
Monica Cheng Munthe-Kaas
Olav Toai Duc Nguyen
Pitt Niehusmann
Hilde Nilsen
Katarina Puco
Anne Hansen Ree
Tonje Bøyum Riste
Karin Semb
Eli Sihn Samdal Steinskog
Andreas Stensvold
Pål Suhrke
Øyvind Tennøe
Geir E. Tjønnfjord
Liv Jorunn Vassbotn
Eline Aas
Kristine Aasebø
Kjetil Tasken
Sigbjørn Smeland
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1479-5876
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03432-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2022 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.