Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Research

The generic Informed Consent Service gICS®: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research

Authors: Henriette Rau, Lars Geidel, Martin Bialke, Arne Blumentritt, Martin Langanke, Wenke Liedtke, Sandra Pasewald, Dana Stahl, Thomas Bahls, Christian Maier, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Wolfgang Hoffmann

Published in: Journal of Translational Medicine | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Defining and protecting participants’ rights is the aim of several ethical codices and legal regulations. According to these regulations, the Informed Consent (IC) is an inevitable element of research with human subjects. In the era of “big data medicine”, aspects of IC become even more relevant since research becomes more complex rendering compliance with legal and ethical regulations increasingly difficult.

Methods

Based on literature research and practical experiences gathered by the Institute for Community Medicine (ICM), University Medicine Greifswald, requirements for digital consent management systems were identified.

Results

To address the requirements, the free-of-charge, open-source software “generic Informed Consent Service” (gICS®) was developed by ICM to provide a tool to facilitate and enhance usage of digital ICs for the international research community covering various scenarios. gICS facilitates IC management based on IC modularisation and supports various workflows within research, including (1) electronic depiction of paper-based consents and (2) fully electronic consents. Numerous projects applied gICS and documented over 336,000 ICs and 2400 withdrawals since 2014.

Discussion

Since the consent’s content is a prerequisite for securing participants’ rights, application of gICS is no guarantee for legal compliance. However, gICS supports fine-granular consents and accommodation of differentiated consent states, which can be directly exchanged between systems, allowing automated data processing.

Conclusion

gICS simplifies and supports sustained IC management as a major key to successfully conduct studies and build trust in research with human subjects. Therefore, interested researchers are invited to use gICS and provide feedback for further improvements.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wiesing U, Ach JS, Bormuth M, Marckmann G. Nürnberger Kodex. In: Wiesing U, editor. Ethik in der Medizin: Ein Studienbuch. Stuttgart: Reclam; 2008. p. 123–30. Wiesing U, Ach JS, Bormuth M, Marckmann G. Nürnberger Kodex. In: Wiesing U, editor. Ethik in der Medizin: Ein Studienbuch. Stuttgart: Reclam; 2008. p. 123–30.
2.
go back to reference Jones JH. Bad blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New and expanded ed. ed. New York Free Press; 1981. Jones JH. Bad blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New and expanded ed. ed. New York Free Press; 1981.
3.
go back to reference Reverby SM. Tuskegee’s Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2000. Reverby SM. Tuskegee’s Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2000.
4.
go back to reference National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Department of Health E, and Welfare; 1979 April 18, 1979. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Department of Health E, and Welfare; 1979 April 18, 1979.
5.
go back to reference World Medicine Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA General Assembly; Fortaleza, Brazil. Fortaleza, Brazil: World Medicine Association; 2013. p. 4. World Medicine Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA General Assembly; Fortaleza, Brazil. Fortaleza, Brazil: World Medicine Association; 2013. p. 4.
6.
go back to reference MITRE. Electronic Consent Management: Landscape Assessment, Challenges, and Technology. McLean2014 29/10/2014 Contract No.: 1. MITRE. Electronic Consent Management: Landscape Assessment, Challenges, and Technology. McLean2014 29/10/2014 Contract No.: 1.
7.
go back to reference Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) 2016/679/EU (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) 2016/679/EU (2016).
8.
go back to reference Win KT, Fulcher JA. Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: a simple yet unresolved issue. J Med Syst. 2007;31(2):91–6.CrossRef Win KT, Fulcher JA. Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: a simple yet unresolved issue. J Med Syst. 2007;31(2):91–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Open eHealth Foundation. Consent Management Suite (GitHub). Accessed. 2018;03(12):2018. Open eHealth Foundation. Consent Management Suite (GitHub). Accessed. 2018;03(12):2018.
15.
go back to reference Bahls T, Liedtke W, Geidel L, Langanke M. Ethics Meets IT: Aspects and elements of Computer-based informed consent processing. In: Fischer T, Langanke M, Marschall P, Michl S, editors. Individualized medicine, ethical, economical and historical perspectives. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p. 209–29.CrossRef Bahls T, Liedtke W, Geidel L, Langanke M. Ethics Meets IT: Aspects and elements of Computer-based informed consent processing. In: Fischer T, Langanke M, Marschall P, Michl S, editors. Individualized medicine, ethical, economical and historical perspectives. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p. 209–29.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pommerening K, Drepper J, Helbing K, Ganslandt T. Leitfaden zum Datenschutz in medizinischen Forschungsprojekten - Generische Lösungen der TMF 2.0. Schriftenreihe der TMF - Technologie- und Methodenplattform für die vernetzte medizinische Forschung e.V. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2014. Pommerening K, Drepper J, Helbing K, Ganslandt T. Leitfaden zum Datenschutz in medizinischen Forschungsprojekten - Generische Lösungen der TMF 2.0. Schriftenreihe der TMF - Technologie- und Methodenplattform für die vernetzte medizinische Forschung e.V. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Schreiweis B, Bronsch T, Merzweiler A, Bergh B. Implementing Modular Research Consents Using IHE Advanced Patient Privacy Consents. In: Ugon A, Karlsson D, Klein GO, Moen A, editors. Building Continents of Knowledge in Oceans of Data: The Future of Co-Created eHealth. 247 ed. Studies in health technology and informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV; 2018. p. 840-4. Schreiweis B, Bronsch T, Merzweiler A, Bergh B. Implementing Modular Research Consents Using IHE Advanced Patient Privacy Consents. In: Ugon A, Karlsson D, Klein GO, Moen A, editors. Building Continents of Knowledge in Oceans of Data: The Future of Co-Created eHealth. 247 ed. Studies in health technology and informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV; 2018. p. 840-4.
24.
go back to reference Völzke H, Lorbeer R, Dörr M, Kock H, Assel H, Ott K et al. Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine (GANI_MED) – Rationale and Design. Gesundheitswesen2010. p. 572-. Völzke H, Lorbeer R, Dörr M, Kock H, Assel H, Ott K et al. Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine (GANI_MED) – Rationale and Design. Gesundheitswesen2010. p. 572-.
26.
go back to reference Geidel L, Bahls T, Hoffmann W, editors. Darf ich? – Herausforderungen an eine generische, automatisierte elektronische Verwaltung von Einwilligungen GMDS 2014. 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). 2014; Göttingen, 07.-10.09.2014. Geidel L, Bahls T, Hoffmann W, editors. Darf ich? – Herausforderungen an eine generische, automatisierte elektronische Verwaltung von Einwilligungen GMDS 2014. 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). 2014; Göttingen, 07.-10.09.2014.
Metadata
Title
The generic Informed Consent Service gICS®: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research
Authors
Henriette Rau
Lars Geidel
Martin Bialke
Arne Blumentritt
Martin Langanke
Wenke Liedtke
Sandra Pasewald
Dana Stahl
Thomas Bahls
Christian Maier
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Wolfgang Hoffmann
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1479-5876
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02457-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2020 Go to the issue