Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Opinion

Evidence-based decision-making for diagnostic and therapeutic methods: the changing landscape of assessment approaches in Germany

Authors: Britta Olberg, Sabine Fuchs, Katja Matthias, Alexandra Nolting, Matthias Perleth, Reinhard Busse

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This article examines the current status and most important changes over time to the legislative framework on the health technology assessment-informed decision-making process on diagnostic and therapeutic ‘methods’ in Germany. The relevant information was obtained through documentary analysis covering the period 1990 to 2017. The findings show that, even if the outpatient care sector appears to be much more regulated than the inpatient sector (based on a strict separation of the two care settings), developments in Germany have led to a more tightened assessment framework, making the use of evidence a firm component in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, a comprehensive approach for a systematic assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic ‘methods’ still does not exist. Readjustments of current regulations in Germany, such as the existing ‘Verbotsvorbehalt’ (i.e. provision of a diagnostic and therapeutic ‘method’ possible unless actively delisted) in the inpatient care setting, as well as further developments at the European level are needed in order to create a system that ensures early access to innovation under controlled study conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fuchs S, Olberg B, Panteli D, Perleth M, Busse R. HTA of medical devices: Challenges and ideas for the future from a European perspective. Health Policy. 2017;121(3):215–29.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs S, Olberg B, Panteli D, Perleth M, Busse R. HTA of medical devices: Challenges and ideas for the future from a European perspective. Health Policy. 2017;121(3):215–29.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ciani O, Wilcher B, Blankart CR, Hatz M, Rupel VP, Erker RS, et al. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European Union agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(3):154–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ciani O, Wilcher B, Blankart CR, Hatz M, Rupel VP, Erker RS, et al. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European Union agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(3):154–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Banta D, Kristensen F, Jonsson E. A history of health technology assessment at the European level. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):68–73.CrossRefPubMed Banta D, Kristensen F, Jonsson E. A history of health technology assessment at the European level. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):68–73.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cleemput I, Van Wilder P. History of health technology assessment in Belgium. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):82–7.CrossRefPubMed Cleemput I, Van Wilder P. History of health technology assessment in Belgium. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):82–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hailey D. The history of health technology assessment in Australia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):61–7.CrossRefPubMed Hailey D. The history of health technology assessment in Australia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):61–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jonsson E. History of health technology assessment in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):42–52.CrossRefPubMed Jonsson E. History of health technology assessment in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):42–52.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wild C. Austria: history of health technology assessment during the past 20 years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):74–81.CrossRefPubMed Wild C. Austria: history of health technology assessment during the past 20 years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):74–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Perleth M, Gibis B, Göhlen B. A short history of health technology assessment in Germany. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(1):112–9.CrossRefPubMed Perleth M, Gibis B, Göhlen B. A short history of health technology assessment in Germany. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(1):112–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Weill C, Banta D. Development of health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):108–11.CrossRefPubMed Weill C, Banta D. Development of health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S1):108–11.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ettelt S. The politics of evidence use in health policy making in Germany – the case of regulating hospital minimum volumes. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017;42(3):513–38.CrossRefPubMed Ettelt S. The politics of evidence use in health policy making in Germany – the case of regulating hospital minimum volumes. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017;42(3):513–38.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Busse R, Blümel M, Knieps F, Bärnighausen T. Statutory health insurance in Germany: a health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. Lancet. 2017;390(10097):882–97.CrossRefPubMed Busse R, Blümel M, Knieps F, Bärnighausen T. Statutory health insurance in Germany: a health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. Lancet. 2017;390(10097):882–97.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Olberg B, Perleth M, Busse R. The new regulation to investigate potentially beneficial diagnostic and therapeutic methods in Germany: up to international standard? Health Policy. 2014;117(2):135–45.CrossRefPubMed Olberg B, Perleth M, Busse R. The new regulation to investigate potentially beneficial diagnostic and therapeutic methods in Germany: up to international standard? Health Policy. 2014;117(2):135–45.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985. Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985.
16.
go back to reference Fricke FU, Dauben HP. Health technology assessment: a perspective from Germany. Value Health. 2009;12 Suppl 2:20–7.CrossRef Fricke FU, Dauben HP. Health technology assessment: a perspective from Germany. Value Health. 2009;12 Suppl 2:20–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Busse R. Bedeutung von Health Technology Assessment bei Bewertungs- und Erstattungsentscheidungen in Deutschland heute und morgen. Gesundh ökon Qual manag. 2005;10:52–8.CrossRef Busse R. Bedeutung von Health Technology Assessment bei Bewertungs- und Erstattungsentscheidungen in Deutschland heute und morgen. Gesundh ökon Qual manag. 2005;10:52–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kreis J, Busse R. From evidence assessments to coverage decisions? The case example of glinides in Germany. Health Policy. 2012;104(1):27–31.CrossRefPubMed Kreis J, Busse R. From evidence assessments to coverage decisions? The case example of glinides in Germany. Health Policy. 2012;104(1):27–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference SGB V; Das Fünfte Buch Sozialgesetzbuch - Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung [SGB V Social Code Book: Statutory Health Insurance] (Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 20. Dezember 1988, BGBl. I S. 2477, 2482), das durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 4. April 2017 (BGBl. I S. 778) geändert worden ist. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_5/SGB_5.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2017. SGB V; Das Fünfte Buch Sozialgesetzbuch - Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung [SGB V Social Code Book: Statutory Health Insurance] (Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 20. Dezember 1988, BGBl. I S. 2477, 2482), das durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 4. April 2017 (BGBl. I S. 778) geändert worden ist. https://​www.​gesetze-im-internet.​de/​sgb_​5/​SGB_​5.​pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2017.
21.
go back to reference Bertelsmann H, Roters D, Bronner D. Vom Nutzen der Nutzenbewertung: Die Prinzipien der evidenzbasierten Medizin und des Health Technology assessments als Entscheidungsgrundlage des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitätssich. 2007;101(7):455–62.PubMed Bertelsmann H, Roters D, Bronner D. Vom Nutzen der Nutzenbewertung: Die Prinzipien der evidenzbasierten Medizin und des Health Technology assessments als Entscheidungsgrundlage des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitätssich. 2007;101(7):455–62.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bundesausschuss der Ärzte und Krankenkassen (Federal Standing Committee of Physicians and Sickness Funds). Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die Einführung neuer Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden und über die Überprüfung erbrachter vertragsärztlicher Leistungen gemäß §135 Abs.1 in Verbindung mit §92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 5 Fünftes Buch Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V). 1997. https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-193/RL_NUB-1997-10-01.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017. Bundesausschuss der Ärzte und Krankenkassen (Federal Standing Committee of Physicians and Sickness Funds). Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die Einführung neuer Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden und über die Überprüfung erbrachter vertragsärztlicher Leistungen gemäß §135 Abs.1 in Verbindung mit §92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 5 Fünftes Buch Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V). 1997. https://​www.​g-ba.​de/​downloads/​62-492-193/​RL_​NUB-1997-10-01.​pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017.
26.
go back to reference Lühmann D, Kohlmann T, Raspe H. Use of bone densitometry in the framework of prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. Example of a systematic evaluation (health technology assessment). Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000;94(6):475–81.PubMed Lühmann D, Kohlmann T, Raspe H. Use of bone densitometry in the framework of prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. Example of a systematic evaluation (health technology assessment). Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000;94(6):475–81.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Busse R, Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004. Busse R, Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004.
38.
go back to reference Wolf K, Dettlof M, Egger B. Hochrisiko-Medizinprodukte in der GKV: Was ist eine innovationsfreundliche Gesundheitspolitik? G&S Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik. 2017;71(3-4):75–83.CrossRef Wolf K, Dettlof M, Egger B. Hochrisiko-Medizinprodukte in der GKV: Was ist eine innovationsfreundliche Gesundheitspolitik? G&S Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik. 2017;71(3-4):75–83.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Perry S, Gardner E, Thamer MW. The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13(1):81–98.CrossRefPubMed Perry S, Gardner E, Thamer MW. The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13(1):81–98.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Oortwijn W, Broos P, Vondeling H, et al. Mapping of health technology assessment in selected countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(4):424–34.CrossRefPubMed Oortwijn W, Broos P, Vondeling H, et al. Mapping of health technology assessment in selected countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(4):424–34.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Oortwijn W, Mathijssen J, Banta D. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries. Health Policy. 2010;95(2-3):74–84.CrossRef Oortwijn W, Mathijssen J, Banta D. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries. Health Policy. 2010;95(2-3):74–84.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Fuchs S, Olberg B, Panteli D, Busse R. Health technology assessment of medical devices in Europe: processes, practices, and methods. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32(4):246–55.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs S, Olberg B, Panteli D, Busse R. Health technology assessment of medical devices in Europe: processes, practices, and methods. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32(4):246–55.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Garrido MV, Kristensen FB, Nielsen CP, Busse R. Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy-Making in Europe: Current Status, Challenges and Potential. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008. Garrido MV, Kristensen FB, Nielsen CP, Busse R. Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy-Making in Europe: Current Status, Challenges and Potential. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008.
45.
go back to reference Zens Y, Fujita-Rohwerder N, Windeler J. Nutzenbewertung von Medizinprodukten. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2015;58(3):240–7.CrossRef Zens Y, Fujita-Rohwerder N, Windeler J. Nutzenbewertung von Medizinprodukten. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2015;58(3):240–7.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Löblová O. Three worlds of health technology assessment: explaining patterns of diffusion of HTA agencies in Europe. Health Econ Policy Law. 2016;11(3):253–73.CrossRefPubMed Löblová O. Three worlds of health technology assessment: explaining patterns of diffusion of HTA agencies in Europe. Health Econ Policy Law. 2016;11(3):253–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evidence-based decision-making for diagnostic and therapeutic methods: the changing landscape of assessment approaches in Germany
Authors
Britta Olberg
Sabine Fuchs
Katja Matthias
Alexandra Nolting
Matthias Perleth
Reinhard Busse
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0253-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue