Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Cancer Biomarker | Research

Staging of gastric cancer with the Clinical Stage Prediction score

Authors: Kiyoaki Taniguchi, Masaho Ota, Takuji Yamada, Akiko Serizawa, Takeharu Noguchi, Kunihiko Amano, Sho Kotake, Shunichi Ito, Naoki Ikari, Akiko Omori, Masakazu Yamamoto

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chemotherapy with or without surgery is the first-line treatment for stage III/IV gastric cancer, while surgery is the first-line treatment for stage I/II gastric cancer. Accordingly, it is important to distinguish between stage III/IV and stage I/II gastric cancer, but clinical staging is less accurate than pathological staging. This study was performed to develop a clinical score that could distinguish stage III/IV gastric cancer from stage I/II gastric cancer.

Methods

We reviewed 2722 patients who underwent gastrectomy at our hospital from January 1996 to December 2015. As pretreatment factors potentially related to tumor stage, we assessed age, sex, tumor markers, tumor diameter, tumor location, tumor histology, and macroscopic type. Factors showing significance on multivariate analysis were used to develop the Clinical Stage Prediction score (CSP score), and a cutoff value for the score was determined by receiver operating characteristics analysis.

Results

According to multivariate analysis, clinical factors associated with stage III/IV disease were elevation of the carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor diameter ≥ 60 mm, circumferential gastric involvement, esophageal infiltration, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and macroscopic types 2–4.
The CSP score was obtained by weighting these factors according to the non-standardized β-coefficient. Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that the optimum cutoff value of the CSP score was 17 points. Among 1042 patients with a CSP score ≥ 17 points, 820 patients (78.7%) had stage III/IV gastric cancer. Conversely, among 1680 patients with a CSP score < 17 points, 1547 patients (92.1%) had stage I/II gastric cancer. When discrimination of stage III/IV gastric cancer from stage I/II gastric cancer by the CSP score was assessed, the sensitivity was 78.7%, specificity was 92.1%, positive predictive value was 86.0%, and negative predictive value was 87.5%.

Conclusions

The CSP score can be helpful for differentiating stage III/IV gastric cancer from stage I/II gastric cancer based on pretreatment clinical factors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H. Hara S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H. Hara S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4387–93.CrossRef Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4387–93.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.
4.
go back to reference Maruyama K, Gunvén P, Okabayashi K, et al. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:596–602.CrossRef Maruyama K, Gunvén P, Okabayashi K, et al. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:596–602.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Adachi Y, Kamakura T, Mori M, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1994;81:414–6.CrossRef Adachi Y, Kamakura T, Mori M, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1994;81:414–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999;86:685–9.CrossRef Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999;86:685–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bando E, Yonemura Y, Taniguchi K, et al. Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:775–84.CrossRef Bando E, Yonemura Y, Taniguchi K, et al. Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:775–84.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Takagane A, Terashima M, Abe K, et al. Evaluation of the ratio of lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:122–8.CrossRef Takagane A, Terashima M, Abe K, et al. Evaluation of the ratio of lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:122–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yu W, Man K, Fan ST, et al. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1305–9.CrossRef Yu W, Man K, Fan ST, et al. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1305–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;178:256–62.CrossRef Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;178:256–62.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Cosimelli M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of peritoneal immune cytology in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1988;16:3406–11.CrossRef Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Cosimelli M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of peritoneal immune cytology in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1988;16:3406–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Mori M, et al. Tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:137–40.CrossRef Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Mori M, et al. Tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:137–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference An JY, Kang TH, Choi MG, et al. Borrmann type IV:an independent prognostic factor for survival in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1364–9.CrossRef An JY, Kang TH, Choi MG, et al. Borrmann type IV:an independent prognostic factor for survival in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1364–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang BB, Liu CG, Lu P, et al. Log-normal censored regression model detecting prognostic factors in gastric cancer: a study of 3018 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2867–72.PubMedPubMedCentral Wang BB, Liu CG, Lu P, et al. Log-normal censored regression model detecting prognostic factors in gastric cancer: a study of 3018 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2867–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Wakatsuki K, Liu CG, Lu P, et al. Characteristics of gastric cancer with esophageal invasion and aspects of surgical treatment. World J Surg. 2009;33:1446–53.CrossRef Wakatsuki K, Liu CG, Lu P, et al. Characteristics of gastric cancer with esophageal invasion and aspects of surgical treatment. World J Surg. 2009;33:1446–53.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhang M, Zhu GY, Zhang HF, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:64–7.CrossRef Zhang M, Zhu GY, Zhang HF, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:64–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bando E, Kojima N, Kawamura T, et al. Prognostic value of age and sex in early gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1197–01.CrossRef Bando E, Kojima N, Kawamura T, et al. Prognostic value of age and sex in early gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1197–01.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7114–24.CrossRef Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7114–24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Maehara Y, Oshiro T, Baba H, et al. Lymphatic invasion and potential for tumor growth and metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Surgery. 1995;117:380–5.CrossRef Maehara Y, Oshiro T, Baba H, et al. Lymphatic invasion and potential for tumor growth and metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Surgery. 1995;117:380–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Maehara Y, Ikeda Y, Miyazaki M, et al. Vascular invasion and potential for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis in gastric carcinoma. Surgery. 2000;128:408–16.CrossRef Maehara Y, Ikeda Y, Miyazaki M, et al. Vascular invasion and potential for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis in gastric carcinoma. Surgery. 2000;128:408–16.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Corso G, et al. Different pathological features and prognosis in gastric cancer patients coming from high-risk and low-risk areas of Italy. Ann Surg. 2009;250:43–50.CrossRef Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Corso G, et al. Different pathological features and prognosis in gastric cancer patients coming from high-risk and low-risk areas of Italy. Ann Surg. 2009;250:43–50.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bando E, Kawamura T, Kinoshita K, et al. Magnitude of serosal changes. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:212–22.CrossRef Bando E, Kawamura T, Kinoshita K, et al. Magnitude of serosal changes. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:212–22.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dilege E, Mihmanli M, Demir U, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels in resectable gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:674–7.PubMed Dilege E, Mihmanli M, Demir U, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels in resectable gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:674–7.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomized nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439–49.CrossRef Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomized nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439–49.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;37:309–15.CrossRef Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;37:309–15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miwa K, Miyazaki H, Sahara T, et al. Rationale for extensive lymphadenectomy in early gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:1518–24.CrossRef Miwa K, Miyazaki H, Sahara T, et al. Rationale for extensive lymphadenectomy in early gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:1518–24.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, et al. Pathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:272–7.CrossRef Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, et al. Pathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:272–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:836–42.CrossRef Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:836–42.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fairweather M, Jajoo K, Sainani N, et al. Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:1016–20.CrossRef Fairweather M, Jajoo K, Sainani N, et al. Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:1016–20.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hallinan JT, Venkatesh SK. Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13:212–27.CrossRef Hallinan JT, Venkatesh SK. Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13:212–27.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ha TK, Choi YY, Song SY, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81:104–10.CrossRef Ha TK, Choi YY, Song SY, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81:104–10.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, et al. Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:148–55.CrossRef Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, et al. Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:148–55.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fukagawa T, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A). Gastric Cancer. 2017;10:1–6. Fukagawa T, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A). Gastric Cancer. 2017;10:1–6.
34.
go back to reference Abe S, Oda I, Shimazu T, et al. Depth-predicting score for differentiated early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:35–40.CrossRef Abe S, Oda I, Shimazu T, et al. Depth-predicting score for differentiated early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:35–40.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Chen Y1, Mou L. A risk score system to preoperatively predict TNM stages in gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34:130–4.PubMed Chen Y1, Mou L. A risk score system to preoperatively predict TNM stages in gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34:130–4.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Staging of gastric cancer with the Clinical Stage Prediction score
Authors
Kiyoaki Taniguchi
Masaho Ota
Takuji Yamada
Akiko Serizawa
Takeharu Noguchi
Kunihiko Amano
Sho Kotake
Shunichi Ito
Naoki Ikari
Akiko Omori
Masakazu Yamamoto
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1589-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2019 Go to the issue