Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Ultrasound 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Stroke | Research

Characteristics and prognosis of patients with cryptogenic stroke and suggestive of patent foramen ovale

Authors: Jaehuk Choi, Min-Kyung Kang, Jin-Sun Jun, Dong Geum Shin, Donghoon Han, Seonghoon Choi, Jung Rae Cho, Namho Lee

Published in: Cardiovascular Ultrasound | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The purpose of this study were to identify the usefulness of screening for PFO using agitated saline echocardiography (ASE) and characteristics and prognosis of patients with suggestive of patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Methods

Three hundred three patients (mean age, 53 ± 9 years; 199 [66%] men) admitted with acute stroke or suspicion of stroke were included. Patients were classified into those with and without right-to-left shunt (RLS) according to the ASE results (positive ASE [n = 92] vs. negative ASE [n = 211]). Fifty-one out of ninety-two patients with positive ASE and twenty-one out of two hundred eleven patients with negative ASE underwent TEE with ASE to confirm PFO.

Results

Ninety-two were positive for ASE and thirty-six of the fifty-one patients who underwent TEE were confirmed as having PFO. Of the patients with RLS grade 1, 50% were diagnosed with PFO and all patients with RLS grade ≥ 2 were diagnosed with PFO. All patients with negative ASE had no PFO (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 58%). Patients with positive ASE were younger, had a lower body mass, and a lower prevalence of hypertension. The positive ASE patients had a higher mean Sʹ velocity and better diastolic function. Four of ninety-one patients with positive ASE and thirteen of one hundred seventy-seven showed recurrence of stroke and suspicion of stroke.

Conclusion

Transthoracic ASE is a good method to screen for PFO. Patients with suggestive of PFO had lower risk factors, less atherosclerosis, and better cardiac performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP, PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS); PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) Investigators. Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study. Circulation. 2002;105(22):2625–31.CrossRef Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP, PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS); PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) Investigators. Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study. Circulation. 2002;105(22):2625–31.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1740–6.CrossRef Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1740–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khan AR, Bin Abdulhak AA, Sheikh MA, Khan S, Erwin PJ, Tleyjeh I, et al. Device closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(12):1316–23.CrossRef Khan AR, Bin Abdulhak AA, Sheikh MA, Khan S, Erwin PJ, Tleyjeh I, et al. Device closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(12):1316–23.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rana BS, Thomas MR, Calvert PA, Monaghan MJ, Hildick-Smith D. Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):749–60.CrossRef Rana BS, Thomas MR, Calvert PA, Monaghan MJ, Hildick-Smith D. Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):749–60.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abdelghani M, El-Shedoudy SAO, Nassif M, Bouma BJ, de Winter RJ. Management of Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: An Update. Cardiology. 2019;143(1–2):62–72.CrossRef Abdelghani M, El-Shedoudy SAO, Nassif M, Bouma BJ, de Winter RJ. Management of Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: An Update. Cardiology. 2019;143(1–2):62–72.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nakanishi K, Yoshiyama M, Homma S. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(8):575–81.CrossRef Nakanishi K, Yoshiyama M, Homma S. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(8):575–81.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maggiore P, Bellinge J, Chieng D, White D, Lan NSR, Jaltotage B, et al. Ischaemic Stroke and the Echocardiographic “Bubble Study”: Are We Screening the Right Patients? Heart Lung Circ. 2018;28:1183–9.CrossRef Maggiore P, Bellinge J, Chieng D, White D, Lan NSR, Jaltotage B, et al. Ischaemic Stroke and the Echocardiographic “Bubble Study”: Are We Screening the Right Patients? Heart Lung Circ. 2018;28:1183–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jauss M, Kaps M, Keberle M, Dorndorf W. A comparison of transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler sonography with contrast medium in the detection of patent foramen ovale. Stroke. 1994;25(6):1265–7.CrossRef Jauss M, Kaps M, Keberle M, Dorndorf W. A comparison of transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler sonography with contrast medium in the detection of patent foramen ovale. Stroke. 1994;25(6):1265–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sorteverg A, Sorteberg W. Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography. Part III: Pitfalls in Methodology and Evaluation of the Cerebral Collateral Capacity. Contemp Neurosur. 2017;29:1–8. Sorteverg A, Sorteberg W. Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography. Part III: Pitfalls in Methodology and Evaluation of the Cerebral Collateral Capacity. Contemp Neurosur. 2017;29:1–8.
10.
go back to reference Meerbaum S. Introduction and general background. In: Meerbaum S, Meltzer R, editors. Myocardial Contrast Two-Dimensional Echocardiography. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989.CrossRef Meerbaum S. Introduction and general background. In: Meerbaum S, Meltzer R, editors. Myocardial Contrast Two-Dimensional Echocardiography. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.CrossRef Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Suramelashvili N, Hetzer R. Strain and strain rate imaging by echocardiography - basic concepts and clinical applicability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5(2):133–48.CrossRef Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Suramelashvili N, Hetzer R. Strain and strain rate imaging by echocardiography - basic concepts and clinical applicability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5(2):133–48.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(8):797–810.CrossRef Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(8):797–810.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004–2006–2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290–6.CrossRef Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004–2006–2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tomlinson LA. Methods for assessing arterial stiffness: technical consider-ations. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(6):655–60.CrossRef Tomlinson LA. Methods for assessing arterial stiffness: technical consider-ations. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(6):655–60.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Thaler DE, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, Mas JL, Serena J, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs. other PFOs. Neurology. 2014;83(3):221–6.CrossRef Thaler DE, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, Mas JL, Serena J, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs. other PFOs. Neurology. 2014;83(3):221–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38.CrossRef Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reinthaler M, Ozga AK, Sinning D, Curio J, Al-Hindwan HS, Bäckemo Johansson J, et al. Revival of transcatheter PFO closure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - impact of shunt size and age. Am Heart J. 2018;201:95–102.CrossRef Reinthaler M, Ozga AK, Sinning D, Curio J, Al-Hindwan HS, Bäckemo Johansson J, et al. Revival of transcatheter PFO closure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - impact of shunt size and age. Am Heart J. 2018;201:95–102.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cheng TO. Paradoxical embolism. A diagnostic challenge and its detection during life. Circulation. 1976;53:565–8. Cheng TO. Paradoxical embolism. A diagnostic challenge and its detection during life. Circulation. 1976;53:565–8.
20.
go back to reference Wagner PD. Ventilation/perfusion relationships. Clin Physiol. 1981;1(5):437–51.CrossRef Wagner PD. Ventilation/perfusion relationships. Clin Physiol. 1981;1(5):437–51.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Saric M, Armour AC, Arnaout MS, Chaudhry FA, Grimm RA, Kronzon I, et al. Guidelines for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of a Cardiac Source of Embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(1):1–42.CrossRef Saric M, Armour AC, Arnaout MS, Chaudhry FA, Grimm RA, Kronzon I, et al. Guidelines for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of a Cardiac Source of Embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(1):1–42.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Blume GG, Mcleod CJ, Barnes ME, Seward JB, Pellikka PA, Bastiansen PM, et al. Left atrial function: physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(6):421–30.CrossRef Blume GG, Mcleod CJ, Barnes ME, Seward JB, Pellikka PA, Bastiansen PM, et al. Left atrial function: physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(6):421–30.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rothwell PM. Carotid artery disease and the risk of ischaemic stroke and coronary vascular events. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(5):21–33.CrossRef Rothwell PM. Carotid artery disease and the risk of ischaemic stroke and coronary vascular events. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(5):21–33.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lorenz MW, Polak JF, Kavousi M, Mathiesen EB, Völzke H, Tuomainen TP, et al. PROG-IMT Study Group. Lancet. 2012;379(9831):2053–62.CrossRef Lorenz MW, Polak JF, Kavousi M, Mathiesen EB, Völzke H, Tuomainen TP, et al. PROG-IMT Study Group. Lancet. 2012;379(9831):2053–62.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006;113(5):664–70.CrossRef Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006;113(5):664–70.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold A, Shin MS, Cook C, Petraco R, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(18):1638–49.CrossRef Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold A, Shin MS, Cook C, Petraco R, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(18):1638–49.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mojadidi MK, Zaman MO, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Patel NK, Agarwal N, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):1035–43.CrossRef Mojadidi MK, Zaman MO, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Patel NK, Agarwal N, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):1035–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characteristics and prognosis of patients with cryptogenic stroke and suggestive of patent foramen ovale
Authors
Jaehuk Choi
Min-Kyung Kang
Jin-Sun Jun
Dong Geum Shin
Donghoon Han
Seonghoon Choi
Jung Rae Cho
Namho Lee
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1476-7120
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-021-00255-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Cardiovascular Ultrasound 1/2021 Go to the issue