Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Ultrasound 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Aortic Coarctation | Research

Study on the views and methods of ultrasonic screening and diagnosis for abnormal aortic arch in infants

Authors: Xinjian He, Jiaoyang Chen, Gaoyang Li

Published in: Cardiovascular Ultrasound | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore echocardiographic views and methods of aortic arch anomalies in infants, so as to improve the screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

140 children with abnormal aortic arch diagnosed by ultrasound in Children’s Hospital of Hebei Province from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected for retrospective analysis. All were confirmed by surgery or/and computerized tomography angiography. Series of views for aortic arch (the three-vessel and tracheal view, aortic arch short axis view, left aortic arch long axis view, aortic arch long axis continuous scan views) were performed in all cases on the basis of the routine views of echocardiography. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of different echocardiographic views for aortic arch anomalies were analyzed.

Results

Among the 140 infants, right aortic arch were 21 cases (6/21 were accompanied by mirror branch and 15/21 were with aberrant left subclavian artery). Left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery were 2 cases, and double aortic arch with both arches open were 20 cases. Double aortic arch with left arch atresia were 2 cases, and atresia of the proximal aorta with aortic arch dysplasia was 1 case. Coarctation of the aorta were 67 cases, and interruption of aortic arch were 27 cases. All the patients were correctly diagnosed except that 2 infants with interruption of aortic arch were incorrectly diagnosed as coarctation of the aorta, and 1 infant with coarctation of the aorta was misdiagnosed as interruption of aortic arch by echocardiography. The screening sensitivities of four views and four-view combination for abnormal aortic arch were 99.3, 73.6, 87.1, 99.3, and 100%; the diagnostic coincidence rates were 85.7, 27.1,66.4, 95.0%, and 97.9% respectively. On the basis of traditional left aortic long axis view, other three views had their own advantages. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of four-view combination were significantly improved.

Conclusions

The three-vessel trachea view is simple and feasible, which is suitable for screening abnormal aortic arch. The combination of four views conduces to improving screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of aortic arch abnormalities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jain S, Kleiner B, Moon-Grady A, Hornberger LK. Prenatal diagnosis of vascular rings. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(2):287–94.CrossRef Jain S, Kleiner B, Moon-Grady A, Hornberger LK. Prenatal diagnosis of vascular rings. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(2):287–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yagel S, Cohen SM, Achiron R. Examination of the fetal heart by five short-axis views: a proposed screening method for comprehensive cardiac evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(5):367–9.CrossRef Yagel S, Cohen SM, Achiron R. Examination of the fetal heart by five short-axis views: a proposed screening method for comprehensive cardiac evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(5):367–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, et al. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:340–5.CrossRef Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, et al. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:340–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thomas R, Nagpal P, Sharma A, Steigner M. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch. Sarv Priya Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8(Suppl 1):S26–44.PubMed Thomas R, Nagpal P, Sharma A, Steigner M. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch. Sarv Priya Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8(Suppl 1):S26–44.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hung Y-Y, Fu Y-C, Wei H-J, Tsai I-C, Chen C-C. Multi- detector row computed tomographic evaluation of a rare type of complete vascular ring: double aortic arch with atretic left arch distal to the origin of left subclavian artery. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:845–8.CrossRef Hung Y-Y, Fu Y-C, Wei H-J, Tsai I-C, Chen C-C. Multi- detector row computed tomographic evaluation of a rare type of complete vascular ring: double aortic arch with atretic left arch distal to the origin of left subclavian artery. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:845–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Etesami M, Ashwath R, Kanne J, Gilkeson RC, Rajiah P. Computed tomography in the evaluation of vascular rings and slings. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:507–21.CrossRef Etesami M, Ashwath R, Kanne J, Gilkeson RC, Rajiah P. Computed tomography in the evaluation of vascular rings and slings. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:507–21.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Imagawa H, Kadoba K, Taniguchi K, et al. Saccular aneurysm in the right-sided aortic arch: a successfully corrected case. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:941–4.CrossRef Imagawa H, Kadoba K, Taniguchi K, et al. Saccular aneurysm in the right-sided aortic arch: a successfully corrected case. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:941–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ryu J-W. Complete vascular ring caused by Kommerell’s diverticulum and right aortic arch with mirror image branching. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45(5):338–41.CrossRef Ryu J-W. Complete vascular ring caused by Kommerell’s diverticulum and right aortic arch with mirror image branching. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45(5):338–41.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sun Z, Cheng TO, Li L, et al. Diagnostic value of transthoracic echocardiography in patients with coarctation of aorta: the Chinese experience in 53 patients studied between 2008 and 2012 in one major medical center. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127399.CrossRef Sun Z, Cheng TO, Li L, et al. Diagnostic value of transthoracic echocardiography in patients with coarctation of aorta: the Chinese experience in 53 patients studied between 2008 and 2012 in one major medical center. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127399.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Patel DM, Maldjian PD, Lovoulos C. Interrupted aortic arch with post-interruption aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve in an adult: a case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 2015;10(3):5–8.CrossRef Patel DM, Maldjian PD, Lovoulos C. Interrupted aortic arch with post-interruption aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve in an adult: a case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 2015;10(3):5–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Türkvatan A, Büyükbayraktar FG, Ölçer T, Cumhur T. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10:176–84.CrossRef Türkvatan A, Büyükbayraktar FG, Ölçer T, Cumhur T. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10:176–84.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Backer CL, Mavroudis C. Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: vascular rings, tracheal stenosis, pectus excavatum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(4 Suppl):S308–18.CrossRef Backer CL, Mavroudis C. Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: vascular rings, tracheal stenosis, pectus excavatum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(4 Suppl):S308–18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study on the views and methods of ultrasonic screening and diagnosis for abnormal aortic arch in infants
Authors
Xinjian He
Jiaoyang Chen
Gaoyang Li
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1476-7120
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-021-00237-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Cardiovascular Ultrasound 1/2021 Go to the issue