Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health

Authors: Ditte Heering Holt, Morten Hulvej Rod, Susanne Boch Waldorff, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For more than 30 years policy action across sectors has been celebrated as a necessary and viable way to affect the social factors impacting on health. In particular intersectoral action on the social determinants of health is considered necessary to address social inequalities in health. However, despite growing support for intersectoral policymaking, implementation remains a challenge. Critics argue that public health has remained naïve about the policy process and a better understanding is needed. Based on ethnographic data, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of a local process of intersectoral policymaking in order to gain a better understanding of the challenges posed by implementation. To help conceptualize the process, we apply the theoretical perspective of organizational neo-institutionalism, in particular the concepts of rationalized myth and decoupling.

Methods

On the basis of an explorative study among ten Danish municipalities, we conducted an ethnographic study of the development of a municipal-wide implementation strategy for the intersectoral health policy of a medium-sized municipality. The main data sources consist of ethnographic field notes from participant observation and interview transcripts.

Results

By providing detailed contextual description, we show how an apparent failure to move from policy to action is played out by the ongoing production of abstract rhetoric and vague plans. We find that idealization of universal intersectoralism, inconsistent demands, and doubts about economic outcomes challenge the notion of implementation as moving from rhetoric to action.

Conclusion

We argue that the ‘myth’ of intersectoralism may be instrumental in avoiding the specification of action to implement the policy, and that the policy instead serves as a way to display and support good intentions and hereby continue the process. On this basis we expand the discussion on implementation challenges regarding intersectoral policymaking for health.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Christiansen NS, Pedersen CH, Holt DH, Holmberg T, Christensen AI, Rod MH. Kortlægning. Kommunernes arbejde med implementering af Sundhedsstyrelsens forebyggelsespakker. Midtvejsrapport. 2014. Copenhagen: Centre for Intervention Research, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark; 2014.
2.
Knudsen M, Møller J, Jacobsen PØ. Rapport om ledelse og organisering af den kommunale sundhedsindsats. Copenhagen: Master of Health Management, CBS, Center for ledelsesudvikling, Kommunernes Landsforening og Efficiens; 2010.
3.
Exworthy M, Hunter DJ. The challenge of joined-up government in tackling health inequalities. International Journal of Public Administration. 2011;34(4):201–12.CrossRef
4.
Baum F, Lawless A, Williams C. Health in all policies from international ideas to local implementation: policies, systems, and organizations. In: Clavier C, de Leeuw E, editors. Health promotion and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 188–217.CrossRef
5.
World Health Organization. The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Ottawa: World Health Organization; 1986.
6.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health W. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
7.
World Health Organization. The Helsinki statement on health in all policies, The 8th global conference on health promotion, Helsinki, Finland, 10-14 June 2013. Helsinki: World Health Organization; 2013.
8.
Embrett MG, Randall GE. Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory. Soc Sci Med. 2014;108:147–55.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Greer SL, Lillvis DF. Beyond leadership: political strategies for coordination in health policies. Health Policy. 2014;116(1):12–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Ollila E. Health in all policies: from rhetoric to action. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2011;39(6):11–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Buse K, Mays N, Walt G: Making health policy.Open University press; 2012.
12.
Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K, Mah CL, Molnar A, Renahy E, O'Campo P. Glossary for the implementation of health in all policies (HiAP). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(12):1068–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Hendriks A-M, Habraken J, Jansen MWJ, Gubbels JS, De Vries NK, van Oers H, Michie S, Atkins L, SPJ K. ‘Are we there yet?’ – Operationalizing the concept of integrated public health policies. Health Policy. 2014;114(2–3):174–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bardach E. The implementation game: what happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1977.
15.
Pressman JL, Wildavsky AB. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland, or, why It's amazing that Federal Programs Work at all, this being a Saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.
16.
Winter S. Implementation perspectives: status and reconsideration. In: Peters G, Pierre J, editors. Handbook of public administration; 2003. p. 212–22.CrossRef
17.
Bernier NF, Clavier C. Public health policy research: making the case for a political science approach. Health Promot Int. 2011;26(1):109–16.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Carey G, Crammond B. Action on the social determinants of health: views from inside the policy process. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128(0):134–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Chircop A, Bassett R, Taylor E. Evidence on how to practice intersectoral collaboration for health equity: a scoping review. Critical Public Health. 2015;25(2):178–91.CrossRef
20.
Shankardass K, Renahy E, Muntaner C, O'Campo P. Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies: a methodology for realist explanatory case studies. Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(4):462–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Meyer JW, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol. 1977;83(2):340–63.CrossRef
22.
Sahlin K, Wedlin L. Circulating ideas: imitation, translation and editing. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, editors. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 218–42.CrossRef
23.
Christensen T, Lægreid P, Roness PG, Rovik KA. Organization theory and the public sector: instrument, culture and myth. London: Routledge; 2007.CrossRef
24.
Holt DH, Frohlich KL, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Clavier C: Intersectoriality in Danish municipalities: corrupting the social determinants of health? Health Promotion International 2016.
25.
Atkinson P, Coffey A. Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2003. p. 108–23.CrossRef
26.
Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. Active interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Postmodern Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2003. p. 66–81.CrossRef
27.
Schrøder K, Drotner K, Kline S, Murray C. Researching audiences. London: Arnold; 2003.
28.
Jansson EV, Tillgren PE. Health promotion at local level: a case study of content, organization and development in four Swedish municipalities. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Collins PA, Hayes MV. The role of urban municipal governments in reducing health inequities: a meta-narrative mapping analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Pons-Vigues M, Diez E, Morrison J, Salas-Nicas S, Hoffmann R, Burstrom B, van Dijk J, Borrell C. Social and health policies or interventions to tackle health inequalities in European cities: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
32.
Bogason P. Forvaltning og stat, vol. 5. udgave, 1. oplag. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2013.
33.
Andersen PT, Jensen J-J. Healthcare reform in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2010;38(3):246–52.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Larsen M, Rantala R, Koudenburg OA, Gulis G. Intersectoral action for health: the experience of a Danish municipality. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2014;42(7):649–57.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Hanak ML, Falk J, Størup M, Bruun JJ. Forebyggelse og sundhedsfremme i kommunen – en vejledning til Sundhedslovens §119 stk. 1 og 2. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen (Danish Health Authority); 2007.
36.
Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Blue Ridge Summit: AltaMira Press; 2011.
37.
Holt DH. Intersectoral policymaking for health? From policy to practice: a qualitative study of challenging implementation. Copenhagen: University of Southern Denmark; 2016.
38.
Schwartzman HB. The meeting. Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 1989. p. 309–14.
39.
Tavory I, Timmermans S. Abductive analysis: theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2014.CrossRef
40.
Blaikie N. Approaches to social enquiry. 2nd ed. UK: Polity Press; 2007.
41.
Mason J. Organizing and indexing qualitative data. In: Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: SAGE publications Ltd.; 2007. p. 147–72.
42.
Ollila E, Baum F, Peña S. Introduction to health in all policies and the analytical framework of the book. In: Leppo K, Ollila E, Peña S, Wismar M, Cook S, editors. Health in all policies seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2013. p. 3–23.
43.
McQueen D, Wismar M, Lin V, Jones CM, Davies M. Intersectoral governance for health in all policies. Structures, actions and experiences. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2012.
44.
Williams P. We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2013;26(1):17–32.CrossRef
45.
Bardach E. Getting agencies to work together : the practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington: Brookings Institution Press; 1998.
46.
Carey G, Crammond B. What works in joined-up government? An evidence synthesis. International Journal of Public Administration. 2015;38:1020–9.CrossRef
47.
Hunter D, Perkins N. Partnership working in public health: the implications for governance of a systems approach. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(2_suppl):45–52.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Brunsson N. The organization of hypocrisy. Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. 2nd ed. Norway: Abstrakt forlag AS; 2002.
49.
Brunsson N. Mechanisms of hope:maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press; 2006.
50.
Pinto AD, Molnar A, Shankardass K, O'Campo PJ, Bayoumi AM. Economic considerations and health in all policies initiatives: evidence from interviews with key informants in Sweden, Quebec and South Australia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Degeling P. The significance of 'sectors' in calls for urban public health intersectoralism: an Australian perspective. Policy & Politics. 1995;23(4):289–301. (213)CrossRef
52.
53.
Holt DH, Waldorff SB, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Rod MH. Ambiguous expectations for intersectoral action for health: a document analysis of the Danish case. Critical Public Health. 2017;2017:1–13.
54.
Lin V, Jones CM, Synnot A, Wismar M. Synthesizing the evidence: how governance structures can trigger governance actions to support health in all policies. In: McQueen D, Wismar M, Lin V, Jones CM, Davies M, editors. Intersectoral governance for health in all policies structures, actions and experiences. Geneva: World Health Organization 2012, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2012.
55.
56.
Shankardass K, Solar O, Murphy K, Greaves L, O'Campo P. A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments. International Journal of Public Health. 2012;57(1):25–33.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Kickbusch I, Williams C, Lawless A. Making the most of open windows: establishing health in all policies in south Australia. Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(1):185–94.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Molnar A, Renahy E, O'Campo P, Muntaner C, Freiler A, Shankardass K. Using win-win strategies to implement health in all policies: a cross-case analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147003. (no pagination)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health
Authors
Ditte Heering Holt
Morten Hulvej Rod
Susanne Boch Waldorff
Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study

Research article

An integrated oral health program for rural residential aged care facilities: a mixed methods comparative study

Research article

Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)

Research article

Frequent attenders at primary care out-of-hours services: a registry-based observational study in Norway

Research article

Services according to mental health needs for youth in foster care? – A multi-informant study

Research article

Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis