Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)

Authors: Pia Cecilie Bing-Jonsson, Paul Slater, Brendan McCormack, Lisbeth Fagerström

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Person-centred health care has widespread recognition, but there are few instruments aimed at measuring the provision of person-centred practice among health care professionals across a range of settings. The Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S) is a new instrument for this purpose, theoretically aligned with McCormack & McCance’s person-centred framework, which has been translated and culturally adapted into Norwegian.

Methods

The study used a two-stage research design involving: translation and cultural adaption of the PCPI-S from English to Norwegian language (phase 1), and a quantitative cross sectional survey following psychometric evaluation (phase 2). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the theoretical measurement model.

Results

The translation and cultural adaption was carried out according to ten recommend steps. Discrepancies were addressed and revised by all translators until consensus was reached on a reconciled version of the translation. A sample of 258 health care staff participated in the survey. The model fit statistics were overall positive; the model requires minor modifications and these are mostly confined to correlated errors.

Conclusions

The translation and cultural adaption process of the PCPI-S from English to Norwegian language was a demanding process in order to retain the conceptual meanings of the original instrument. Overall, the psychometric properties of the tool were acceptable, but testing on a larger sample size is recommended.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCormack B, McCance T. Person-centred practice in nursing and health care:theory and practice, second edition. Edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. McCormack B, McCance T. Person-centred practice in nursing and health care:theory and practice, second edition. Edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.
2.
go back to reference Slater P, McCormack B. The development and testing of the person-centred practice inventory – staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. in press; Slater P, McCormack B. The development and testing of the person-centred practice inventory – staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. in press;
3.
go back to reference Sjögren K, Lindkvist M, Sandman P-O, Zingmark K, Edvardsson D. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the person-centered care assessment tool (P-CAT). Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(3):406–15.CrossRefPubMed Sjögren K, Lindkvist M, Sandman P-O, Zingmark K, Edvardsson D. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the person-centered care assessment tool (P-CAT). Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(3):406–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Edvardsson D, Innes A. Measuring person-centered care: a critical comparative review of published tools. The Gerontologist. 2010;50(6):834–46.CrossRefPubMed Edvardsson D, Innes A. Measuring person-centered care: a critical comparative review of published tools. The Gerontologist. 2010;50(6):834–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DeSilva D. Helping measure person-centred care: a review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centred care. In. London: The Health Foundation; 2014. DeSilva D. Helping measure person-centred care: a review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centred care. In. London: The Health Foundation; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Köberich S, Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patients′ perceptions of patient-centred nursing care. Nurs Inq. 2015;22(2):106–20.CrossRefPubMed Köberich S, Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patients′ perceptions of patient-centred nursing care. Nurs Inq. 2015;22(2):106–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bergland A, Kirkevold M, Edvardsson D. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian person-centred climate questionnaire from a nursing home context. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;26(4):820–8.CrossRefPubMed Bergland A, Kirkevold M, Edvardsson D. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian person-centred climate questionnaire from a nursing home context. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;26(4):820–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rokstad AMM, Engedal K, Edvardsson D, Selbaek G. Psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian version of the person-centred care assessment tool. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(1):99–105.CrossRefPubMed Rokstad AMM, Engedal K, Edvardsson D, Selbaek G. Psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian version of the person-centred care assessment tool. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(1):99–105.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harding E, Wait S, Scrutton J. In: Partnership THP, editor. The state of play in Person-centred Care: A pragmatic review of how person-centred care is defined, applied and measured. London: The Health Foundation; 2015. Harding E, Wait S, Scrutton J. In: Partnership THP, editor. The state of play in Person-centred Care: A pragmatic review of how person-centred care is defined, applied and measured. London: The Health Foundation; 2015.
10.
go back to reference Slater P, McCane T, McCormack B. The development and testing of the person-centred practice inventory – staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(4):541–7.CrossRefPubMed Slater P, McCane T, McCormack B. The development and testing of the person-centred practice inventory – staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(4):541–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRefPubMed Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
13.
go back to reference Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babib B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2006. Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babib B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2006.
14.
go back to reference Hoe SL. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling techniques. J Appl Quant Methods. 2008;3(1):76–83. Hoe SL. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling techniques. J Appl Quant Methods. 2008;3(1):76–83.
15.
go back to reference Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
16.
Metadata
Title
Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)
Authors
Pia Cecilie Bing-Jonsson
Paul Slater
Brendan McCormack
Lisbeth Fagerström
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3374-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue