Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices

Authors: Natasha C. Campling, David G. Pitts, Paul V. Knight, Richard Aspinall

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Monitoring health and care needs through the use of telehealthcare devices has been proposed to help alleviate funding concerns in a climate of limited budgets. As well as improving cost effectiveness, such an approach could be used to help individuals live at home for longer. In practice however, these devices often go unused. A qualitative study was carried out to determine the barriers to uptake of these devices from both the perspective of the end user and from key players in the healthcare supply chain.

Methods

A qualitative approach was used involving focus groups and interviews. Two UK-based focus groups were held with users and potential users, to assess their views on the wide array of devices available. 27 individuals were involved in the groups, all over the age of 60. Additionally 27 telephone interviews were conducted with key supply chain players to ascertain their views on the barriers to uptake of these devices. A semi-structured interview guide was used. All data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach.

Results

Users were generally unaware of the wide array of devices available and when shown a selection, were often unclear as to their purpose. The interviews revealed extensive barriers to uptake due to lack of awareness, unfamiliar terminology, complex supply routes and costs, resistance from professionals to device usage and lack of expertise.

Conclusions

Public and professional awareness campaigns are required with appropriate funding mechanisms for users to gain access to devices. The numerous barriers identified require systematically addressing, so that device usage is better promoted, enabling individuals to live at home successfully for longer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Collerton J, Davies K, Jagger C, Kingston A, Bond J, Eccles MP, Robinson LA, Martin-Ruiz C, von Zglinicki T, James OF, et al. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Collerton J, Davies K, Jagger C, Kingston A, Bond J, Eccles MP, Robinson LA, Martin-Ruiz C, von Zglinicki T, James OF, et al. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Gunashekar S, Spisak A, Dean K, Ryan N, Lepetit L, Cornish P. Accelerating the internet of things. Santa Monica, California and Cambridge UK: RAND corporation; 2016. Gunashekar S, Spisak A, Dean K, Ryan N, Lepetit L, Cornish P. Accelerating the internet of things. Santa Monica, California and Cambridge UK: RAND corporation; 2016.
8.
go back to reference Campling NC, Pitts DG, Knight PV, Aspinall R. A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users? BMC Health Services Research 201717:455 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2408-8. Campling NC, Pitts DG, Knight PV, Aspinall R. A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users? BMC Health Services Research 201717:455 DOI: 10.​1186/​s12913-017-2408-8.
9.
go back to reference Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):9. 12(4): 436-445.CrossRef Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):9. 12(4): 436-445.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):25.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):25.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Campling N. Telehealthcare Devices: The Views of End-Users and the Barriers to Uptake and Usage. Unpublished report. Chelmsford: Anglia Ruskin University; 2015. Campling N. Telehealthcare Devices: The Views of End-Users and the Barriers to Uptake and Usage. Unpublished report. Chelmsford: Anglia Ruskin University; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Ward G, Ray S. Unlocking the potential of the younger older consumer. In: Consumer preference and the assisted living market Research findings from the CO-MODAL project. Coventry: Health design and technology institute, Coventry University; 2014. Ward G, Ray S. Unlocking the potential of the younger older consumer. In: Consumer preference and the assisted living market Research findings from the CO-MODAL project. Coventry: Health design and technology institute, Coventry University; 2014.
13.
go back to reference Gibson G, Dickinson C, Brittain K, Robinson L. The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gibson G, Dickinson C, Brittain K, Robinson L. The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Barlow JG. Changing the innovariton landscape in the UK's National Hedalth Service to meet its future challenges. Innov Entrepreneurship Health. 2015;2:8. Barlow JG. Changing the innovariton landscape in the UK's National Hedalth Service to meet its future challenges. Innov Entrepreneurship Health. 2015;2:8.
16.
go back to reference K T. Better Care for frail older people: working differently to improve care. In. Deloitte UK Centre for Health Solutions; 2014. K T. Better Care for frail older people: working differently to improve care. In. Deloitte UK Centre for Health Solutions; 2014.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices
Authors
Natasha C. Campling
David G. Pitts
Paul V. Knight
Richard Aspinall
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2270-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue