Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Palliative sedation challenging the professional competency of health care providers and staff: a qualitative focus group and personal written narrative study

Authors: Danièle Leboul, Régis Aubry, Jean-Michel Peter, Victor Royer, Jean-François Richard, Frédéric Guirimand

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite recent advances in palliative medicine, sedating a terminally ill patient is regarded as an indispensable treatment to manage unbearable suffering. With the prospect of widespread use of palliative sedation, the feelings and representations of health care providers and staff (carers) regarding sedation must be carefully explored if we are to gain a better understanding of its impact and potential pitfalls. The objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of the opinions of carers about the use of sedation practices in palliative care units (PCU), which have become a focus of public attention following changes in legislation.

Methods

Data were collected using a qualitative study involving multi-professional focus groups with health care providers and staff as well as personal narratives written by physicians and paramedical staff. A total of 35 medical and paramedical providers volunteered to participate in focus group discussions in three Palliative Care Units in two French hospitals and to write personal narratives.

Results

Health care provider and staff opinions had to do with their professional stance and competencies when using midazolam and practicing sedation in palliative care. They expressed uncertainty regarding three aspects of the comprehensive care: biomedical rigour of diagnosis and therapeutics, quality of the patient/provider relationship and care to be provided. Focusing on the sedative effect of midazolam and continuous sedation until death, the interviewed health care providers examined the basics of their professional competency as well as the key role played by the health care team in terms of providing support and minimizing workplace suffering. Nurses were subject to the greatest misgivings about their work when they were called upon to sedate patients.

Conclusions

The uncertainty experienced by the carers with regard to the medical, psychosocial and ethical justification for sedation is a source of psychological burden and moral distress, and it has proved to be a major source of suffering in the workplace. Lastly, the study shows the uncertainty can have the positive effect of prompting the care team to devise ways to deal with it.
Literature
1.
Maltoni M, Setola E. Palliative Sedation in Patients With Cancer. Cancer Control. 2015;22:433–41.PubMed
2.
3.
Elsayem A, Curry Iii E, Boohene J, Munsell MF, Calderon B, Hung F, et al. Use of palliative sedation for intractable symptoms in the palliative care unit of a comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:53–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Rousseau P. The ethical validity and clinical experience of palliative sedation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1064–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Seale C, Raus K, Bruinsma S, van der Heide A, Sterckx S, Mortier F, et al. The language of sedation in end-of-life care: The ethical reasoning of care providers in three countries. Health (London). 2015;19:339–54.CrossRef
6.
Jacquemin D, Rodrigues P. Pertinence du recours au concept de transgression face aux nouvelles situations de fin de vie. Ethics Med Public Health. 2015;1:424–30.CrossRef
7.
Raus K, Sterckx S, Mortier F. Continuous deep sedation at the end of life and the “natural death” hypothesis. Bioethics. 2012;26:329–36.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sercu M, Pype P, Christiaens T, Derese A, Deveugele M. Belgian general practitioners’ perspectives on the use of palliative sedation in end-of-life home care: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47:1054–63.CrossRef
9.
Cherny NI, Radbruch L. The Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23:581–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Morita T, Bito S, Kurihara Y, Uchitomi Y. Development of a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy using the Delphi method. J Palliat Med. 2005;8:716–29.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Gurschick L, Mayer DK, Hanson LC. Palliative Sedation: An Analysis of International Guidelines and Position Statements. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2015;32:660–71.CrossRef
12.
Verkerk M, van Wijlick E, Legemaate J, de Graeff A. A National Guideline for Palliative Sedation in The Netherlands. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34:666–70.CrossRef
13.
Kirk TW, Mahon MM. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO) Position Statement and Commentary on the Use of Palliative Sedation in Imminently Dying Terminally Ill Patients. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;39:914–23.CrossRef
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Raus K, Brown J, Seale C, Rietjens JA, Janssens R, Bruinsma S, et al. Continuous sedation until death: the everyday moral reasoning of physicians, nurses and family caregivers in the UK, The Netherlands and Belgium. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Gielen J, Van den Branden S, Van Iersel T, Broeckaert B. Flemish palliative-care nurses’ attitudes to palliative sedation: a quantitative study. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19:692–704.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Arevalo JJ, Rietjens JA, Swart SJ, Perez RSGM, van der Heide A. Day-to-day care in palliative sedation: survey of nurses’ experiences with decision-making and performance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:613–21.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Rietjens JAC, Hauser J, van der Heide A, Emanuel L. Having a difficult time leaving: experiences and attitudes of nurses with palliative sedation. Palliat Med. 2007;21:643–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Abarshi EA, Papavasiliou ES, Preston N, Brown J, Payne S. The Complexity of Nurses’ Attitudes and Practice of Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Literature Review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47:915–25.CrossRef
23.
Masanès M-J, Rostaing-Rigattieri S, Blanchet V, Chouaïd C, Lebeau B. Le vécu de la sédation par midazolam en phase palliative terminale dans un service de pneumologie. Méd Palliat Soins Support–Accompagnement–Éthique. 2006;5:306–17.CrossRef
24.
Blondeau D, Roy L, Dumont S, Godin G, Martineau I. Physicians’ and pharmacists’ attitudes toward the use of sedation at the end of life: influence of prognosis and type of suffering. J Palliat Care. 2005;21:238–45.PubMed
25.
Morita T, Miyashita M, Kimura R, Adachi I, Shima Y. Emotional burden of nurses in palliative sedation therapy. Palliat Med. 2004;18:550–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Deschepper R, Laureys S, Hachimi-Idrissi S, Poelaert J, Distelmans W, Bilsen J. Palliative sedation: Why we should be more concerned about the risks that patients experience an uncomfortable death. Pain. 2013;154:1505–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Rietjens J, van Delden J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Buiting H, van der Maas P, van der Heide A. Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study. BMJ. 2008;336:810–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1990.
29.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Maltoni M, Scarpi E, Rosati M, Derni S, Fabbri L, Martini F, et al. Palliative sedation in end-of-life care and survival: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1378–83.CrossRef
31.
Cherny NI, Portenoy RK. Sedation in the management of refractory symptoms: guidelines for evaluation and treatment. J Palliat Care. 1994;10:31–8.PubMed
32.
Higgins PC, Altilio T. Palliative Sedation: An Essential Place for Clinical Excellence. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;3:3–30.CrossRef
33.
Swart SJ, van der Heide A, van Zuylen L, Perez RS, Zuurmond WW, van der Maas PJ, et al. Considerations of physicians about the depth of palliative sedation at the end of life. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184:360–6.CrossRef
34.
Seymour J, Rietjens J, Bruinsma S, Deliens L, Sterckx S, Mortier F, et al. Using continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study of physicians’ and nurses’ practice in three European countries. Palliat Med. 2015;29:48–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Rietjens J, Buiting H, Pasman H, van der Maas P, van Delden J, van der Heide A. Deciding about continuous deep sedation: physicians’ perspectives: A focus group study. Palliat Med. 2009;23:410–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Swart SJ, Brinkkemper T, Rietjens JAC, Blanker MH, van Zuylen L, Ribbe M, et al. Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences with continuous palliative sedation in the Netherlands. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1271–4.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Derby S. Case presentation: believing that your injection killed the patient. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1998;16:133.CrossRef
38.
Bachelard G. L’Air et les songes, essai sur l’imagination du mouvement. Paris: Aubin; 1950.
39.
Castoriadis C. Fait et à faire. Paris: Le Seuil; 1997.
40.
Rys S, Mortier F, Deliens L, Deschepper R, Battin MP, Bilsen J. Continuous sedation until death: moral justifications of physicians and nurses—a content analysis of opinion pieces. Med Health Care Philos. 2013;16:533–42.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
42.
Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
43.
Talbot M. Bioethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
44.
Jacquemin D, Pujol N, Aubry R, Choteau B, Desmedt M, Guirimand F, et al. La transgression : une expérience à penser pour construire la visée éthique de certaines pratiques cliniques. Méd Palliat Soins Support–Accompagnement–Éthique. 2015;14:91–7.CrossRef
45.
Douglas CD, Kerridge IH, Ankeny RA. Narratives of “terminal sedation” and the importance of the intention foresight distinction in palliative care practice. Bioethics. 2013;27:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Foley R-A, Johnston WS, Bernard M, Canevascini M, Currat T, Borasio GD, et al. Attitudes Regarding Palliative Sedation and Death Hastening Among Swiss Physicians: A Contextually Sensitive Approach. Death Stud. 2015;39:473–82.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Anquinet L, Rietjens JA, Mathers N, Seymour J, van der Heide A, Deliens L. Descriptions by general practitioners and nurses of their collaboration in continuous sedation until death at home: in-depth qualitative interviews in three European countries. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2015;49:98–109.CrossRef
48.
Gernet I, Dejours C. Evaluation of work and recognition. Nouv Rev Psychosociologie. 2009;8:27–36.CrossRef
49.
Dejours C, Gernet I. Work, subjectivity, and trust. Nouv Rev Psychosociologie. 2012;13:75–91.CrossRef
50.
Goncalves JAF. Sedation and Expertise in Palliative Care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:44–5.CrossRef
51.
Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, Schildman J, Dauwerse L, Widdershoven G, et al. Outcomes of moral case deliberation—the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Stolper M, Metselaar S, Molewijki B, Widdershoven G. Moral case deliberation in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Tensions between theory and practice. J Int Bioethique. 2012;23:53–66. 191–2.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Stolper M, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation. HEC Forum. 2015;27:47–59.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Drapeau M. Science-like criteria in qualitative research. Prat Psychol. 2004;10:79–86.
55.
Metadata
Title
Palliative sedation challenging the professional competency of health care providers and staff: a qualitative focus group and personal written narrative study
Authors
Danièle Leboul
Régis Aubry
Jean-Michel Peter
Victor Royer
Jean-François Richard
Frédéric Guirimand
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0198-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Palliative Care 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Exploring the rewards and challenges of paediatric palliative care work – a qualitative study of a multi-disciplinary children’s hospice care team

Research article

Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis

Research article

Degree of dyspnoea at admission and discharge in patients with heart failure and respiratory diseases

Research article

Validation of a modified VOICES survey to measure end-of-life care quality: the CaregiverVoice survey

Research article

Factors that influence advance directives completion amongst terminally ill patients at a tertiary hospital in Kenya

Research article

Compassionate collaborative care: an integrative review of quality indicators in end-of-life care