Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Laminotomy | Research article

Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis

Authors: Hao-Ju Lo, Chen-Sheng Chen, Hung-Ming Chen, Sai-Wei Yang

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An interspinous process device, the Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM™) designed to treat lumbar neurogenic disease secondary to the lumbar spinal stenosis, it provides dynamic stabilization after minimally invasive (MI) lumbar decompression. The current study was conducted using an experimentally validated L1-L5 spinal finite element model (FEM) to evaluate the limited decompression on range of motion (ROM) and stress distribution on a neural arch implanted with the DIAM.

Methods

The study simulated bilateral laminotomies with partial discectomy at L3-L4, as well as unilateral and bilateral laminotomies with partial discectomy combined with implementation of the DIAM at L3-L4. The ROM and maximum von Mises stresses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion were analyzed in response to the hybrid protocol in comparison with the intact model.

Results

The investigation revealed that decreased ROM, intradiscal stress, and facet joint force at the implant level, but considerably increased stress at the pars interarticularis were found during flexion and torsion at the L4, as well as during extension, lateral bending, and torsion at the L3, when the DIAM was implanted compared with the defect model.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that the DIAM may be beneficial in reducing the symptoms of stress-induced low back pain. Nevertheless, the results also suggest that a surgeon should be cognizant of the stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis results from MI decompression plus the application of the interspinous process device.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:17–23.CrossRef Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:17–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schatzker J, Pennal GF. Spinal stenosis, a cause of cauda equina compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968;50(3):606–18.CrossRef Schatzker J, Pennal GF. Spinal stenosis, a cause of cauda equina compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968;50(3):606–18.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gibson JNA, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane review. Spine. 2005;30(20):2312–20.CrossRef Gibson JNA, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane review. Spine. 2005;30(20):2312–20.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tuite GF, Doran SE, Stern JD, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM, Lundquist CA, et al. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Radiographic changes and clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:707–15.CrossRef Tuite GF, Doran SE, Stern JD, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM, Lundquist CA, et al. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Radiographic changes and clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:707–15.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE, Papadopoulos SM, McGillicuddy JE, Oyedijo DI, et al. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:699–706.CrossRef Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE, Papadopoulos SM, McGillicuddy JE, Oyedijo DI, et al. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:699–706.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Herron LD, Pheasant HC. Bilateral laminotomy and discectomy for segmental lumbar disc disease. Decompression with stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:86–97.CrossRef Herron LD, Pheasant HC. Bilateral laminotomy and discectomy for segmental lumbar disc disease. Decompression with stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:86–97.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poletti CE. Central lumbar stenosis caused by ligamentum flavum: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral ligamentectomy: preliminary report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:343–7.CrossRef Poletti CE. Central lumbar stenosis caused by ligamentum flavum: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral ligamentectomy: preliminary report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:343–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khoo LT, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):146–54. Khoo LT, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):146–54.
9.
go back to reference Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R. Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(2 Suppl):213–7.PubMed Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R. Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(2 Suppl):213–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ivanov AL, Faizan A. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(1):18–22.CrossRef Ivanov AL, Faizan A. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(1):18–22.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG. Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:S73–8.CrossRef Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG. Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:S73–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nockels RP. Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;3(16 Suppl):S68–72.CrossRef Nockels RP. Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;3(16 Suppl):S68–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy. Spine J. 2006;6:714–22.CrossRef Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy. Spine J. 2006;6:714–22.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Buric J, Pulidori M. Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1304–11.CrossRef Buric J, Pulidori M. Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1304–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chosa E, Totoribe K, Tajima N. A biomechanical study of lumbar spondylolysis based on a three-dimensional finite element method. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):158–63.CrossRef Chosa E, Totoribe K, Tajima N. A biomechanical study of lumbar spondylolysis based on a three-dimensional finite element method. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):158–63.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anasetti F, Galbusera F, Aziz HN, Bellini CM, Addis A, Villa T, Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M. Spine stability after implantation of an interspinous device: an in vitro and finite element biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(5):568–75.CrossRef Anasetti F, Galbusera F, Aziz HN, Bellini CM, Addis A, Villa T, Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M. Spine stability after implantation of an interspinous device: an in vitro and finite element biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(5):568–75.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bellini CM, Galbusera F, Raimondi MT, Mineo GV, Brayda-Bruno M. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine after dynamic stabilization. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(6):423–9.CrossRef Bellini CM, Galbusera F, Raimondi MT, Mineo GV, Brayda-Bruno M. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine after dynamic stabilization. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(6):423–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lafage V, Gangnet N, Sénégas J, Lavaste F, Skalli W. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(16):1706–13.CrossRef Lafage V, Gangnet N, Sénégas J, Lavaste F, Skalli W. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(16):1706–13.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Hassan CR, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(2):200–8.CrossRef Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Hassan CR, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(2):200–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(3):257–65.CrossRef Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(3):257–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhong ZC, Chen SH, Hung C. Load- and displacement controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants. Proc Instn Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med. 2009;223:143–57.CrossRef Zhong ZC, Chen SH, Hung C. Load- and displacement controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants. Proc Instn Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med. 2009;223:143–57.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shih SL, Chen CS, Lin HM, Huang LY, Liu CL, Huang CH, et al. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(5):E140–9.CrossRef Shih SL, Chen CS, Lin HM, Huang LY, Liu CL, Huang CH, et al. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(5):E140–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shih SL, Liu CL, Huang LY, Huang CH, Chen CS. Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression-a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):191.CrossRef Shih SL, Liu CL, Huang LY, Huang CH, Chen CS. Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression-a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):191.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:579–86.CrossRef Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:579–86.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990;15:1142–7.CrossRef Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990;15:1142–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2008;33:514–8.CrossRef Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2008;33:514–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP, et al. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:84.CrossRef Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP, et al. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Chapman JR, Cohen AM, et al. The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:1789–93.CrossRef Lee MJ, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Chapman JR, Cohen AM, et al. The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:1789–93.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rao RD, Wang M, Singhal P, McGrady LM, Rao S. Intradiscal pressure and kinematic behavior of lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. Spine J. 2002;2:320–6.CrossRef Rao RD, Wang M, Singhal P, McGrady LM, Rao S. Intradiscal pressure and kinematic behavior of lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. Spine J. 2002;2:320–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Elgafy H, Goel VK, Terai T. Midline sparing bilateral laminotomy prevents disc collapse as compared to traditional laminectomy – a biomechanical finite element analysis. Spine J. 2009;9:134S–5S.CrossRef Elgafy H, Goel VK, Terai T. Midline sparing bilateral laminotomy prevents disc collapse as compared to traditional laminectomy – a biomechanical finite element analysis. Spine J. 2009;9:134S–5S.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Zander T, Rohlmann A, Klöckner C, Bergmann G. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:427–34.CrossRef Zander T, Rohlmann A, Klöckner C, Bergmann G. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:427–34.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Goel VK, Nishiyama K, Weinstein J, Liu YK. Mechanical properties of lumbar spinal motion segments as affected by partial disc removal. Spine. 1986;11:1008–12.CrossRef Goel VK, Nishiyama K, Weinstein J, Liu YK. Mechanical properties of lumbar spinal motion segments as affected by partial disc removal. Spine. 1986;11:1008–12.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Goel VK, Goyal S, Clark C, Nishiyama K, Nye T. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine. Effect of discectomy. Spine. 1985;10:543–54.CrossRef Goel VK, Goyal S, Clark C, Nishiyama K, Nye T. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine. Effect of discectomy. Spine. 1985;10:543–54.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Adams MA, May S, Freeman BJ, et al. Effects of backward bending on lumbar intervertebral discs: relevance to physical therapy treatments for low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:431–7 discussion 438.CrossRef Adams MA, May S, Freeman BJ, et al. Effects of backward bending on lumbar intervertebral discs: relevance to physical therapy treatments for low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:431–7 discussion 438.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine. 2003;28:26–32.CrossRef Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine. 2003;28:26–32.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine. 1995;20:887–900.CrossRef Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine. 1995;20:887–900.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Yang KH, King AI. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine. 1984;9:557–65.CrossRef Yang KH, King AI. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine. 1984;9:557–65.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Minns RJ, Walsh WK. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine. 1997;22:1819–25; discussion 1826–7.CrossRef Minns RJ, Walsh WK. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine. 1997;22:1819–25; discussion 1826–7.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Green TP, Allvey JC, Adams MA. Spondylolysis. Bending of the inferior articular processes of lumbar vertebrae during simulated spinal movements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(23):2683–91.CrossRef Green TP, Allvey JC, Adams MA. Spondylolysis. Bending of the inferior articular processes of lumbar vertebrae during simulated spinal movements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(23):2683–91.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Schulitz KP, Niethard FU. Strain on the interarticular stress distribution. Measurements regarding the development of spondylolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;96(3):197–202.CrossRef Schulitz KP, Niethard FU. Strain on the interarticular stress distribution. Measurements regarding the development of spondylolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;96(3):197–202.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis
Authors
Hao-Ju Lo
Chen-Sheng Chen
Hung-Ming Chen
Sai-Wei Yang
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Laminotomy
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2565-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2019 Go to the issue