Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Surgical management of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus: an email survey among Swiss orthopaedic surgeons regarding their current practice

Authors: Lukas Daniel Iselin, Georg Klammer, Norman Espinoza, Panagiotis D. Symeonidis, David Iselin, Peter Stavrou

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Various clinical and radiological criteria have been suggested to choose one of the numerous techniques in surgical treatment of hallux valgus and rigidus. We hypothesized that the surgeons' professional background will influence that choice depending on specialization, age, type and institution of training as well as his orthopaedic cultural orientation. Since Switzerland is characterized by regional languages (the most important being German and French), we were interested to learn if the linguistic differences had an influence on the orientation of the surgeons towards e.g. Anglo-American or French surgical traditions and/or sources of literature on the subject.

Methods

A survey was e-mailed to all members of the Swiss Orthopaedic Society (SGOT-SSOT). Questions were asked regarding respondents’ demographics as well as their preferred treatment for 3 separate cases of (1) moderate and (2) severe hallux valgus and (3) hallux rigidus. The responses were collected and statistically analyzed.

Results

Two hundred thirty of 322 respondents completed the survey(response rate 46 %). as they perform foot surgery on a regular base; 39 % were members of the Swiss Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (SFAS). Selected surgical treatments differed as follows: in joint sparing procedures older and busier surgeons were more likely to use Chevron osteotomies, however more than 50 % preferred a Scarf-type of osteotomy. Along the so-called "Rösti-Graben" separating the French from the German speaking part of Switzerland no significant difference was found in the choice of operation technique.
Nevertheless the fact being a member of SFAS showed significant differences in technical choice in case 2 and 3.

Conclusions

There are significant associations between the surgeons’ age, expertise and training and their preferred operative intervention. Considerable differences in the surgical management were found in the practice of the general orthopaedic surgeons 72 and the foot and ankle specialists. The cultural background and training is not mirroring the classical Swiss east west discrepancy. Despite the large number of surgical options available for hallux valgus, only a small number were preferred by the majority of surgeons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux Valgus: Demographics, Etiology, and Radiographic Assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:759–77.CrossRefPubMed Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux Valgus: Demographics, Etiology, and Radiographic Assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:759–77.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hueter C. In Klinic der Gelenkkrankungen mit Einschluss der Orthopaedie. Vogel, Leipzig: Edited; 1870. Hueter C. In Klinic der Gelenkkrankungen mit Einschluss der Orthopaedie. Vogel, Leipzig: Edited; 1870.
3.
go back to reference Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, editors. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 151–269. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, editors. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 151–269.
4.
go back to reference Silver D. The operative treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1923;5:225. Silver D. The operative treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1923;5:225.
6.
go back to reference Plattner PF, Van Manen JW. Results of Akin type proximal phalangeal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Orthopedics. 1990;13:989–96.PubMed Plattner PF, Van Manen JW. Results of Akin type proximal phalangeal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Orthopedics. 1990;13:989–96.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Regnauld B. Disorders of the Great Toe. In: Elson R, editor. The Foot: Pathology, Aetiology, Seminology, Clinical Investigation and Treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986. p. 269–81. 344 – 349.CrossRef Regnauld B. Disorders of the Great Toe. In: Elson R, editor. The Foot: Pathology, Aetiology, Seminology, Clinical Investigation and Treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986. p. 269–81. 344 – 349.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Akin OF. The treatment of hallux valgus: a new operative procedure and its results. Med Sentinel. 1925;33:678–9. Akin OF. The treatment of hallux valgus: a new operative procedure and its results. Med Sentinel. 1925;33:678–9.
9.
go back to reference Barouk LS, Barouk P, Baudet B, Toullec E. The great toe proximal phalanx osteotomy: the final step of the bunionectomy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:141–55.CrossRefPubMed Barouk LS, Barouk P, Baudet B, Toullec E. The great toe proximal phalanx osteotomy: the final step of the bunionectomy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:141–55.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bordelon RL. Technique and use of Akin osteotomy. Contemp Orthop. 1991;23:38–41.PubMed Bordelon RL. Technique and use of Akin osteotomy. Contemp Orthop. 1991;23:38–41.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hattrup SJ, Johnson KA. Chevron osteotomy: analysis of factors in patients’ dissatisfaction. Foot Ankle. 1985;5:327–32.CrossRefPubMed Hattrup SJ, Johnson KA. Chevron osteotomy: analysis of factors in patients’ dissatisfaction. Foot Ankle. 1985;5:327–32.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Johnson JE, Clanton TO, Baxter DE, Gottlieb MS. Comparison of chevron osteotomy and modified McBride bunionectomy for correction of mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle. 1991;12:61–8.CrossRefPubMed Johnson JE, Clanton TO, Baxter DE, Gottlieb MS. Comparison of chevron osteotomy and modified McBride bunionectomy for correction of mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle. 1991;12:61–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jones S, Al Hussainy HA, Ali F, Betts RP, Flowers MJ. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. A prospective clinical and pedobarographic study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:830–6.CrossRef Jones S, Al Hussainy HA, Ali F, Betts RP, Flowers MJ. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. A prospective clinical and pedobarographic study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:830–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Keller WL. The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. NY Med J. 1912;95:696. Keller WL. The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. NY Med J. 1912;95:696.
15.
go back to reference Leventen EO. Etiology and treatment of hallux valgus. The chevron procedure. Orthopedics. 1990;13:973–6.PubMed Leventen EO. Etiology and treatment of hallux valgus. The chevron procedure. Orthopedics. 1990;13:973–6.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mann RA, Clanton TO. Hallux Rigidus: Treatment by Cheilectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70-A(3):400–6. Mann RA, Clanton TO. Hallux Rigidus: Treatment by Cheilectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70-A(3):400–6.
17.
go back to reference McBride ED. A conservative operation for bunions. J Bone Joint Surg. 1928;10-A:735–9. McBride ED. A conservative operation for bunions. J Bone Joint Surg. 1928;10-A:735–9.
18.
go back to reference Mitchell CL, Fleming JL, Allen R, Glenney C, Sanford GA. Osteotomy-bunionectomy for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40-A:41–58.PubMed Mitchell CL, Fleming JL, Allen R, Glenney C, Sanford GA. Osteotomy-bunionectomy for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40-A:41–58.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Raikin SM, Ahmad J, Pour AE, Abidi N. Comparison of Arthrodesis and Metallic Hemiarthroplasty of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:1979–85.CrossRefPubMed Raikin SM, Ahmad J, Pour AE, Abidi N. Comparison of Arthrodesis and Metallic Hemiarthroplasty of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:1979–85.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Thordarson DB, Ebramzadeh E, Moorthy M, Lee J, Rudicel S. Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:122–7.PubMed Thordarson DB, Ebramzadeh E, Moorthy M, Lee J, Rudicel S. Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:122–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Iselin LD, Munt J, Symeonidis PD, Klammer G, Chehade M, Stavrou P. Operative management of common forefoot deformities: a representative survey of Australian orthopaedic surgeons. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012;5(3):188–94.CrossRefPubMed Iselin LD, Munt J, Symeonidis PD, Klammer G, Chehade M, Stavrou P. Operative management of common forefoot deformities: a representative survey of Australian orthopaedic surgeons. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012;5(3):188–94.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pinney S, Song K, Chou L. Surgical Treatment of Mild Hallux Valgus Deformity: The State of Practice among Academic Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:970–3.PubMed Pinney S, Song K, Chou L. Surgical Treatment of Mild Hallux Valgus Deformity: The State of Practice among Academic Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:970–3.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Crevoisier X, Mouhsine E, Ortolano V, Udin B, Dutoit M. The scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a review of 84 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:970–6.PubMed Crevoisier X, Mouhsine E, Ortolano V, Udin B, Dutoit M. The scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a review of 84 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:970–6.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Schneider W, Aigner N, Pinggera O, Knahr K. Chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus. Ten-year results of 112 cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:1016–20.CrossRef Schneider W, Aigner N, Pinggera O, Knahr K. Chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus. Ten-year results of 112 cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:1016–20.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical management of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus: an email survey among Swiss orthopaedic surgeons regarding their current practice
Authors
Lukas Daniel Iselin
Georg Klammer
Norman Espinoza
Panagiotis D. Symeonidis
David Iselin
Peter Stavrou
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0751-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015 Go to the issue