Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Bronchiectasis | Research article

Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Authors: James D. Chalmers, Megan L. Crichton, Gill Brady, Simon Finch, Mike Lonergan, Thomas C. Fardon

Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis.

Methods

Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation.

Results

Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31–2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant.

Conclusions

This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis.

Trial registration

NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.​gov 29th June 2014.
Literature
17.
go back to reference Greening NJ, Williams JEA, Hussain SF, et al. An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g4315.CrossRef Greening NJ, Williams JEA, Hussain SF, et al. An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g4315.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wise RA, Brown CD. Minimal clinically important differences in the six-minute walk test and the incremental shuttle walking test. COPD. 2005;2(1):125–9.CrossRef Wise RA, Brown CD. Minimal clinically important differences in the six-minute walk test and the incremental shuttle walking test. COPD. 2005;2(1):125–9.CrossRef
22.
Metadata
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Authors
James D. Chalmers
Megan L. Crichton
Gill Brady
Simon Finch
Mike Lonergan
Thomas C. Fardon
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2466
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2019 Go to the issue