Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial

Authors: Pablo Altman, Luis Wehbe, Juergen Dederichs, Tadhg Guerin, Brian Ament, Miguel Cardenas Moronta, Andrea Valeria Pino, Pankaj Goyal

Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated.

Methods

This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices.

Results

In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders.

Conclusions

Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender.

Trial registration

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015. 
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). 2017. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). 2017.
2.
go back to reference Bonini M, Usmani OS. The importance of inhaler devices in the treatment of COPD. COPD Res Prac. 2015;1:9.CrossRef Bonini M, Usmani OS. The importance of inhaler devices in the treatment of COPD. COPD Res Prac. 2015;1:9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lavorini F, Mannini C, Chellini E, Fontana GA. Optimising inhaled pharmacotherapy for elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the importance of delivery devices. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(7):461–73.CrossRefPubMed Lavorini F, Mannini C, Chellini E, Fontana GA. Optimising inhaled pharmacotherapy for elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the importance of delivery devices. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(7):461–73.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, allergy, and immunology. Chest. 2005;127(1):335–71.CrossRefPubMed Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, allergy, and immunology. Chest. 2005;127(1):335–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI Respir Med. 2000;94(5):496–500.CrossRefPubMed Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI Respir Med. 2000;94(5):496–500.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Atkins PJ. Dry powder inhalers: an overview. Respir Care. 2005;50(10):1304–12. discussion 1312PubMed Atkins PJ. Dry powder inhalers: an overview. Respir Care. 2005;50(10):1304–12. discussion 1312PubMed
7.
go back to reference Pedersen S, Steffensen G. Fenoterol powder inhaler technique in children: influence of inspiratory flow rate and breath-holding. Eur J Respir Dis. 1986;68(3):207–14.PubMed Pedersen S, Steffensen G. Fenoterol powder inhaler technique in children: influence of inspiratory flow rate and breath-holding. Eur J Respir Dis. 1986;68(3):207–14.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Part II: the role of inhalant delivery devices and drug formulations in therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):600–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Part II: the role of inhalant delivery devices and drug formulations in therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):600–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Clark AR, Hollingworth AM. The relationship between powder inhaler resistance and peak inspiratory conditions in healthy volunteers--implications for in vitro testing. J Aerosol Med. 1993;6(2):99–110.CrossRefPubMed Clark AR, Hollingworth AM. The relationship between powder inhaler resistance and peak inspiratory conditions in healthy volunteers--implications for in vitro testing. J Aerosol Med. 1993;6(2):99–110.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dederichs JJ, Singh D, Pavkov R. Inspiratory flow profiles generated by patients with COPD through the Breezhaler® inhaler and other marketed dry powder inhalers. Poster presented at the Am J Respir Crit Care Med, American Thoracic Society International Conference, May 15–20, 2015, Denver, CO, USA, 2015. Vol. 191. Dederichs JJ, Singh D, Pavkov R. Inspiratory flow profiles generated by patients with COPD through the Breezhaler® inhaler and other marketed dry powder inhalers. Poster presented at the Am J Respir Crit Care Med, American Thoracic Society International Conference, May 15–20, 2015, Denver, CO, USA, 2015. Vol. 191.
11.
go back to reference Colthorpe P, Voshaar T, Kieckbusch T, Cuoghi E, Jauernig J. Delivery characteristics of a low-resistance dry-powder inhaler used to deliver the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium. J Drug Assess. 2013;2(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Colthorpe P, Voshaar T, Kieckbusch T, Cuoghi E, Jauernig J. Delivery characteristics of a low-resistance dry-powder inhaler used to deliver the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium. J Drug Assess. 2013;2(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Mueller S, Haeberlin B. S. E. Comparison of performance characteristics for Foradil Aerolizer® and Foradil Concept1 (a new single dose dry powder inhaler) at different test flow rates. Resp Drug Deliv. 2008;3:67–678. Mueller S, Haeberlin B. S. E. Comparison of performance characteristics for Foradil Aerolizer® and Foradil Concept1 (a new single dose dry powder inhaler) at different test flow rates. Resp Drug Deliv. 2008;3:67–678.
13.
go back to reference Pavkov R, Singh D. Concept1 (a new single dose dry powder inhaler) peak inspiratory flow rate study with COPD patients. Resp Drug Deliv. 2008;3:683–6. Pavkov R, Singh D. Concept1 (a new single dose dry powder inhaler) peak inspiratory flow rate study with COPD patients. Resp Drug Deliv. 2008;3:683–6.
14.
go back to reference Kuttler A, Dimke T. A novel biophysical simulation model of drug deposition implemented to predict and optimize QVA149 delivery to the lungs., American Thoracic Society International Conference, San Diego, CA, US, 16 May–21 May., 2014. Vol Abstract A3038. Kuttler A, Dimke T. A novel biophysical simulation model of drug deposition implemented to predict and optimize QVA149 delivery to the lungs., American Thoracic Society International Conference, San Diego, CA, US, 16 May–21 May., 2014. Vol Abstract A3038.
15.
go back to reference Pavkov R, Mueller S, Fiebich K, Singh D, Stowasser F, Pignatelli G, et al. Characteristics of a capsule based dry powder inhaler for the delivery of indacaterol. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(11):2527–33.CrossRefPubMed Pavkov R, Mueller S, Fiebich K, Singh D, Stowasser F, Pignatelli G, et al. Characteristics of a capsule based dry powder inhaler for the delivery of indacaterol. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(11):2527–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Molimard M, Raherison C, Lignot S, Balestra A, Lamarque S, Chartier A, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(2) Molimard M, Raherison C, Lignot S, Balestra A, Lamarque S, Chartier A, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(2)
17.
go back to reference Chapman KR, Fogarty CM, Peckitt C, Lassen C, Jadayel D, Dederichs J, et al. Delivery characteristics and patients’ handling of two single-dose dry-powder inhalers used in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:353–63.PubMedPubMedCentral Chapman KR, Fogarty CM, Peckitt C, Lassen C, Jadayel D, Dederichs J, et al. Delivery characteristics and patients’ handling of two single-dose dry-powder inhalers used in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:353–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). 2014. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). 2014.
19.
go back to reference Chodosh S, Flanders JS, Kesten S, Serby CW, Hochrainer D, Witek TJ Jr. Effective delivery of particles with the HandiHaler dry powder inhalation system over a range of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. J Aerosol Med. 2001;14(3):309–15.CrossRefPubMed Chodosh S, Flanders JS, Kesten S, Serby CW, Hochrainer D, Witek TJ Jr. Effective delivery of particles with the HandiHaler dry powder inhalation system over a range of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. J Aerosol Med. 2001;14(3):309–15.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Phillip Krüger BE, Zier M, Greguletz R. Inspiratory flow resistance of marketed dry powder inhalers (DPI). Eur Respir J. 2014;2014(44):4635. Phillip Krüger BE, Zier M, Greguletz R. Inspiratory flow resistance of marketed dry powder inhalers (DPI). Eur Respir J. 2014;2014(44):4635.
21.
go back to reference Darba J, Ramirez G, Sicras A, Francoli P, Torvinen S, Sanchez-de la Rosa R. The importance of inhaler devices: the choice of inhaler device may lead to suboptimal adherence in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:2335–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Darba J, Ramirez G, Sicras A, Francoli P, Torvinen S, Sanchez-de la Rosa R. The importance of inhaler devices: the choice of inhaler device may lead to suboptimal adherence in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:2335–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Hira D, Koide H, Nakamura S, Okada T, Ishizeki K, Yamaguchi M, et al. Assessment of inhalation flow patterns of soft mist inhaler co-prescribed with dry powder inhaler using inspiratory flow meter for multi inhalation devices. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hira D, Koide H, Nakamura S, Okada T, Ishizeki K, Yamaguchi M, et al. Assessment of inhalation flow patterns of soft mist inhaler co-prescribed with dry powder inhaler using inspiratory flow meter for multi inhalation devices. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Ibrahim M, Verma R, Garcia-Contreras L. Inhalation drug delivery devices: technology update. Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:131–9. Ibrahim M, Verma R, Garcia-Contreras L. Inhalation drug delivery devices: technology update. Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:131–9.
24.
go back to reference Prime D, de Backer W, Hamilton M, Cahn A, Preece A, Kelleher D, et al. Effect of disease severity in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on inhaler-specific inhalation profiles through the ELLIPTA(R) dry powder inhaler. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28(6):486–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prime D, de Backer W, Hamilton M, Cahn A, Preece A, Kelleher D, et al. Effect of disease severity in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on inhaler-specific inhalation profiles through the ELLIPTA(R) dry powder inhaler. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28(6):486–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Mahler DA, Waterman LA, Gifford AH. Prevalence and COPD phenotype for a suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate against the simulated resistance of the Diskus(R) dry powder inhaler. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013;26(3):174–9.CrossRefPubMed Mahler DA, Waterman LA, Gifford AH. Prevalence and COPD phenotype for a suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate against the simulated resistance of the Diskus(R) dry powder inhaler. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013;26(3):174–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Behara SR, Larson I, Kippax P, Stewart P, Morton DA. Insight into pressure drop dependent efficiencies of dry powder inhalers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;46(3):142–8.CrossRefPubMed Behara SR, Larson I, Kippax P, Stewart P, Morton DA. Insight into pressure drop dependent efficiencies of dry powder inhalers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;46(3):142–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ciciliani AM, Langguth P, Wachtel H. In vitro dose comparison of Respimat((R)) inhaler with dry powder inhalers for COPD maintenance therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:1565-77. Ciciliani AM, Langguth P, Wachtel H. In vitro dose comparison of Respimat((R)) inhaler with dry powder inhalers for COPD maintenance therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:1565-77.
29.
go back to reference Wieshammer S, Dreyhaupt J. Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75(1):18-25. Wieshammer S, Dreyhaupt J. Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75(1):18-25.
30.
go back to reference Brennan VK, Osman LM, Graham H, Critchlow A, Everard ML. True device compliance: the need to consider both competence and contrivance. Respir Med. 2005;99(1):97-102. Brennan VK, Osman LM, Graham H, Critchlow A, Everard ML. True device compliance: the need to consider both competence and contrivance. Respir Med. 2005;99(1):97-102.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
Authors
Pablo Altman
Luis Wehbe
Juergen Dederichs
Tadhg Guerin
Brian Ament
Miguel Cardenas Moronta
Andrea Valeria Pino
Pankaj Goyal
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2466
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue