Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Older working adults in the HEAF study are more likely to report loneliness after two years of follow-up if they have negative perceptions of their work quality

Authors: Gregorio Bevilacqua, Stefania D’Angelo, Georgia Ntani, Holly Emma Syddall, Elizabeth Clare Harris, Cathy Linaker, Martin Stevens, Cyrus Cooper, Karen Walker-Bone

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loneliness is an important public health issue associated with mortality and morbidity. Often researched amongst older people, less is known about risk factors for loneliness among adults aged 50–64 years who are in work. We investigated (a) if exit from the workforce increases the odds of loneliness; (b) whether adverse psychosocial work factors are associated with increased odds of loneliness over 2 years of follow-up; and (c) whether the association is stronger among subjects still working compared with those who have exited the workforce.

Methods

Data came from the Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) study, a large population cohort who provided questionnaire information about work and health at baseline and 2 annual follow-ups. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between psychosocial risk factors and loneliness at follow-up 2, with adjustment for loneliness at baseline, sex, age, self-rated health, living alone, and mental health diagnosis.

Results

Of the initial 8134 participants, 4521 were working at baseline and provided data for this analysis. Of those, 507 (11.2%) were defined as lonely at 2 years’ follow-up. Exiting the workforce was not significantly associated with loneliness (OR = 1.1, 95%CI: 0.7–1.7). However, negative psychosocial work factors predicted loneliness at follow-up. After mutual adjustment, lack of choice at work (OR: 1.5, 95%CI: 1.1–1.9), often lying awake worrying about work (OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 1.0–1.9) and perceived not coping with physical demands of the job (OR: 1.3, 95%CI: 1.0–1.7) were independent predictors, with associations robust to adjustment for demographic factors and health. Associations were only slightly altered when we restricted the sample to those who remained in work until the end of follow-up.

Conclusions

Loneliness amongst middle-aged working adults is not predicted by permanent work exit but is predicted by individuals’ perceptions about their work. Provision of good-quality work, matched to the capacity of the older worker, could prevent loneliness.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Black CM, Great B. Working for a healthier tomorrow: dame Carol Black's review of the health of britain's working age population : presented to the secretary of state for health and the secretary of state for work and pensions. London: TSO; 2008. Black CM, Great B. Working for a healthier tomorrow: dame Carol Black's review of the health of britain's working age population : presented to the secretary of state for health and the secretary of state for work and pensions. London: TSO; 2008.
9.
go back to reference Beaumont J. Measuring national well-being–older people and loneliness, 2013. London: Office for National Statistics; 2013. Beaumont J. Measuring national well-being–older people and loneliness, 2013. London: Office for National Statistics; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Luo Y, Hawkley LC, Waite LJ, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(6):907–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo Y, Hawkley LC, Waite LJ, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(6):907–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health. Psychosocial factors at work : recognition and control. Geneva: International Labour Office; 1986. Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health. Psychosocial factors at work : recognition and control. Geneva: International Labour Office; 1986.
29.
go back to reference Karaoglu N, Pekcan S, Durduran Y, Mergen H, Odabasi D, Ors R. A sample of paediatric residents' loneliness-anxiety-depression-burnout and job satisfaction with probable affecting factors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65(2):183–91.PubMed Karaoglu N, Pekcan S, Durduran Y, Mergen H, Odabasi D, Ors R. A sample of paediatric residents' loneliness-anxiety-depression-burnout and job satisfaction with probable affecting factors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65(2):183–91.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;45(6):1887–94. Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;45(6):1887–94.
36.
go back to reference Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1):37–48.CrossRefPubMed Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1):37–48.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Koposov R, et al. Loneliness and health risk behaviours among Russian and U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 366, 2014;14. Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Koposov R, et al. Loneliness and health risk behaviours among Russian and U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 366, 2014;14.
Metadata
Title
Older working adults in the HEAF study are more likely to report loneliness after two years of follow-up if they have negative perceptions of their work quality
Authors
Gregorio Bevilacqua
Stefania D’Angelo
Georgia Ntani
Holly Emma Syddall
Elizabeth Clare Harris
Cathy Linaker
Martin Stevens
Cyrus Cooper
Karen Walker-Bone
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10610-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue