Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Obesity | Research article

Social network influences and the adoption of obesity-related behaviours in adults: a critical interpretative synthesis review

Authors: Nestor Serrano Fuentes, Anne Rogers, Mari Carmen Portillo

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a key risk factor for developing a long-term condition and a leading cause of mortality globally. The limited evidence associated with interventions that currently target obesity-related behaviours demand new approaches to tackle this problem. Given the evidence that social ties are implicated in the gaining and reduction of weight, the use of social networks in interventions is potentially a novel and useful means of tackling this health issue. There is a specific gap in the literature regarding what and how social network properties and processes together with environmental and individual factors influence the adoption of positive and negative obesity-related behaviours in adults.

Methods

To address this gap in developing an integrated and holistic conceptual approach, a critical interpretative synthesis was undertaken following a line of argument synthesis as an analytical strategy.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included. The data-driven themes meso-micro network processes, contextual and individual factors, and types of ties and properties were identified individually as components and causes of different health scenarios. Nevertheless, these drivers do not act on their own. As a consequence, developing multi-agent coalitions considering cross-level influences between the data-driven themes are two mechanisms that are created to understand more in-depth how social networks and the environment influence the adoption of obesity-related behaviours. These two new constructs point to a dynamic multilevel set of influences between multiple constructs, developing scenarios where positive and negative health results are identified.

Conclusions

This critical interpretative synthesis offers a new means of exploring the application of social network properties and mechanisms in the ‘obesity’ field. The synthesizing argument created during the analysis process might be considered by health policy-makers, who might need to contemplate the wider open system of socially connected individuals and harness these forces to design new interventions where social networks and other contextual and individual factors operate together in a complex multilevel environment influencing obesity-related behaviours and practices.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815–25.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
6.
Health and Social Care Information Centre, Lifestyles Statistics. Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England. England: NHS; 2013.
7.
Government Office for Science. Tackling obesities: future choices – project report. 2nd ed. London: Government Office for Science; 2007.
8.
Nightingale G. Social determinants of health and health inequalities: focus on nutrition. Department of Health: England; 2015.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Lemstra M, Bird Y, Nwankwo C, Rogers M, Moraros J. Weight loss intervention adherence and factors promoting adherence: a meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:1547–59.CrossRef
13.
Jebb SA, Aveyard PN, Hawkes C. The evolution of policy and actions to tackle obesity in England. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl 2):42–59.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Millar L, Kremer P, de Silva-Sanigorski A, McCabe MP, Mavoa H, Moodie M, et al. Reduction in overweight and obesity from a 3-year community-based intervention in Australia: the “It’s your move!” project. Obes Rev. 2011;12(2):20–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Rogers A, Vassilev I, Sanders C, Kirk S, Chew-Graham C, Kennedy A, et al. Social networks, work and network-based resources for the management of long-term conditions: a framework and study protocol for developing self-care support. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Pachucki MA, Jacques PF, Christakis NA. Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(11):2170–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Voorhees CC, Murray D, Welk G, Birnbaum A, Ribisi KM, Johnson CC, et al. The role of peer social network factors and physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Health Behav. 2005;29:183–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Koetsenruijter J, van Lieshout J, Lionis C, Portillo MC, Vassilev I, Todorova E, et al. Social support and health in diabetes patients: An observational study in six European countries in an era of austerity. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135079.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Brandes U, Robins G, Mccranie A, Wasserman W. What is network science? Network sciences. 2013;1:1–15.CrossRef
20.
Kadushin C. Understanding social networks. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
21.
Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Borgatti SP. Egocentric network analysis: foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.CrossRef
22.
Marsden PV, Campbell KE. Measuring tie strength. Social forces. 1984;63(2):482–501.CrossRef
23.
Emirbayer M, Goodwin J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Am J Sociol. 1994;99(6):1411–54.CrossRef
24.
Mackenbach JD, Lakerveld J, Van Lenthe FJ, Kawachi I, Mckee M, Rutter H, et al. Neighbourhood social capital: measurement issues and associations with health outcomes. Obes Rev. 2016;17(Suppl 1):96–107.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol. 2008;34:405–29.CrossRef
26.
Zhang S, de la Haye K, Ji M, An R. Applications of social network analysis to obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(7):976–88.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Leahey TM, Doyle CY, Xu X, Bihuniak J, Wing RR. Social networks and social norms are associated with obesity treatment outcomes. Obesity. 2015;23(8):1550–4.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Kim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, Hughes DA, O’Malley AJ, Fowler JH, et al. A randomised controlled trial of social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change. 2015;386(9989):145.
29.
de la Haye K, Fluke M, Laney PC, Goran M, Galama T, Chou CP, et al. In-home obesity prevention in low-income infants through maternal and social transmission. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;77:61–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Vassilev I, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Oatley C, James E. Identifying the processes of change and engagement from using a social network intervention for people with long-term conditions. A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2019;22(2):173–82.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Gesell SB, Bess KD, Barkin SL. Understanding the social networks that form within the context of an obesity prevention intervention. J Obes. 2012;2012:749832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, editors. Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 3–90.
34.
Brug J, Kremers SP, Lenthe FV, Ball K, Crawford D. Environmental determinants of healthy eating: in need of theory and evidence. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:307–16.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1992.
36.
Lomi A, Robins G, Tranmer M. Introduction to multilevel social networks. Soc Networks. 2016;44:266–8.CrossRef
37.
Latkin CA, Knowlton AR. Social network assessments and interventions for health behaviour change: a critical review. Behav Med. 2015;41(3):90–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Christakis NA. Social networks and health: a systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;125:60–78.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Valente TW, Pitts SR. An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health: challenges and opportunities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:103–18.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Huitsing G, Van Duijn MAJ, Snijders TAB, Wang P, Sainio M, Salmivalli C, et al. Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: liking, disliking, and bully–victim relationships. Soc Networks. 2012;34(4):645–57.CrossRef
41.
Labianca G, Brass DJ. Exploring the social ledger: negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31:596–614.CrossRef
42.
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Flemming K. Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using critical interpretive synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(1):201–17.CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
Shakya HB, Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Self-comparisons as motivators for healthy behaviour. Obesity. 2015;23(12):2477–84.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences, revisited. The sage handbook of qualitative research. United States: Sage Publications; 2011.
47.
Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, et al. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006;6(1):27–44.CrossRef
48.
Alvarado M, Murphy MM, Guell C. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity amongst overweight and obese women in an afro-Caribbean population: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2015;12:97.CrossRef
49.
Kennedy A, Rogers A, Vassilev I, Todorova E, Roukova P, Foss C, et al. Dynamics and nature of support in the personal networks of people with type 2 diabetes living in Europe: qualitative analysis of network properties. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):3172–85.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Forthofer M, Burroughs-Girardi E, Stoisor-Olsson L, Wilcox S, Sharpe PA, Pekuri LM. Use of formative research and social network theory to develop a group walking intervention: Sumter County on the move! Eval Program Plann. 2016;58:28–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Knutsen IR, Foss IC, Todorova E, Roukova P, Kennedy A, Portillo MC, et al. Negotiating diet in networks: a cross-European study of the experiences of managing type 2 diabetes. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(3):299–310.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Ali HI, Baynouna LM, Bernsen RM. Barriers and facilitators of weight management: perspectives of Arab women at risk for type 2 diabetes. Health Soc Care Community. 2010;18(2):219–28.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Mama SK, McCurdy SA, Evans AE, Thompson DI, Diamond PM, Lee RE. Using community insight to understand physical activity adoption in overweight and obese African American and Hispanic women: a qualitative study. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(3):321–8.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Robertson A, Mullan B, Todd J. A qualitative exploration of experiences of overweight young and older adults. An application of the integrated behaviour model. Appetite. 2014;75:157–64.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Sriram U, Morgan E, Graham M, Folta S, Seguin R. Support and sabotage: a qualitative study of social influences on health behaviors among rural adults. J Rural Health. 2018;34:88–97.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Daborn C, Dibsall L, Lambert N. Understanding the food related experiences and beliefs of a specific group of low-income men in the UK. Health Educ. 2005;105(2):109–25.CrossRef
57.
Bell R, Smith C, Hale L, Kira G, Tumilty S. Understanding obesity in the context of an indigenous population-a qualitative study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11(5):558–66.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Procter S, Mutrie N, Davis A, Audrey S. Views and experiences of behaviour change techniques to encourage walking to work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Vassilev I, Rogers A, Kennedy WM, Koetsenruijter J, Orlando R, et al. Social Network Type and Long-Term Condition Management Support: A Cross-Sectional Study in Six European Countries. PloS One. 2016;11(8):e0161027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
O'Malley AJ, Arbesman S, Steiger DM, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Egocentric social network structure, health, and pro-social behaviours in a national panel study of Americans. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Conklin AI, Forouhi NG, Surtees P, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Monsivais P. Social relationships and healthful dietary behaviour: evidence from over-50s in the EPIC cohort. UK Soc Sci Med. 2014;100:167–75.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Mötteli S, Siegrist M, Keller C. Women's social eating environment and its associations with dietary behavior and weight management. Appetite. 2017;110:86–93.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Barclay KJ, Edling C, Rydgren J. Peer clustering of exercise and eating behaviours among young adults in Sweden: a cross-sectional study of egocentric network data. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:784.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Winston GJ, Phillips EG, Wethington E, Devine C, Wells M, Peterson JC, et al. Social network characteristics associated with weight loss among black and hispanic adults. Obesity. 2015;23(8):1570–6.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Becofsky KM, Shook RP, Sui X, Wilcox S, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Influence of the source of social support and size of social network on all-cause mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(7):895–902.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Rancourt D, Leahey TM, LaRose JG, Crowther JH. Effects of weight-focused social comparisons on diet and activity outcomes in overweight and obese young women. Obesity. 2015;23(1):85–9.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Hempler NF, Joensen LE, Willaing I. Relationship between social network, social support and health behaviour in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional studies. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Hong QN, Pluye P, Bujold M, Wassef M. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Syst rev. 2017;6(1):61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Roberts KA, Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1596–9.CrossRefPubMed
71.
72.
Schütz A. Collected papers 1. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague; 1962.
73.
Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–907.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Schreiber R, Crooks D, Stern PN. Qualitative Meta-analysis. In: Morse JM, editor. Completing a Qualitative Project: Details and Dialogue. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage; 1997. p. 311–26.
75.
Portillo MC, Regaira E, Pumar-Méndez MJ, Mujika A, Vassilev I, Rogers A. Voluntary organizations and community groups as new partners in diabetes self-management and education: a critical interpretative synthesis. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41(5):550–68.CrossRefPubMed
76.
McFerran KS, Hense C, Medcalf L, Murphy M, Fairchild R. Integrating emotions into the critical interpretive synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(1):13–23.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Lin S, Melendez-Torres GJ. Critical interpretive synthesis of barriers and facilitators to TB treatment in immigrant populations. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22(10):1206–22.CrossRef
78.
Given LM. 100 questions (and answers) about qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2016.
79.
Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.
80.
Olshansky EF. Generating theory using grounded theory methodology. In: de Chesnay M, editor. Nursing research using grounded theory: qualitative designs and methods in nursing. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 19–28.
81.
Bolíbar M. Macro, meso, micro: broadening the ‘social’ of social network analysis with a mixed methods approach. Qual Quant. 2016;50(5):2217–36.CrossRef
82.
Arias N, Calvo M, Benítez-Andrades J, Álvarez M, Alonso-Cortés B, Benavides C. Socioeconomic status in adolescents: a study of its relationship with overweight and obesity and influence on social network configuration. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2018;15(9):2014.CrossRef
83.
Portillo MC, Kennedy A, Todorova E, Regaira E, Wensing M, Foss C, et al. Interventions and working relationships of voluntary organisations for diabetes self-management: a cross-national study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;70:58–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
84.
Rogers A, Vassilev I, Pumar MJ, Todorova E, Portillo MC, Foss C, et al. Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
85.
Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Edwards HM, Foster MK, Breslau ES, Chollette V, et al. Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer I. 2012;2012(44):2–10.
86.
Bellotti E. Qualitative networks. Oxford: Routledge; 2015.
87.
Rogers, A., Brooks, H., Vassilev, I., Kennedy, A., Blickem, C. and Reeves, D., 2014. Why less may be more: a mixed methods study of the work and relatedness of ‘weak ties’ in supporting long-term condition self-management. Implementation science, 9(1), p.19.
88.
89.
Cohen-Cole E, Fletcher JM. Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. J Health Econ. 2008;27(5):1382–7.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(51):21544–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
91.
Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2010;51:843–57.CrossRef
92.
93.
Nam S, Redeker N, Whittemore R. Social networks and future direction for obesity research: a scoping review. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:299–317.CrossRefPubMed
94.
Kristal AR, Patterson RE, Glanz K, Heimendinger J, Hebert JR, Feng Z, et al. Psychosocial correlates of healthful diets: baseline results from the working well study. Prev Med. 1995;24(3):221–8.CrossRefPubMed
95.
Sarkar U, Fisher L, Schillinger D. Is self-efficacy associated with diabetes self-management across race/ethnicity and health literacy? Diabetes Care. 2006;29(4):823–9.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Lazega E, Snijders TA. Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences: theory, methods and applications. New York: Springer; 2015.
97.
Degenne A, Forsé M. Introducing social networks. London: Sage Publications; 1999.CrossRef
98.
Bottero W, Crossley N. Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cult Sociol. 2011;5:99–119.CrossRef
99.
Lozares C, Martín-Artiles A, López-Roldán P. El tratamiento multiestratégico en la investigación sociológica. Papers Revista de Sociologia. 1998;55:27–43.CrossRef
100.
Sayer A. Method in social science. A realist approach. London: Routledge; 1992.
Metadata
Title
Social network influences and the adoption of obesity-related behaviours in adults: a critical interpretative synthesis review
Authors
Nestor Serrano Fuentes
Anne Rogers
Mari Carmen Portillo
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Obesity
Obesity
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7467-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Acute and mixed alcohol intoxications in asylum seekers presenting to an urban emergency department in Switzerland

Research article

The price of personal mobility: burden of injury and mortality from personal mobility devices in Singapore - a nationwide cohort study

Research article

SKIP (Supporting Kids with diabetes In Physical activity): Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a digital intervention for 9-12 year olds with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Research article

Recurrent sick leave and resignation rates among female cancer survivors after return to work: the Japan sickness absence and return to work (J-SAR) study

Research article

Factors influencing high respiratory mortality in coal-mining counties: a repeated cross-sectional study

Research article

“They say that I have lost my integrity by breaking my virginity”: experiences of teen school going mothers in two schools in Lusaka Zambia