Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Factors associated with social casino gaming among adolescents across game types

Authors: Livia Veselka, Rochelle Wijesingha, Scott T Leatherdale, Nigel E Turner, Tara Elton-Marshall

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the proliferation of social casino games (SCGs) online, which offer the opportunity to gamble without monetary gains and losses, comes a growing concern regarding the effects of these unregulated games on public health, particularly among adolescents. However, given the limited research pertaining to SCG use, little is currently known about the manner in which adolescents engage with this new gambling medium. The present study aims to identify the factors that characterize adolescent social casino gamers, and to determine whether these factors differ by SCG type. Moreover, the study examines the extent to which social casino gaming is associated with monetary gambling and problem gambling in this cohort.

Method

Data were obtained from students in Grades 9 to 12 (n = 10,035) residing in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Participants completed the Youth Gambling Survey (YGS), which is a supplementary instrument administered alongside the Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey (CSTADS). Logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with SCG play.

Results

Overall, 12.4% of respondents reported having participated in SCGs in the past three months. Compared to adolescents who did not report playing SCGs, SCG players were typically more likely to participate in monetary gambling activities, and were more prevalently classified as problem gamblers of low-to-moderate severity or high severity. Although profiles of SCG players differed across SCG game types, factors significantly associated with the playing of SCGs were gender, weekly spending money, having friends and parents who gamble, and screen time. It was also shown that current smokers were significantly more likely to participate in simulated slots online relative to adolescents who did not play SCGs.

Conclusion

Significant associations exist between SCG play, monetary gambling, and problem gambling among adolescents. Gambling intervention efforts directed at this population should aim to identify personal and environmental factors associated with social casino gaming, and should be tailored to different types of SCGs.
Literature
1.
Gainsbury S, Hing N, Delfabbro PH, King DL. A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14(2):196–213.CrossRef
2.
Parke J, Wardle H, Rigbye J, Parke A. Exploring social gambling: scoping, classification and evidence review. London: Report Commissioned by the UK Gambling Commission. The Gambling Lab; 2013.
3.
Nettleton J, Huang M. Review of the interactive gambling act 2001: implications for internet gambling in Australia. Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2013;17(2):129–33.CrossRef
4.
Rose IN, Owens MD. Internet gaming law. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert; 2009.
5.
Alha K, Koskinen E, Paavilainen J, Hamari J, Kinnunen J: Free-to-play games: professionals’ perspectives. Nordic DiGRA 2014 2014:.
6.
Kim HS, Hollingshead S, Wohl MJ. Who spends money to play for free? Identifying who makes micro-transactions on social casino games (and why). J Gambl Stud. 2017;33(2):525–38.CrossRef
7.
Owens MD Jr. If you Can’t tweet ‘Em, join ‘Em: the new media, hybrid games, and gambling law. Gaming Law Review and Economics. 2010;14(9):669–72.CrossRef
8.
Morgan Stanley Report. Social gambling: Click here to play. New York: Morgan Stanley Research; 2012.
9.
SuperData Research: Social casino metrics. 2012.
10.
Gainsbury S, Russell A, Hing N. An investigation of social casino gaming among land-based and internet gamblers: a comparison of sociodemographic characteristics, gambling and co-morbidities. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;33:126–35.CrossRef
11.
Gainsbury S, King D, Delfabbro P, Hing N, Russell A, Blaszczynski A, Derevensky J. The use of social media in gambling. Australia: Gambling Research; 2015.
12.
Ipsos MORI. British survey of children, the national lottery and gambling 2008–09: report of a quantitative survey. London: National Lottery Commission; 2009.
13.
Ipsos MORI. Underage gambling in England and Wales: a research study among 11–16 year olds on behalf of the National Lottery Commission. London: Author; 2011.
14.
King DL, Delfabbro PH, Kaptisis D, Zwaans T. Adolescent simulated gambling via digital and social media: an emerging problem. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:305–13.CrossRef
15.
Wijesingha R, Leatherdale ST, Turner NE, Elton-Marshall T. Factors associated with adolescent online and land-based gambling in Canada. Addict Res Theory. 2017;25(6):525–32.CrossRef
16.
17.
Derevensky JL, Gainsbury SM. Social casino gaming and adolescents: should we be concerned and is regulation in sight? Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;44:1–6.CrossRef
18.
Gainsbury SM, King DL, Russell AM, Delfabbro P, Hing N. Virtual addictions: an examination of problematic social casino game use among at-risk gamblers. Addict Behav. 2017;64:334–9.CrossRef
19.
Griffiths M. Gaming in social networking sites: a growing concern? World Online Gambl. 2010;9:12–3.
20.
Gainsbury SM, Russell AM, King DL, Delfabbro P, Hing N. Migration from social casino games to gambling: motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:59–67.CrossRef
21.
Kim HS, Wohl MJA, Salmon MM, Gupta R, Derevensky J. Do social casino gamers migrate to online gambling? An assessment of migration rate and potential predictors. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(4):1819–31.CrossRef
22.
King DL, Russell A, Gainsbury S, Delfabbro PH, Hing N. The cost of virtual wins: an examination of gambling-related risks in youth who spend money on social casino games. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(3):401–9.CrossRef
23.
King DL, Delfabbro PH. Early exposure to digital simulated gambling: a review and conceptual model. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:198–206.CrossRef
24.
Wohl MJ, Salmon MM, Hollingshead SJ, Kim HS. An examination of the relationship between social casino gaming and gambling: the bad, the ugly, and the good. J Gambl Iss. 2017;35:1–23.CrossRef
25.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRef
26.
Dussault F, Brunelle N, Kairouz S, Rousseau M, Leclerc D, Tremblay J, Cousineau M-M, Dufour M. Transition from playing with simulated gambling games to gambling with real money: a longitudinal study in adolescence. Int Gambl Stud. 2017;17(3):386–400.CrossRef
27.
McBride J, Derevensky J. Internet gambling and risk-taking among students: an exploratory study. J Behav Addict. 2012;1(2):50–8.CrossRef
28.
Hayer T, Kalke J, Meyer G, Brosowski T. Do simulated gambling activities predict gambling with real money during adolescence? Empirical findings from a longitudinal study. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34(3):929–47.CrossRef
29.
Abarbanel B, Rahman A. eCommerce market convergence in action: social casinos and real money gambling. UNLV Gaming Res Rev J. 2015;19(1):51–62.
30.
Gainsbury SM, King DL, Russell AM, Delfabbro P. Who pays to play freemium games? The profiles and motivations of players who make purchases within social casino games. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(2):221–30.CrossRef
31.
Hollingshead SJ, Kim HS, Wohl MJA, Derevensky JL. The social casino gaming-gambling link: motivation for playing social casino games determines whether self-reported gambling increases or decreases among disordered gamblers. J Gambl Iss. 2016;33:52–67.CrossRef
32.
Jacobs DF. Juvenile gambling in North America: an analysis of long term trends and future prospects. J Gambl Stud. 2000;16:119–52.CrossRef
33.
McCormack A, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD. An empirical study of gender differences in online gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(1):71–88.CrossRef
34.
Wood RT, Williams RJ. A comparative profile of the internet gambler: demographic characteristics, game-play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media Soc. 2011;13(7):1123–41.CrossRef
35.
González-Ibáñez A, Mora M, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J, Ariza A, Lourido-Ferreira MR. Pathological gambling and age: differences in personality, psychopathology, and response to treatment variables. Addict Behav. 2005;30(2):383–8.CrossRef
36.
Petry NM. A comparison of young, middle-aged, and older adult treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. The Gerontologist. 2002;42(1):92–9.CrossRef
37.
Campbell C, Derevensky J, Meerkamper E, Cutajar J. Parents’ perceptions of adolescent gambling: a Canadian national study. J Gambl Iss. 2011;25:36–53.CrossRef
38.
King D, Delfabbro P, Griffiths M. The convergence of gambling and digital media: implications for gambling in young people. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(2):175–87.CrossRef
39.
Wong ILK, So EMT. Internet gambling among high school students in Hong Kong. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30:565–76.CrossRef
40.
Wood R, Williams R. Internet gambling: prevalence, patterns, problems and policy options. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2009.
41.
Yani-de-Soriano M, Javed U, Yousafzai S. Can an industry be socially responsible if its products harm consumers? The case of online gambling. J Bus Ethics. 2012;110(4):481–97.CrossRef
42.
Casey M, Harvey J, Telford A, Eime R, Mooney A, Payne W. Patterns of time use among regional and rural adolescent girls: associations with correlates of physical activity and health-related quality of life. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(11):931–5.CrossRef
43.
Floros G, Paradisioti A, Hadjimarcou M, Mappouras DG, Karkanioti O, Siomos K. Adolescent online gambling in Cyprus: associated school performance and psychopathology. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:367–84.CrossRef
44.
Potenza MN, Wareham JD, Steinberg MA, Rugle L, Cavallo DA, Krishnan-Sarin S, Desai RA. Correlates of at-risk/problem internet gambling in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(2):150–9.CrossRef
45.
Moore TL. Older Gambling in Oregon: An Epidemiological Survey. Salem: Oregon Gambling Addiction Treatment Foundation; 2001.
46.
O’Brien Cousins S, Witcher CSG. Who plays bingo in later life? The sedentary lifestyles of ‘little old ladies. J Gambl Stud. 2007;23(1):95–112.CrossRef
47.
Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep. 2011;22(1):15–23.PubMed
48.
Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie C, Looze M, Roberts C. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Copenhagen: World Health Organization regional office for Europe; 2012.
49.
Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP. Use of social networking sites and adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations in adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(5):474–80.CrossRef
50.
Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(3):292–9.CrossRef
51.
Wechsler H, Nelson TF. Binge drinking and the American college students: What’s five drinks? Psychol Addict Behav. 2001;15(4):287.CrossRef
52.
Muthen BO, Muthen LK. The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a US national sample. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(2):290–300.CrossRef
53.
Miller JW, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Jones SE. Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):76–85.CrossRef
54.
Valois RF, McKeown RE, Garrison CZ, Vincent ML. Correlates of aggressive and violent behaviors among public high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16(1):26–34.CrossRef
55.
Walker DM, Clark C, Folk JL. The relationship between gambling behavior and binge drinking, hard drug use, and paying for sex. UNLV Gaming Res Rev J. 2010;14(1):2.
56.
Colasante E, Gori M, Bastiani L, Scalese M, Siciliano V, Molinaro S. Italian adolescent gambling behaviour: psychometric evaluation of the south oaks gambling screen: revised for adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(4):789–801.CrossRef
57.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Rohde P, Seeley JR, Rohling ML. Individual, family, and peer correlates of adolescent gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2004;20(1):23–46.CrossRef
58.
Donovan JE, Jessor R. Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(6):890–904.CrossRef
59.
Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR. The generality of deviance. In: Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR, editors. The generality of deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction; 1994. p. 1–22.
60.
LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Disordered gambling, type of gambling and gambling involvement in the British gambling prevalence survey 2007. Euro J Pub Health. 2009;21(4):532–7.CrossRef
61.
Volberg RA, Gupta R, Griffiths MD, Olason DT, Delfabbro P. An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010;22:3–38.PubMed
62.
Elton-Marshall T, Leatherdale S, Holtby L, Burkhalter R, Holtby L, Wijesingha R. Project Youth Gambling Survey: A national gambling monitoring survey among Canadian youth. Waterloo: Gambling Research and Exchange Ontario (GREO); 2015.
63.
Burkhalter R, Holtby L. 2012-2013 Youth gambling survey data description document. Waterloo: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact; 2013. p. 1–14.
64.
Burkhalter R, Cumming T, Rynard V, Manske S. 2012/2013 youth smoking survey microdata user guide. Waterloo: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo; 2013.
65.
Elton-Marshall T, Leatherdale ST, Turner NE. An examination of internet and land-based gambling among adolescents in three Canadian provinces: results from the youth gambling survey (YGS). BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):277.CrossRef
66.
Tremblay J, Stinchfield R, Wiebe J, Wynne H. Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory (CAGI) Phase III Final Report. In: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and the Interprovincial Consortium on Gambling Research; 2010.
67.
Stinchfield R. Gambling among Minnesota public school students from 1992 to 2007: declines in youth gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25:108–17.CrossRef
68.
St-Pierre R, Derevensky JL, Temcheff CE, Gupta R. Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: examination of an extended theory of planned behaviour. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15(3):506–25.CrossRef
69.
Turner NE, Elton-Marshall T, Shi J, Wiebe J, Boak A, van der Maas M, Mann RE. Cross validation of the gambling problem severity subscale of the Canadian adolescent gambling index (CAGI/GPSS) on a sample of Ontario high school students. J Gambl Stud. 2017;34(2):521–37.CrossRef
70.
Bondy SJ, Victor JC, Diemert LM. Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys. Tob Control. 2009;18:317–23.CrossRef
71.
Copley T, Lovato C, O’Connor S. Indicators for monitoring tobacco control: a resource for decision-makers, evaluators and researchers. Toronto, ON: Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative; 2006.
72.
Centers for Disease Control: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: 2010 summary data quality report 2011.
73.
Health Canada. Microdata user guide: Canadian tobacco use monitoring survey (CTUMS): February to December 2006. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2007.
74.
Guilamo-Ramos V, Jaccard J, Turrisi R, Johansson M. Parental and school correlates of binge drinking among middle school students. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(5):894–9.CrossRef
75.
Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Popkin BM. Longitudinal physical activity and sedentary behavior trends. Adolescence to adulthood. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):277–83.CrossRef
76.
Gainsbury SM, Hing N, Delfabbro P, Dewar G, King DL. An exploratory study of interrelationships between social casino gaming, gambling, and problem gambling. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2015;13(1):136–53.CrossRef
77.
Kelley R, Todosichuk P, Azmier JJ. Gambling@home: Internet gambling in Canada. Calgary: Gambling in Canada Research Report No 15; 2001.
78.
Abarbanel BL. Differences in motivational dimensions across gambling frequency, game choice and medium of play in the United Kingdom. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14(3):472–91.CrossRef
79.
McCormack A, Griffiths MD. Motivating and inhibiting factors in online gambling behaviour: a grounded theory study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2012;10(1):39–53.CrossRef
80.
Wood RT, Williams RJ, Lawton PK. Why do internet gamblers prefer online versus landbased venues? Some preliminary findings and implications. J Gambl Iss. 2007;20:235–52.
81.
Wood RT, Griffiths MD, Parke J. Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(3):354–61.CrossRef
82.
Rose IN. Should social casino games be regulated? Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2014;18(2):134–7.CrossRef
83.
Frahn T, Delfabbro P, King DL. Exposure to free-play modes in simulated online gaming increases risk-taking in monetary gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(4):1531–43.CrossRef
84.
Forrest D, McHale IG. Gambling and problem gambling among young adolescents in Great Britain. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(4):607–22.CrossRef
85.
Holtgraves T. Gambling, gambling activities, and problem gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(2):295–302.CrossRef
86.
Beco E. Prevalence surveys of problem and pathological gambling in Europe: the cases of Germany, Holland and Spain. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(2):179–92.CrossRef
87.
Volberg RA, Steadman HJ. Accurately depicting pathological gamblers: policy and treatment implications. J Gambl Stud. 1992;8(4):401–12.CrossRef
88.
Fisher S, Griffiths M. Current trends in slot machine gambling: research and policy issues. J Gambl Stud. 1995;11(3):239–47.CrossRef
89.
Griffiths M. Gambling technologies: prospects for problem gambling. J Gambl Stud. 1999;15(3):265–83.CrossRef
90.
Broos A. Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychol Behav. 2005;8(1):21–31.CrossRef
91.
Griffiths M, Wardle H, Orford J, Sproston K, Erens B. Sociodemographic correlates of internet gambling: findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009;12:199–202.CrossRef
92.
Gray R. New Zealanders’ participation in gambling: Results from the 2010 Health and lifestyles survey. Wellington: Health Sponsorship Council; 2011.
93.
MacDonald M, McMullan JL, Perrier DC. Gambling households in Canada. J Gambl Stud. 2004;20(3):187–236.CrossRef
94.
Marshall K. The gambling industry: raising the stakes. Perspect labour income. 1998;10(4):7–11.
95.
Magoon ME, Ingersoll GM. Parental modeling, attachment, and supervision as moderators of adolescent gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2006;22(1):1–22.CrossRef
96.
Deans EG, Thomas SL, Daube M, Derevensky J. The role of peer influences on the normalisation of sports wagering: a qualitative study of Australian men. Addict Res Theory. 2017;25(2):103–13.CrossRef
97.
Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Janssen I, Kho ME, Hicks A, Murumets K, Colley RC, Duggan M. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36:59–64.CrossRef
98.
Dufour M, Brunelle N, Roy E. Are poker players all the same? Latent class analysis. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(2):441–54.CrossRef
99.
McCormack A, Griffiths MD. What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2012;10:243–57.CrossRef
100.
Henningfield JE, Heishman SJ. The addictive role of nicotine in tobacco use. Psychopharmacology. 1995;117(1):11–3.CrossRef
101.
Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;25(4):40–4.
102.
Kuentzel JG, Henderson MJ, Melville CL. The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(3):307–19.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors associated with social casino gaming among adolescents across game types
Authors
Livia Veselka
Rochelle Wijesingha
Scott T Leatherdale
Nigel E Turner
Tara Elton-Marshall
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6069-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Health behaviour changes in partners of women with recent gestational diabetes: a phase IIa trial

Research article

The role of community health workers and local leaders in reducing attrition among participant in the AIDS indicator survey and HIV incidence in a national cohort study in Rwanda

Research article

Exploring the care provided to mothers and children by community health workers in South Africa: missed opportunities to provide comprehensive care

Research article

Secondhand smoke exposure and risk of incident peripheral arterial disease and mortality: a Scotland-wide retrospective cohort study of 4045 non-smokers with cotinine measurement

Research article

Dietary patterns are influenced by socio-demographic conditions of women in childbearing age: a cohort study of pregnant women

Research article

Condom use social norms and self-efficacy with different kinds of male partners among Chinese men who have sex with men: results from an online survey