Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The application of theories of the policy process to obesity prevention: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

Authors: Brydie Clarke, Boyd Swinburn, Gary Sacks

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Theories of the policy process are recommended as tools to help explain both policy stasis and change.

Methods

A systematic review of the application of such theoretical frameworks within the field of obesity prevention policy was conducted. A meta-synthesis was also undertaken to identify the key influences on policy decision-making.

Results

The review identified 17 studies of obesity prevention policy underpinned by political science theories. The majority of included studies were conducted in the United States (US), with significant heterogeneity in terms of policy level (e.g., national, state) studied, areas of focus, and methodologies used. Many of the included studies were methodologically limited, in regard to rigour and trustworthiness. Prominent themes identified included the role of groups and networks, political institutions, and political system characteristics, issue framing, the use of evidence, personal values and beliefs, prevailing political ideology, and timing.

Conclusions

The limited application of political science theories indicates a need for future theoretically based research into the complexity of policy-making and multiple influences on obesity prevention policy processes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Roberto CA, Swinburn B, Hawkes C, Huang TTK, Costa SA, Ashe M, et al. Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. Lancet. 2015;13:2400–9.CrossRef
2.
Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378:804–14.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, Levy D, Carter R, Mabry PL, Finegood DT, et al. Changing the future of obesity: science, policy, and action. Lancet. 2011;378:838–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
Brambila-Macias J, Shankar B, Capacci S, Mazzocchi M, Perez-Cueto FJA, Verbeke W, et al. Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising. Food Nutr Bull. 2011;32:365–75.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Sacks G, Swinburn B, Lawrence M. Obesity policy action framework and analysis grids for a comprehensive policy approach to reducing obesity. Obes Rev. 2009;10:76–86.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sacks G, Swinburn BA, Lawrence MA. A systematic policy approach to changing the food system and physical activity environments to prevent obesity. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008;5:13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Mills C. Planning law and public health at an impasse in Australia: the need for targeted law reforms to improve local food environments to reduce overweight and obesity. J Law Med. 2014;22:179–87.PubMed
10.
Hawkes C, Jewell J, Allen K. A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev. 2013;14:159–68.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ. 2012;15:344. e2931.
12.
Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Orton L, Hawkes C, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, et al. Smorgasbord or symphony? Assessing public health nutrition policies across 30 European countries using a novel framework. BMC Pub Health. 2014;14:1–34.CrossRef
13.
Crammond B, Van C, Allender S, Peeters A, Lawrence M, Sacks G, et al. The possibility of regulating for obesity prevention - understanding regulation in the Commonwealth Government. Obes Rev. 2013;14:213–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hawkes C, Smith TG, Jewell J, Wardle J, Hammond RA, Friel S, et al. Smart food policies for obesity prevention. Lancet. 2015;385:2410–21.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Milio N. Nutrition policy for food-rich countries: a strategic analysis. London: The John Hopkins University Press; 1990.
21.
Lachat C, Otchere S, Roberfroid D, Abdulai A, Seret FMA, Milesevic J, et al. Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review. PLoS Med. 2013;10:1–19.CrossRef
22.
23.
24.
Swinburn B, Kraak V, Rutter H, Vandevijvere S, Lobstein T, Sacks G, et al. Strengthening of accountability systems to create healthy food environments and reduce global obesity. Lancet. 2015;385:2534–45.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Brownell KD, Battle HK. Food fight: inside story of the food industry, America's obesity crisis, and what we can do about it. Los Angeles: Contemporary Books; 2004.
26.
Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, et al. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381:670–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Bowen S, Zwi AB, Sainsbury P, Whitehead M. Killer facts, politics and other influences: what evidence triggered early childhood intervention policies in Australia? Evid Policy. 2009;5:5–32.CrossRef
28.
Boswell J. ‘Hoisted with our own petard’: evidence and democratic deliberation on obesity. Policy Sci. 2014;47:345–65.CrossRef
29.
30.
Finegood DT, Merth TDN, Rutter H. Implications of the foresight obesity system map for solutions to childhood obesity. Obesity. 2010;18:S13–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Allender S, Gleeson E, Crammond B, Sacks G, Lawrence M, Peeters A, et al. Policy change to create supportive environments for physical activity and healthy eating: which options are the most realistic for local government? Health Promot Int. 2012;27:261–74.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Shill J, Mavoa H, Allender S, Lawrence M, Sacks G, Peeters A, et al. Government regulation to promote healthy food environments-a view from inside state governments. Obes Rev. 2012;13:162–73.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Shill J, Mavoa H, Crammond B, Loff B, Peeters A, Lawrence M, et al. Regulation to create environments conducive to physical activity: understanding the barriers and facilitators at the Australian state government level. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42831.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Huang TTK, Cawley JH, Ashe M, Costa SA, Frerichs LM, Zwicker L, et al. Mobilisation of public support for policy actions to prevent obesity. Lancet. 2015;385:2422–31.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Clark R, Waters E, Armstrong R, Conning R, Allender S, Swinburn B. Evidence and obesity prevention: developing evidence summaries to support decision making. Evid Pol J Res Deb Pract. 2013;9:547–56.CrossRef
36.
Allender S, Cavill N, Parker M, Foster C. 'Tell us something we don't already know or do!' - The response of planning and transport professionals to public health guidance on the built environment and physical activity. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:102–16.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Johnson DB, Quinn EL, Podrabsky M, Beckwith-Stanley N, Chan N, Ellings A, et al. Perceived impact and feasibility of strategies to improve access to healthy foods in Washington State, USA. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:2178–87.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Sadler RC, Gilliland JA, Arku G. Stakeholder and policy maker perception of key issues in food systems planning and policy making. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2014;9(1):1–15.CrossRef
39.
Waqa G, Mavoa H, Snowdon W, Moodie M, Schultz J, McCabe M, et al. Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation. Implement Sci. 2013;8:1–11.CrossRef
40.
Walton M, Signal L, Thomson G. Public policy to promote healthy nutrition in schools: views of policymakers. Health Educ J. 2013;72:283–91.CrossRef
41.
Johnson DB, Cheadle A, Podrabsky M, Quinn E, MacDougall E, Cechovic K, et al. Advancing nutrition and obesity policy through cross-sector collaboration: the Local Farms-Healthy Kids initiative in Washington State. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2013;8:171–86.CrossRef
42.
Abeysinghe S. ‘Because we all know that vaccines are an extremely effective public health tool’: path dependency, H1N1 and the World Health Organisation. Policy Stud. 2012;33:381–97.CrossRef
43.
Lasswell HD. The decision process: seven categories of functional analysis. College Park: University of Maryland Press; 1956.
44.
45.
Breton E, De Leeuw E. Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review. Health Promot Int. 2011;26:82–90.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Using political science to progress public health nutrition: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2015;19:1–9.
48.
Sabatier P, Weible CM. Theories of the policy process. Oxford: Westview Press; 2014.
49.
50.
51.
Gomez EJ. Understanding the United States and Brazil's response to obesity: institutional conversion, policy reform, and the lessons learned. Global Health. 2015;11:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Houlihan B, Green M. The changing status of school sport and physical education: explaining policy change. Sport Educ Soc. 2006;11:73–92.CrossRef
53.
Phillpots L. An analysis of the policy process for physical education and school sport: the rise and demise of school sport partnerships. Int J Sports Policy Polit. 2012;5:193–211.CrossRef
54.
Reid G, Thornburn M. Analysing policy change in Scottish physical education and school sport. J Policy Res Tourism Leisure Events. 2011;3:298–315.CrossRef
55.
Walsh D, Downe S. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50:204–11.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Crotty M. The foundations of social research Sydney: Allen and Unwin. 1998.
57.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.
58.
John P. Analysing public policy. New York: Routledge; 2012.
59.
Cairney P. Understanding public policy: theories and issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; 2012.CrossRef
60.
61.
Cairney P, Heikkila T. A comparison of theories of the policy process. Oxford: Westview Press; 2014.
62.
Freudenberg N, Atkinson S. Getting food policy on the Mayoral table: a comparison of two election cycles in New York and London. Public Health. 2015;129:295–302.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Thow AM, Annan R, Mensah L, Chowdhury SN. Development, implementation and outcome of standards to restrict fatty meat in the food supply and prevent NCDs: learning from an innovative trade/food policy in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:249–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Mosier SL. Cookies, candy, and coke: examining state sugar-sweetened-beverage tax policy from a multiple streams approach. Int Rev Public Adm. 2013;18:93–120.
65.
Quinn E, Johnson DB, Krieger J, MacDougall E, Payne E, Chan NL. Developing local board of health guidelines to promote healthy food access - King County, Washington, 2010–2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22.CrossRef
67.
68.
Craig RL, Felix HC, Walker JF, Phillips MM. Public health professionals as policy entrepreneurs: Arkansas's childhood obesity policy experience. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2047–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Dodson EA, Fleming C, Boehmer TK, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA, Brownson RC. Preventing childhood obesity through state policy: qualitative assessment of enablers and barriers. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:S161–76.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Gladwin CP, Church J, Plotnikoff RC. Public policy processes and getting physical activity into Alberta's urban schools. Can J Public Health. 2008;99:332–8.PubMed
71.
Khayesi M, Amekudzi AA. Kingdon’s multiple streams model and automobile dependence reversal path: the case of Curitiba. Brazil J Transp Geogr. 2011;19:1547–52.CrossRef
72.
McBeth MK, Clemons RS, Husmann MA, Kusko E, Gaarden A. The social construction of a crisis: policy narratives and contemporary U.S. obesity policy. Risk Hazard Cris Public Policy. 2013;4:135–63.CrossRef
73.
Olstad DL, Campbell EJ, Raine KD, Nykiforuk CIJ. A multiple case history and systematic review of adoption, diffusion, implementation and impact of provincial daily physical activity policies in Canadian schools. BMC Pub Health. 2015;15:385.CrossRef
74.
Ulmer VM, Rathert AR, Rose D. Understanding policy enactment: the New Orleans fresh food retailer initiative. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:S116–22.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Milton K, Grix J. Public health policy and walking in England-analysis of the 2008 'policy window'. BMC Pub Health. 2015;15:614.CrossRef
76.
Yeatman HR. Food and nutrition policy at the local level: key factors that influence the policy development process. Crit Pub Health. 2003;13:125–38.CrossRef
77.
Johnson DB, Payne EC, McNeese MA, Allen D. Menu-labeling policy in King County, Washington. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:S130–5.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Botterill LC, Hindmoor A. Turtles all the way down: bounded rationality in an evidence-based age. Policy Stud. 2012;33:367–79.CrossRef
79.
Cairney P. Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Polit Stud Rev. 2012;10:346–58.CrossRef
80.
Colebatch H. Policy. New York: McGraw- Hill Education; 2008.
81.
Sabatier P. Theories of the policy process. Theoretical lenses on public policy. Boulder: Westview Press; 1999.
82.
Olstad DL, Raine KD, McCargar LJ. Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: tensions between public health and corporate profitability. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:815–23.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Weible CM. Introducing the scope and focus of policy process research and theory. In: Sabatier P, Weible CM, editors. Theories of the policy process. 3rd ed. Oxford: Westview Press; 2014. p. 3–24.
84.
Zahariadis N. Ambiguity and multiple streams. In: Sabatier P, Weible CM, editors. Theories of the policy process. 3rd ed. Oxford: Westview Press; 2014. p. 25–59.
85.
Zahariadis N. The multiple streams, framework- structure, limitations, prospects. In: Sabatier P, editor. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007. p. 65–92.
86.
Schagler E. A comparison of frameworks, theories and models of policy processes. In: Sabatier P, editor. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007. p. 293–320.
87.
Brunner S. Understanding policy change: multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany. Glob Environ Chang. 2008;18:501–7.CrossRef
88.
Ackrill R, Kay A, Zahariadis N. Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. J Euro Public Polic. 2013;20:871–87.CrossRef
89.
Jenkins-Smith H, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: foundations, evolution and ongoing research. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM, editors. Theories of the policy process. 3rd ed. Oxford: Westview Press; 2014. p. 183–224.
90.
Nowlin MC. Theories of the policy process: state of the research and emerging trends. Policy Stud J. 2011;39:41–60.CrossRef
91.
Breton E, Richard L, Gagnon F, Jacques M, Bergeron P. Health promotion research and practice require sound policy analysis models: the case of Quebec's Tobacco Act. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1679.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Eller W, Krutz G. Policy process, scholarship, and the road ahead: an introduction to the 2008 policy shootout! Policy Stud J. 2009;37:1–4.CrossRef
93.
Cairney P. Standing on the shoulders of giants: how do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Stud J. 2013;41:1–21.CrossRef
94.
Meier KJ. Policy theory, policy theory everywhere: ravings of a deranged policy scholar. Policy Stud J. 2009;37:5–11.CrossRef
95.
Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M. Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q. 2009;87:7–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
96.
Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Gollust SE. Framing childhood obesity: how individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention. Polit Psychol. 2013;34:327–49.CrossRef
97.
Gollust SE, Niederdeppe J, Barry CL. Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:e96–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Lee TK, Shapiro MA, Niederdeppe J. Deeper processing is associated with support for policies to reduce obesity. Health Commun. 2014;29:791–801.CrossRefPubMed
99.
Jones MD, McBeth MK. A narrative policy framework: clear enough to be wrong? Policy Stud J. 2010;38:329–53.CrossRef
100.
Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making health policy. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2005.
101.
Armstrong R, Waters E, Jackson N, Oliver S, Popay J, Shepherd J, Petticrew M, Anderson L, Bailie R, Brunton G, Hawe P, Kristjansson E, Naccarella L, Norris S, Pienaar E, Roberts H, Rogers W, Sowden A, Thomas H. Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Melbourne: University Melbourne Press; 2007.
102.
103.
104.
Metadata
Title
The application of theories of the policy process to obesity prevention: a systematic review and meta-synthesis
Authors
Brydie Clarke
Boyd Swinburn
Gary Sacks
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3639-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Gaps in awareness of peripheral arterial disease in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study

Research article

The first mile: community experience of outbreak control during an Ebola outbreak in Luwero District, Uganda

Research article

Overweight and obesity epidemic in Ghana—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research article

More active pre-school children have better motor competence at school starting age: an observational cohort study

Study protocol

The efficacy of mobile phone-based text message interventions (‘Happy Quit’) for smoking cessation in China

Research article

The involvement of young people in school- and community-based noncommunicable disease prevention interventions: a scoping review of designs and outcomes