Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology

Authors: Sandra van Dulmen, Ruud Roodbeen, Lotte Schulze, Karen Prantl, Maarten Rookmaaker, Brigit van Jaarsveld, Janneke Noordman, Alferso Abrahams

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Given the complexity and variety in treatment options for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), shared decision-making (SDM) can be a challenge. SDM is needed for making decisions that best suit patients’ needs and their medical and living situations. SDM might be experienced differently by different stakeholders. This study aimed to explore clinical practice and perspectives on SDM in nephrology from three angles: observers, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Methods

An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. First, in the quantitative part of the study, outpatient consultations with patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 20 ml/min) were video recorded and SDM was assessed using the OPTION5 instrument. Subsequently, in the qualitative part, patients and HCPs reflected on their own SDM behaviour during individual stimulated recall interviews which were analysed using deductive thematic content analysis.

Results

Twenty nine consultations were recorded and observed in seven hospitals. The mean SDM score was 51 (range 25–80), indicating that SDM was applied to a moderate extent. The stimulated recall interviews with patients showed that they rely on the information provision and opinion of HCPs, expect consistency and support, and desire a proactive role. They also expect to be questioned by the HCP about their SDM preferences. HCPs said they were willing to incorporate patients’ preferences in SDM, as long as there are no medical contraindications. They also prefer patients to take a prominent role in SDM. HCPs ascribe various roles to themselves in supporting patients’ decision-making.

Conclusions

Although SDM was applied by HCPs to a moderate extent, improvement is needed, especially in helping patients get the information they need and in making sure that every patient is involved in SDM. This is even more important given the complex nature of the disease and the relatively high prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with chronic kidney disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hoekstra T, Dekker FW, Cransberg K, Bos WJ, Van Buren M, Hemmelder MH. RENINE annual report 2018 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 29]. Available from: www.nefrovisie.nl Hoekstra T, Dekker FW, Cransberg K, Bos WJ, Van Buren M, Hemmelder MH. RENINE annual report 2018 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 29]. Available from: www.​nefrovisie.​nl
3.
go back to reference Ishani A, Slinin Y, Greer N, MacDonald R, Messana J, Rutks I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of home-based kidney Dialysis versus in-center or other outpatient kidney Dialysis locations – a systematic review. Comp eff home-based kidney dial versus in-center or other outpatient kidney dial Locat A Syst Rev [Internet] 2015 Mar 4 [cited 2021 Feb 1]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937543 Ishani A, Slinin Y, Greer N, MacDonald R, Messana J, Rutks I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of home-based kidney Dialysis versus in-center or other outpatient kidney Dialysis locations – a systematic review. Comp eff home-based kidney dial versus in-center or other outpatient kidney dial Locat A Syst Rev [Internet] 2015 Mar 4 [cited 2021 Feb 1]; Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​26937543
4.
go back to reference Morton RL, Snelling P, Webster AC, Rose J, Masterson R, Johnson DW, et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):102–11.CrossRef Morton RL, Snelling P, Webster AC, Rose J, Masterson R, Johnson DW, et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):102–11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chan CT, Blankestijn PJ, Dember LM, Gallieni M, Harris DCH, Lok CE, et al. Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2019;96(1):37–47.CrossRef Chan CT, Blankestijn PJ, Dember LM, Gallieni M, Harris DCH, Lok CE, et al. Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2019;96(1):37–47.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.CrossRef Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.CrossRef Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Firanek CA, Garza S, Gellens ME, Lattrel K, Mancini A, Robar A, et al. Contrasting perceptions of home Dialysis therapies among in-center and home Dialysis staff. Nephrol Nurs J. 2016;43(3):195–205.PubMed Firanek CA, Garza S, Gellens ME, Lattrel K, Mancini A, Robar A, et al. Contrasting perceptions of home Dialysis therapies among in-center and home Dialysis staff. Nephrol Nurs J. 2016;43(3):195–205.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dulmen S van, Peereboom E, Schulze L, Prantl K, Rookmaaker M, Jaarsveld B van, Abrahams A, Roodbeen R. The use of implicit persuasion in decision-making about treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Perit Dial Int 2022; 42(4): 277–286. Dulmen S van, Peereboom E, Schulze L, Prantl K, Rookmaaker M, Jaarsveld B van, Abrahams A, Roodbeen R. The use of implicit persuasion in decision-making about treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Perit Dial Int 2022; 42(4): 277–286.
12.
go back to reference Hoekstra T, van Ittersum FJ, Hemmelder MH. Renine year report 2016. Utrecht: Nefrovisie; 2017. Hoekstra T, van Ittersum FJ, Hemmelder MH. Renine year report 2016. Utrecht: Nefrovisie; 2017.
13.
go back to reference Subedi D. Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research Community of Knowledge Claim. Am J Educ Res. 2016;4(7):570–7. Subedi D. Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research Community of Knowledge Claim. Am J Educ Res. 2016;4(7):570–7.
14.
go back to reference Arborelius E, Timpka T. In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship ? Med Teach. 1990;12(2):197–208.CrossRef Arborelius E, Timpka T. In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship ? Med Teach. 1990;12(2):197–208.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Penner LA, Orom H, Albrecht TL, Franks MM, Foster TS, Ruckdeschel JC. Camera-related behaviors during video recorded medical interactions. J Nonverbal Behav. 2007;31(2):99–117.CrossRef Penner LA, Orom H, Albrecht TL, Franks MM, Foster TS, Ruckdeschel JC. Camera-related behaviors during video recorded medical interactions. J Nonverbal Behav. 2007;31(2):99–117.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C. Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors’ consultation behaviour? Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40(340):455–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C. Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors’ consultation behaviour? Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40(340):455–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Tsulukidze M, Edwards A, Légaré F, Newcombe R. Using a “talk” model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: observer OPTION5 item. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):265–71.CrossRef Elwyn G, Tsulukidze M, Edwards A, Légaré F, Newcombe R. Using a “talk” model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: observer OPTION5 item. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):265–71.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, Tsulukidze M, Gionfriddo MR, Montori V, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of observer OPTION5, an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(8):970–6.CrossRef Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, Tsulukidze M, Gionfriddo MR, Montori V, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of observer OPTION5, an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(8):970–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015;18(4):542–61.CrossRef Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015;18(4):542–61.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Charles C, Ellis PM, Gafni A, Lovrics P, et al. Women’s perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):431–6.CrossRef O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Charles C, Ellis PM, Gafni A, Lovrics P, et al. Women’s perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):431–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Atkins S, Murphy K. Reflection: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(8):1188–92.CrossRef Atkins S, Murphy K. Reflection: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(8):1188–92.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Geessink NH, Ofstad EH, Olde Rikkert MGM, van Goor H, Kasper J, Schoon Y. Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: determinants of patients’ and observers’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(10):1767–74.CrossRef Geessink NH, Ofstad EH, Olde Rikkert MGM, van Goor H, Kasper J, Schoon Y. Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: determinants of patients’ and observers’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(10):1767–74.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference O'Conner C, Joffe H. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. Int J Qual Meth. 2020:1–13. O'Conner C, Joffe H. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. Int J Qual Meth. 2020:1–13.
25.
go back to reference Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M Jr, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277(4):350–6.CrossRef Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M Jr, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277(4):350–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding Interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding Interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Syed M, Nelson SC. Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerg Adulthood. 2015;3(6):375–87.CrossRef Syed M, Nelson SC. Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerg Adulthood. 2015;3(6):375–87.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dulmen S van, Bijnen E van. What makes them (not) talk about proper medication use with their patients? An analysis of the determinants of GP communication using reflective practice. Int J Pers Cent Med 2011;1(1):27–34. Dulmen S van, Bijnen E van. What makes them (not) talk about proper medication use with their patients? An analysis of the determinants of GP communication using reflective practice. Int J Pers Cent Med 2011;1(1):27–34.
29.
go back to reference Noordman J, Driesenaar JA, Henselmans I, Verboom J, Heijmans M, van Dulmen S. Patient participation during oncological encounters: barriers and need for supportive interventions experienced by elderly cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2262–8.CrossRef Noordman J, Driesenaar JA, Henselmans I, Verboom J, Heijmans M, van Dulmen S. Patient participation during oncological encounters: barriers and need for supportive interventions experienced by elderly cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2262–8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research, 4th ed. 4th editio. Sage, Londen, UK. SAGE Publications; 2018. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research, 4th ed. 4th editio. Sage, Londen, UK. SAGE Publications; 2018.
31.
go back to reference Henselmans I, van Laarhoven HWM, de Haes HCJM, Tokat M, Engelhardt EG, van Maarschalkerweerd PEA, et al. Training for medical oncologists on shared decision-making about palliative chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Oncologist. 2019;24(2):259–65.CrossRef Henselmans I, van Laarhoven HWM, de Haes HCJM, Tokat M, Engelhardt EG, van Maarschalkerweerd PEA, et al. Training for medical oncologists on shared decision-making about palliative chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Oncologist. 2019;24(2):259–65.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Roodbeen R, Noordman J, Boland G, van DS. Shared decision-making in practice and the perspectives of healthcare professionals on video-recorded consultations with patients with low health literacy in the palliative phase of their disease. MDM Policy Pract. 2021;6(1). Roodbeen R, Noordman J, Boland G, van DS. Shared decision-making in practice and the perspectives of healthcare professionals on video-recorded consultations with patients with low health literacy in the palliative phase of their disease. MDM Policy Pract. 2021;6(1).
33.
go back to reference Barry MJ. Shared decision making: informing and involving patients to do the right thing in health care. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35(2):90–8.CrossRef Barry MJ. Shared decision making: informing and involving patients to do the right thing in health care. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35(2):90–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.CrossRef Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dageforde LA, Cavanaugh KL. Health Literacy: Emerging Evidence and Applications in Kidney Disease Care. Vol. 20, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. W.B. Saunders; 2013. p. 311–319. Dageforde LA, Cavanaugh KL. Health Literacy: Emerging Evidence and Applications in Kidney Disease Care. Vol. 20, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. W.B. Saunders; 2013. p. 311–319.
36.
go back to reference Roh YH, Do KY, Kim JO, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Patients with limited health literacy have similar preferences but different perceptions in surgical decision-making for carpal tunnel release. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(4):846–51.CrossRef Roh YH, Do KY, Kim JO, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Patients with limited health literacy have similar preferences but different perceptions in surgical decision-making for carpal tunnel release. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(4):846–51.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference McCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK, Rovner D, Nutbeam D, Clayman ML, et al. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl. 2):1–14. McCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK, Rovner D, Nutbeam D, Clayman ML, et al. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl. 2):1–14.
38.
go back to reference Henselmans I, Heijmans M, Rademakers J, van Dulmen S. Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2375–88.CrossRef Henselmans I, Heijmans M, Rademakers J, van Dulmen S. Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2375–88.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference van der Weijden T, Post H, Brand PLP, van Veenendaal H, Drenthen T, van Mierlo LA, et al. Shared decision making, a buzz-word in the Netherlands, the pace quickens towards nationwide implementation …. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017;123–124:69–74.CrossRef van der Weijden T, Post H, Brand PLP, van Veenendaal H, Drenthen T, van Mierlo LA, et al. Shared decision making, a buzz-word in the Netherlands, the pace quickens towards nationwide implementation …. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017;123–124:69–74.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Taylor DM, Fraser SDS, Bradley JA, Bradley C, Draper H, Metcalfe W, et al. ATTOM investigators. A systematic review of the prevalence and associations of limited health literacy in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:1070–84.CrossRef Taylor DM, Fraser SDS, Bradley JA, Bradley C, Draper H, Metcalfe W, et al. ATTOM investigators. A systematic review of the prevalence and associations of limited health literacy in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:1070–84.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Berkhout-Byrne N, Gaasbeek A, Mallat MJK, Rabelink TJ, Mooijaart SP, Dekker FW, et al. Regret about the decision to start dialysis: a cross-sectional Dutch national survey. Neth J Med. 2017;75(6):225–34.PubMed Berkhout-Byrne N, Gaasbeek A, Mallat MJK, Rabelink TJ, Mooijaart SP, Dekker FW, et al. Regret about the decision to start dialysis: a cross-sectional Dutch national survey. Neth J Med. 2017;75(6):225–34.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Song MK, Hanson LC, Gilet CA, Jo M, Reed TJ, Hladik GA. Management of ethical issues related to care of seriously ill dialysis patients in free-standing facilities. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(3):343–52.CrossRef Song MK, Hanson LC, Gilet CA, Jo M, Reed TJ, Hladik GA. Management of ethical issues related to care of seriously ill dialysis patients in free-standing facilities. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(3):343–52.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Santos BP Dos, Viegas A da C, Feijó AM, Lise F, Schwartz E. It was/wasn’t everything I had imagined: advantages and disadvantages after kidney transplantation. Rev Gauch Enferm 2016;37(3):e60135. Santos BP Dos, Viegas A da C, Feijó AM, Lise F, Schwartz E. It was/wasn’t everything I had imagined: advantages and disadvantages after kidney transplantation. Rev Gauch Enferm 2016;37(3):e60135.
Metadata
Title
Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology
Authors
Sandra van Dulmen
Ruud Roodbeen
Lotte Schulze
Karen Prantl
Maarten Rookmaaker
Brigit van Jaarsveld
Janneke Noordman
Alferso Abrahams
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02887-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Nephrology 1/2022 Go to the issue