Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Peritonitis | Research

Impact of telehealth interventions added to peritoneal dialysis-care: a systematic review

Authors: Geertje K. M. Biebuyck, Aegida Neradova, Carola W. H. de Fijter, Lily Jakulj

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Telehealth could potentially increase independency and autonomy of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Moreover, it might improve clinical and economic outcomes. The demand for telehealth modalities accelerated significantly in the recent COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated current literature on the impact of telehealth interventions added to PD-care on quality of life (QoL), clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Methods

An electronic search was performed in Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library in order to find studies investigating associations between telehealth interventions and: i. QoL, including patient satisfaction; ii. Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG)-PD clinical outcomes: PD-related infections, mortality, cardiovascular disease and transfer to hemodialysis (HD); iii. Cost-effectiveness. Studies investigating hospitalizations and healthcare resource utilization were also included as secondary outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed.

Results

Sixteen reports (N = 10,373) were included. Studies varied in terms of: sample size; design; risk of bias, telehealth-intervention and duration; follow-up time; outcomes and assessment tools. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) was the most frequently studied intervention (11 reports; N = 4982). Telehealth interventions added to PD-care, and RPM in particular, might reduce transfer to HD, hospitalization rate and length, as well as the number of in-person visits. It may also improve patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

There is a need for adequately powered prospective studies to determine which telehealth-modalities might confer clinical and economic benefit to the PD-community.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brück K, Stel VS, Gambaro G, Hallan S, Völzke H, Ärnlöv J, et al. CKD prevalence varies across the European general population. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(7):2135–47.CrossRef Brück K, Stel VS, Gambaro G, Hallan S, Völzke H, Ärnlöv J, et al. CKD prevalence varies across the European general population. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(7):2135–47.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tong A, Lesmana B, Johnson DW, Wong G, Campbell D, Craig JC. The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(6):873–88.CrossRef Tong A, Lesmana B, Johnson DW, Wong G, Campbell D, Craig JC. The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(6):873–88.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Jager KJ, Segelmark M, Pascual J, Collart F, Hemke AC, et al. Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA registry over a 20-year period. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(1):120–8.CrossRef van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Jager KJ, Segelmark M, Pascual J, Collart F, Hemke AC, et al. Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA registry over a 20-year period. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(1):120–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mohnen SM, van Oosten MJM, Los J, Leegte MJH, Jager KJ, Hemmelder MH, et al. Healthcare costs of patients on different renal replacement modalities - analysis of Dutch health insurance claims data. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220800.CrossRef Mohnen SM, van Oosten MJM, Los J, Leegte MJH, Jager KJ, Hemmelder MH, et al. Healthcare costs of patients on different renal replacement modalities - analysis of Dutch health insurance claims data. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220800.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klarenbach SW, Tonelli M, Chui B, Manns BJ. Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(11):644–52.CrossRef Klarenbach SW, Tonelli M, Chui B, Manns BJ. Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(11):644–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Eck van der Sluijs A, Bonenkamp AA, Dekker FW, Abrahams AC, van Jaarsveld BC. DOMESTICO study group. Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis study to improve clinical outcomes (DOMESTICO): rationale and design. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):361.CrossRef van Eck van der Sluijs A, Bonenkamp AA, Dekker FW, Abrahams AC, van Jaarsveld BC. DOMESTICO study group. Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis study to improve clinical outcomes (DOMESTICO): rationale and design. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):361.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US renal data system 2018 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3 Suppl 1):A7–8.CrossRef Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US renal data system 2018 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3 Suppl 1):A7–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li PK-T, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Johnson DW, Jager KJ, Mehrotra R, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(2):90–103.CrossRef Li PK-T, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Johnson DW, Jager KJ, Mehrotra R, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(2):90–103.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Walker RC, Howard K, Morton RL, Palmer SC, Marshall MR, Tong A. Patient and caregiver values, beliefs and experiences when considering home dialysis as a treatment option: a semi-structured interview study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(1):133–41.CrossRef Walker RC, Howard K, Morton RL, Palmer SC, Marshall MR, Tong A. Patient and caregiver values, beliefs and experiences when considering home dialysis as a treatment option: a semi-structured interview study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(1):133–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chan CT, Collins K, Ditschman EP, Koester-Wiedemann L, Saffer TL, Wallace E, et al. Overcoming barriers for uptake and continued use of home dialysis: an NKF-KDOQI conference report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(6):926–34.CrossRef Chan CT, Collins K, Ditschman EP, Koester-Wiedemann L, Saffer TL, Wallace E, et al. Overcoming barriers for uptake and continued use of home dialysis: an NKF-KDOQI conference report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(6):926–34.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Schwetz O, Carey H, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Patients’ descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2002;22(2):184–90.CrossRef Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Schwetz O, Carey H, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Patients’ descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2002;22(2):184–90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cartwright EJ, Z ZSG, Foo M, Chan CM, Htay H, Griva K. eHealth interventions to support patients in delivering and managing peritoneal dialysis at home: a systematic review. Perit Dial Int. 2021;41(1):32-41. Cartwright EJ, Z ZSG, Foo M, Chan CM, Htay H, Griva K. eHealth interventions to support patients in delivering and managing peritoneal dialysis at home: a systematic review. Perit Dial Int. 2021;41(1):32-41.
15.
go back to reference Lew SQ, Sikka N, Thompson C, Magnus M. Impact of remote biometric monitoring on cost and hospitalization outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(10):581–6.CrossRef Lew SQ, Sikka N, Thompson C, Magnus M. Impact of remote biometric monitoring on cost and hospitalization outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(10):581–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Polanco E, Aquey M, Collado J, Campos E, Guzman J, Cuevas-Budhart MA, et al. A COVID-19 pandemic-specific, structured care process for Peritoneal Dialysis patients facilitated by Telemedicine: therapy continuity, prevention and complications management. Ther Apher Dial. 2021:1744–9987.13635). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13635. Polanco E, Aquey M, Collado J, Campos E, Guzman J, Cuevas-Budhart MA, et al. A COVID-19 pandemic-specific, structured care process for Peritoneal Dialysis patients facilitated by Telemedicine: therapy continuity, prevention and complications management. Ther Apher Dial. 2021:1744–9987.13635). Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1744-9987.​13635.
17.
go back to reference Nayak A, Karopadi A, Antony S, Sreepada S, Nayak KS. Use of a peritoneal dialysis remote monitoring system in India. Perit Dial Int. 2012;32(2):200–4.CrossRef Nayak A, Karopadi A, Antony S, Sreepada S, Nayak KS. Use of a peritoneal dialysis remote monitoring system in India. Perit Dial Int. 2012;32(2):200–4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Viglino G, Neri L, Barbieri S, Tortone C. Videodialysis: a pilot experience of telecare for assisted peritoneal dialysis. J Nephrol. 2020;33(1):177–82.CrossRef Viglino G, Neri L, Barbieri S, Tortone C. Videodialysis: a pilot experience of telecare for assisted peritoneal dialysis. J Nephrol. 2020;33(1):177–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bunch A, Ardila F, Castaño R, Quiñonez S, Corzo L. Through the storm: automated peritoneal dialysis with remote patient monitoring during COVID-19 pandemic. Blood Purif. 2021;50(3):279–82.CrossRef Bunch A, Ardila F, Castaño R, Quiñonez S, Corzo L. Through the storm: automated peritoneal dialysis with remote patient monitoring during COVID-19 pandemic. Blood Purif. 2021;50(3):279–82.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Milan Manani S, Rosner MH, Virzì GM, Giuliani A, Berti S, Crepaldi C, et al. Longitudinal experience with remote monitoring for automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron. 2019;142(1):1–9.CrossRef Milan Manani S, Rosner MH, Virzì GM, Giuliani A, Berti S, Crepaldi C, et al. Longitudinal experience with remote monitoring for automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron. 2019;142(1):1–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Milan Manani S, Baretta M, Giuliani A, Virzì GM, Martino F, Crepaldi C, et al. Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: benefits on clinical outcomes and on quality of life. J Nephrol. 2020;33(6):1301–8.CrossRef Milan Manani S, Baretta M, Giuliani A, Virzì GM, Martino F, Crepaldi C, et al. Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: benefits on clinical outcomes and on quality of life. J Nephrol. 2020;33(6):1301–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.CrossRef Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.CrossRef Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cao F, Li L, Lin M, Lin Q, Ruan Y, Hong F. Application of instant messaging software in the follow-up of patients using peritoneal dialysis, a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(15–16):3001–7.CrossRef Cao F, Li L, Lin M, Lin Q, Ruan Y, Hong F. Application of instant messaging software in the follow-up of patients using peritoneal dialysis, a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(15–16):3001–7.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Harrington DM, Myers L, Karen E, Bhise V, Nayak KS, Rosner MH. The use of a tablet computer platform to optimize the care of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: a pilot study. Blood Purif. 2014;37(4):311–5.CrossRef Harrington DM, Myers L, Karen E, Bhise V, Nayak KS, Rosner MH. The use of a tablet computer platform to optimize the care of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: a pilot study. Blood Purif. 2014;37(4):311–5.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Li J, Wang H, Xie H, Mei G, Cai W, Ye J, et al. Effects of post-discharge nurse-led telephone supportive care for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis in China: a randomized controlled trial. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34(3):278–88.CrossRef Li J, Wang H, Xie H, Mei G, Cai W, Ye J, et al. Effects of post-discharge nurse-led telephone supportive care for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis in China: a randomized controlled trial. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34(3):278–88.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chaudhuri S, Han H, Muchiutti C, Ryter J, Reviriego-Mendoza M, Maddux D, et al. Remote treatment monitoring on hospitalization and technique failure rates in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney360. 2020;1(3):191–202.CrossRef Chaudhuri S, Han H, Muchiutti C, Ryter J, Reviriego-Mendoza M, Maddux D, et al. Remote treatment monitoring on hospitalization and technique failure rates in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney360. 2020;1(3):191–202.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kiberd J, Khan U, Stockman C, Radhakrishnan A, Phillips M, Kiberd BA, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based eHealth portal for delivery of care to home Dialysis patients: a single-arm pilot study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:2054358118794415. Kiberd J, Khan U, Stockman C, Radhakrishnan A, Phillips M, Kiberd BA, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based eHealth portal for delivery of care to home Dialysis patients: a single-arm pilot study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:2054358118794415.
33.
go back to reference Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T, Lew SQ. Satisfaction and improvements in peritoneal Dialysis outcomes associated with telehealth. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(1):214–25.PubMedPubMedCentral Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T, Lew SQ. Satisfaction and improvements in peritoneal Dialysis outcomes associated with telehealth. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(1):214–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Corzo L, Wilkie M, Vesga JI, Lindholm B, Buitrago G, Rivera AS, et al. Technique failure in remote patient monitoring program in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(3):288–96.CrossRef Corzo L, Wilkie M, Vesga JI, Lindholm B, Buitrago G, Rivera AS, et al. Technique failure in remote patient monitoring program in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(3):288–96.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dey V, Jones A, Spalding EM. Telehealth: acceptability, clinical interventions and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116670188. Dey V, Jones A, Spalding EM. Telehealth: acceptability, clinical interventions and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116670188.
36.
go back to reference Sanabria M, Buitrago G, Lindholm B, Vesga J, Nilsson LG, Yang D, et al. Remote patient monitoring program in automated peritoneal dialysis: impact on hospitalizations. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):472–8.CrossRef Sanabria M, Buitrago G, Lindholm B, Vesga J, Nilsson LG, Yang D, et al. Remote patient monitoring program in automated peritoneal dialysis: impact on hospitalizations. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):472–8.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lew SQ, Wallace EL, Srivatana V, Warady BA, Watnick S, Hood J, et al. Telehealth for home dialysis in COVID-19 and beyond: a perspective from the American society of nephrology COVID-19 home dialysis subcommittee. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77(1):142–8.CrossRef Lew SQ, Wallace EL, Srivatana V, Warady BA, Watnick S, Hood J, et al. Telehealth for home dialysis in COVID-19 and beyond: a perspective from the American society of nephrology COVID-19 home dialysis subcommittee. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77(1):142–8.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Schachter ME, Bargman JM, Copland M, Hladunewich M, Tennankore KK, Levin A, et al. Rationale for a home dialysis virtual ward: design and implementation. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15(1):33.CrossRef Schachter ME, Bargman JM, Copland M, Hladunewich M, Tennankore KK, Levin A, et al. Rationale for a home dialysis virtual ward: design and implementation. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15(1):33.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bakken S, Grullon-Figueroa L, Izquierdo R, Lee N-J, Morin P, Palmas W, et al. Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(6):660–7.CrossRef Bakken S, Grullon-Figueroa L, Izquierdo R, Lee N-J, Morin P, Palmas W, et al. Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(6):660–7.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Washida N, Yube N, Kasai T, Shinozuka K, Morimoto K, et al. The impact of a remote monitoring system of healthcare resource consumption in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD): a simulation study. Clin Nephrol. 2018;90(5):334–40.CrossRef Uchiyama K, Washida N, Yube N, Kasai T, Shinozuka K, Morimoto K, et al. The impact of a remote monitoring system of healthcare resource consumption in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD): a simulation study. Clin Nephrol. 2018;90(5):334–40.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ariza JG, Walton SM, Sanabria M, Bunch A, Vesga J, Rivera A. Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(4):377–83.CrossRef Ariza JG, Walton SM, Sanabria M, Bunch A, Vesga J, Rivera A. Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(4):377–83.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Makhija D, Alscher MD, Becker S, D’Alonzo S, Mehrotra R, Wong L, et al. Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis patients: assessing clinical and economic value. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(4):315–23.CrossRef Makhija D, Alscher MD, Becker S, D’Alonzo S, Mehrotra R, Wong L, et al. Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis patients: assessing clinical and economic value. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(4):315–23.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.CrossRef Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ma T, Yang Z, Li S, Pei H, Zhao J, Li Y, et al. The peritoneal Dialysis telemedicine-assisted platform cohort (PDTAP) study: design and methods. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(1):75-82. Ma T, Yang Z, Li S, Pei H, Zhao J, Li Y, et al. The peritoneal Dialysis telemedicine-assisted platform cohort (PDTAP) study: design and methods. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(1):75-82.
Metadata
Title
Impact of telehealth interventions added to peritoneal dialysis-care: a systematic review
Authors
Geertje K. M. Biebuyck
Aegida Neradova
Carola W. H. de Fijter
Lily Jakulj
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02869-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Nephrology 1/2022 Go to the issue