Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions

Authors: Noel Engels, Paul B. van der Nat, Jet W. Ankersmid, Janine C. M. Prick, Ellen Parent, Regina The, Asako Takahashi, Hans A. J. Bart, Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Willem J. W. Bos, Marinus A. van den Dorpel

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient decision aids (PtDAs) support patients and clinicians in shared decision-making (SDM). Real-world outcome information may improve patients’ risk perception, and help patients make decisions congruent with their expectations and values. Our aim was to develop an online PtDA to support kidney failure treatment modality decision-making, that: 1) provides patients with real-world outcome information, and 2) facilitates SDM in clinical practice.

Methods

The International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) development process model was complemented with a user-centred and convergent mixed-methods approach. Rapid prototyping was used to develop the PtDA with a multidisciplinary steering group in an iterative process of co-creation. The results of an exploratory evidence review and a needs-assessment among patients, caregivers, and clinicians were used to develop the PtDA. Seven Dutch teaching hospitals and two national Dutch outcome registries provided real-world data on selected outcomes for all kidney failure treatment modalities. Alpha and beta testing were performed to assess the prototype and finalise development. An implementation strategy was developed to guide implementation of the PtDA in clinical practice.

Results

The ‘Kidney Failure Decision Aid’ consists of three components designed to help patients and clinicians engage in SDM: 1) a paper hand-out sheet, 2) an interactive website, and 3) a personal summary sheet. A ‘patients-like-me’ infographic was developed to visualise survival probabilities for each treatment modality on the website. Other treatment outcomes were incorporated as event rates (e.g. hospitalisation rates) or explained in text (e.g. the flexibility of each treatment modality). No major revisions were needed after alpha and beta testing. During beta testing, some patients ignored the survival probabilities because they considered these too confronting. Nonetheless, patients agreed that every patient has the right to choose whether they want to view this information. Patients and clinicians believed that the PtDA would help patients make informed decisions, and that it would support values- and preferences-based decision-making. Implementation of the PtDA has started in October 2020.

Conclusions

The ‘Kidney Failure Decision Aid’ was designed to facilitate SDM in clinical practice and contains real-world outcome information on all kidney failure treatment modalities. It is currently being investigated for its effects on SDM in a clinical trial.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Moss AH. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2380–3.CrossRef Moss AH. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2380–3.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barret MA, Green JA, Greer RC, et al. Preferences for and Experiences of Shared and Informed Decision-Making Among Patients Choosing Kidney Replacement Therapies in Nephrology Care. Kidney Med. 2021;3:905–15.CrossRef Barret MA, Green JA, Greer RC, et al. Preferences for and Experiences of Shared and Informed Decision-Making Among Patients Choosing Kidney Replacement Therapies in Nephrology Care. Kidney Med. 2021;3:905–15.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney A. Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context. Health Expect. 2014;17:710–23.CrossRef Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney A. Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context. Health Expect. 2014;17:710–23.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9.CrossRef Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359: j4891.CrossRef Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359: j4891.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennet CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennet CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Engels N, de Graav G, van der Nat P, van den Dorpel MA, Bos WJ, Stiggelbout AM. Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10: e034142.CrossRef Engels N, de Graav G, van der Nat P, van den Dorpel MA, Bos WJ, Stiggelbout AM. Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10: e034142.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Durand ME, Witt J, Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe RG, Politi MC, Sivell S, et al. Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:462–8.CrossRef Durand ME, Witt J, Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe RG, Politi MC, Sivell S, et al. Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:462–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Dolan Mullen P, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S2.CrossRef Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Dolan Mullen P, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S2.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference de Jong Y, van der Willik EM, Milders J, Meuleman Y, Morton RL, Dekker FW, et al. Person centred care provision and care planning in chronic kidney disease: which outcomes matter? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies : Care planning in CKD: which outcomes matter? BMC Nephrol. 2021;22:309.CrossRef de Jong Y, van der Willik EM, Milders J, Meuleman Y, Morton RL, Dekker FW, et al. Person centred care provision and care planning in chronic kidney disease: which outcomes matter? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies : Care planning in CKD: which outcomes matter? BMC Nephrol. 2021;22:309.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P. Kristiansen A, Akl EA, et al. Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens. BMJ. 2015;350:g7624. Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P. Kristiansen A, Akl EA, et al. Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens. BMJ. 2015;350:g7624.
20.
go back to reference Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:2134–56.CrossRef Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:2134–56.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Verberne WR, Das-Gupta Z, Allegretti AS, Bart JAJ, van Biesen W, Garcia-Garcia G, et al. Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73:372–84.CrossRef Verberne WR, Das-Gupta Z, Allegretti AS, Bart JAJ, van Biesen W, Garcia-Garcia G, et al. Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73:372–84.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tong A, Manns B, Wang AYM, Hemmelgarn B, Wheel DC, Gill J, et al. Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop. Kidney Int. 2018;94:1053–68.CrossRef Tong A, Manns B, Wang AYM, Hemmelgarn B, Wheel DC, Gill J, et al. Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop. Kidney Int. 2018;94:1053–68.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Gutman T, Cho Y, et al. Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Peritoneal Dialysis: Report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) Consensus Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75:404–12.CrossRef Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Gutman T, Cho Y, et al. Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Peritoneal Dialysis: Report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) Consensus Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75:404–12.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Boaz A, Baeza J, Fraser A. European Implementation Score Collaborative Group (EIS). Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:212.CrossRef Boaz A, Baeza J, Fraser A. European Implementation Score Collaborative Group (EIS). Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:212.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference van Tol-Geerdink JJ, van Oort IM, Somford DM, Wijburg CJ, Geboers A, van Uden-kraan CF, et al. Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy. Health Informatics J. 2020;26:1194–207.CrossRef van Tol-Geerdink JJ, van Oort IM, Somford DM, Wijburg CJ, Geboers A, van Uden-kraan CF, et al. Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy. Health Informatics J. 2020;26:1194–207.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–13.CrossRef Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–13.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Nota I, Drossaert CHC, Melissant HC, Taal E, Vonkeman HE, Haagsma CJ, et al. Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:51.CrossRef Nota I, Drossaert CHC, Melissant HC, Taal E, Vonkeman HE, Haagsma CJ, et al. Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:51.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Berkhout-Byrne N, Gaasbeek A, Mallat M, Rabelink TJ, Mooijaart SP, Dekker FW, et al. Regret about the decision to start dialysis: a cross-sectional Dutch national survey. Neth J Med. 2017;75:225–34.PubMed Berkhout-Byrne N, Gaasbeek A, Mallat M, Rabelink TJ, Mooijaart SP, Dekker FW, et al. Regret about the decision to start dialysis: a cross-sectional Dutch national survey. Neth J Med. 2017;75:225–34.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Mooney A, Wilkie M, Davies SJ, Crane D, et al. Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:374–81.CrossRef Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Mooney A, Wilkie M, Davies SJ, Crane D, et al. Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:374–81.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Patzer RE, McPherson L, Basu M, Mohan S, Wolf M, Chiles M, et al. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:1954–65.CrossRef Patzer RE, McPherson L, Basu M, Mohan S, Wolf M, Chiles M, et al. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:1954–65.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Boulware LE, Ephraim PL, Ameling J, Lewis-Boyer L, Rabb H, Greer RC, et al. Effectiveness of informational decision aids and a live donor financial assistance program on pursuit of live kidney transplants in African American hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:107.CrossRef Boulware LE, Ephraim PL, Ameling J, Lewis-Boyer L, Rabb H, Greer RC, et al. Effectiveness of informational decision aids and a live donor financial assistance program on pursuit of live kidney transplants in African American hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:107.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Malkina A, Tuot DS. Role of telehealth in renal replacement therapy education. Semin Dial. 2018;31:129–34.CrossRef Malkina A, Tuot DS. Role of telehealth in renal replacement therapy education. Semin Dial. 2018;31:129–34.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schrauben SJ, Appel L, Rivera E, Lora CM, Lash JP, Chen J, CRIC Study Investigators, et al. Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77:941–50.CrossRef Schrauben SJ, Appel L, Rivera E, Lora CM, Lash JP, Chen J, CRIC Study Investigators, et al. Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77:941–50.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Patzer RE, Paul S, Plantinga L, Gander J, Sauls L, Krisher J, Southeastern Kidney Transplant Coalition, et al. A Randomized Trial to Reduce Disparities in Referral for Transplant Evaluation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:935–42.CrossRef Patzer RE, Paul S, Plantinga L, Gander J, Sauls L, Krisher J, Southeastern Kidney Transplant Coalition, et al. A Randomized Trial to Reduce Disparities in Referral for Transplant Evaluation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:935–42.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Raj R, Thiruvengadam S, Ahuja KDK, Frandsen M, Jose M. Discussions during shared decision-making in older adults with advanced renal disease: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e031427.CrossRef Raj R, Thiruvengadam S, Ahuja KDK, Frandsen M, Jose M. Discussions during shared decision-making in older adults with advanced renal disease: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e031427.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Brown EA, Bekker HL, Davison SN, Koffman J, Schell JO. Supportive Care: Communication Strategies to Improve Cultural Competence in Shared Decision Making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:1902–8.CrossRef Brown EA, Bekker HL, Davison SN, Koffman J, Schell JO. Supportive Care: Communication Strategies to Improve Cultural Competence in Shared Decision Making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:1902–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Muscat DM, Kanagaratnam R, Shepherd HL, Sud K, McCaffery K, Webster A. Beyond dialysis decisions: a qualitative exploration of decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:339.CrossRef Muscat DM, Kanagaratnam R, Shepherd HL, Sud K, McCaffery K, Webster A. Beyond dialysis decisions: a qualitative exploration of decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:339.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions
Authors
Noel Engels
Paul B. van der Nat
Jet W. Ankersmid
Janine C. M. Prick
Ellen Parent
Regina The
Asako Takahashi
Hans A. J. Bart
Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan
Anne M. Stiggelbout
Willem J. W. Bos
Marinus A. van den Dorpel
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02853-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Nephrology 1/2022 Go to the issue