Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Kidney Transplantation | Research article

Life and expectations post-kidney transplant: a qualitative analysis of patient responses

Authors: Emily L. Tucker, Abigail R. Smith, Mark S. Daskin, Hannah Schapiro, Sabrina M. Cottrell, Evelyn S. Gendron, Peg Hill-Callahan, Alan B. Leichtman, Robert M. Merion, Stephen J. Gill, Kayse Lee Maass

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The effect of a kidney transplant on a recipient extends beyond the restoration of kidney function. However, there is limited qualitative analysis of recipient perspectives on life following transplantation, particularly in the United States. To understand the full patient experience, it is necessary to understand recipient views on life adjustments after kidney transplantation, medical management, and quality of life. This could lead to improvements in recipient care and sense of well-being.

Methods

We conducted a paper-based survey from March 23 to October 1, 2015 of 476 kidney transplant recipients at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We analyzed their open-ended responses using qualitative research methods. This is a companion analysis to a previous quantitative report on the closed-ended responses to that survey.

Results

Common themes relating to changes following transplantation included: improvements in quality of life, a return to normalcy, better health and more energy. Concerns included: duration of graft survival, fears about one day returning to dialysis or needing to undergo another kidney transplant, comorbidities, future quality of life, and the cost and quality of their healthcare. Many recipients were grateful for their transplant, but some were anxious about the burdens transplantation placed on their loved ones.

Conclusions

While most recipients reported meaningful improvements in health and lifestyle after kidney transplantation, a minority of participants experienced declines in energy or health status. Worries about how long the transplant will function, future health, and cost and quality of healthcare are prevalent. Future research could study the effects of providing additional information, programs, and interventions following transplantation that target these concerns. This may better prepare and support kidney recipients and lead to improvements in the patient experience.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference United States Renal Data System. 2015 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2015. United States Renal Data System. 2015 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2015.
4.
go back to reference Orr A, Willis S, Holmes M, Britton P, Orr D. Living with a kidney transplant: a qualitative investigation of quality of life. J Health Psychol. 2007;12:653–62.CrossRef Orr A, Willis S, Holmes M, Britton P, Orr D. Living with a kidney transplant: a qualitative investigation of quality of life. J Health Psychol. 2007;12:653–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adang EMM, Kootstra G, Engel GL, Van Hooff JP, Merckelbach HLGJ. Do retrospective and prospective quality of life assessments differ for pancreas-kidney transplant recipients? Transpl Int. 1998;11:11–5.CrossRef Adang EMM, Kootstra G, Engel GL, Van Hooff JP, Merckelbach HLGJ. Do retrospective and prospective quality of life assessments differ for pancreas-kidney transplant recipients? Transpl Int. 1998;11:11–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Howell M, Wong G, Rose J, Tong A, Craig JC, Howard K. Patient preferences for outcomes after kidney transplantation: a best-worst scaling survey. Transplantation. 2017;101:2765–73.CrossRef Howell M, Wong G, Rose J, Tong A, Craig JC, Howard K. Patient preferences for outcomes after kidney transplantation: a best-worst scaling survey. Transplantation. 2017;101:2765–73.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee SY, Chu SH, Oh EG, Huh KH. Low adherence to immunosuppressants is associated with symptom experience among kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:2707–11. Lee SY, Chu SH, Oh EG, Huh KH. Low adherence to immunosuppressants is associated with symptom experience among kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:2707–11.
12.
go back to reference Alkatheri A, Al Bekairy A, Aburuz S, Qandil A, Khalidi N, Abdullah K, et al. Exploring quality of life among renal and liver transplant recipients. Ann Saudi Med. 2015;35:368–76.CrossRef Alkatheri A, Al Bekairy A, Aburuz S, Qandil A, Khalidi N, Abdullah K, et al. Exploring quality of life among renal and liver transplant recipients. Ann Saudi Med. 2015;35:368–76.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co; 1967. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co; 1967.
21.
go back to reference Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11:Art 8. Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11:Art 8.
22.
go back to reference Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2015;20:1408–16 doi:1, 1408-1416. Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2015;20:1408–16 doi:1, 1408-1416.
23.
go back to reference Van Der Mei SF, Kuiper D, Groothoff JW, Van Den Heuvel WJA, Van Son WJ, Brouwer S. Long-term health and work outcomes of renal transplantation and patterns of work status during the end-stage renal disease trajectory. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:325–34.CrossRef Van Der Mei SF, Kuiper D, Groothoff JW, Van Den Heuvel WJA, Van Son WJ, Brouwer S. Long-term health and work outcomes of renal transplantation and patterns of work status during the end-stage renal disease trajectory. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:325–34.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Carter JM, Winsett RP, Rager D, Hathaway DK. A center-based approach to a transplant employment program. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:204–8.CrossRef Carter JM, Winsett RP, Rager D, Hathaway DK. A center-based approach to a transplant employment program. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:204–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Newton SE. Renal transplant recipients’ and their physicians’ expectations regarding return to work posttransplant. ANNA J. 1999;26:227–32 discussion 234. Newton SE. Renal transplant recipients’ and their physicians’ expectations regarding return to work posttransplant. ANNA J. 1999;26:227–32 discussion 234.
Metadata
Title
Life and expectations post-kidney transplant: a qualitative analysis of patient responses
Authors
Emily L. Tucker
Abigail R. Smith
Mark S. Daskin
Hannah Schapiro
Sabrina M. Cottrell
Evelyn S. Gendron
Peg Hill-Callahan
Alan B. Leichtman
Robert M. Merion
Stephen J. Gill
Kayse Lee Maass
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1368-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Nephrology 1/2019 Go to the issue