Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Safety and efficacy of Rapamune® (Sirolimus) in kidney transplant recipients: results of a prospective post-marketing surveillance study in Korea

Authors: Hee Jung Jeon, Hahn-Ey Lee, Jaeseok Yang

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few post-marketing surveillance studies have examined the safety and efficacy of Rapamune® (Sirolimus) in Asian countries. This study aimed to better understand safety and efficacy of Rapamune for kidney transplant recipients in the routine clinical practice setting in Korea.

Methods

This was an open-label, non-comparative, observational, prospective, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study conducted at 15 Korean transplant centers between 31 August 2009 and 24 September 2015. The subjects were administered Rapamune as part of routine practice. The safety was monitored based on reporting of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included acute rejection, graft function, graft survival, and patient survival.

Results

Rapamune was most commonly used for late conversion therapy after post-transplant 1 year and was substituted for anti-metabolites (63.6%) or calcineurin inhibitors (28.7%). The median treatment duration of Rapamune was 182 days. Among 209 subjects enrolled, AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 54.07% and 43.06% of subjects, respectively, in the safety analysis set. Most of the AEs were expected (96.21%), mild (75.83%), did not result in any action taken with regard to the study drug (72.99%), and resolved by the end of the study (75.36%). The most frequently reported AEs/ADRs were pharyngitis and diarrhea. Most of the serious AEs/ADRs occurred in one or two subjects. Unexpected ADRs of renal artery occlusion and cholangitis were reported by one subject each. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 2.87%. At the end of the study, 99.51% of the subjects and their grafts had survived. The mean eGFR was 64.72 ± 19.56 mL/min.

Conclusions

Rapamune had an acceptable safety profile in prevention of kidney allograft rejection in Korea.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Russ G, Segoloni G, Oberbauer R, Legendre C, Mota A, Eris J, et al. Superior outcomes in renal transplantation after early cyclosporine withdrawal and sirolimus maintenance therapy, regardless of baseline renal function. Transplantation. 2005;80:1204–11.CrossRefPubMed Russ G, Segoloni G, Oberbauer R, Legendre C, Mota A, Eris J, et al. Superior outcomes in renal transplantation after early cyclosporine withdrawal and sirolimus maintenance therapy, regardless of baseline renal function. Transplantation. 2005;80:1204–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Thervet E, Buchler M, Etienne I, Westeel PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1665–75.CrossRefPubMed Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Thervet E, Buchler M, Etienne I, Westeel PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1665–75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Toupance O, Westeel PF, Etienne I, Thervet E, et al. Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: concept study. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1115–23.CrossRefPubMed Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Toupance O, Westeel PF, Etienne I, Thervet E, et al. Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: concept study. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1115–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lebranchu Y, Snanoudj R, Toupance O, Weestel PF, Hurault de Ligny B, Buchler M, et al. Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing de novo sirolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation: the SPIESSER study. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1801–10.CrossRefPubMed Lebranchu Y, Snanoudj R, Toupance O, Weestel PF, Hurault de Ligny B, Buchler M, et al. Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing de novo sirolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation: the SPIESSER study. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1801–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, Dinh L, Filler G, Lepage N, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3763–70.CrossRefPubMed White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, Dinh L, Filler G, Lepage N, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3763–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Townamchai N, Praditpornsilpa K, Chawatanarat T, Avihingsanon Y, Tiranathanagul K, Katavetin P, et al. The validation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation for renal transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol. 2013;79:206–13.CrossRefPubMed Townamchai N, Praditpornsilpa K, Chawatanarat T, Avihingsanon Y, Tiranathanagul K, Katavetin P, et al. The validation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation for renal transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol. 2013;79:206–13.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Felix MJ, Felipe CR, Tedesco-Silva H, Osmar M-PJ. Time-dependent and immunosuppressive drug-associated adverse event profiles in De novo kidney transplant recipients converted from Tacrolimus to Sirolimus regimens. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:152–65.CrossRefPubMed Felix MJ, Felipe CR, Tedesco-Silva H, Osmar M-PJ. Time-dependent and immunosuppressive drug-associated adverse event profiles in De novo kidney transplant recipients converted from Tacrolimus to Sirolimus regimens. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:152–65.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tedesco-Silva H, Peddi VR, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Marder BA, Russ GR, Diekmann F, et al. Open-Label, Randomized Study of Transition From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Immunosuppression in Renal Allograft Recipients. Transplant Direct. 2016;2:e69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tedesco-Silva H, Peddi VR, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Marder BA, Russ GR, Diekmann F, et al. Open-Label, Randomized Study of Transition From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Immunosuppression in Renal Allograft Recipients. Transplant Direct. 2016;2:e69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Euvrard S, Morelon E, Rostaing L, Goffin E, Brocard A, Tromme I, et al. Sirolimus and secondary skin-cancer prevention in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:329–39.CrossRefPubMed Euvrard S, Morelon E, Rostaing L, Goffin E, Brocard A, Tromme I, et al. Sirolimus and secondary skin-cancer prevention in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:329–39.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Manuelli M, De Luca L, Iaria G, Tatangelo P, Sforza D, Perrone L, et al. Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression for malignancy after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:1314–6.CrossRefPubMed Manuelli M, De Luca L, Iaria G, Tatangelo P, Sforza D, Perrone L, et al. Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression for malignancy after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:1314–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Laham G, Scuteri R, Cornicelli P, Arriola M, Raffaele PM, Davalos Michel M, et al. Surveillance registry of Sirolimus use in recipients of kidney allografts from expanded criteria donors. Transplant Proc. 2016;48:2650–5.CrossRefPubMed Laham G, Scuteri R, Cornicelli P, Arriola M, Raffaele PM, Davalos Michel M, et al. Surveillance registry of Sirolimus use in recipients of kidney allografts from expanded criteria donors. Transplant Proc. 2016;48:2650–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and efficacy of Rapamune® (Sirolimus) in kidney transplant recipients: results of a prospective post-marketing surveillance study in Korea
Authors
Hee Jung Jeon
Hahn-Ey Lee
Jaeseok Yang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1002-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Nephrology 1/2018 Go to the issue