Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Rationale and study design of the prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study “rISk strAtification in end-stage renal disease” (ISAR) study

Authors: Christoph Schmaderer, Susanne Tholen, Anna-Lena Hasenau, Christine Hauser, Yana Suttmann, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Christopher C. Mayer, Axel Bauer, Kostantinos D. Rizas, Stephan Kemmner, Konstantin Kotliar, Bernhard Haller, Johannes Mann, Lutz Renders, Uwe Heemann, Marcus Baumann

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ISAR study is a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study to improve the cardiovascular risk stratification in endstage renal disease (ESRD). The major goal is to characterize the cardiovascular phenotype of the study subjects, namely alterations in micro- and macrocirculation and to determine autonomic function.

Methods/design

We intend to recruit 500 prevalent dialysis patients in 17 centers in Munich and the surrounding area. Baseline examinations include: (1) biochemistry, (2) 24-h Holter Electrocardiography (ECG) recordings, (3) 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), (4) 24 h pulse wave analysis (PWA) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), (5) retinal vessel analysis (RVA) and (6) neurocognitive testing. After 24 months biochemistry and determination of single PWA, single PWV and neurocognitive testing are repeated. Patients will be followed up to 6 years for (1) hospitalizations, (2) cardiovascular and (3) non-cardiovascular events and (4) cardiovascular and (5) all-cause mortality.

Discussion/conclusion

We aim to create a complex dataset to answer questions about the insufficiently understood pathophysiology leading to excessively high cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. Finally we hope to improve cardiovascular risk stratification in comparison to the use of classical and non-classical (dialysis-associated) risk factors and other models of risk stratification in ESRD patients by building a multivariable Cox-Regression model using a combination of the parameters measured in the study.

Clinical trials identifier

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01152892 (June 28, 2010)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collins AJ, et al. United States renal data system public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2015;5(1):2–7.CrossRef Collins AJ, et al. United States renal data system public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2015;5(1):2–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Liyanage T, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1975–82.PubMedCrossRef Liyanage T, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1975–82.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Collins AJ, et al. Excerpts from the US renal data system 2009 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(1 Suppl 1):S1–420. A6-7.PubMedCentral Collins AJ, et al. Excerpts from the US renal data system 2009 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(1 Suppl 1):S1–420. A6-7.PubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Eknoyan G, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25):2010–9.PubMedCrossRef Eknoyan G, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25):2010–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ghanta M, Kozicky M, Jim B. Pathophysiologic and treatment strategies for cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantations. Cardiol Rev. 2015;23(3):109–18.PubMed Ghanta M, Kozicky M, Jim B. Pathophysiologic and treatment strategies for cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantations. Cardiol Rev. 2015;23(3):109–18.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tholen S, et al. Variability of cognitive performance during hemodialysis: standardization of cognitive assessment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;38(1–2):31–8.PubMedCrossRef Tholen S, et al. Variability of cognitive performance during hemodialysis: standardization of cognitive assessment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;38(1–2):31–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wassertheurer S, et al. A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(8):498–504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wassertheurer S, et al. A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(8):498–504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weber T, et al. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2011;58(5):825–32.PubMedCrossRef Weber T, et al. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2011;58(5):825–32.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wei W, et al. Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(4):225–8.PubMedCrossRef Wei W, et al. Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(4):225–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luzardo L, et al. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(10):980–7.PubMedCrossRef Luzardo L, et al. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(10):980–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hametner B, et al. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18(3):173–6.PubMedCrossRef Hametner B, et al. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18(3):173–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Karpetas A, et al. Ambulatory recording of wave reflections and arterial stiffness during intra- and interdialytic periods in patients treated with dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(4):630–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Karpetas A, et al. Ambulatory recording of wave reflections and arterial stiffness during intra- and interdialytic periods in patients treated with dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(4):630–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koutroumbas G, et al. Ambulatory aortic blood pressure, wave reflections and pulse wave velocity are elevated during the third in comparison to the second interdialytic day of the long interval in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:2046–53.PubMedCrossRef Koutroumbas G, et al. Ambulatory aortic blood pressure, wave reflections and pulse wave velocity are elevated during the third in comparison to the second interdialytic day of the long interval in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:2046–53.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sarafidis PA, et al. Evaluation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric method for estimating central systolic pressure in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(3):242–50.PubMedCrossRef Sarafidis PA, et al. Evaluation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric method for estimating central systolic pressure in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(3):242–50.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Franssen PM, Imholz BP. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(4):229–31.PubMedCrossRef Franssen PM, Imholz BP. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(4):229–31.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Feistritzer HJ, et al. Comparison of an oscillometric method with cardiac magnetic resonance for the analysis of aortic pulse wave velocity. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116862.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Feistritzer HJ, et al. Comparison of an oscillometric method with cardiac magnetic resonance for the analysis of aortic pulse wave velocity. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116862.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baumann M, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease stages 2–4. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):899–903.PubMed Baumann M, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease stages 2–4. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):899–903.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wang JJ, et al. Hypertensive retinal vessel wall signs in a general older population: the blue mountains eye study. Hypertension. 2003;42(4):534–41.PubMedCrossRef Wang JJ, et al. Hypertensive retinal vessel wall signs in a general older population: the blue mountains eye study. Hypertension. 2003;42(4):534–41.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Leung H, et al. Relationships between age, blood pressure, and retinal vessel diameters in an older population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(7):2900–4.PubMedCrossRef Leung H, et al. Relationships between age, blood pressure, and retinal vessel diameters in an older population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(7):2900–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ikram MK, et al. Retinal vascular caliber measurements: clinical significance, current knowledge and future perspectives. Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(3):125–36.PubMedCrossRef Ikram MK, et al. Retinal vascular caliber measurements: clinical significance, current knowledge and future perspectives. Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(3):125–36.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wong TY, et al. Retinal vessel diameters and their associations with age and blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(11):4644–50.PubMedCrossRef Wong TY, et al. Retinal vessel diameters and their associations with age and blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(11):4644–50.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wong TY, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of retinal microvascular abnormalities in older persons: the cardiovascular health study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(4):658–66.PubMedCrossRef Wong TY, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of retinal microvascular abnormalities in older persons: the cardiovascular health study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(4):658–66.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Garhofer G, et al. Use of the retinal vessel analyzer in ocular blood flow research. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(7):717–22.PubMedCrossRef Garhofer G, et al. Use of the retinal vessel analyzer in ocular blood flow research. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(7):717–22.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Seifertl BU, Vilser W. Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA)--design and function. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):678–81.CrossRef Seifertl BU, Vilser W. Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA)--design and function. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):678–81.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vilser W, Nagel E, Lanzl I. Retinal Vessel Analysis--new possibilities. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):682–5.CrossRef Vilser W, Nagel E, Lanzl I. Retinal Vessel Analysis--new possibilities. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):682–5.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bachler M, et al. Online and offline determination of QT and PR interval and QRS duration in electrocardiography. In: Zu Q, Hu B, Elçi A, editors. Pervasive computing and the networked World. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 1–15. Bachler M, et al. Online and offline determination of QT and PR interval and QRS duration in electrocardiography. In: Zu Q, Hu B, Elçi A, editors. Pervasive computing and the networked World. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 1–15.
28.
go back to reference Rautaharju PM, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e241–50.PubMedCrossRef Rautaharju PM, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e241–50.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hancock EW, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e251–61.PubMedCrossRef Hancock EW, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e251–61.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996; 93(5): 1043–65. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996; 93(5): 1043–65.
31.
go back to reference Rajendra Acharya U, et al. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(12):1031–51.PubMedCrossRef Rajendra Acharya U, et al. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(12):1031–51.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sassi R, et al. Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015;17:1341–53.PubMedCrossRef Sassi R, et al. Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015;17:1341–53.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schmidt G, et al. Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1999;353(9162):1390–6.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt G, et al. Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1999;353(9162):1390–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Barthel P, et al. Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by heart rate turbulence. Circulation. 2003;108(10):1221–6.PubMedCrossRef Barthel P, et al. Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by heart rate turbulence. Circulation. 2003;108(10):1221–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bauer A, et al. Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study. Lancet. 2006;367(9523):1674–81.PubMedCrossRef Bauer A, et al. Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study. Lancet. 2006;367(9523):1674–81.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Nasreddine ZS, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.PubMedCrossRef Nasreddine ZS, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Pereira AA, et al. Subcortical cognitive impairment in dialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2007;11(3):309–14.PubMedCrossRef Pereira AA, et al. Subcortical cognitive impairment in dialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2007;11(3):309–14.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kurella Tamura M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(8):1429–38.PubMedCrossRef Kurella Tamura M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(8):1429–38.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hughes CP, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–72.PubMedCrossRef Hughes CP, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–72.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Charlson ME, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Liu J, et al. An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2010;77(2):141–51.PubMedCrossRef Liu J, et al. An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2010;77(2):141–51.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(1):125–32.PubMedCrossRef Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(1):125–32.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lindholm B, Davies S. End-stage renal disease: a new comorbidity index for estimating mortality risk in ESRD. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6(7):391–3.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm B, Davies S. End-stage renal disease: a new comorbidity index for estimating mortality risk in ESRD. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6(7):391–3.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Floege J, et al. Development and validation of a predictive mortality risk score from a European hemodialysis cohort. Kidney Int. 2015;87(5):996–1008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Floege J, et al. Development and validation of a predictive mortality risk score from a European hemodialysis cohort. Kidney Int. 2015;87(5):996–1008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Fortier C, et al. Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch and mortality in dialysis population. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):378–84.PubMedCrossRef Fortier C, et al. Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch and mortality in dialysis population. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):378–84.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Harrell F. Regression modeling strategies. With application to linear models, logistic regression and survival. New York: Springer; 2001. Harrell F. Regression modeling strategies. With application to linear models, logistic regression and survival. New York: Springer; 2001.
47.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, et al. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1503–10.PubMedCrossRef Peduzzi P, et al. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1503–10.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.PubMedCrossRef Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Beyersmann J, Allignol A, Schumacher M. Competing risks and multistate models with R. New York: Springer; 2012.CrossRef Beyersmann J, Allignol A, Schumacher M. Competing risks and multistate models with R. New York: Springer; 2012.CrossRef
50.
51.
go back to reference Parati G, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32(7):1359–66.PubMedCrossRef Parati G, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32(7):1359–66.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Reverse epidemiology of hypertension and cardiovascular death in the hemodialysis population: the 58th annual fall conference and scientific sessions. Hypertension. 2005;45(4):811–7.PubMedCrossRef Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Reverse epidemiology of hypertension and cardiovascular death in the hemodialysis population: the 58th annual fall conference and scientific sessions. Hypertension. 2005;45(4):811–7.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Zager PG, et al. “U” curve association of blood pressure and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Medical Directors of Dialysis Clinic, Inc. Kidney Int. 1998;54(2):561–9.PubMedCrossRef Zager PG, et al. “U” curve association of blood pressure and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Medical Directors of Dialysis Clinic, Inc. Kidney Int. 1998;54(2):561–9.PubMedCrossRef
55.
56.
go back to reference Jardine AG, Agarwal R. Con: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in patients receiving haemodialysis: a sore arm and a waste of time? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1438–41.PubMedCrossRef Jardine AG, Agarwal R. Con: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in patients receiving haemodialysis: a sore arm and a waste of time? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1438–41.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Zoccali C, et al. Moderator’s view: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure for the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1443–8.PubMedCrossRef Zoccali C, et al. Moderator’s view: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure for the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1443–8.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Blacher J, et al. Arterial calcifications, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular risk in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2001;38(4):938–42.PubMedCrossRef Blacher J, et al. Arterial calcifications, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular risk in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2001;38(4):938–42.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Goodman WG, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1478–83.PubMedCrossRef Goodman WG, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1478–83.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Blacher J, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999;99(18):2434–9.PubMedCrossRef Blacher J, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999;99(18):2434–9.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference O’Rourke MF, Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens Suppl. 1996;14(5):S147–57.PubMed O’Rourke MF, Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens Suppl. 1996;14(5):S147–57.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Papaioannou TG, et al. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(1):57–61.PubMedCrossRef Papaioannou TG, et al. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(1):57–61.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Durand MJ, et al. Acute exertion elicits a H2O2-dependent vasodilator mechanism in the microvasculature of exercise-trained but not sedentary adults. Hypertension. 2015;65(1):140–5.PubMedCrossRef Durand MJ, et al. Acute exertion elicits a H2O2-dependent vasodilator mechanism in the microvasculature of exercise-trained but not sedentary adults. Hypertension. 2015;65(1):140–5.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Lim LS, et al. Structural changes in the retinal microvasculature and renal function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2970–6.PubMedCrossRef Lim LS, et al. Structural changes in the retinal microvasculature and renal function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2970–6.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Ciocalteu AM, Dumitrache M. The impact of hemodialysis on retinal circulation. Oftalmologia. 2011;55(1):94–9.PubMed Ciocalteu AM, Dumitrache M. The impact of hemodialysis on retinal circulation. Oftalmologia. 2011;55(1):94–9.PubMed
66.
67.
68.
go back to reference Drawz PE, et al. Heart rate variability is a predictor of mortality in chronic kidney disease: a report from the CRIC Study. Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(6):517–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Drawz PE, et al. Heart rate variability is a predictor of mortality in chronic kidney disease: a report from the CRIC Study. Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(6):517–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Chandra P, et al. Relationship between heart rate variability and pulse wave velocity and their association with patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol. 2014;81(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRef Chandra P, et al. Relationship between heart rate variability and pulse wave velocity and their association with patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol. 2014;81(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Elias MF, Dore GA, Davey A. Kidney disease and cognitive function. Contrib Nephrol. 2013;179:42–57.PubMedCrossRef Elias MF, Dore GA, Davey A. Kidney disease and cognitive function. Contrib Nephrol. 2013;179:42–57.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Tiffin-Richards FE, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - a sensitive screening instrument for detecting cognitive impairment in chronic hemodialysis patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e106700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tiffin-Richards FE, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - a sensitive screening instrument for detecting cognitive impairment in chronic hemodialysis patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e106700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rationale and study design of the prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study “rISk strAtification in end-stage renal disease” (ISAR) study
Authors
Christoph Schmaderer
Susanne Tholen
Anna-Lena Hasenau
Christine Hauser
Yana Suttmann
Siegfried Wassertheurer
Christopher C. Mayer
Axel Bauer
Kostantinos D. Rizas
Stephan Kemmner
Konstantin Kotliar
Bernhard Haller
Johannes Mann
Lutz Renders
Uwe Heemann
Marcus Baumann
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0374-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Nephrology 1/2016 Go to the issue