Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Triage | Research

Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department

Authors: Rebecca Sparks, Arisa Harada, Ruchir Chavada, Christopher Trethewy

Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bacteraemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with delayed antibiotic treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Early identification is challenging, but clinically important. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to identify individuals in the broader categories of sepsis. We designed this study to assess the performance of existing scoring systems and pathways—CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway (an Australian sepsis care package), quick sequential organ failure score (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the Shapiro criteria.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study performed in two metropolitan hospitals in NSW, consisting of adult patients (> 18 years) with positive blood cultures containing a true pathogen and patients matched by age without positive blood cultures. Performance (sensitivity, specificity, and mortality prediction) of recognised sepsis and bacteraemia criteria and pathways—qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in the first 4 h following ED triage was assessed.

Results

There were 251 patients in each cohort. Sepsis-related mortality was higher in the bacteraemic group (OR 0.4, p = 0.03). Of the criteria studied, the modified Shapiro criteria had the highest sensitivity (88%) with modest specificity (37.85%), and qSOFA had the highest specificity (83.67%) with poor sensitivity (19.82%). SIRS had reasonable sensitivity (82.07%), with poor sensitivity (20.72%). The CEC SEPSIS pathway sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 71.1%. The SEPSIS KILLS was activated on only 14% of bacteraemic patients.

Conclusion

The performance of all scoring systems and pathways was suboptimal in the identification of patients at risk of bacteraemia presenting to the emergency department.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.CrossRef Singer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–6.CrossRef Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cecconi M, et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):75–87.CrossRef Cecconi M, et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):75–87.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Weinstein MP, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. II. Clinical observations, with special reference to factors influencing prognosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(1):54–70.CrossRef Weinstein MP, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. II. Clinical observations, with special reference to factors influencing prognosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(1):54–70.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kumar A, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–96.CrossRef Kumar A, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–96.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.CrossRef Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Bellomo R. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(9):881.PubMed Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Bellomo R. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(9):881.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Shapiro NI, et al. Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(3):255–64.CrossRef Shapiro NI, et al. Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(3):255–64.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jessen MK, et al. Prediction of bacteremia in the emergency department: an external validation of a clinical decision rule. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;23(1):44–9.CrossRef Jessen MK, et al. Prediction of bacteremia in the emergency department: an external validation of a clinical decision rule. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;23(1):44–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Freund Y, et al. Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the Emergency Department. JAMA. 2017;317(3):301–8.CrossRef Freund Y, et al. Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the Emergency Department. JAMA. 2017;317(3):301–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tusgul S, et al. Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):108.CrossRef Tusgul S, et al. Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):108.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bone RC, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.CrossRef Bone RC, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Burrell AR, et al. SEPSIS KILLS: early intervention saves lives. Med J Aust. 2016;204(2):73.CrossRef Burrell AR, et al. SEPSIS KILLS: early intervention saves lives. Med J Aust. 2016;204(2):73.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Long B, Koyfman A. Best clinical practice: blood culture utility in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(5):529–39.CrossRef Long B, Koyfman A. Best clinical practice: blood culture utility in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(5):529–39.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Laukemann S, et al. Can we reduce negative blood cultures with clinical scores and blood markers? Results from an observational cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(49): e2264.CrossRef Laukemann S, et al. Can we reduce negative blood cultures with clinical scores and blood markers? Results from an observational cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(49): e2264.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shetty AL, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome-based severe sepsis screening algorithms in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis. Emerg Med Australas. 2016;28(3):287–94.CrossRef Shetty AL, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome-based severe sepsis screening algorithms in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis. Emerg Med Australas. 2016;28(3):287–94.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Poses RM, Anthony M. Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians’ diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia. Med Decis Making. 1991;11(3):159–68.CrossRef Poses RM, Anthony M. Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians’ diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia. Med Decis Making. 1991;11(3):159–68.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones GR, Lowes JA. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of bacteraemia and outcome from sepsis. QJM. 1996;89(7):515–22.CrossRef Jones GR, Lowes JA. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of bacteraemia and outcome from sepsis. QJM. 1996;89(7):515–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Finkelsztein EJ, et al. Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):73.CrossRef Finkelsztein EJ, et al. Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):73.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Churpek MM, et al. Investigating the impact of different suspicion of infection criteria on the accuracy of quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(11):1805–12.CrossRef Churpek MM, et al. Investigating the impact of different suspicion of infection criteria on the accuracy of quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(11):1805–12.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Phua J, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R202.CrossRef Phua J, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R202.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bates DW, Pruess KE, Lee TH. How bad are bacteremia and sepsis? Outcomes in a cohort with suspected bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(6):593–8.CrossRef Bates DW, Pruess KE, Lee TH. How bad are bacteremia and sepsis? Outcomes in a cohort with suspected bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(6):593–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Francisco J, Aragao I, Cardoso T. Risk factors for long-term mortality in patients admitted with severe infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):161.CrossRef Francisco J, Aragao I, Cardoso T. Risk factors for long-term mortality in patients admitted with severe infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):161.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
Authors
Rebecca Sparks
Arisa Harada
Ruchir Chavada
Christopher Trethewy
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2022 Go to the issue