Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2019

Open Access 01-09-2019 | Research

National surveillance using mobile systems for health monitoring: complexity, functionality and feasibility

Authors: Yages Singh, Debra Jackson, Sanjana Bhardwaj, Natasha Titus, Ameena Goga

Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Special Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although the use of technology viz. mobile phones, personalised digital assistants, smartphones, notebook and tablets to monitor health and health care (mHealth) is mushrooming, only small, localised studies have described their use as a data collection tool. This paper describes the complexity, functionality and feasibility of mHealth for large scale surveillance at national and sub-national levels in South Africa, a high HIV-prevalence setting.

Methods

In 2010, 2011–12 and 2012–13 three nationally representative surveys were conducted amongst infants attending 580 facilities across all 51 districts, within all nine provinces of South Africa, to monitor the effectiveness of the programme to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT). In all three surveys a technical protocol and iterative system for mobile data collection was developed. In 2012–13 the system included automated folders to store information about upcoming interviews. Paper questionnaires were used as a back-up, in case of mHealth failure. These included written instructions per question on limits, skips and compulsory questions. Data collectors were trained on both systems.

Results

In the 2010, 2011–12 and 2012–2013 surveys respectively, data from 10,554, 10,071, and 10,536 interviews, and approximately 186 variables per survey were successfully uploaded to 151 mobile phones collecting data from 580 health facilities in 51 districts, across all nine provinces of South Africa. A technician, costing approximately U$D20 000 p.a. was appointed to support field-based staff. Two percent of data were gathered using paper- questionnaires. The time needed for mHealth interviews was approximately 1,5 times less than the time needed for paper questionnaires 30–45 min versus approximately 120 min (including 60–70 min for the interview with an additional 45 min for data capture). In 2012–13, 1172 data errors were identified via the web-based console. There was a four-week delay in resolving data errors from paper-based surveys compared with a 3-day turnaround time following direct capture on mobile phones.

Conclusion

Our experiences demonstrate the feasibility of using mHealth during large-scale national surveys, in the presence of a supportive data management team. mHealth systems reduced data collection time by almost 1.5 times, thus reduced data collector costs and time needed for data management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peersman G. Overview: data collection and analysis methods in impact evaluation. In: Methodological briefs: impact evaluation, vol. 10. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research; 2014. Peersman G. Overview: data collection and analysis methods in impact evaluation. In: Methodological briefs: impact evaluation, vol. 10. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:188.CrossRef Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:188.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, Buskirk TD, Hunter Childs J, Langer Tesfaye C. Mobile Technologies for Conducting, Augmenting and Potentially Replacing Surveys: Executive Summary of the AAPOR Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opin Q. 2014;78(4):779–87. First published online November 25, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu054.CrossRef Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, Buskirk TD, Hunter Childs J, Langer Tesfaye C. Mobile Technologies for Conducting, Augmenting and Potentially Replacing Surveys: Executive Summary of the AAPOR Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opin Q. 2014;78(4):779–87. First published online November 25, 2014. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​poq/​nfu054.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pakhare AP, Bali S, Kalra G. Use of mobile phones as research instrument for data collection. Indian J Community Health. 2013;25(2):95–8 01 August 2013. Pakhare AP, Bali S, Kalra G. Use of mobile phones as research instrument for data collection. Indian J Community Health. 2013;25(2):95–8 01 August 2013.
8.
go back to reference Thakker M, et.al. Mobile-based technology for monitoring and evaluation. Poverty action lab. Cambridge. 2013. Thakker M, et.al. Mobile-based technology for monitoring and evaluation. Poverty action lab. Cambridge. 2013.
9.
go back to reference Leon N, Schneider H. MHealth4CBS in South Africa: a review of the role of mobile phone technology for the monitoring and evaluation of community based health services. Cape Town: Medical Research Council and University of Western Cape; 2012. Leon N, Schneider H. MHealth4CBS in South Africa: a review of the role of mobile phone technology for the monitoring and evaluation of community based health services. Cape Town: Medical Research Council and University of Western Cape; 2012.
10.
go back to reference Patnaik S, Brunskill E, Thies W. Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice. in 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD). 2009. Patnaik S, Brunskill E, Thies W. Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice. in 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD). 2009.
11.
go back to reference Van Heerden A. Evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, accuracy and use of electronic data-collection methods for health in KwaZulu-Natal. 2014. Van Heerden A. Evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, accuracy and use of electronic data-collection methods for health in KwaZulu-Natal. 2014.
13.
go back to reference Ganesan M, Prashant S, Jhunjhunwala A. A review on challenges in implementing mobile phone based data collection in developing countries. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries, 2012;6(1). Ganesan M, Prashant S, Jhunjhunwala A. A review on challenges in implementing mobile phone based data collection in developing countries. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries, 2012;6(1).
14.
go back to reference Robertson C, et al., Mobile phone–based infectious disease surveillance system, Sri Lanka. Emerging infectious diseases. 2010;16(10):1524.CrossRef Robertson C, et al., Mobile phone–based infectious disease surveillance system, Sri Lanka. Emerging infectious diseases. 2010;16(10):1524.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
National surveillance using mobile systems for health monitoring: complexity, functionality and feasibility
Authors
Yages Singh
Debra Jackson
Sanjana Bhardwaj
Natasha Titus
Ameena Goga
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Issue Special Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4338-z

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2019

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2019 Go to the issue