Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings – a qualitative study

Authors: Jannike Dyb Oksavik, Marit Solbjør, Ralf Kirchhoff, Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Active patients lie at the heart of integrated care. Although interventions to increase the participation of older patients in care planning are being implemented in several countries, there is a lack of knowledge about the interactions involved and how they are experienced by older patients with multimorbidity. We explore this issue in the context of care-planning meetings within Norwegian municipal health services.

Methods

This qualitative study drew on direct observations of ten care-planning meetings and an interview with each patient right after the meeting. Following a stepwise-deductive induction approach, the analysis began inductively and then considered the interactions through the lens of game theory.

Results

The care-planning interactions were influenced by uncertainty about the course of the disease and how to plan service delivery. In terms derived from game theory, the imaginary and unpredictable player ‘Nature’ generated uncertainty in the ‘game’ of care planning. The ‘players’ assessed this uncertainty differently, leading to three patterns of game. 1) In the ‘game of chance’, patients viewed future events as random and uncontrollable; they felt outmatched by the opponent Nature and became passive in their decision-making. 2) In the ‘competitive game’, participants positioned themselves on two opposing sides, one side perceiving Nature as a significant threat and the other assigning it little importance. The two sides negotiated about how to accommodate uncertainty, and the level of patient participation varied. 3) In the ‘coordination game’, all participants were aligned, either in viewing themselves as teammates against Nature or in ascribing little importance to it. The level of patient participation was high.

Conclusions

In care planning meetings, the level of patient participation may partly be associated with how the various actors appraise and respond to uncertainty. Dialogue on uncertainty in care-planning interventions could help to increase patient participation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Leijten FRM, Struckmann V, van Ginneken E, Czypionka T, Kraus M, Reiss M, et al. On behalf of the SELFIE consortium. The SELFIE framework for integrated care for multi-morbidity: development and description. Health Policy. 2018;22(1):12–22.CrossRef Leijten FRM, Struckmann V, van Ginneken E, Czypionka T, Kraus M, Reiss M, et al. On behalf of the SELFIE consortium. The SELFIE framework for integrated care for multi-morbidity: development and description. Health Policy. 2018;22(1):12–22.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods fourth edition: SAGE Publications; 2015. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods fourth edition: SAGE Publications; 2015.
26.
go back to reference Tjora A. Qualitative research as stepwise-deductive induction: Routledge; 2019. Tjora A. Qualitative research as stepwise-deductive induction: Routledge; 2019.
27.
go back to reference Ringard Å, Sagan A, Sperre Saunes I, Lindahl AK. Norway: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(8):1–162.PubMed Ringard Å, Sagan A, Sperre Saunes I, Lindahl AK. Norway: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(8):1–162.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Brinkmann S. The interview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2018. Brinkmann S. The interview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2018.
33.
go back to reference Colman AM. Game theory & its applications in the social and biological sciences: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.; 1995. Colman AM. Game theory & its applications in the social and biological sciences: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.; 1995.
35.
go back to reference Goffman E. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction: Bobbs-Merrill; 1961. Goffman E. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction: Bobbs-Merrill; 1961.
37.
go back to reference Breen R. Game theory. In: Hedstrom P, Bearman P, editors. The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology: Oxford University Press; 2009. Breen R. Game theory. In: Hedstrom P, Bearman P, editors. The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology: Oxford University Press; 2009.
40.
go back to reference Thompson AGH. The meaning of patient involvement and participation: a taxonomy: Open University Press; 2007. Thompson AGH. The meaning of patient involvement and participation: a taxonomy: Open University Press; 2007.
41.
go back to reference NVivo 12 Pro. QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2018. NVivo 12 Pro. QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2018.
44.
go back to reference Jabloo VG, Alibhai SMH, Fitch M, Tourangeau AE, Ayala AP, Puts MTE. Antecedents and outcomes of uncertainty in older adults with cancer: a scoping review of the literature. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017;44(4):152–67.CrossRef Jabloo VG, Alibhai SMH, Fitch M, Tourangeau AE, Ayala AP, Puts MTE. Antecedents and outcomes of uncertainty in older adults with cancer: a scoping review of the literature. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017;44(4):152–67.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The constructivist credo: Left Coast Press, Inc.; 2013. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The constructivist credo: Left Coast Press, Inc.; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings – a qualitative study
Authors
Jannike Dyb Oksavik
Marit Solbjør
Ralf Kirchhoff
Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02184-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Geriatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue