Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient preferences are integral to person-centred care, but preference stability is poorly understood in older people, who may experience fluctuant illness trajectories with episodes of acute illness. We aimed to describe, and explore influences on the stability of care preferences in frail older people following recent acute illness.

Methods

Mixed-methods prospective cohort study with dominant qualitative component, parallel data collection and six-month follow up. Study population: age ≥ 65, Rockwood Clinical Frailty score ≥ 5, recent acute illness requiring acute assessment/hospitalisation. Participants rated the importance of six preferences (to extend life, improve quality of life, remain independent, be comfortable, support ‘those close to me’, and stay out of hospital) at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks using a 0–4 scale, and ranked the most important. A maximum-variation sub-sample additionally contributed serial in-depth qualitative interviews. We described preference stability using frequencies and proportions, and undertook thematic analysis to explore influences on preference stability.

Results

90/192 (45%) of potential participants consented. 82/90 (91%) answered the baseline questionnaire; median age 84, 63% female. Seventeen undertook qualitative interviews. Most participants consistently rated five of the six preferences as important (range 68–89%). ‘Extend life’ was rated important by fewer participants (32–43%). Importance ratings were stable in 61–86% of cases. The preference ranked most important was unstable in 82% of participants.
Preference stability was supported by five influences: the presence of family support; both positive or negative care experiences; preferences being concordant with underlying values; where there was slowness of recovery from illness; and when preferences linked to long term goals. Preference change was related to changes in health awareness, or life events; if preferences were specific to a particular context, or multiple concurrent preferences existed, these were also more liable to change.

Conclusions

Preferences were largely stable following acute illness. Stability was reinforced by care experiences and the presence of family support. Where preferences were unstable, this usually related to changing health awareness. Consideration of these influences during preference elicitation or advance care planning will support delivery of responsive care to meet preferences. Obtaining longer-term data across diverse ethnic groups is needed in future research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Street RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):167–80.CrossRef Street RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):167–80.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J. Through the patient's eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1993. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J. Through the patient's eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1993.
7.
go back to reference Etkind SN, Bone AE, Lovell N, Murtagh FE, Higginson IJ. Influences on care preferences of older people with advanced illness: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. JAGS. 2018;66(5):1031–9.CrossRef Etkind SN, Bone AE, Lovell N, Murtagh FE, Higginson IJ. Influences on care preferences of older people with advanced illness: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. JAGS. 2018;66(5):1031–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1487–92.CrossRef Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1487–92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lunney JR, Lynn J, Hogan C. Profiles of older medicare decedents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6):1108–12.CrossRef Lunney JR, Lynn J, Hogan C. Profiles of older medicare decedents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6):1108–12.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wallis S, Wall J, Biram R, Romero-Ortuno R. Association of the clinical frailty scale with hospital outcomes. QJM. 2015;108(12):943–9.CrossRef Wallis S, Wall J, Biram R, Romero-Ortuno R. Association of the clinical frailty scale with hospital outcomes. QJM. 2015;108(12):943–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association; 2000.CrossRef Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association; 2000.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kohut N, Sam M, O'Rourke K, MacFadden DK, Salit I, Singer PA. Stability of treatment preferences: although most preferences do not change, most people change some of their preferences. J Clin Ethics. 1997;8(2):124–35.PubMed Kohut N, Sam M, O'Rourke K, MacFadden DK, Salit I, Singer PA. Stability of treatment preferences: although most preferences do not change, most people change some of their preferences. J Clin Ethics. 1997;8(2):124–35.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd Edition ed; 2018. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd Edition ed; 2018.
23.
go back to reference Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research: Sage; 2010. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research: Sage; 2010.
24.
go back to reference Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. English indices of deprivation 2015: Office For National Statisitcs, UK. 2015. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. English indices of deprivation 2015: Office For National Statisitcs, UK. 2015.
25.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173(5):489–95.CrossRef Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173(5):489–95.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC. The Australia-modified Karnofsky performance status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481]. BMC Palliative Care. 2005;4(1):7. Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC. The Australia-modified Karnofsky performance status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481]. BMC Palliative Care. 2005;4(1):7.
32.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2010;341. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2010;341.
35.
go back to reference Chochinov HM. Dignity and the essence of medicine: the a, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ. 2007;335(7612):184.CrossRef Chochinov HM. Dignity and the essence of medicine: the a, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ. 2007;335(7612):184.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, et al. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1203.CrossRef Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, et al. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1203.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference van Wijmen MP, Pasman HRW, Twisk JW, et al. Stability of end-of-life preferences in relation to health status and life-events: a cohort study with a 6-year follow-up among holders of an advance directive. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209315.CrossRef van Wijmen MP, Pasman HRW, Twisk JW, et al. Stability of end-of-life preferences in relation to health status and life-events: a cohort study with a 6-year follow-up among holders of an advance directive. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209315.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people
Publication date
01-12-2020
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01725-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Geriatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue