Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Does the institutionalization influence elderly’s quality of life? A systematic review and meta–analysis

Authors: Mariana Marinho Davino de Medeiros, Talita Malini Carletti, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues-Garcia

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Institutionalization is a global phenomenon and its impact on elderly’s quality of life (QoL) is under discussion. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the influence of the institutionalization on elderly’s QoL.

Methods

Searches were performed in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Cochrane Library and SIGLE by two independent reviewers up to May 2019. The eligibility criteria were based on PECO strategy, considering observational studies in elderly (P), which were (E) or not (C) institutionalized to identify differences in their QoL (O). For qualitative synthesis, data were extracted and risk of bias was evaluated through a validated guideline. Meta-analysis was based on Mean Difference (MD) and Standard Mean Difference (SMD) calculation (p ≤ 0.05). The evidence was quality-tested using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

The initial search identified 3841 articles. Duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were read and eligibility criteria were applied, remaining 16 sixteen cross-sectional studies that were included for data extraction and qualitative synthesis. Out of 16 articles, 14 evaluated the Health-Related Quality of Life, using Leipad (n = 2), WHOQOL-BREF and/or OLD (n = 8), SF-36 or RAND-36 (n = 4) questionnaires, and two assessed the Oral Health–Related Quality of Life, through GOHAI questionnaire. One eligible article was considered as low risk of bias. In the meta-analysis, 12 studies were included. Leipad questionnaire did not show differences on elderly’s QoL (MD 0.11 [− 0.10, 0.32] I2 = 76%). Differences on elderly’s QoL were detected through WHOQOL-BREF (SMD -0.70 [CI95%: − 0.94, − 0.47] I2 = 93%), WHOQOL-OLD (SMD -1.13 [− 1.47, − 0.80] I2 = 91%) and SF-36/RAND-36 (MD -5.97 [CI95%: − 11.29, − 0.64] I2 = 90%). All studies had very low or low certainty of evidence, since the study design influenced evidence classification, and show high heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Although the institutionalization influences negatively the elderly’s QoL, further well-designed studies are needed to confirm this evidence.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Wilmoth JR. Demography of longevity: past, present, and future trends. Exp Gerontol. 2000;35(9–10):1111–29.CrossRef Wilmoth JR. Demography of longevity: past, present, and future trends. Exp Gerontol. 2000;35(9–10):1111–29.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Active ageing: A policy framework. A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid: WHO; 2002. World Health Organization. Active ageing: A policy framework. A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid: WHO; 2002.
5.
go back to reference Campos ACV, Ferreira EF, Vargas AMD. Determinants of active aging according to quality of life and gender. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2015;20(7):2221–37.CrossRef Campos ACV, Ferreira EF, Vargas AMD. Determinants of active aging according to quality of life and gender. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2015;20(7):2221–37.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–9.CrossRef Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Del Duca GF, Silva SG, Thumé E, Santos IS, Halla PC. Predictive factors for institutionalization of the elderly: a case-control study. Rev Saúde Pública. 2012;46(1):147–53.CrossRef Del Duca GF, Silva SG, Thumé E, Santos IS, Halla PC. Predictive factors for institutionalization of the elderly: a case-control study. Rev Saúde Pública. 2012;46(1):147–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pulst A, Fassmer AM, Schmiemann G. Experiences and involvement of family members in transfer decisions from nursing home to hospital: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:155.CrossRef Pulst A, Fassmer AM, Schmiemann G. Experiences and involvement of family members in transfer decisions from nursing home to hospital: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:155.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Akça F, Sahin G. A study comparing the quality of life and related psychological symptoms of the elderly living in nursing homes, with the ones living with their families. Turkish J Geriatr. 2008;11(4):190–9. Akça F, Sahin G. A study comparing the quality of life and related psychological symptoms of the elderly living in nursing homes, with the ones living with their families. Turkish J Geriatr. 2008;11(4):190–9.
11.
go back to reference Alcarde ACB, Bittar TO, Fornazari DH, Meneghim MC, Ambrosano GMV, Pereira AC. A cross-sectional study of oral health-related quality of life of Piracicaba’s elderly population. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2010;25(2):126–31.CrossRef Alcarde ACB, Bittar TO, Fornazari DH, Meneghim MC, Ambrosano GMV, Pereira AC. A cross-sectional study of oral health-related quality of life of Piracicaba’s elderly population. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2010;25(2):126–31.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bodur S, Dayanir CD. Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(7):652–6.CrossRef Bodur S, Dayanir CD. Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(7):652–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bonan PRF, Borges SP, Haikal DS, Silveira MF, Martelli-Júnior H. Unsatisfactory Oral and rehabilitation conditions dissociated from quality of life perception. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2008;23(2):115–9. Bonan PRF, Borges SP, Haikal DS, Silveira MF, Martelli-Júnior H. Unsatisfactory Oral and rehabilitation conditions dissociated from quality of life perception. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2008;23(2):115–9.
16.
go back to reference Dagios P, Vasconcellos C, Evangelista DHR. Evaluation of quality of life: a comparison between non- institutionalized elderly. Estud Interdiscip Envelhec. 2015;20(2):469–84. Dagios P, Vasconcellos C, Evangelista DHR. Evaluation of quality of life: a comparison between non- institutionalized elderly. Estud Interdiscip Envelhec. 2015;20(2):469–84.
18.
go back to reference Herazo-Beltrán Y, Quintero-Cruz MV, Pinillos-Patiño Y, García-Puello F, Núñez-Bravo N, Suarez-Palacio D. Quality of life, functionality and physical fitness in institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly people. Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension. 2017;12(5):174–81. Herazo-Beltrán Y, Quintero-Cruz MV, Pinillos-Patiño Y, García-Puello F, Núñez-Bravo N, Suarez-Palacio D. Quality of life, functionality and physical fitness in institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly people. Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension. 2017;12(5):174–81.
19.
go back to reference Khoury HTT, Sá-Neves AC. Perceived control and quality of life: comparison between elderly living in nursing homes and in the community. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2014;17(3):553–65.CrossRef Khoury HTT, Sá-Neves AC. Perceived control and quality of life: comparison between elderly living in nursing homes and in the community. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2014;17(3):553–65.CrossRef
20.
23.
go back to reference Ramos LJ, Pizzato AC, Ettrich B, Melnik CS, Goldim JR. Ethical and nutrition issues in a sample of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly. Revista HCPA. 2012;32(2):223–6. Ramos LJ, Pizzato AC, Ettrich B, Melnik CS, Goldim JR. Ethical and nutrition issues in a sample of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly. Revista HCPA. 2012;32(2):223–6.
24.
go back to reference Urciuoli O, Dello Buono M, Padoani W, De Leo D. Assessment of quality of life in the oldest-olds living in nursing homes and at home. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1998;6:507–14.CrossRef Urciuoli O, Dello Buono M, Padoani W, De Leo D. Assessment of quality of life in the oldest-olds living in nursing homes and at home. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1998;6:507–14.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vitorino LM, Paskulin LM, Vianna LA. Quality of life of seniors living in the community and in long term care facilities: a comparative study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013;21:3–11.CrossRef Vitorino LM, Paskulin LM, Vianna LA. Quality of life of seniors living in the community and in long term care facilities: a comparative study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013;21:3–11.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Maia LC, Antonio AG. Systematic reviews in dental research. A guideline J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Winter;37(2):117–24.CrossRef Maia LC, Antonio AG. Systematic reviews in dental research. A guideline J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Winter;37(2):117–24.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Petrie A, Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Further statistics in dentistry part 8: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br Dent J. 2003;194(2):73–8.CrossRef Petrie A, Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Further statistics in dentistry part 8: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br Dent J. 2003;194(2):73–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fowkes FG, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. BMJ. 1991;302(6785):1136–40.CrossRef Fowkes FG, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. BMJ. 1991;302(6785):1136–40.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane library. Chichester: Wiley.; 2006. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane library. Chichester: Wiley.; 2006.
32.
33.
go back to reference Paskulin LMG, Córdova FP, Costa FM, Vianna LAC. Elders’ perception of quality of life. Acta paul enferm. 2010;23(1):101–7.CrossRef Paskulin LMG, Córdova FP, Costa FM, Vianna LAC. Elders’ perception of quality of life. Acta paul enferm. 2010;23(1):101–7.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference De Leo D, Diekstra RF, Lonnqvist J, Trabucchi M, Cleiren MH, Frisoni GB, Dello Buono M, Haltunen A, Zucchetto M, Rozzini R, Grigoletto F, Sampaio-Faria J. LEIPAD, an internationally applicable instrument to assess quality of life in the elderly. Behav Med. 1998;24(1):17–27.CrossRef De Leo D, Diekstra RF, Lonnqvist J, Trabucchi M, Cleiren MH, Frisoni GB, Dello Buono M, Haltunen A, Zucchetto M, Rozzini R, Grigoletto F, Sampaio-Faria J. LEIPAD, an internationally applicable instrument to assess quality of life in the elderly. Behav Med. 1998;24(1):17–27.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Group TW. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–85.CrossRef Group TW. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–85.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.CrossRef The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group. Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res. 2005 Dec;14(10):2197–214.CrossRef Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group. Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res. 2005 Dec;14(10):2197–214.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–27.CrossRef Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–27.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, Kohler B. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(2):195–204.CrossRef Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, Kohler B. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(2):195–204.CrossRef
43.
Metadata
Title
Does the institutionalization influence elderly’s quality of life? A systematic review and meta–analysis
Authors
Mariana Marinho Davino de Medeiros
Talita Malini Carletti
Marcela Baraúna Magno
Lucianne Cople Maia
Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti
Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues-Garcia
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Geriatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue