Top

BMC Geriatrics

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Falls efficacy instruments for community-dwelling older adults: a COSMIN-based systematic review

Authors: Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh, Judith Lane, Tianma Xu, Nigel Gleeson, Chee Wee Tan

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Falls efficacy is a widely-studied latent construct in community-dwelling older adults. Various self-reported instruments have been used to measure falls efficacy. In order to be informed of the choice of the best measurement instrument for a specific purpose, empirical evidence of the development and measurement properties of falls efficacy related instruments is needed.

Methods

The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Intruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to summarise evidence on the development, content validity, and structural validity of instruments measuring falls efficacy in community-dwelling older adults. Databases including MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL were searched (May 2019). Records on the development of instruments and studies assessing content validity or structural validity of falls efficacy related scales were included. COSMIN methodology was used to guide the review of eligible studies and in the assessment of their methodological quality. Evidence of content validity: relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility and unidimensionality for structural validity were synthesised. A modified GRADE approach was applied to evidence synthesis.

Results

Thirty-five studies, of which 18 instruments had been identified, were included in the review. High-quality evidence showed that the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)-13 items (MFES-13) has sufficient relevance, yet insufficient comprehensiveness for measuring falls efficacy. Moderate quality evidence supported that the FES-10 has sufficient relevance, and MFES-14 has sufficient comprehensibility. Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale–Simplified (ABC-15) has sufficient relevance in measuring balance confidence supported by moderate-quality evidence. Low to very low-quality evidence underpinned the content validity of other instruments. High-quality evidence supported sufficient unidimensionality for eight instruments (FES-10, MFES-14, ABC-6, ABC-15, ABC-16, Iconographical FES (Icon-FES), FES–International (FES-I) and Perceived Ability to Prevent and Manage Fall Risks (PAPMFR)).

Conclusion

Content validity of instruments to measure falls efficacy is understudied. Structural validity is sufficient for a number of widely-used instruments. Measuring balance confidence is a subset of falls efficacy. Further work is needed to investigate a broader construct for falls efficacy.

Available only for authorised users

World Health Organization. Falls. World Health Organization. 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.

Hartholt KA, van Beeck EF, van der Cammen TJM. Mortality from falls in dutch adults 80 years and older, 2000-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(13):1380–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pua YH, Ong PH, Clark RA, Matcher DB, Lim ECW. Falls efficacy, postural balance, and risk for falls in older adults with falls-related emergency department visits: prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0682-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yoshikawa A, Smith ML. Mediating role of fall-related efficacy in a fall prevention program. Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(2):393–405. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.2.15.CrossRefPubMed

Schoene D, Heller C, Aung YN, Sieber CC, Kemmler W, Freiberger E. A systematic review on the influence of fear of falling on quality of life in older people: is there a role for falls? Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:701–19. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S197857.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRefPubMed

Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):P239–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.p239.CrossRefPubMed

Moore DS, Ellis R. Measurement of fall-related psychological constructs among independent-living older adults: a review of the research literature. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(6):684–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802148855.CrossRefPubMed

Hill KD, Schwarz JA, Kalogeropoulos AJ, Gibson SJ. Fear of falling revisited. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(10):1025–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90063-5.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(1):M28–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Simpson JM, Worsfold C, Fisher KD, Valentine JD. The CONFbal scale: a measure of balance confidence - a key outcome of rehabilitation. Physiotherapy. 2009;95(2):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.12.004.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the falls efficacy scale - international (FES-I). Age Ageing. 2005;34(6):614–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afi196.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Delbaere K, Smith ST, Lord SR. Development and initial validation of the iconographical falls efficacy scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(6):674–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr019.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Li F, Fisher KJ, Harmer P, McAuley E. Falls self-efficacy as a mediator of fear of falling in an exercise intervention for older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60(1):P34–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.1.P34.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hughes CC, Kneebone II, Jones F, Brady B. A theoretical and empirical review of psychological factors associated with falls-related psychological concerns in community-dwelling older people. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(7):1071–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214002701.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lachman ME, Howland J, Tennstedt S, Jette A, Assmann S, Peterson EW. Fear of falling and activity restriction: the survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly (SAFFE). J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53B(1):P43–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53B.1.P43.CrossRef

17.

Velozo CA, Peterson EW. Developing meaningful fear of falling measures for community dwelling elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(9):662–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200109000-00006.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Huang TT. Geriatric fear of falling measure: development and psychometric testing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(3):357–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.04.006.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hotchkiss A, Fisher A, Robertson R, Ruttencutter A, Schuffert J, Barker DB. Convergent and predictive validity of three scales related to falls in the elderly. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58(1):100–3. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.1.100.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Peretz C, Herman T, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. Assessing fear of falling: can a short version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale be useful? Mov Disord. 2006;21(12):2101–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21113.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Simpson J, Worsfold C, Hawke J. Balance confidence in elderly people the CONFbal scale. Age Ageing. 1998;27(suppl 2):57-b-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/27.suppl_2.57-b.CrossRef

22.

Hadjistavropoulos T, Delbaere K, Fitzgerald TD. Reconceptualizing the role of fear of falling and balance confidence in fall risk. J Aging Health. 2011;23(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264310378039.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Filiatrault J, Gauvin L, Fournier M, Parisien M, Robitaille Y, Laforest S, et al. Evidence of the psychometric qualities of a simplified version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale for community-dwelling seniors. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2007;88(5):664–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.003.CrossRef

24.

Hallam RS, Hinchcliffe R. Emotional stability; its relationship to confidence in maintaining balance. J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(4–5):421–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(91)90037-o.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Jørstad EC, Hauer K, Becker C, Lamb SE. ProFaNE group. Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(3):501–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53172.x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, De Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Mokkink LB, De Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Chiarotto A, De Vet HCW, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of health-related patient-reported outcome measures: a delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Karström L, Yttergren M, Borgblad M, Stenström CH. The falls-efficacy scale. Nord Fysioter. 2002;6(2):66–73.

32.

Parry SW, Steen N, Galloway SR, Kenny RA, Bond J. Falls and confidence related quality of life outcome measures in an older british cohort. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(904):103–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.77.904.103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Aleksic J, Zvekic-Svorcan J, Stupar NV, Jeremic I, Grgurevic A. Cross-cultural validation of the modified falls efficacy scale in serbian community-dwelling women at risk for osteoporotic fracture. Menopause. 2018;25(4):444–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001009.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Perrot A, Castanier C, Maillot P, Zitari H. French validation of the modified-falls efficacy scale (M-FES Fr). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;78:233–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.07.001.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Lusardi MM, Smith EV Jr. Development of a scale to assess concern about falling and applications to treatment programs. J Outcome Meas. 1997;1(1):34–55.PubMed

36.

Schott N. Reliability and validity of the german short version of the activities specific balance confidence (ABC-D6) scale in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(2):272–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.05.003.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Guan Q, Han H, Li Y, Zhao L, Jin L, Zhan Q. Activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale adapted for the mainland population of China. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(7):648–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511427748.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Arnadottir SA, Lundin-Olsson L, Gunnarsdottir ED, Fisher AG. Application of rasch analysis to examine psychometric aspects of the activities-specific balance confidence scale when used in a new cultural context. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):156–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.010.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wang YC, Sindhu B, Lehman L, Li X, Yen SC, Kapellusch J. Rasch analysis of the activities-specific balance confidence scale in older adults seeking outpatient rehabilitation services. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(7):574–83. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.8023.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Ayhan Ç, Büyükturan Ö, Kirdi N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç. The turkish version of the activities specific balance confidence (abc) scale: its cultural adaptation, validation and reliability in older adults. Turk Geriatri Dergisi. 2014;17(2):157–63.

41.

Mak MK, Lau AL, Law FS, Cheung CC, Wong IS. Validation of the chinese translated activities-specific balance confidence scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(4):496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Schott N. German adaptation of the “activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale” for the assessment of falls-related self-efficacy. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2008;41(6):475–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-007-0504-9.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Delbaere K, Smith ST, Lord SR. Development and initial validation of the iconographical falls efficacy scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66A(6):674–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr019.CrossRef

44.

Papadimitriou A, Perry M. A systematic review of the effects of perturbation training on preventing falls. NZ J Physiother. 2017;45(1):31–49.

45.

Moon Y, Sosnoff JJ. Safe landing strategies during a fall: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(4):783–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.460.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Falls efficacy instruments for community-dwelling older adults: a COSMIN-based systematic review
Authors: Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh
Judith Lane
Tianma Xu
Nigel Gleeson
Chee Wee Tan
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01960-7

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Falls efficacy instruments for community-dwelling older adults: a COSMIN-based systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

The effects of single and a combination of determinants of anaemia in the very old: results from the TULIPS consortium

Expert-based medication reviews to reduce polypharmacy in older patients in primary care: a northern-Italian cluster-randomised controlled trial

Effects of a multimodal exercise intervention on physical and cognitive functions in patients with chronic low back pain (MultiMove): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Visceral fat area is the measure of obesity best associated with mobility disability in community dwelling oldest-old Chinese adults

Job-search self-efficacy and reemployment willingness among older adults: roles of achievement motivation and age

Factors associated with TBS worse than BMD in non-osteoporotic elderly population: Bushehr elderly health program

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page