Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Dementia | Research article

It takes two to tango: carers’ reflections on their participation and the participation of people with dementia in the James Lind Alliance process

Authors: Agnete Nygaard, Liv Halvorsrud, Asta Bye, Astrid Bergland

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Worldwide, patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research has grown steadily in recent decades. The James Lind Alliance (JLA) is one approach to PPI that brings patients, carers and clinicians together to identify priorities for future research in a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP). Our study aim was to describe the reflections of informal carers of people with dementia on the possibility of participating in the JLA’s PSP process, for both themselves and the recipients of their care. In addition, we wanted to explore barriers to and facilitators of their participation.

Methods

We conducted four focus groups with 36 carers of people with dementia. Thematic analysis was applied to analyse the data.

Results

An overarching theme emerged from the participants’ reflections: “Creating empowering teams where all voices are heard”. The overarching theme incorporates the participants’ suggestions about the importance of equivalence in power, mutual agreement with and understanding of the goals, adequate support, openness about each partner’s tasks and the bonds needed between the partners to sustain the enterprise, and expectations of positive outcomes. From the overarching theme, two main themes emerged: “Interaction of human factors, the PSP process and the environment” and “The power of position and knowledge”. The overall results indicated that carers are willing to participate in PSP processes and that they thought it important for people with dementia to participate in PSP processes as well, even if some might need extra support to do so. The carers also identified the need for research topics that influence their everyday lives, policy development and healthcare services.

Conclusions

Both carers and the people with dementia for whom they care are able to contribute to the PSP process when given sufficient support. The involvement of these groups is important for setting healthcare research agendas, developing research projects that increase awareness and knowledge about their circumstances and improving health professionals’, researchers’ and policymakers’ understanding of and insight into their unique situations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Law E, Russ TC, Connelly PJ. What motivates patients and carers to participate in dementia studies? Nurs Older People. 2013;25(9):31–6.PubMedCrossRef Law E, Russ TC, Connelly PJ. What motivates patients and carers to participate in dementia studies? Nurs Older People. 2013;25(9):31–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75.e2.PubMedCrossRef Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75.e2.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bateman DR, Brady E, Wilkerson D, Yi E-H, Karanam Y, Callahan CM. Comparing crowdsourcing and friendsourcing: a social media-based feasibility study to support Alzheimer disease caregivers. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(4):e56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bateman DR, Brady E, Wilkerson D, Yi E-H, Karanam Y, Callahan CM. Comparing crowdsourcing and friendsourcing: a social media-based feasibility study to support Alzheimer disease caregivers. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(4):e56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Middendorp JJ, Allison HC, Ahuja S, Bracher D, Dyson C, Fairbank J, et al. Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(5):341–6.PubMedCrossRef Van Middendorp JJ, Allison HC, Ahuja S, Bracher D, Dyson C, Fairbank J, et al. Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(5):341–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N. Patient and public involvement: models and muddles. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(18):2547–54.PubMedCrossRef Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N. Patient and public involvement: models and muddles. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(18):2547–54.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O'Cathain A, Boyer I, Taylor J, MacDonald C, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Res. 2018;7:752.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O'Cathain A, Boyer I, Taylor J, MacDonald C, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Res. 2018;7:752.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kylberg M, Haak M, Iwarsson S. Research with and about user participation: potentials and challenges. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;30:105–8.CrossRef Kylberg M, Haak M, Iwarsson S. Research with and about user participation: potentials and challenges. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;30:105–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hall DA, Mohamad N, Firkins L, Fenton M, Stockdale D. Identifying and prioritizing unmet research questions for people with tinnitus: the James Lind Alliance tinnitus priority setting partnership. Clin Investig (Lond). 2013;3(1):21–8.CrossRef Hall DA, Mohamad N, Firkins L, Fenton M, Stockdale D. Identifying and prioritizing unmet research questions for people with tinnitus: the James Lind Alliance tinnitus priority setting partnership. Clin Investig (Lond). 2013;3(1):21–8.CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Elliott MJ, Sale JEM, Goodarzi Z, Wilhelm L, Laupacis A, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2018;21(6):1142–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elliott MJ, Sale JEM, Goodarzi Z, Wilhelm L, Laupacis A, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2018;21(6):1142–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sheperd V, Wood F, Hood K. Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff. Age Ageing. 2017;46:284–90. Sheperd V, Wood F, Hood K. Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff. Age Ageing. 2017;46:284–90.
16.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Charlesworth G, Burnell K, Crellin N, Hoare Z, Hoe J, Knapp M, et al. Peer support and reminiscence therapy for people with dementia and their family carers: A factorial pragmatic randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1218–28. Charlesworth G, Burnell K, Crellin N, Hoare Z, Hoe J, Knapp M, et al. Peer support and reminiscence therapy for people with dementia and their family carers: A factorial pragmatic randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1218–28.
18.
go back to reference Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Second ed. London: Sage Publications; 2003. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Second ed. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
19.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Calif: Sage; 1985.CrossRef Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Calif: Sage; 1985.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–34.CrossRef Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–34.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Enosh G, Ben-Ari A. Reflexivity: the creation of liminal spaces—researchers, participants, and research encounters. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(4):578–84.PubMedCrossRef Enosh G, Ben-Ari A. Reflexivity: the creation of liminal spaces—researchers, participants, and research encounters. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(4):578–84.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harrison JD, Auerbach AD, Anderson W, Fagan M, Carnie M, Hanson C, et al. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities. Health Expect. 2019;22(3):307–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harrison JD, Auerbach AD, Anderson W, Fagan M, Carnie M, Hanson C, et al. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities. Health Expect. 2019;22(3):307–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Staley K, Cockcroft E, Shelly A, Liabo K. ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Staley K, Cockcroft E, Shelly A, Liabo K. ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maidment ID, Aston L, Moutela T, Fox CG, Hilton A. A qualitative study exploring medication management in people with dementia living in the community and the potential role of the community pharmacist. Health Expect. 2017;20(5):929–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Maidment ID, Aston L, Moutela T, Fox CG, Hilton A. A qualitative study exploring medication management in people with dementia living in the community and the potential role of the community pharmacist. Health Expect. 2017;20(5):929–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin E, Skelton DA, Lundin-Olsson L, Ginsberg SD. Reach the person behind the dementia: physical therapists’ reflections and strategies when composing physical training. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166686.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin E, Skelton DA, Lundin-Olsson L, Ginsberg SD. Reach the person behind the dementia: physical therapists’ reflections and strategies when composing physical training. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166686.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference McKenzie E, Potestio ML, Boyd JM, Niven DJ, Brundin-Mather R, Bagshaw SM, et al. Reconciling patient and provider priorities for improving the care of critically ill patients: a consensus method and qualitative analysis of decision making. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1367–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McKenzie E, Potestio ML, Boyd JM, Niven DJ, Brundin-Mather R, Bagshaw SM, et al. Reconciling patient and provider priorities for improving the care of critically ill patients: a consensus method and qualitative analysis of decision making. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1367–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, Jarden M. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):3.PubMedCrossRef Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, Jarden M. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):3.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Smith J, Dransfield A. Patient and carer involvement in healthcare education, service delivery and research: avoiding tokenism. Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Jul;22(3):65–6.PubMedCrossRef Smith J, Dransfield A. Patient and carer involvement in healthcare education, service delivery and research: avoiding tokenism. Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Jul;22(3):65–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kenny J, Baddeliyanage R, Shaikh F, Dimaras H. Facilitating an evolving service user involvement group for people with dementia: what can we learn? The journal of mental health training. Education and Practice. 2016;11(2):81–90. Kenny J, Baddeliyanage R, Shaikh F, Dimaras H. Facilitating an evolving service user involvement group for people with dementia: what can we learn? The journal of mental health training. Education and Practice. 2016;11(2):81–90.
32.
go back to reference Britton J, Gadeke L, Lovat L, Hamdy S, Hawkey C, McLaughlin J, et al. Research priority setting in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(11):824–31.PubMedCrossRef Britton J, Gadeke L, Lovat L, Hamdy S, Hawkey C, McLaughlin J, et al. Research priority setting in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(11):824–31.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Weber M. Makt og byråkrati. Oslo: Gyldendal; 1971. Weber M. Makt og byråkrati. Oslo: Gyldendal; 1971.
34.
go back to reference Askheim OP. Brukermedvirkning og empowerment - gammel vin på nye flasker? In: Askheim OP, Starrin B, editors. Empowerment i teori og praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2007. p. 34–46. Askheim OP. Brukermedvirkning og empowerment - gammel vin på nye flasker? In: Askheim OP, Starrin B, editors. Empowerment i teori og praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2007. p. 34–46.
35.
go back to reference Burr V. An introduction to social constructionism. J French Francophone Philos. 1995;7(3):267. Burr V. An introduction to social constructionism. J French Francophone Philos. 1995;7(3):267.
36.
go back to reference Foucault M. Discipline and punishment. Middlesex: Peregrine books; 1979. Foucault M. Discipline and punishment. Middlesex: Peregrine books; 1979.
37.
go back to reference Butcher HL, Banks S, Robertson J, Henderson P. Critical community practice. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.CrossRef Butcher HL, Banks S, Robertson J, Henderson P. Critical community practice. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Rowlands J. Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam; 1997.CrossRef Rowlands J. Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam; 1997.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Third ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013. Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Third ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
40.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Fourth ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Fourth ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018.
41.
go back to reference Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
It takes two to tango: carers’ reflections on their participation and the participation of people with dementia in the James Lind Alliance process
Authors
Agnete Nygaard
Liv Halvorsrud
Asta Bye
Astrid Bergland
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Dementia
Dementia
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01570-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Geriatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.