Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Community-dwelling older adults’ needs and acceptance regarding the use of robot technology to assist with daily living performance

Authors: Yeon-Hwan Park, Hee Kyung Chang, Min Hye Lee, Seong Hyeon Lee

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The rate of aging in Korea is extremely fast compared to major countries. We examined the key demands of community-dwelling older adults with regard to Connected Active Space technology, which provides tailored assistance with daily living performance through robotic services.

Methods

This study is based on a mixed-method design, through a quantitative survey (n = 234) first phase, followed by a qualitative study with focus group interviews (n = 23) to explore the needs and acceptance of community-dwelling aged people concerning the application of robot technology in their daily lives.

Results

The scores concerning the need for and acceptance of robot services to assist daily living performance were high, at 7.2 and 7.9 out of 10 points, respectively. Further, for both needs and acceptance, timely reaction to emergency situations, early detection of emergency situations, help to locate objects, assistance with mobility, and assistance in memory recall were prioritized (in that order). In a thematic analysis of qualitative data from three focus-group interviews, a ‘mismatch between desires and functional capacity’ was the core characteristic of living as an older person and ‘being a friend and helper’ was the most desired trait of a robot service.

Conclusion

Although most of the participants lived independently, they regularly experienced difficulties regarding buying products, transportation, using phones, and preparing meals. If appropriate assistance technology is developed, this population can maintain its independence. Thus, it is necessary to address main needs, including detecting and addressing emergency situations, locating objects, assisting mobility and memory recall, and assisting with daily living performance. New robot services that can be tailored to the functions or abilities of the elderly must be developed based on individually collected information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Welfare (2015). Living profiles of older people survey: a national report on the living status and welfare needs of older adults. Policy report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2015. Report no.: 11–1352000–001426-12. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2015). Living profiles of older people survey: a national report on the living status and welfare needs of older adults. Policy report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2015. Report no.: 11–1352000–001426-12.
2.
go back to reference Korea National Statistical Office. Statistics of the elderly (in Korean). Seoul: National statistical office; 2018. Korea National Statistical Office. Statistics of the elderly (in Korean). Seoul: National statistical office; 2018.
6.
go back to reference Harrefors C, Axelsson K, Sävenstedt S. Using assistive technology services at differing levels of care: healthy older couples’ perceptions. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(7):1523–32.CrossRef Harrefors C, Axelsson K, Sävenstedt S. Using assistive technology services at differing levels of care: healthy older couples’ perceptions. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(7):1523–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Skymne C, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Claesson L, Eklund K. Getting used to assistive devices: ambivalent experiences by frail elderly persons. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(2):194–203.CrossRef Skymne C, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Claesson L, Eklund K. Getting used to assistive devices: ambivalent experiences by frail elderly persons. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(2):194–203.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gramstad A, Storli SL, Hamran T. “Do I need it? Do I really need it?” elderly people experiences of unmet assistive technology device needs. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(4):287–93.CrossRef Gramstad A, Storli SL, Hamran T. “Do I need it? Do I really need it?” elderly people experiences of unmet assistive technology device needs. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(4):287–93.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mahmood A, Yamamoto T, Lee M, Steggell C. Perceptions and use of gerontechnology: implications for aging in place. J Hous Elder. 2008;22(1–2):104–26.CrossRef Mahmood A, Yamamoto T, Lee M, Steggell C. Perceptions and use of gerontechnology: implications for aging in place. J Hous Elder. 2008;22(1–2):104–26.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McCaig M, Waugh A, Duffy T, Martin CR. The lived experience of older people using assistive technology. Working Older People. 2012;16(4):170–4.CrossRef McCaig M, Waugh A, Duffy T, Martin CR. The lived experience of older people using assistive technology. Working Older People. 2012;16(4):170–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Williams V, McCrindle R, Victor C. Older people's perceptions of assistive technology—an exploratory pan-European study. J Integr Care. 2010;18(1):38–44.CrossRef Williams V, McCrindle R, Victor C. Older people's perceptions of assistive technology—an exploratory pan-European study. J Integr Care. 2010;18(1):38–44.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
14.
go back to reference Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):3–20.CrossRef Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):3–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Passmore C, Dobbie AE, Parchman M, Tysinger J. Guidelines for constructing a survey. Fam Med. 2002;34:281–6.PubMed Passmore C, Dobbie AE, Parchman M, Tysinger J. Guidelines for constructing a survey. Fam Med. 2002;34:281–6.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups, vol. 610. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups, vol. 610. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
17.
go back to reference Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research, vol. 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research, vol. 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996.
18.
go back to reference Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology. 2009;8(2):94–103.CrossRef Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology. 2009;8(2):94–103.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Seelye AM, Wild KV, Larimer N, Maxwell S, Kearns P, Kaye JA. Reactions to a remote-controlled video-communication robot in seniors' homes: a pilot study of feasibility and acceptance. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012;18(10):755–9.CrossRef Seelye AM, Wild KV, Larimer N, Maxwell S, Kearns P, Kaye JA. Reactions to a remote-controlled video-communication robot in seniors' homes: a pilot study of feasibility and acceptance. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012;18(10):755–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wu YH, Wrobel J, Cornuet M, Kerhervé H, Damnée S, Rigaud AS. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:801–11.CrossRef Wu YH, Wrobel J, Cornuet M, Kerhervé H, Damnée S, Rigaud AS. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:801–11.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smarr CA, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzner TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA. Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications 2012;56(1):153–157. Smarr CA, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzner TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA. Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications 2012;56(1):153–157.
24.
go back to reference Oh JH, Yi YJ, Shin CJ, Park C, Kang S, Kim J, Kim IS. Effects of Silver-Care-robot program on cognitive function, depression, and activities of daily living for institutionalized elderly people. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(3):388–96.CrossRef Oh JH, Yi YJ, Shin CJ, Park C, Kang S, Kim J, Kim IS. Effects of Silver-Care-robot program on cognitive function, depression, and activities of daily living for institutionalized elderly people. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(3):388–96.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Epiopoulos C. Gerontological nursing (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. Epiopoulos C. Gerontological nursing (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
26.
go back to reference Shin S. A study on a successful aging (discourse of the aged), vol. 14: Korean Academy of Practical Human Welfare; 2015. p. 41–73. Shin S. A study on a successful aging (discourse of the aged), vol. 14: Korean Academy of Practical Human Welfare; 2015. p. 41–73.
27.
go back to reference Vandemeulebroucke T, de Casterle BD, Gastmans C. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(2):149–67.CrossRef Vandemeulebroucke T, de Casterle BD, Gastmans C. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(2):149–67.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pammolli F, Riccaboni M, Magazzini L. The sustainability of European health care systems: beyond income and aging. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(5):623–34.CrossRef Pammolli F, Riccaboni M, Magazzini L. The sustainability of European health care systems: beyond income and aging. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(5):623–34.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rodeschini G. Gerotechnology: a new kind of care for aging? An analysis of the relationship between older people and technology. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(4):521–8.CrossRef Rodeschini G. Gerotechnology: a new kind of care for aging? An analysis of the relationship between older people and technology. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(4):521–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Community-dwelling older adults’ needs and acceptance regarding the use of robot technology to assist with daily living performance
Authors
Yeon-Hwan Park
Hee Kyung Chang
Min Hye Lee
Seong Hyeon Lee
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1227-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Geriatrics 1/2019 Go to the issue