Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

What is important to people living with dementia?: the ‘long-list’ of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions

Authors: Andrew J. E. Harding, Hazel Morbey, Faraz Ahmed, Carol Opdebeeck, Reena Lasrado, Paula R. Williamson, Caroline Swarbrick, Iracema Leroi, David Challis, Ingrid Hellstrom, Alistair Burns, John Keady, Siobhan T. Reilly

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Core outcome sets (COS) prioritise outcomes based on their importance to key stakeholders, reduce reporting bias and increase comparability across studies. The first phase of a COS study is to form a ‘long-list’ of outcomes. Key stakeholders then decide on their importance. COS reporting is described as suboptimal and this first phase is often under-reported. Our objective was to develop a ‘long-list’ of outcome items for non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia living at home.

Methods

Three iterative phases were conducted. First, people living with dementia, care partners, health and social care professionals, policymakers and researchers (n = 55) took part in interviews or focus groups and were asked which outcomes were important. Second, existing dementia trials were identified from the ALOIS database. 248 of 1009 pharmacological studies met the inclusion criteria. Primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from a 50% random sample (n = 124) along with eight key reviews/qualitative papers and 38 policy documents. Third, extracted outcome items were translated onto an existing qualitative framework and mapped into domains. The research team removed areas of duplication and refined the ‘long-list’ in eight workshops.

Results

One hundred seventy outcome items were extracted from the qualitative data and literature. The 170 outcome items were consolidated to 54 in four domains (Self-Managing Dementia Symptoms, Quality of Life, Friendly Neighbourhood & Home, Independence).

Conclusions

This paper presents a transparent blueprint for ‘long-list’ development. Though a useful resource in their own right, the 54 outcome items will be distilled further in a modified Delphi survey and consensus meeting to identify core outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. Living well with dementia: a National Dementia Strategy. Leeds: Department of Health; 2009. Department of Health. Living well with dementia: a National Dementia Strategy. Leeds: Department of Health; 2009.
3.
go back to reference Gitlin L, Corcoran M, Winter L, Boyce A, Hauck W. A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist. 2001;41(1):4–14. Gitlin L, Corcoran M, Winter L, Boyce A, Hauck W. A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist. 2001;41(1):4–14.
4.
go back to reference Leroi I, Woolham J, Gathercole R, et al. Does telecare prolong community living in dementia? A study protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(349):1–9. Leroi I, Woolham J, Gathercole R, et al. Does telecare prolong community living in dementia? A study protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(349):1–9.
5.
go back to reference Padilla R. Effectiveness of environment based interventions for people with Alzheimer's diseases and related dementias. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(5):514–22. Padilla R. Effectiveness of environment based interventions for people with Alzheimer's diseases and related dementias. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(5):514–22.
6.
go back to reference Fleming R, Sum S. Empirical studies on the effectiveness of assistive technology in the care of people with dementia: a systematic review. J Assist Technol. 2014;8(1):14–34. Fleming R, Sum S. Empirical studies on the effectiveness of assistive technology in the care of people with dementia: a systematic review. J Assist Technol. 2014;8(1):14–34.
8.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: Assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and carers - Clinical Guideline, Methods, evidence and recommendations (Draft for consultation). London: NICE; 2018. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: Assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and carers - Clinical Guideline, Methods, evidence and recommendations (Draft for consultation). London: NICE; 2018.
9.
go back to reference Pickett J, Bird C, Ballard C, et al. A roadmap to advance dementia research in prevention, diagnosis, intervention, and care by 2025. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(7):900–6.CrossRef Pickett J, Bird C, Ballard C, et al. A roadmap to advance dementia research in prevention, diagnosis, intervention, and care by 2025. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(7):900–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.
11.
go back to reference Williamson P, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(3). Williamson P, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(3).
12.
go back to reference Ritchie C, Muniz Terrera G, Quinn TJ. Dementia trials and dementia tribulations: methodological and analytical challenges in dementia research. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(31):1–11. Ritchie C, Muniz Terrera G, Quinn TJ. Dementia trials and dementia tribulations: methodological and analytical challenges in dementia research. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(31):1–11.
13.
go back to reference Pencheon D. The good indicators guide: understanding how to use and choose indicators. NHS Institue for Innovation and Improvement. Coventry: University of Warwick Campus; 2008. Pencheon D. The good indicators guide: understanding how to use and choose indicators. NHS Institue for Innovation and Improvement. Coventry: University of Warwick Campus; 2008.
14.
go back to reference Qureshi H. Outcomes in social care practice, outcomes in community care Practic. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2001. Qureshi H. Outcomes in social care practice, outcomes in community care Practic. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2001.
15.
go back to reference Dewitte L, Vandenbulcke M, Dezutter J. Cognitive functioning and quality of life: diverging views of older adults with Alzheimer and professional care staff. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(8):1074–81.CrossRef Dewitte L, Vandenbulcke M, Dezutter J. Cognitive functioning and quality of life: diverging views of older adults with Alzheimer and professional care staff. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(8):1074–81.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alzheimer's Society. My name is not dementia: people with dementia discuss quality of life indicators. London: Alzheimer's Society; 2010. Alzheimer's Society. My name is not dementia: people with dementia discuss quality of life indicators. London: Alzheimer's Society; 2010.
17.
go back to reference Bielsten T, Hellström I. An extended review of couple-centred interventions in dementia: exploring the what and why — part B. Dementia. 2017;0(0):1–24. Bielsten T, Hellström I. An extended review of couple-centred interventions in dementia: exploring the what and why — part B. Dementia. 2017;0(0):1–24.
18.
go back to reference Bamford C, Bruce E. Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. Ageing Soc. 2000;20(5):543–70.CrossRef Bamford C, Bruce E. Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. Ageing Soc. 2000;20(5):543–70.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Harding AJE, Morbey H, Ahmed F, et al. Developing a core outcome set for people living with dementia at home in their neighbourhoods and communities: study protocol for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community based health and social care interventions. Trials. 2018;19(247):13. Harding AJE, Morbey H, Ahmed F, et al. Developing a core outcome set for people living with dementia at home in their neighbourhoods and communities: study protocol for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community based health and social care interventions. Trials. 2018;19(247):13.
20.
go back to reference Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods R, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(1):14–29.CrossRef Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods R, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(1):14–29.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sinha I, Smyth R, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trial: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.CrossRef Sinha I, Smyth R, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trial: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reilly S, Miranda-Castillo C, Malouf R, et al. Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1. Reilly S, Miranda-Castillo C, Malouf R, et al. Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1.
23.
go back to reference Swarbrick CM, Doors O, Scottish Dementia Working G, Educate DK, Keady J. Visioning change: Co-producing a model of involvement and engagement in research. Dementia. 2016;0(0):1471301216674559. Swarbrick CM, Doors O, Scottish Dementia Working G, Educate DK, Keady J. Visioning change: Co-producing a model of involvement and engagement in research. Dementia. 2016;0(0):1471301216674559.
24.
go back to reference Morbey H, Harding AJE, Swarbrick C, Ahmed F, Elvish R, Keady J, et al. Involving people living with dementia in research: an accessible modified Delphi survey for core outcome set development. Trials. 2019;20(1):12.CrossRef Morbey H, Harding AJE, Swarbrick C, Ahmed F, Elvish R, Keady J, et al. Involving people living with dementia in research: an accessible modified Delphi survey for core outcome set development. Trials. 2019;20(1):12.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome set–STAndards for reporting: the COS-STAR statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002148.CrossRef Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome set–STAndards for reporting: the COS-STAR statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002148.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Smith H, Horobin A, Fackell K, et al. Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in Core Outcome Set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains. Res Involvement Engagement. 2018;4(8). Smith H, Horobin A, Fackell K, et al. Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in Core Outcome Set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains. Res Involvement Engagement. 2018;4(8).
28.
go back to reference Colucci E. “Focus groups can be fun”: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1422–33.CrossRef Colucci E. “Focus groups can be fun”: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1422–33.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRef Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sakellariou D, Boniface G, Brown P. Using joint interviews in a narrative-based study on illness experiences. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(11):1563–70.CrossRef Sakellariou D, Boniface G, Brown P. Using joint interviews in a narrative-based study on illness experiences. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(11):1563–70.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cummings J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire: Background and administration. Los Angeles: Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research; 1994. Cummings J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire: Background and administration. Los Angeles: Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research; 1994.
Metadata
Title
What is important to people living with dementia?: the ‘long-list’ of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions
Authors
Andrew J. E. Harding
Hazel Morbey
Faraz Ahmed
Carol Opdebeeck
Reena Lasrado
Paula R. Williamson
Caroline Swarbrick
Iracema Leroi
David Challis
Ingrid Hellstrom
Alistair Burns
John Keady
Siobhan T. Reilly
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Geriatrics 1/2019 Go to the issue