Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research Article

Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons

Authors: Asangaedem Akpan, Charlotte Roberts, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Barbara Batty, Claudia Bausewein, Diane Bell, David Bramley, Julie Bynum, Ian D. Cameron, Liang-Kung Chen, Anne Ekdahl, Arnold Fertig, Tom Gentry, Marleen Harkes, Donna Haslehurst, Jonathon Hope, Diana Rodriguez Hurtado, Helen Lyndon, Joanne Lynn, Mike Martin, Ruthe Isden, Francesco Mattace Raso, Sheila Shaibu, Jenny Shand, Cathie Sherrington, Samir Sinha, Gill Turner, Nienke De Vries, George Jia-Chyi Yi, John Young, Jay Banerjee

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) was founded in 2012 to propose consensus-based measurement tools and documentation for different conditions and populations.This article describes how the ICHOM Older Person Working Group followed a consensus-driven modified Delphi technique to develop multiple global outcome measures in older persons.
The standard set of outcome measures developed by this group will support the ability of healthcare systems to improve their care pathways and quality of care. An additional benefit will be the opportunity to compare variations in outcomes which encourages and supports learning between different health care systems that drives quality improvement. These outcome measures were not developed for use in research. They are aimed at non researchers in healthcare provision and those who pay for these services.

Methods

A modified Delphi technique utilising a value based healthcare framework was applied by an international panel to arrive at consensus decisions.To inform the panel meetings, information was sought from literature reviews, longitudinal ageing surveys and a focus group.

Results

The outcome measures developed and recommended were participation in decision making, autonomy and control, mood and emotional health, loneliness and isolation, pain, activities of daily living, frailty, time spent in hospital, overall survival, carer burden, polypharmacy, falls and place of death mapped to a three tier value based healthcare framework.

Conclusions

The first global health standard set of outcome measures in older persons has been developed to enable health care systems improve the quality of care provided to older persons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Banerjee S. Multimorbidity: older adults need health care that can count past one. Lancet. 2014;385:587–9.CrossRefPubMed Banerjee S. Multimorbidity: older adults need health care that can count past one. Lancet. 2014;385:587–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Makary MA. How health care's successes became distractions. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2014;33:1311–3.CrossRef Makary MA. How health care's successes became distractions. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2014;33:1311–3.CrossRef
5.
7.
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. Wright JM, ed. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. Wright JM, ed. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Taylor JO, Wallace RB, Ostfeld AM et al. Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, 1981–1993: [East Boston, Massachusetts, Iowa and Washington Counties, Iowa, New Haven, Connecticut, and North Central North Carolina] Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Available at: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/studies/9915. Accessed 17 June 2016. Taylor JO, Wallace RB, Ostfeld AM et al. Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, 1981–1993: [East Boston, Massachusetts, Iowa and Washington Counties, Iowa, New Haven, Connecticut, and North Central North Carolina] Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Available at: http://​www.​icpsr.​umich.​edu/​icpsrweb/​NACDA/​studies/​9915. Accessed 17 June 2016.
11.
go back to reference Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Simonsick EM, et al. The Women’s Health and Aging Study: Health and Social Characteristics of Older Women With Disability. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging; 1995. NIH Publication 95–4009:009–018 Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Simonsick EM, et al. The Women’s Health and Aging Study: Health and Social Characteristics of Older Women With Disability. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging; 1995. NIH Publication 95–4009:009–018
29.
44.
go back to reference Miner L, Bolding P, Hilbe J et al. Practical predictive analytics and Decisioning Systems for Medicine, 1st Edition. London: Elsevier; 2014. Miner L, Bolding P, Hilbe J et al. Practical predictive analytics and Decisioning Systems for Medicine, 1st Edition. London: Elsevier; 2014.
45.
47.
go back to reference Allsop J. Competing Paradigms and Health Research: Design and Process. In Researching Health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. 2nd edition. Saks M & Allsop J (Eds). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013. Allsop J. Competing Paradigms and Health Research: Design and Process. In Researching Health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. 2nd edition. Saks M & Allsop J (Eds). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
48.
go back to reference Bandeen-Roche K, Xue Q, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the Women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci. 2006;61:262–6.CrossRef Bandeen-Roche K, Xue Q, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the Women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci. 2006;61:262–6.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Turner G, Clegg A. Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British geriatrics society, age UK and Royal College of general practitioners report. Age Ageing. 2014;43:744–7.CrossRefPubMed Turner G, Clegg A. Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British geriatrics society, age UK and Royal College of general practitioners report. Age Ageing. 2014;43:744–7.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Ko FC, Walston JD.What is frailty? In: Evidenced based practice in palliative medicine Goldstein NE & Morrison S (Eds). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013. Chap 63 pg. 363–70. Ko FC, Walston JD.What is frailty? In: Evidenced based practice in palliative medicine Goldstein NE & Morrison S (Eds). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013. Chap 63 pg. 363–70.
53.
go back to reference Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype Gerontol a biol Sci. Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype Gerontol a biol Sci. Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.
54.
go back to reference Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1929–33.CrossRefPubMed Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1929–33.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference de Vries NM, Staal JB, Olde MG, et al. Evaluative frailty index for physical activity (EFIP): a reliable and valid instrument to measure changes in level of frailty. Phys Ther. 2013;93:551–61.CrossRefPubMed de Vries NM, Staal JB, Olde MG, et al. Evaluative frailty index for physical activity (EFIP): a reliable and valid instrument to measure changes in level of frailty. Phys Ther. 2013;93:551–61.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Moorhouse IP, Rockwood K. Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation. JR Coll Physicians Edinb. 2012;42:333–4.CrossRef Moorhouse IP, Rockwood K. Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation. JR Coll Physicians Edinb. 2012;42:333–4.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:681–7.CrossRefPubMed Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:681–7.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;0:1–8. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;0:1–8.
59.
go back to reference Russell D. UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66:20–40.CrossRefPubMed Russell D. UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66:20–40.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Netten A, Forder J, Beadle-Brown J, et al. Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Version 1.0 (ASCOT). Discussion Paper No. 2716, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury; 2010. Netten A, Forder J, Beadle-Brown J, et al. Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Version 1.0 (ASCOT). Discussion Paper No. 2716, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury; 2010.
62.
go back to reference Zarit SH, Orr NK, Zarit JM. The hidden victims of Alzheimer's disease. New York: Families under stress New York University Press; 1985. Zarit SH, Orr NK, Zarit JM. The hidden victims of Alzheimer's disease. New York: Families under stress New York University Press; 1985.
Metadata
Title
Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons
Authors
Asangaedem Akpan
Charlotte Roberts
Karen Bandeen-Roche
Barbara Batty
Claudia Bausewein
Diane Bell
David Bramley
Julie Bynum
Ian D. Cameron
Liang-Kung Chen
Anne Ekdahl
Arnold Fertig
Tom Gentry
Marleen Harkes
Donna Haslehurst
Jonathon Hope
Diana Rodriguez Hurtado
Helen Lyndon
Joanne Lynn
Mike Martin
Ruthe Isden
Francesco Mattace Raso
Sheila Shaibu
Jenny Shand
Cathie Sherrington
Samir Sinha
Gill Turner
Nienke De Vries
George Jia-Chyi Yi
John Young
Jay Banerjee
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Geriatrics 1/2018 Go to the issue