Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data

Authors: Mamadou Diop, Erin C. Strumpf, Geetanjali D. Datta

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Certain cancer case ascertainment methods used in Quebec and elsewhere are known to underestimate the burden of cancer, particularly for some subgroups. Algorithms using claims data are a low-cost option to improve the quality of cancer surveillance, but have not frequently been implemented at the population-level. Our objectives were to 1) develop a colorectal cancer (CRC) case ascertainment algorithm using population-level hospitalization and physician billing data, 2) validate the algorithm, and 3) describe the characteristics of cases.

Methods

We linked physician billing, hospitalization, and tumor registry data for 2,013,430 Montreal residents age 20+ (2000–2010). We compared the performance of three algorithms based on diagnosis and treatment codes from different data sources. We described identified cases according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, treatment patterns, site distribution, and time trends. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Our algorithm based on diagnosis and treatment codes identified 11,476 of the 12,933 incident CRC cases contained in the tumor registry as well as 2317 newly-captured cases. Our cases share similar overall time trends and site distributions to existing data, which increases our confidence in the algorithm. Our algorithm captured proportionally 35% more individuals age 50 and younger among CRC cases: 8.2% vs. 5.3%. The newly captured cases were also more likely to be living in socioeconomically advantaged areas.

Conclusions

Our algorithm provides a more complete picture of population-wide CRC incidence than existing case ascertainment methods. It could be used to estimate long-term incidence trends, aid in timely surveillance, and to inform interventions, in both Quebec and other jurisdictions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Butler EN, Chawla N, Lund J, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;46(1):13–35.CrossRef Butler EN, Chawla N, Lund J, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;46(1):13–35.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers. Med Care. 1999;37(5):436–44.CrossRefPubMed Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers. Med Care. 1999;37(5):436–44.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McClish D, Penberthy L, Pugh A. Using Medicare claims to identify second primary cancers and recurrences in order to supplement a cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):760–7.CrossRefPubMed McClish D, Penberthy L, Pugh A. Using Medicare claims to identify second primary cancers and recurrences in order to supplement a cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):760–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Penberthy L, McClish D, Manning C, et al. The added value of claims for cancer surveillance: results of varying case definitions. Med Care. 2005;43(7):705–12.CrossRefPubMed Penberthy L, McClish D, Manning C, et al. The added value of claims for cancer surveillance: results of varying case definitions. Med Care. 2005;43(7):705–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Freeman JL, Zhang D, Freeman DH, et al. An approach to identifying incident breast cancer cases using Medicare claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(6):605–14.CrossRefPubMed Freeman JL, Zhang D, Freeman DH, et al. An approach to identifying incident breast cancer cases using Medicare claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(6):605–14.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Warren JL, Feuer E, Potosky AL, et al. Use of Medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence. Med Care. 1999;37(5):445–56.CrossRefPubMed Warren JL, Feuer E, Potosky AL, et al. Use of Medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence. Med Care. 1999;37(5):445–56.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, et al. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast Cancer. Health Services Res. 2004;39(6p1):1733–50.CrossRef Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, et al. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast Cancer. Health Services Res. 2004;39(6p1):1733–50.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goldsbury D, Weber M, Yap S, et al. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldsbury D, Weber M, Yap S, et al. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Bousquet PJ, Caillet P, Coeuret-Pellicer M, et al. Using cancer case identification algorithms in medico-administrative databases: literature review and first results from the REDSIAM tumors group based on breast, colon, and lung cancer. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017;65 Suppl 4:S236–s242.CrossRefPubMed Bousquet PJ, Caillet P, Coeuret-Pellicer M, et al. Using cancer case identification algorithms in medico-administrative databases: literature review and first results from the REDSIAM tumors group based on breast, colon, and lung cancer. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017;65 Suppl 4:S236–s242.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Baldi I, Vicari P, Di Cuonzo D, et al. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):373–9.CrossRefPubMed Baldi I, Vicari P, Di Cuonzo D, et al. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):373–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Quantin C, Benzenine E, Hägi M, et al. Estimation of national colorectal-cancer incidence using claims databases. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:298369. Quantin C, Benzenine E, Hägi M, et al. Estimation of national colorectal-cancer incidence using claims databases. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:298369.
17.
go back to reference Rolnick SJ, Hart G, Barton MB, et al. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(4):257–62. Rolnick SJ, Hart G, Barton MB, et al. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(4):257–62.
18.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, Mandelson MT, Etzioni R, et al. Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal Cancer? A comparison of two health plans. Health Serv outcomes res method health services and outcomes research methodology: an international journal devoted to quantitative methods for the study of the utilization, quality, cost and outcomes of. Health Care. 2004;5(1):27–37. Ramsey SD, Mandelson MT, Etzioni R, et al. Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal Cancer? A comparison of two health plans. Health Serv outcomes res method health services and outcomes research methodology: an international journal devoted to quantitative methods for the study of the utilization, quality, cost and outcomes of. Health Care. 2004;5(1):27–37.
19.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, Scoggins JF, Blough DK, et al. Sensitivity of administrative claims to identify incident cases of lung cancer: a comparison of 3 health plans. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15(8):659–68.PubMed Ramsey SD, Scoggins JF, Blough DK, et al. Sensitivity of administrative claims to identify incident cases of lung cancer: a comparison of 3 health plans. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15(8):659–68.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal Cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:8. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal Cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:8.
22.
go back to reference Banque de données des statistiques officielles sur le Québec. Nombre d'adhérents selon le sexe, le groupe d'âge et la région sociosanitaire de la personne assurée au Régime public d'assurance médicaments, Québec, 2012. In. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec,; 2015. Banque de données des statistiques officielles sur le Québec. Nombre d'adhérents selon le sexe, le groupe d'âge et la région sociosanitaire de la personne assurée au Régime public d'assurance médicaments, Québec, 2012. In. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec,; 2015.
25.
go back to reference Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, et al. An area-based material and social deprivation index for public health in Quebec and Canada. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(8 Suppl 2):S17–22.PubMed Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, et al. An area-based material and social deprivation index for public health in Quebec and Canada. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(8 Suppl 2):S17–22.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.
27.
go back to reference Drolet M, Dion Y, Simard M, et al. Évolution de l'incidence et de la mortalité du cancer colorectal au Québec: une comparaison avec le Canada hors Québec et les pays industrialisés: Programmes de dépistage, génétique et lutte au cancer, Institut national de santé publique du Québec; 2009. Drolet M, Dion Y, Simard M, et al. Évolution de l'incidence et de la mortalité du cancer colorectal au Québec: une comparaison avec le Canada hors Québec et les pays industrialisés: Programmes de dépistage, génétique et lutte au cancer, Institut national de santé publique du Québec; 2009.
28.
go back to reference Chan TW, Brown C, Ho CC, et al. Primary tumor resection in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of a provincial population-based cohort. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33(1):52–5.CrossRefPubMed Chan TW, Brown C, Ho CC, et al. Primary tumor resection in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of a provincial population-based cohort. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33(1):52–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Le H, Ziogas A, Lipkin SM, et al. Effects of socioeconomic status and treatment disparities in colorectal cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(8):1950–62.CrossRef Le H, Ziogas A, Lipkin SM, et al. Effects of socioeconomic status and treatment disparities in colorectal cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(8):1950–62.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Abdelsattar ZM, Wong SL, Regenbogen SE, et al. Colorectal cancer outcomes and treatment patterns in patients too young for average-risk screening. Cancer. 2016;122(6):929–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abdelsattar ZM, Wong SL, Regenbogen SE, et al. Colorectal cancer outcomes and treatment patterns in patients too young for average-risk screening. Cancer. 2016;122(6):929–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference McBean AM, Warren JL, Babish JD. Measuring the incidence of cancer in elderly Americans using Medicare claims data. Cancer. 1994;73(9):2417–25.CrossRefPubMed McBean AM, Warren JL, Babish JD. Measuring the incidence of cancer in elderly Americans using Medicare claims data. Cancer. 1994;73(9):2417–25.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Goldsbury DE, Armstrong K, Simonella L, et al. Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in new South Wales. Australia: a validation study BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:387.PubMed Goldsbury DE, Armstrong K, Simonella L, et al. Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in new South Wales. Australia: a validation study BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:387.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Med Care. 2000;38(4):411–21.CrossRefPubMed Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Med Care. 2000;38(4):411–21.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bickell NA, Chassin MR. Determining the quality of breast cancer care: do tumor registries measure up? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(9):705–10.CrossRefPubMed Bickell NA, Chassin MR. Determining the quality of breast cancer care: do tumor registries measure up? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(9):705–10.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hall S, Schulze K, Groome P, et al. Using cancer registry data for survival studies: the example of the Ontario Cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed Hall S, Schulze K, Groome P, et al. Using cancer registry data for survival studies: the example of the Ontario Cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
Authors
Mamadou Diop
Erin C. Strumpf
Geetanjali D. Datta
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018 Go to the issue