Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The evaluation of the aortic annulus displacement during cardiac cycle using magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Tomasz Plonek, Mikolaj Berezowski, Jacek Kurcz, Przemyslaw Podgorski, Marek Sąsiadek, Bartosz Rylski, Andrzej Mysiak, Marek Jasinski

Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The stress in the ascending aorta results from many biomechanical factors including the geometry of the vessel and its maximum dimensions, arterial blood pressure and longitudinal systolic stretching due to heart motion. The stretching of the ascending aorta resulting from the longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus during the heart cycle has not been examined in the general population so far. The aim of the study is to evaluate this parameter using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the general population in all age groups.

Methods

The cardiac magnetic resonance images of 73 patients were evaluated. The maximum distance to which the ventriculo-aortic junction was pulled by the contracting heart (LDAA – longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus) was measured in the cine coronal sequences. Moreover, the maximum dimensions of the aortic root and the ascending aorta were assessed.

Results

The LDAA value was on average 11.6 ± 2.9 mm (range: 3-19 mm; 95% CI: 10.9–12.3 mm) and did not differ between males and females (11.8 ± 2.9 mm vs. 11.2 ± 2.9 mm, p = .408). The diameter of the ascending aorta was 32 ± 6.3 mm (range: 20-57 mm). The maximal dimension of the aortic root was 35 ± 5.1 mm (range: 18-42 mm). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the LDAA and the age of patients (r = −.38, p = .001). There was no significant correlation between the LDAA and aortic root dimension (r = .1, p = .409) and between the LDAA and diameter of the ascending aorta (r = .16, p = .170).

Conclusions

Human aortic root and ascending aorta are significantly stretched during systole and the distance to which the aorta is stretched decreases with age. The measurement of the longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus using the CMR is feasible and reproducible.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Erbel R, et al. ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2014. 2014;35(41):2873–926. Erbel R, et al. ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2014. 2014;35(41):2873–926.
3.
go back to reference Hiratzka LF, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010;121(13):e266–369.CrossRefPubMed Hiratzka LF, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010;121(13):e266–369.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pape LA, et al. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type a aortic dissection: observations from the international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2007;116(10):1120–7.CrossRefPubMed Pape LA, et al. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type a aortic dissection: observations from the international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2007;116(10):1120–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rylski B, et al. How does the ascending aorta geometry change when it dissects? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(13):1311–9.CrossRefPubMed Rylski B, et al. How does the ascending aorta geometry change when it dissects? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(13):1311–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kruger T, et al. Ascending aortic elongation and the risk of dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(2):241–7.CrossRefPubMed Kruger T, et al. Ascending aortic elongation and the risk of dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(2):241–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kruger T, et al. Aortic elongation and the risk for dissection: the Tubingen aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) projectdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(6):1119–26.CrossRefPubMed Kruger T, et al. Aortic elongation and the risk for dissection: the Tubingen aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) projectdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(6):1119–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim J, Baek S. Circumferential variations of mechanical behavior of the porcine thoracic aorta during the inflation test. J Biomech. 2011;44(10):1941–7.CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Baek S. Circumferential variations of mechanical behavior of the porcine thoracic aorta during the inflation test. J Biomech. 2011;44(10):1941–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Okamoto RJ, et al. The influence of mechanical properties on wall stress and distensibility of the dilated ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):842–50.CrossRefPubMed Okamoto RJ, et al. The influence of mechanical properties on wall stress and distensibility of the dilated ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):842–50.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Beller CJ, et al. Role of aortic root motion in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection. Circulation. 2004;109(6):763–9.CrossRefPubMed Beller CJ, et al. Role of aortic root motion in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection. Circulation. 2004;109(6):763–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beller CJ, et al. Increased aortic wall stress in aortic insufficiency: clinical data and computer model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):270–5.CrossRefPubMed Beller CJ, et al. Increased aortic wall stress in aortic insufficiency: clinical data and computer model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):270–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Plonek T, et al. The combined impact of mechanical factors on the wall stress of the human ascending aorta - a finite elements study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Plonek T, et al. The combined impact of mechanical factors on the wall stress of the human ascending aorta - a finite elements study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Martufi G, et al. Is there a role for biomechanical engineering in helping to elucidate the risk profile of the thoracic aorta? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):390–8.CrossRefPubMed Martufi G, et al. Is there a role for biomechanical engineering in helping to elucidate the risk profile of the thoracic aorta? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):390–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(9):841–57.CrossRefPubMed Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(9):841–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim EK, et al. Aortic diameter predicts acute type a aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(5):1505–10.CrossRefPubMed Kim EK, et al. Aortic diameter predicts acute type a aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(5):1505–10.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Doyle BJ, et al. Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. J Biomech. 2010;43(7):1408–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doyle BJ, et al. Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. J Biomech. 2010;43(7):1408–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Krishnan K, et al. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(4):471–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krishnan K, et al. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(4):471–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Martin C, Sun W, Elefteriades J. Patient-specific finite element analysis of ascending aorta aneurysms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;308(10):H1306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin C, Sun W, Elefteriades J. Patient-specific finite element analysis of ascending aorta aneurysms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;308(10):H1306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Mitchell GF, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1239–45.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell GF, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1239–45.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The evaluation of the aortic annulus displacement during cardiac cycle using magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Tomasz Plonek
Mikolaj Berezowski
Jacek Kurcz
Przemyslaw Podgorski
Marek Sąsiadek
Bartosz Rylski
Andrzej Mysiak
Marek Jasinski
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2261
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0891-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue