Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Study protocol

Effectiveness of computer-tailored Smoking Cessation Advice in Primary Care (ESCAPE): a Randomised Trial

Authors: Hazel Gilbert, Irwin Nazareth, Stephen Sutton, Richard Morris, Christine Godfrey

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Smoking remains a major public health problem; developing effective interventions to encourage more quit attempts, and to improve the success rate of self-quit attempts, is essential to reduce the numbers of people who smoke. Interventions for smoking cessation can be characterised in two extremes: the intensive face-to face therapy of the clinical approach, and large-scale, public health interventions and policy initiatives. Computer-based systems offer a method for generating highly tailored behavioural feedback letters, and can bridge the gap between these two extremes. Proactive mailing and recruitment can also serve as a prompt to motivate smokers to make quit attempts or to seek more intensive help. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of personally tailored feedback reports, sent to smokers identified from general practitioners lists on quit rates and quitting activity. The trial uses a modified version of a computer-based system developed by two of the authors to generate individually tailored feedback reports.

Method

A random sample of cigarette smokers, aged between 18 and 65, identified from GP records at a representative selection of practices registered with the GPRF are sent a questionnaire. Smokers returning the questionnaire are randomly allocated to a control group to receive usual care and standard information, or to an intervention group to receive usual care and standard information plus tailored feedback reports. Smoking status and cognitive change will be assessed by postal questionnaire at 6-months.

Discussion

Computer tailored personal feedback, adapted to reading levels and motivation to quit, is a simple and inexpensive intervention which could be widely replicated and delivered cost effectively to a large proportion of the smoking population. Given its recruitment potential, a modest success rate could have a large effect on public health. The intervention also fits into the broader scope of tobacco control, by prompting more quit attempts, and increasing referrals to specialised services. The provision of this option to smokers in primary care can complement existing services, and work synergistically with other measures to produce more quitters and reduce the prevalence of smoking in the UK.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN05385712
Literature
1.
2.
Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R: Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies. BMJ. 2000, 321: 323-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Jarvis MJ: Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation in the general population. The Tobacco Epidemic. Progress in Respiratory Research. Edited by: Bolliger CT, Fagerstrom KO. 1997, Basel: Karger, 28: 151-164.CrossRef
4.
Jarvis M, Wardle J: Social patterning of individual health behaviours: the case of cigarette smoking. Social determinants of health. Edited by: Marmot M, Wilkinson R. 1999, Oxford: OUP
5.
Dept of Health: Improvement, expansion and reform: the next 3 years. Priorities And Planning Framework 2003–2006. 2002, London: The Stationery Office
6.
Secretary of State for Health: Smoking Kills: a white paper on tobacco. 1998, London: Stationary Office
7.
Bauld L, Chesterman J, Judge K, Pound E, Coleman T, on behalf of the English Evaluation of Smoking Cessation Services: Impact of UK National Health Service smoking services: variations in outcomes in England. Tobacco Control. 2003, 12: 296-301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Cokkinides VE, Ward E, Jemal A, Thun M: Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results form the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. American Jnl of Preventive Medicine. 2005, 28: 119-122.CrossRef
9.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Fava JL, Rossi JS, Tsoh JY: Evaluating a population based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors. 2001, 26: 583-602.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B: One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999, 21: 276-283.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Pierce JP, Giovino GA, Hatziandreu EJ: Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. Do cessation programs help?. JAMA. 1990, 263: 2760-2765.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Mason D, Sutton S, Jarvis M: Evaluation of the BBC's Kick the Habit Campaign. Final Report to the British Heart Foundation and the King's Fund. 2002
13.
Etter J-F, Perneger TV, Ronchi A: Distributions by stage: international comparison and association with smoking prevalence. Preventive Medicine. 1997, 26: 580-585.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Sutton S, Gilbert H: Effectiveness of individually tailored smoking cessation advice letters as an adjunct to telephone counseling and generic self-help materials: randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2007, 102: 994-1000. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01831.xCrossRefPubMed
15.
Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J, van Breukelen G: Tailored intervention to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages. Jnl of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998, 66: 1-9.
16.
Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC: Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking cessation program. Jnl of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991, 59: 318-324.CrossRef
17.
Etter J-F, Perneger TV: Effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation program: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001, 161: 2596-2601.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fiore MC, Jorenby DE, Baker TB, Kenford SL: Tobacco dependence and the nicotine patch: clinical guidelines for effective use. Journal of American Medical Association. 1992, 268: 2687-2694.CrossRef
19.
Hughes JR: Combined psychological and nicotine gum treatment for smoking: a critical review. Jnl of Substance Abuse. 1991, 3: 337-350.CrossRef
20.
Lancaster T, Stead LF: Self-help interventions for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005, Art. No.: CD001118.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.pub2, 3CrossRef
21.
Lennox AS, Osman LM, Reiter E, Robertson R, Friend J, McCann I, Skatun D, Donnan PT: Cost effectiveness of computer tailored and non-tailored smoking cessation letters in general practice: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1396-10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1396.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Aveyard P, Griffin C, Lawrence T, Cheng KK: A controlled trial of an expert system and self-help manual intervention based on the stages of change versus standard self-help materials in smoking cessation. Addiction. 2003, 98: 345-354.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF: The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1997, 12: 38-48.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Sutton S: Back to the drawing board? A review of applications of the transtheoretical model to substance use. Addiction. 2001, 96: 175-186.CrossRefPubMed
25.
West R: Time for a change: putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction. 2005, 100: 1036-1039.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Reiter E, Robertson R, Osman LM: Lessons from a failure: generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artificial Intelligence. 2003, 144: 41-58.CrossRef
27.
Strecher VJ: Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999, 36: 107-117.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000, 321: 694-696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
30.
Gilbert H, Nazareth I, Sutton S: Assessing the Feasibility of Proactive Recruitment of Smokers to an Intervention in General Practice for Smoking Cessation using Computer-Tailored Feedback Reports. Family Practice. 2007, 24: 388-394.CrossRef
31.
Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi , Pratap S, Wentz , Kwan , Cooper R: Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. The Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews. 2005, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1
32.
Miller WR: Why do people change addictive behavior? The 1996 H David Archibald Lecture. Addiction. 1998, 93: 163-172.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Dijskstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers MA: Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials. Preventive Medicine. 1999, 28: 203-211.CrossRef
34.
35.
Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen JJ: Treating tobacco use and dependence: clinical practice guidelines. 2000, Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services
36.
Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL: Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2003, 5: 13-25.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Hughes JR: Tobacco withdrawal in self-quitters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992, 60: 689-697.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Gritz ER: Debunking myths about self-quitting: evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. American Psychologist. 1989, 44: 1355-1365.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Machin D, Campbell M, Sayers P, Pinot A: Sample size tables for clinical studies. 1997, Oxford: Blackwell, 2
40.
Gilbert H, Sutton S: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Proactive Telephone Counselling for Smoking Cessation in a Randomised Controlled Trial. Addiction. 2006, 101: 590-598.CrossRefPubMed
41.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. 2004, London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence
42.
43.
Lichtenstein E, Glasgow RE: Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade?. Jnl of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992, 60: 518-527.CrossRef
44.
Resnicow K, Royce J, Vaughan R, Orlandi MA, Smith M: Analysis of a multicomponent smoking cessation project: what worked and why. Preventive Medicine. 1997, 26: 373-381.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Lader D, Goddard E: Smoking-related behaviour and attitudes, 2004. A report on research using the ONS Omnibus Survey produced by the Office for National Statistics on behalf of the Department of Health. 2005, London: Office for National Statistics
46.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of computer-tailored Smoking Cessation Advice in Primary Care (ESCAPE): a Randomised Trial
Authors
Hazel Gilbert
Irwin Nazareth
Stephen Sutton
Richard Morris
Christine Godfrey
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-23

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Trials 1/2008 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Community based trial of home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack recently discharged from hospital

Study protocol

Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design

Study protocol

The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

Research

A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes

Methodology

A concept for trial institutions focussing on randomised controlled trials in surgery

Research

Inefficacy of different strategies to improve guideline awareness – 5-year follow-up of the hypertension evaluation project (HEP)