Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis

Authors: An H Do, Po T Wang, Christine E King, Sophia N Chun, Zoran Nenadic

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Excessive reliance on wheelchairs in individuals with tetraplegia or paraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to many medical co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic derangements, osteoporosis, and pressure ulcers. Treatment of these conditions contributes to the majority of SCI health care costs. Restoring able-body-like ambulation in this patient population can potentially reduce the incidence of these medical co-morbidities, in addition to increasing independence and quality of life. However, no biomedical solution exists that can reverse this loss of neurological function, and hence novel methods are needed. Brain-computer interface (BCI) controlled lower extremity prostheses may constitute one such novel approach.

Methods

One able-bodied subject and one subject with paraplegia due to SCI underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings while engaged in alternating epochs of idling and walking kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI). These data were analyzed to generate an EEG prediction model for online BCI operation. A commercial robotic gait orthosis (RoGO) system (suspended over a treadmill) was interfaced with the BCI computer to allow for computerized control. The subjects were then tasked to perform five, 5-min-long online sessions where they ambulated using the BCI-RoGO system as prompted by computerized cues. The performance of this system was assessed with cross-correlation analysis, and omission and false alarm rates.

Results

The offline accuracy of the EEG prediction model averaged 86.30% across both subjects (chance: 50%). The cross-correlation between instructional cues and the BCI-RoGO walking epochs averaged across all subjects and all sessions was 0.812±0.048 (p-value <10−4). Also, there were on average 0.8 false alarms per session and no omissions.

Conclusion

These results provide preliminary evidence that restoring brain-controlled ambulation after SCI is feasible. Future work will test the function of this system in a population of subjects with SCI. If successful, this may justify the future development of BCI-controlled lower extremity prostheses for free overground walking for those with complete motor SCI. Finally, this system can also be applied to incomplete motor SCI, where it could lead to improved neurological outcomes beyond those of standard physiotherapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson RL, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG: Cost of traumatic spinal cord injury in a population-based registry. Spinal Cord 1996,34(8):470-480. 10.1038/sc.1996.81CrossRefPubMed Johnson RL, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG: Cost of traumatic spinal cord injury in a population-based registry. Spinal Cord 1996,34(8):470-480. 10.1038/sc.1996.81CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wang PT, King CE, Chui LA, Nenadic Z, Do AH: BCI controlled walking simulator for a BCI driven FES device. Proc RESNA Ann Conf 2010. Wang PT, King CE, Chui LA, Nenadic Z, Do AH: BCI controlled walking simulator for a BCI driven FES device. Proc RESNA Ann Conf 2010.
3.
go back to reference Wang PT, King CE, Chui LA, Do AH, Nenadic Z: Self-paced brain–computer interface control of ambulation in a virtual reality environment. J Neural Eng 2012,9(5):056016. 10.1088/1741-2560/9/5/056016CrossRefPubMed Wang PT, King CE, Chui LA, Do AH, Nenadic Z: Self-paced brain–computer interface control of ambulation in a virtual reality environment. J Neural Eng 2012,9(5):056016. 10.1088/1741-2560/9/5/056016CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference King CE, Wang PT, Chui LA, Do AH, Nenadic Z: Operation of a brain-computer interface walking simulator for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013, 10: 77. 10.1186/1743-0003-10-77PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed King CE, Wang PT, Chui LA, Do AH, Nenadic Z: Operation of a brain-computer interface walking simulator for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013, 10: 77. 10.1186/1743-0003-10-77PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Aminian K, Najafi B, Büla C, Leyvraz PF, Robert P: Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech 2002,35(5):689-699. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00008-8CrossRefPubMed Aminian K, Najafi B, Büla C, Leyvraz PF, Robert P: Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech 2002,35(5):689-699. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00008-8CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Das K, Osechinskiy S, Nenadic Z: A classwise PCA-based recognition of neural data for brain-computer interfaces. Proc 29th IEEE EMBS Conf 2007, 6519-6522. Das K, Osechinskiy S, Nenadic Z: A classwise PCA-based recognition of neural data for brain-computer interfaces. Proc 29th IEEE EMBS Conf 2007, 6519-6522.
7.
go back to reference Das K, Nenadic Z: An efficient discriminant-based solution for small sample size problem. Pattern Recogn 2009,42(5):857-866. 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.08.036CrossRef Das K, Nenadic Z: An efficient discriminant-based solution for small sample size problem. Pattern Recogn 2009,42(5):857-866. 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.08.036CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Das K, Nenadic Z: Approximate information discriminant analysis: a computationally simple heteroscedastic feature extraction technique. Pattern Recogn 2008,41(5):1548-1557. 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.10.001CrossRef Das K, Nenadic Z: Approximate information discriminant analysis: a computationally simple heteroscedastic feature extraction technique. Pattern Recogn 2008,41(5):1548-1557. 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.10.001CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kohavi R: A study of cross-validation and Bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proc Int Joint C Art Int 1995, 1137-1145. Kohavi R: A study of cross-validation and Bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proc Int Joint C Art Int 1995, 1137-1145.
10.
go back to reference Do AH, Wang PT, Abiri A, King CE, Nenadic Z: Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation system for ankle movement. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011, 8: 49. 10.1186/1743-0003-8-49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Do AH, Wang PT, Abiri A, King CE, Nenadic Z: Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation system for ankle movement. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011, 8: 49. 10.1186/1743-0003-8-49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference King CE, Wang PT, Mizuta M, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Do AH, Moromugi S, Nenadic Z: Noninvasive brain-computer interface driven hand orthosis. Proc 33rd IEEE EMBS Conf 2011, 5786-5789. King CE, Wang PT, Mizuta M, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Do AH, Moromugi S, Nenadic Z: Noninvasive brain-computer interface driven hand orthosis. Proc 33rd IEEE EMBS Conf 2011, 5786-5789.
13.
go back to reference Do AH, Wang PT, King CE, Schombs A, Cramer SC, Nenadic Z: Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation device for foot drop due to stroke. Proc 34th IEEE EMBS Conf 2012, 6414-6417. Do AH, Wang PT, King CE, Schombs A, Cramer SC, Nenadic Z: Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation device for foot drop due to stroke. Proc 34th IEEE EMBS Conf 2012, 6414-6417.
14.
go back to reference Mazzoleni S, Stampacchia G, Cattin E, Bradaschia E, Tolaini M, Rossi B, Carrozza MC: Effects of a robot-mediated locomotor training on EMG activation in healthy and SCI subjects. Proc 11th IEEE Int Conf Rehab Robotics 2009, 378-382. Mazzoleni S, Stampacchia G, Cattin E, Bradaschia E, Tolaini M, Rossi B, Carrozza MC: Effects of a robot-mediated locomotor training on EMG activation in healthy and SCI subjects. Proc 11th IEEE Int Conf Rehab Robotics 2009, 378-382.
15.
go back to reference La Fougère C, Zwergal A, Rominger A, Förster S, Fesl G, Dieterich M, Brandt T, Strupp M, Bartenstein P, Jahn K: Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage 2010,50(4):1589-1598. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.060CrossRefPubMed La Fougère C, Zwergal A, Rominger A, Förster S, Fesl G, Dieterich M, Brandt T, Strupp M, Bartenstein P, Jahn K: Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage 2010,50(4):1589-1598. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.060CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis
Authors
An H Do
Po T Wang
Christine E King
Sophia N Chun
Zoran Nenadic
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-111

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2013 Go to the issue