Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Factors affecting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer

Authors: Chu Wang, Yi Xiao, Huizhong Qiu, Jie Yao, Weidong Pan

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study is to clarify the relationship between demographic and surgical factors and operating time, and thus operative difficulty, in patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer, since different studies have derived different results.

Methods

The records of patients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection were retrospectively studied. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and pelvimetry measurements were collected and analyzed with respect to operating time, using correlation coefficient analysis, principle component analysis, and linear regression.

Results

A total of 14 patients (10 males, 4 females; 65.50 ± 7.12 years of age) were included. Demographic and tumor characteristics not correlated with operating time. Body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.001); interacetabular distance (IA) (P = 0.001); anatomical transverse distance (IP) (P = 0.008); interischial distance (IS) (P = 0.002); intertuberous distance (IT) (P = 0.005); distance between the coccyx and symphysis (CoSy) (P = 0.013); and the angle of the lower border of the symphysis pubis, upper border of symphysis pubis, and sacral promontory (angle 5) (P = 0.004) were significantly associated with operating time. The equation was:
operating time = 0.653 × BMI + 0.818 × angle 5 - 0.404 × IA - 0.380 × IP - 0.512 × IS - 0.405 × IT - 0.570 × CoSy + 330.8 .

Conclusions

Transverse diameters of the pelvis, BMI, angle 5, and CoSy played the most important role in affecting operating time. The equation can be a very useful tool for preoperative assessment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009, 250: 54-61. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511.CrossRefPubMed Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009, 250: 54-61. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A: Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008, 34: 1135-1142. 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.11.015.CrossRefPubMed Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A: Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008, 34: 1135-1142. 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.11.015.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, Al-Dabbagh Z, Francis D, Warren S: Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 2974-2979. 10.1007/s00464-010-1075-1.CrossRefPubMed Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, Al-Dabbagh Z, Francis D, Warren S: Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 2974-2979. 10.1007/s00464-010-1075-1.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Akagi T, Inomata M, Etoh T, Moriyama H, Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Eshima N, Kitano S: Multivariate evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012, 22: 52-57. 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824019fc.CrossRefPubMed Akagi T, Inomata M, Etoh T, Moriyama H, Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Eshima N, Kitano S: Multivariate evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012, 22: 52-57. 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824019fc.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim JY, Kim YW, Kim NK, Hur H, Lee K, Min BS, Cho HJ: Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011, 21: 334-339.PubMed Kim JY, Kim YW, Kim NK, Hur H, Lee K, Min BS, Cho HJ: Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011, 21: 334-339.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Veenhof AA, Engel AF, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Cuesta MA: Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008, 23: 469-475. 10.1007/s00384-007-0433-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Veenhof AA, Engel AF, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Cuesta MA: Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008, 23: 469-475. 10.1007/s00384-007-0433-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gu J, Bo XF, Xiong CY, Wu AW, Zhang XP, Li M, An Q, Fang J, Li J, Zhang X, Wang HY, Gao F, You WC: Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006, 49: 1517-1526. 10.1007/s10350-006-0665-4.CrossRefPubMed Gu J, Bo XF, Xiong CY, Wu AW, Zhang XP, Li M, An Q, Fang J, Li J, Zhang X, Wang HY, Gao F, You WC: Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006, 49: 1517-1526. 10.1007/s10350-006-0665-4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Miyata S, Yamaguchi T: Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009, 146: 483-489. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.030.CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Miyata S, Yamaguchi T: Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009, 146: 483-489. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.030.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M: Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008, 247: 642-649. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c6a.CrossRefPubMed Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M: Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008, 247: 642-649. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c6a.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I, Yamato T, Sakai Y: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: “narrow pelvis” is not a contraindication. Surg Endosc. 1907–1912, 2011: 25- Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I, Yamato T, Sakai Y: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: “narrow pelvis” is not a contraindication. Surg Endosc. 1907–1912, 2011: 25-
11.
go back to reference Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M: Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc. 2007, 21: 929-934. 10.1007/s00464-006-9084-9.CrossRefPubMed Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M: Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc. 2007, 21: 929-934. 10.1007/s00464-006-9084-9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wang C, Lao LF, Niu WX, Xing ZJ, Qiu GX, Wu ZH: Computer-assisted versus traditional Cobb angle measurement on digital radiograph in scoliosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010, 90: 1300-1303.PubMed Wang C, Lao LF, Niu WX, Xing ZJ, Qiu GX, Wu ZH: Computer-assisted versus traditional Cobb angle measurement on digital radiograph in scoliosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010, 90: 1300-1303.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, Al-Dabbagh Z, Francis D, Warren S: Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012, 26: 277-10.1007/s00464-011-1746-6.CrossRefPubMed Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, Al-Dabbagh Z, Francis D, Warren S: Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012, 26: 277-10.1007/s00464-011-1746-6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Ueno M: Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011, 25: 3122-3123. 10.1007/s00464-011-1649-6.CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Ueno M: Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011, 25: 3122-3123. 10.1007/s00464-011-1649-6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Factors affecting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer
Authors
Chu Wang
Yi Xiao
Huizhong Qiu
Jie Yao
Weidong Pan
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-44

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2014 Go to the issue