Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2008

Open Access 01-05-2008 | Original Article

Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer

A single institution pilot study

Authors: A. A. F. A. Veenhof, A. F. Engel, D. L. van der Peet, C. Sietses, W. J. H. J. Meijerink, E. S. M. de Lange-de Klerk, M. A. Cuesta

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to categorize laparoscopic rectal resections according to technical difficulty to standardize learning purposes and stratify results, making future studies more comparable.

Materials and methods

Fifty patients undergoing a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision were prospectively followed. Four preoperatively known facts (gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor localization, and preoperative radiation therapy) were compared to four operative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, a visual analogue score (VAS) for difficulty rewarded by the surgeon, and oncological radicality of the procedure).

Results

Operating time for male and female patients was 257 vs. 245 min (P = 0.229), blood loss was 300 vs. 300 ml (P = 0.309), the VAS was 8 vs. 6 (P < 0.001), and radicality was 93% vs. 91% (P = 0.806). Operating time was 215, 250, and 305 min for high, mid, and low tumors (Spearman −0.44; P = 0.02), respectively. Blood loss was 105, 300, and 600 ml (Spearman −0.38; P = 0.01). Lower tumors were rewarded a higher VAS (Spearman −0.57; P < 0.001) and were less often radically resected (Spearman 0.32; P = 0.026). Operating time for irradiated and nonirradiated patients was 277 vs. 225 min (P = 0.008), blood loss was 500 vs. 150 ml (P = 0.006), the VAS was 7 vs. 5 (P < 0.001), and radicality was 79% vs. 100% (P = 0.046). Operating time was 240 min for BMI 25–30 and 253 min for BMI > 30 (Spearman 0.13; P = 0.391). Blood loss was 150 ml for BMI 25–30 and 500 ml for BMI > 30 (Spearman 0.38; P = 0.01). Higher BMIs were rewarded a higher VAS (Spearman 0.06; P = 0.704). BMI had no correlation to radicality of the procedure (Spearman −0.12; P = 0.402). There was an association between technical difficulty score and operation time (P = 0.007), blood loss (P < 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), and radicality of surgery (P = 0.043).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery in male, irradiated, and obese patients with lower tumors seemed more difficult. A categorization according to technical difficulty, to preoperatively predict difficulty of the procedure, was found feasible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goligher JC (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Baillière Tindall, London Goligher JC (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Baillière Tindall, London
2.
go back to reference Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A (2003) When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Pediatr Surg 38:720–724PubMedCrossRef Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A (2003) When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Pediatr Surg 38:720–724PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP, Beart RW Jr (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38:600–603PubMedCrossRef Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP, Beart RW Jr (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38:600–603PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44PubMed Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Geis WP, Coletta AV, Verdeja JC, Plasencia G, Ojogho O, Jacobs M (1994) Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery. Arch Surg 129:206–212PubMed Geis WP, Coletta AV, Verdeja JC, Plasencia G, Ojogho O, Jacobs M (1994) Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery. Arch Surg 129:206–212PubMed
7.
go back to reference Geis WP, Coletta AV, Jacobs M, Placensia G, Kim HC (1994) Benefits of complexity scales in laparoscopic colectomy. Int Surg 79:230–232PubMed Geis WP, Coletta AV, Jacobs M, Placensia G, Kim HC (1994) Benefits of complexity scales in laparoscopic colectomy. Int Surg 79:230–232PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM (1995) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy. Am Surg 61:681–685PubMed Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM (1995) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy. Am Surg 61:681–685PubMed
Metadata
Title
Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer
A single institution pilot study
Authors
A. A. F. A. Veenhof
A. F. Engel
D. L. van der Peet
C. Sietses
W. J. H. J. Meijerink
E. S. M. de Lange-de Klerk
M. A. Cuesta
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0433-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2008 Go to the issue