Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Authors: Zhipeng Sun, Nengwei Zhang

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the clinical practice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response markers are very important. We aimed o investigate whether tumor markers CEA(carcino-embryonic antigen), CA19-9(carbohydrate antigen 19–9), CA72-4(carbohydrate antigen 72–4), and CA125(carbohydrate antigen 125) can be used to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to evaluate the diagnosis and prognosis value of four tumor markers in the patients of gastric cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 184 gastric cancer patients who underwent a 5-Fu, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, followed by surgical treatment. Blood samples for CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, and CA125 levels were taken from patients upon admission to the hospital and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the clinical value of these tumor markers in predicting the survival and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Median overall survival times of pretreatment CA19-9-positive and CA72-4-positive patients (14.0 +/−2.8 months and 14.8 +/−4.0 months, respectively) were significantly less than negative patients (32.5 +/−8.9 months and 34.0 +/−10.1 months, respectively) (P = 0.000 and P = 0.002, respectively). Pretreatment status of CA19-9 and CA72-4 were independent prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients (P = 0.029 and P = 0.008, respectively). Pretreatment CEA >50 ng/ml had a positive prediction value for clinical disease progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the ROC curve (AUC: 0.694, 95% CI: 0.517 to 0.871, P = 0.017). The decrease of tumor markers CEA, CA72-4, and CA125 was significant after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.030, P = 0.010, and P = 0.009, respectively), especially in patients with disease control (including complete, partial clinical response, and stable disease) (P = 0.012, P = 0.020, and P = 0.025, respectively). A decrease in CA72-4 by more than 70% had a positive prediction value for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the ROC curve (AUC: 0.764, 95% CI: 0.584 to 0.945, P = 0.020).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that high preoperative serum levels of CA72-4 and CA19-9 are associated with higher risk of death, high pretreatment CEA levels (>50 ng/ml) may predict clinical disease progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and a decrease (>70%) of CA72-4 may predict pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 2137-2150. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308.CrossRefPubMed Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 2137-2150. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wang CS, Chao TC, Jan YY: Benefits of palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer. Chang Gung Med J. 2002, 25: 792-802.PubMed Wang CS, Chao TC, Jan YY: Benefits of palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer. Chang Gung Med J. 2002, 25: 792-802.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fink U, Stein HJ, Schuhmacher C, Wilke HJ: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: update. World J Surg. 1995, 19: 509-516. 10.1007/BF00294711.CrossRefPubMed Fink U, Stein HJ, Schuhmacher C, Wilke HJ: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: update. World J Surg. 1995, 19: 509-516. 10.1007/BF00294711.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sakamoto J: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in the near future?. Gastric Cancer. 2003, 6: 131-133. 10.1007/s10120-003-0254-3.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto J: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in the near future?. Gastric Cancer. 2003, 6: 131-133. 10.1007/s10120-003-0254-3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mezhir JJ, Tang LH, Coit DG: Neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 101: 305-314. 10.1002/jso.21483.CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ, Tang LH, Coit DG: Neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 101: 305-314. 10.1002/jso.21483.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, Schneider PM: 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 102: 135-140. 10.1002/jso.21592.CrossRefPubMed Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, Schneider PM: 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 102: 135-140. 10.1002/jso.21592.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ: Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009, 374: 477-490. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60617-6.CrossRefPubMed Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ: Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009, 374: 477-490. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60617-6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yamao T, Kai S, Kazami A: Tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999, 29: 550-555. 10.1093/jjco/29.11.550.CrossRefPubMed Yamao T, Kai S, Kazami A: Tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999, 29: 550-555. 10.1093/jjco/29.11.550.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC: The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 1471-1474. 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC: The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 1471-1474. 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Washington K: 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 3077-3079. 10.1245/s10434-010-1362-z.CrossRefPubMed Washington K: 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 3077-3079. 10.1245/s10434-010-1362-z.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Edge SBBD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A: (Eds): AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2010, New York, NY: Springer, 7 Edge SBBD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A: (Eds): AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2010, New York, NY: Springer, 7
13.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45: 228-247. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45: 228-247. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Ota DM, Jessup JM: Resectable gastric carcinoma. An evaluation of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Cancer. 1991, 68: 1501-1506. 10.1002/1097-0142(19911001)68:7<1501::AID-CNCR2820680706>3.0.CO;2-L.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Ota DM, Jessup JM: Resectable gastric carcinoma. An evaluation of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Cancer. 1991, 68: 1501-1506. 10.1002/1097-0142(19911001)68:7<1501::AID-CNCR2820680706>3.0.CO;2-L.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C: Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2003, 98: 1521-1530. 10.1002/cncr.11660.CrossRefPubMed Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C: Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2003, 98: 1521-1530. 10.1002/cncr.11660.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ninomiya Y, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y: Histological indications of a favorable prognosis with far-advanced gastric carcinomas after preoperative chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999, 125: 699-706. 10.1007/s004320050337.CrossRefPubMed Ninomiya Y, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y: Histological indications of a favorable prognosis with far-advanced gastric carcinomas after preoperative chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999, 125: 699-706. 10.1007/s004320050337.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Moehler M, Schimanski CC, Gockel I: (Neo)adjuvant strategies of advanced gastric carcinoma: time for a change?. Dig Dis. 2004, 22: 345-350. 10.1159/000083597.CrossRefPubMed Moehler M, Schimanski CC, Gockel I: (Neo)adjuvant strategies of advanced gastric carcinoma: time for a change?. Dig Dis. 2004, 22: 345-350. 10.1159/000083597.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Diez-Alonso M: Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001, 22: 318-322. 10.1159/000050633.CrossRefPubMed Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Diez-Alonso M: Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001, 22: 318-322. 10.1159/000050633.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tocchi A, Costa G, Lepre L: The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998, 124: 450-455. 10.1007/s004320050198.CrossRefPubMed Tocchi A, Costa G, Lepre L: The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998, 124: 450-455. 10.1007/s004320050198.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ychou M, Duffour J, Kramar A: Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Dis Markers. 2000, 16: 105-110. 10.1155/2000/595492.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ychou M, Duffour J, Kramar A: Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Dis Markers. 2000, 16: 105-110. 10.1155/2000/595492.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ucar E, Semerci E, Ustun H: Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA 19–9, CA 72–4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer. Adv Ther. 2008, 25: 1075-1084. 10.1007/s12325-008-0100-4.CrossRefPubMed Ucar E, Semerci E, Ustun H: Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA 19–9, CA 72–4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer. Adv Ther. 2008, 25: 1075-1084. 10.1007/s12325-008-0100-4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A: Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999, 57: 55-62. 10.1159/000012001.CrossRefPubMed Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A: Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999, 57: 55-62. 10.1159/000012001.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A: Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19–9, and CA 72–4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001, 181: 16-19. 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00549-3.CrossRefPubMed Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A: Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19–9, and CA 72–4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001, 181: 16-19. 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00549-3.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Byrne DJ, Browning MC, Cuschieri A: CA72-4: a new tumour marker for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1990, 77: 1010-1013. 10.1002/bjs.1800770918.CrossRefPubMed Byrne DJ, Browning MC, Cuschieri A: CA72-4: a new tumour marker for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1990, 77: 1010-1013. 10.1002/bjs.1800770918.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Spila A, Roselli M, Cosimelli M: Clinical utility of CA 72–4 serum marker in the staging and immediate post-surgical management of gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996, 16: 2241-2247.PubMed Spila A, Roselli M, Cosimelli M: Clinical utility of CA 72–4 serum marker in the staging and immediate post-surgical management of gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996, 16: 2241-2247.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH: CEA, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22: 2311-2316.PubMed Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH: CEA, CA 19–9 and CA 72–4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22: 2311-2316.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hamazoe R, Maeta M, Matsui T: Ca72-4 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor-marker for gastric-cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992, 28A: 1351-1354.CrossRefPubMed Hamazoe R, Maeta M, Matsui T: Ca72-4 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor-marker for gastric-cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992, 28A: 1351-1354.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gonzalez A, Vizoso F, Allende MT: Preoperative CEA and TAG-72 serum levels as prognostic indicators in resectable gastric carcinoma. Int J Biol Markers. 1996, 11: 165-171.PubMed Gonzalez A, Vizoso F, Allende MT: Preoperative CEA and TAG-72 serum levels as prognostic indicators in resectable gastric carcinoma. Int J Biol Markers. 1996, 11: 165-171.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ikeguchi M, Katano K, Saitou H: Pre-operative serum levels of CA72-4 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1997, 44: 866-871.PubMed Ikeguchi M, Katano K, Saitou H: Pre-operative serum levels of CA72-4 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1997, 44: 866-871.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I: Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 3681-3686. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0904.CrossRefPubMed Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I: Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 3681-3686. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0904.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P: CA 19–9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 132-138. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70001-9.CrossRefPubMed Hess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P: CA 19–9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 132-138. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70001-9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Katz MH, Varadhachary GR, Fleming JB: Serum CA 19–9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 1794-1801. 10.1245/s10434-010-0943-1.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Katz MH, Varadhachary GR, Fleming JB: Serum CA 19–9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 1794-1801. 10.1245/s10434-010-0943-1.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Precht LM, Lowe KA, Atwood M, Beatty JD: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: tumor markers as predictors of pathologic response, recurrence, and survival. Breast J. 2010, 16: 362-368.PubMed Precht LM, Lowe KA, Atwood M, Beatty JD: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: tumor markers as predictors of pathologic response, recurrence, and survival. Breast J. 2010, 16: 362-368.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kang S, Kim TJ, Seo SS: Interaction between preoperative CA-125 level and survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010, 120: 18-22.CrossRefPubMed Kang S, Kim TJ, Seo SS: Interaction between preoperative CA-125 level and survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010, 120: 18-22.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Wanebo JH, Stearns M, Schwartz MK: Use of CEA as an indicator of early recurrence and as a guide to a selected second-look procedure in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1978, 188: 481-493. 10.1097/00000658-197810000-00006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wanebo JH, Stearns M, Schwartz MK: Use of CEA as an indicator of early recurrence and as a guide to a selected second-look procedure in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1978, 188: 481-493. 10.1097/00000658-197810000-00006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Attiyeh FF, Stearns MW: Second-look laparotomy based on CEA elevations in colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1981, 47: 2119-2125. 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2119::AID-CNCR2820470903>3.0.CO;2-7.CrossRefPubMed Attiyeh FF, Stearns MW: Second-look laparotomy based on CEA elevations in colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1981, 47: 2119-2125. 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2119::AID-CNCR2820470903>3.0.CO;2-7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Authors
Zhipeng Sun
Nengwei Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-397

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2014 Go to the issue