Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Outcome analysis of breast cancer patients who declined evidence-based treatment

Authors: Kurian Joseph, Sebastian Vrouwe, Anmmd Kamruzzaman, Ali Balbaid, David Fenton, Richard Berendt, Edward Yu, Patricia Tai

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To analyze the characteristics and outcomes of women with breast cancer in the Northern Alberta Health Region (NAHR) who declined recommended primary standard treatments.

Methods

A chart review was performed of breast cancer patients who refused recommended treatments during the period 1980 to 2006. A matched pair analysis was performed to compare the survival data between those who refused or received standard treatments.

Results

A total of 185 (1.2%) patients refused standard treatment. Eighty-seven (47%) were below the age of 75 at diagnosis. The majority of those who refused standard treatments were married (50.6%), 50 years or older (60.9%), and from the urban area (65.5%). The 5-year overall survival rates were 43.2% (95% CI: 32.0 to 54.4%) for those who refused standard treatments and 81.9% (95% CI: 76.9 to 86.9%) for those who received them. The corresponding values for the disease-specific survival were 46.2% (95% CI: 34.9 to 57.6%) vs. 84.7% (95% CI: 80.0 to 89.4%).

Conclusions

Women who declined primary standard treatment had significantly worse survival than those who received standard treatments. There is no evidence to support using Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as primary cancer treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian cancer statistics 2011, Toronto, ON, Canada 2011. National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian cancer statistics 2011, Toronto, ON, Canada 2011.
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1233-1241. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1233-1241. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL: Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17 (2): 460-469.PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL: Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17 (2): 460-469.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chang EY, Glissmeyer M, Tonnes S: Outcomes of breast cancer in patients who use alternative therapies as primary treatment. Am J Surg. 2006, 192: 471-473. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.013.CrossRefPubMed Chang EY, Glissmeyer M, Tonnes S: Outcomes of breast cancer in patients who use alternative therapies as primary treatment. Am J Surg. 2006, 192: 471-473. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.013.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM, Fioretta GM, Rapiti E: Patients’ refusal of surgery strongly impairs breast cancer survival. Ann Surg. 2005, 242: 276-280. 10.1097/01.sla.0000171305.31703.84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Verkooijen HM, Fioretta GM, Rapiti E: Patients’ refusal of surgery strongly impairs breast cancer survival. Ann Surg. 2005, 242: 276-280. 10.1097/01.sla.0000171305.31703.84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van Kleffens T, van Leeuwen E: Physicians’ evaluations of patients' decisions to refuse oncological treatment. J Med Ethics. 2005, 31: 131-136. 10.1136/jme.2004.008755.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed van Kleffens T, van Leeuwen E: Physicians’ evaluations of patients' decisions to refuse oncological treatment. J Med Ethics. 2005, 31: 131-136. 10.1136/jme.2004.008755.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Huchcroft SA, Snodgrass T: Cancer patients who refuse treatment. Cancer Causes and Control. 1993, 4: 179-292.PubMed Huchcroft SA, Snodgrass T: Cancer patients who refuse treatment. Cancer Causes and Control. 1993, 4: 179-292.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kremser T, Evans A, Moore A: Use of complementary therapies by Australian women with breast cancer. Breast. 2008, 17: 387-394. 10.1016/j.breast.2007.12.006.CrossRefPubMed Kremser T, Evans A, Moore A: Use of complementary therapies by Australian women with breast cancer. Breast. 2008, 17: 387-394. 10.1016/j.breast.2007.12.006.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Carrese JA: Refusal of care: patients' well-being and physicians' ethical obligations: "but doctor, I want to go home". JAMA. 2006, 296 (6): 691-695. 10.1001/jama.296.6.691.CrossRefPubMed Carrese JA: Refusal of care: patients' well-being and physicians' ethical obligations: "but doctor, I want to go home". JAMA. 2006, 296 (6): 691-695. 10.1001/jama.296.6.691.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shumay DM, Maskarinec G, Kakai H, Gotay CC: Why some cancer patients choose complementary and alternative medicine instead of conventional treatment. J Fam Pract. 2001, 50: 1067-PubMed Shumay DM, Maskarinec G, Kakai H, Gotay CC: Why some cancer patients choose complementary and alternative medicine instead of conventional treatment. J Fam Pract. 2001, 50: 1067-PubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcome analysis of breast cancer patients who declined evidence-based treatment
Authors
Kurian Joseph
Sebastian Vrouwe
Anmmd Kamruzzaman
Ali Balbaid
David Fenton
Richard Berendt
Edward Yu
Patricia Tai
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-118

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2012 Go to the issue