Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

An evaluative study of the benefits of participating in intergenerational playgroups in aged care for older people

Authors: C Margaret Skropeta, Alf Colvin, Shannon Sladen

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intergenerational playgroups in aged care are limited and little is known about the perceptions of individuals who have participated in such programs. Most research is focused on intergenerational programs that involved two generations of people – young people and older people or young people and people with dementia reported the significant outcomes for each group of participants. In this study a number of generations participated in the intergenerational playgroup intervention that included older people, child carers who were parents, grandparents or nannies and children aged 0–4 years old. The objective of this study was to explore the benefits of participating in an intergenerational playgroup program IPP in an aged care facility.

Methods

This mixed methods quantitative and qualitative design explored the benefits of participating in an intergenerational playgroup program IPP in aged care settings. The intervention is an intergenerational playgroup program (IPP) offered in the aged care facility where intergenerational socialisation and interaction occurred between different generations. The SF36 and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were used to collect pre-test post test data. The qualitative interpretive research approach used semi-structured interviews to develop the descriptive interpretation of the intergenerational playgroup experience. Interviews were conducted with aged care residents and child carers.

Results

The pre-test post-test results for the SF36 revealed a declining trend in one scale only energy/fatigue and no significant differences on the Geriatric Depression Scale GDS. The interview analyses revealed the following themes (1) intergenerational experiences, (2) two-way contributions, (3) friendships work, (4) personal growth, and (5) environmental considerations and nineteen subthemes were extracted to provide meanings.

Conclusions

The IPP provided a successful innovative intergenerational program intervention where older people and people with dementia interacted and connected with a number of people from different generations. The IPP provided meaningful engagement for all participants considered important for self-esteem and the ability to participate fully in society. This allowed people to develop a sense of connectedness and friendships in a safe and secure environment. This increased the dignity of older people and people with dementia within the community and increased public awareness about the existing care and support services available to them.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaplan M, Lin N, Hannon P: Intergenerational engagement in retirement communities: a case study of a community capacity-building model. J Appl Gerontol. 2006, 25: 406-426. 10.1177/0733464806292862.CrossRef Kaplan M, Lin N, Hannon P: Intergenerational engagement in retirement communities: a case study of a community capacity-building model. J Appl Gerontol. 2006, 25: 406-426. 10.1177/0733464806292862.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jarrott SE, Bruno K: Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: an observational assessment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003, 18: 31-37. 10.1177/153331750301800109.CrossRefPubMed Jarrott SE, Bruno K: Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: an observational assessment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003, 18: 31-37. 10.1177/153331750301800109.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jarrott SE, Smith CL, Weintraub APC: Development of a standardized tool for intergenerational programming: the intergenerational observation scale. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2008, 6: 433-447. 10.1080/15350770802474595.CrossRef Jarrott SE, Smith CL, Weintraub APC: Development of a standardized tool for intergenerational programming: the intergenerational observation scale. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2008, 6: 433-447. 10.1080/15350770802474595.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haynes A: Are family changes, social trends and unanticipated policy consequences making children’s lives more challenging?. Austr Inst Fam Stud – Fam Matters. 2008, 78: 60-63. Haynes A: Are family changes, social trends and unanticipated policy consequences making children’s lives more challenging?. Austr Inst Fam Stud – Fam Matters. 2008, 78: 60-63.
8.
go back to reference Oberg B: Meeting the other: a way of fighting age discrimination: a discussion circle with young and old participants in Sweden. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2007, 5: 27-44.CrossRef Oberg B: Meeting the other: a way of fighting age discrimination: a discussion circle with young and old participants in Sweden. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2007, 5: 27-44.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Phinney A, Chaudhury H, O’Connor DL: Doing as much as I can do: the meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2007, 11: 384-393. 10.1080/13607860601086470.CrossRefPubMed Phinney A, Chaudhury H, O’Connor DL: Doing as much as I can do: the meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2007, 11: 384-393. 10.1080/13607860601086470.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Brooker DJ, Woolley RJ: Enriching opportunities for people living with dementia: the development of a blueprint for a sustainable activity-based model. Aging Ment Health. 2007, 11: 371-383. 10.1080/13607860600963687.CrossRefPubMed Brooker DJ, Woolley RJ: Enriching opportunities for people living with dementia: the development of a blueprint for a sustainable activity-based model. Aging Ment Health. 2007, 11: 371-383. 10.1080/13607860600963687.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Marshall MJ, Hutchinson SA: A critique of research on the use of activities with persons with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2002, 35: 488-496.CrossRef Marshall MJ, Hutchinson SA: A critique of research on the use of activities with persons with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2002, 35: 488-496.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stratton D, Tadd W: Dignity and older people: the voice of society. Qual Ageing –Policy Pract Res. 2005, 6: 37-45.CrossRef Stratton D, Tadd W: Dignity and older people: the voice of society. Qual Ageing –Policy Pract Res. 2005, 6: 37-45.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee RM, Robbins SB: The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem and social identity. J Counsell Psychol. 1998, 45: 338-345.CrossRef Lee RM, Robbins SB: The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem and social identity. J Counsell Psychol. 1998, 45: 338-345.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sabat R, Lee JM: Relatedness among people diagnosed with dementia: social cognition and the possibility of friendship. Dementia. 2012, 11: 315-327. 10.1177/1471301211421069.CrossRef Sabat R, Lee JM: Relatedness among people diagnosed with dementia: social cognition and the possibility of friendship. Dementia. 2012, 11: 315-327. 10.1177/1471301211421069.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Doyle PJ, de Medeiros K, Saunders PA: Nested social groups within the social environment of a dementia care assisted living setting. Dementia. 2012, 11: 383-399. 10.1177/1471301211421188.CrossRef Doyle PJ, de Medeiros K, Saunders PA: Nested social groups within the social environment of a dementia care assisted living setting. Dementia. 2012, 11: 383-399. 10.1177/1471301211421188.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ehart BK, Hoppping D, Power MB, Mitchell ET, Racine D: Generations of hope communities: an intergenerational neighbourhood model of support services. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009, 31: 47-52. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.05.008.CrossRef Ehart BK, Hoppping D, Power MB, Mitchell ET, Racine D: Generations of hope communities: an intergenerational neighbourhood model of support services. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009, 31: 47-52. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.05.008.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Williams S, Renehan E, Cramer E, Li X, Haralambous B: All in a day’s play – an intergenerational playgroup in a residential aged care facility. Int J Play. 2012, 1: 250-263. 10.1080/21594937.2012.738870.CrossRef Williams S, Renehan E, Cramer E, Li X, Haralambous B: All in a day’s play – an intergenerational playgroup in a residential aged care facility. Int J Play. 2012, 1: 250-263. 10.1080/21594937.2012.738870.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Blumer H: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Methods. 1969, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Blumer H: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Methods. 1969, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
21.
go back to reference Lauer RH, Handel WH: The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interactionism. 1977, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company Lauer RH, Handel WH: The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interactionism. 1977, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
22.
go back to reference Giddings LS: Mixed methods research. J Res Nurs. 2006, 11: 195-203. 10.1177/1744987106064635.CrossRef Giddings LS: Mixed methods research. J Res Nurs. 2006, 11: 195-203. 10.1177/1744987106064635.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ross T: A Survival Guide for Health Research Methods. 2012, England: McGraw-Hill Education Open University Press Ross T: A Survival Guide for Health Research Methods. 2012, England: McGraw-Hill Education Open University Press
24.
go back to reference Creswell JW: Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2014, California: Sage Publications Inc, 4 Creswell JW: Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2014, California: Sage Publications Inc, 4
25.
go back to reference Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Karvouni A, Kouri I, Ioannidis JPA: Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2009, 339: a3006-doi:101136/bmja3006CrossRef Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Karvouni A, Kouri I, Ioannidis JPA: Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2009, 339: a3006-doi:101136/bmja3006CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE: Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001, 30: 337-343. 10.1093/ageing/30.4.337.CrossRefPubMed Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE: Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001, 30: 337-343. 10.1093/ageing/30.4.337.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fleming R: Challenge Depression: A Manual to Help Staff Identify and Reduce Depression in Aged Care Facilities. 2001, Sydney: The Hammond Care Group Fleming R: Challenge Depression: A Manual to Help Staff Identify and Reduce Depression in Aged Care Facilities. 2001, Sydney: The Hammond Care Group
28.
go back to reference Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA: Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS]: Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986, 5: 165-173. 10.1300/J018v05n01_09.CrossRef Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA: Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS]: Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986, 5: 165-173. 10.1300/J018v05n01_09.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P: Mini-Mental State; a practical method of grading the cognitive state of the patients for clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P: Mini-Mental State; a practical method of grading the cognitive state of the patients for clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Vertes A, Lever JA, Molloy DW, Sanderson B, Tuttle I, Pokoradi L, Principi E: Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination use and interpretation. Can Fam Physician. 2018–2023, 2001: 47- Vertes A, Lever JA, Molloy DW, Sanderson B, Tuttle I, Pokoradi L, Principi E: Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination use and interpretation. Can Fam Physician. 2018–2023, 2001: 47-
31.
go back to reference Woodward M, Feldman H: Mild to Moderate Stages. Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. Edited by: Gauthier S. 2006, United Kingdom: Informa Healthcare, 3 Woodward M, Feldman H: Mild to Moderate Stages. Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. Edited by: Gauthier S. 2006, United Kingdom: Informa Healthcare, 3
32.
go back to reference Coakes SJ: SPSS Version 20.00 for Windows Analysis without Anguish. 2013, Milton Queensland: WILEY John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd: Australia Coakes SJ: SPSS Version 20.00 for Windows Analysis without Anguish. 2013, Milton Queensland: WILEY John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd: Australia
33.
go back to reference Weintraub APC, Killian TS: Intergenerational programming: older person’s perceptions of its impact. J Appl Gerontol. 2007, 26: 370-384. 10.1177/0733464807302671.CrossRef Weintraub APC, Killian TS: Intergenerational programming: older person’s perceptions of its impact. J Appl Gerontol. 2007, 26: 370-384. 10.1177/0733464807302671.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ochiltree G: Grandparents, Grandchildren and the Generation Between. 2006, Camberwell Victoria: ACER Press Ochiltree G: Grandparents, Grandchildren and the Generation Between. 2006, Camberwell Victoria: ACER Press
Metadata
Title
An evaluative study of the benefits of participating in intergenerational playgroups in aged care for older people
Authors
C Margaret Skropeta
Alf Colvin
Shannon Sladen
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-109

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Geriatrics 1/2014 Go to the issue