Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Review

WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis

Authors: Salomone Di Saverio, Arianna Birindelli, Micheal D. Kelly, Fausto Catena, Dieter G. Weber, Massimo Sartelli, Michael Sugrue, Mark De Moya, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Aneel Bhangu, Ferdinando Agresta, Ernest E. Moore, Kjetil Soreide, Ewen Griffiths, Steve De Castro, Jeffry Kashuk, Yoram Kluger, Ari Leppaniemi, Luca Ansaloni, Manne Andersson, Federico Coccolini, Raul Coimbra, Kurinchi S. Gurusamy, Fabio Cesare Campanile, Walter Biffl, Osvaldo Chiara, Fred Moore, Andrew B. Peitzman, Gustavo P. Fraga, David Costa, Ronald V. Maier, Sandro Rizoli, Zsolt J Balogh, Cino Bendinelli, Roberto Cirocchi, Valeria Tonini, Alice Piccinini, Gregorio Tugnoli, Elio Jovine, Roberto Persiani, Antonio Biondi, Thomas Scalea, Philip Stahel, Rao Ivatury, George Velmahos, Roland Andersson

Published in: World Journal of Emergency Surgery | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common cause of acute abdominal pain. Diagnosis of AA is challenging; a variable combination of clinical signs and symptoms has been used together with laboratory findings in several scoring systems proposed for suggesting the probability of AA and the possible subsequent management pathway. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of AA is still debated, with variable use of US, CT and MRI in different settings worldwide. Up to date, comprehensive clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management of AA have never been issued. In July 2015, during the 3rd World Congress of the WSES, held in Jerusalem (Israel), a panel of experts including an Organizational Committee and Scientific Committee and Scientific Secretariat, participated to a Consensus Conference where eight panelists presented a number of statements developed for each of the eight main questions about diagnosis and management of AA. The statements were then voted, eventually modified and finally approved by the participants to The Consensus Conference and lately by the board of co-authors. The current paper is reporting the definitive Guidelines Statements on each of the following topics: 1) Diagnostic efficiency of clinical scoring systems, 2) Role of Imaging, 3) Non-operative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis, 4) Timing of appendectomy and in-hospital delay, 5) Surgical treatment 6) Scoring systems for intra-operative grading of appendicitis and their clinical usefulness 7) Non-surgical treatment for complicated appendicitis: abscess or phlegmon 8) Pre-operative and post-operative antibiotics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–25.PubMed Addiss DG, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–25.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344, e2156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344, e2156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):741–8.CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE, Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):741–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557–64.CrossRefPubMed Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008;32(8):1843–9.CrossRefPubMed Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008;32(8):1843–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chong CF, et al. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(3):220–5.PubMed Chong CF, et al. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(3):220–5.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Atema JJ, et al. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):979–90.CrossRefPubMed Atema JJ, et al. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):979–90.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Debnath J, et al. Alvarado score: is it time to develop a clinical-pathological-radiological scoring system for diagnosing acute appendicitis? Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(6):839–40.CrossRefPubMed Debnath J, et al. Alvarado score: is it time to develop a clinical-pathological-radiological scoring system for diagnosing acute appendicitis? Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(6):839–40.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McKay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(5):489–93.CrossRefPubMed McKay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(5):489–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gwynn LK. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med. 2001;21(2):119–23.CrossRefPubMed Gwynn LK. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med. 2001;21(2):119–23.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference de Castro SM, et al. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012;36(7):1540–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Castro SM, et al. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012;36(7):1540–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Kollar D, et al. Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score and clinical assessment. World J Surg. 2015;39(1):104–9.CrossRefPubMed Kollar D, et al. Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score and clinical assessment. World J Surg. 2015;39(1):104–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Scott AJ, et al. Risk stratification by the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score to guide decision-making in patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):563–72.CrossRefPubMed Scott AJ, et al. Risk stratification by the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score to guide decision-making in patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):563–72.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ebell MH, Shinholser J. What are the most clinically useful cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Scores? A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(4):365–72. e2.CrossRefPubMed Ebell MH, Shinholser J. What are the most clinically useful cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Scores? A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(4):365–72. e2.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Kulik DM, Uleryk EM, Maguire JL. Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed Kulik DM, Uleryk EM, Maguire JL. Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004;91(1):28–37.CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004;91(1):28–37.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hallan S, Asberg A. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis--a meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1997;57(5):373–80.CrossRefPubMed Hallan S, Asberg A. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis--a meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1997;57(5):373–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg. 1992;58(4):264–9.PubMed Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg. 1992;58(4):264–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kirkil C, et al. Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(1):13–9.CrossRefPubMed Kirkil C, et al. Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(1):13–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bongard F, Landers DV, Lewis F. Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. A prospective analysis. Am J Surg. 1985;150(1):90–6.CrossRefPubMed Bongard F, Landers DV, Lewis F. Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. A prospective analysis. Am J Surg. 1985;150(1):90–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Webster DP, et al. Differentiating acute appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease in women of childbearing age. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(6):569–72.CrossRefPubMed Webster DP, et al. Differentiating acute appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease in women of childbearing age. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(6):569–72.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Arnbjornsson E. Varying frequency of acute appendicitis in different phases of the menstrual cycle. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(5):709–11.PubMed Arnbjornsson E. Varying frequency of acute appendicitis in different phases of the menstrual cycle. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(5):709–11.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Rothrock SG, et al. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed Rothrock SG, et al. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Dahlberg DL, et al. Differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Appendicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease? Adv Nurse Pract. 2004;12(1):40–5. quiz 45–6.PubMed Dahlberg DL, et al. Differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Appendicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease? Adv Nurse Pract. 2004;12(1):40–5. quiz 45–6.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Morishita K, et al. Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(2):152–7.CrossRefPubMed Morishita K, et al. Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(2):152–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Albiston E. The role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16(7):451–63.CrossRefPubMed Albiston E. The role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16(7):451–63.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Smith MP, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(2):85–91.CrossRefPubMed Smith MP, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(2):85–91.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Gaitan HG, et al. Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5, CD007683.PubMed Gaitan HG, et al. Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5, CD007683.PubMed
34.
go back to reference United Kingdom National Surgical Research C, Bhangu A. Bhangu, Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):894–903. United Kingdom National Surgical Research C, Bhangu A. Bhangu, Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):894–903.
35.
go back to reference Krajewski S, et al. Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):43–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krajewski S, et al. Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):43–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Andersson RE. The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg. 2007;31(1):86–92.CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE. The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg. 2007;31(1):86–92.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kotagal M, et al. Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(4):642–6.CrossRefPubMed Kotagal M, et al. Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(4):642–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kotagal M, et al. Improving ultrasound quality to reduce computed tomography use in pediatric appendicitis: the Safe and Sound campaign. Am J Surg. 2015;209(5):896–900. discussion 900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kotagal M, et al. Improving ultrasound quality to reduce computed tomography use in pediatric appendicitis: the Safe and Sound campaign. Am J Surg. 2015;209(5):896–900. discussion 900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Kim ME, et al. Performance of CT examinations in children with suspected acute appendicitis in the community setting: a need for more education. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(4):857–60.CrossRefPubMed Kim ME, et al. Performance of CT examinations in children with suspected acute appendicitis in the community setting: a need for more education. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(4):857–60.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Nielsen JW, et al. Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):144–8.CrossRefPubMed Nielsen JW, et al. Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):144–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
go back to reference Spalluto LB, et al. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):317–34.CrossRefPubMed Spalluto LB, et al. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):317–34.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Theilen LH, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):345 e1–6.CrossRefPubMed Theilen LH, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):345 e1–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Heineman J. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: An evaluation of the Alvarado score as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis in children. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(12):1013–4.PubMed Heineman J. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: An evaluation of the Alvarado score as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis in children. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(12):1013–4.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF. Reevaluating the sonographic criteria for acute appendicitis in children: a review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of 246 cases. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(11):1382–94.CrossRefPubMed Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF. Reevaluating the sonographic criteria for acute appendicitis in children: a review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of 246 cases. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(11):1382–94.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Dingemann J, Ure B. Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012;22(3):195–200.CrossRefPubMed Dingemann J, Ure B. Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012;22(3):195–200.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Andersson RE. Short and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period. A national population-based cohort study. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):974–81.CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE. Short and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period. A national population-based cohort study. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):974–81.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Jones RP, et al. Journal Club: the Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendiceal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(3):519–26.CrossRefPubMed Jones RP, et al. Journal Club: the Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendiceal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(3):519–26.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference National Surgical Research, C. Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(9):1240–52.CrossRef National Surgical Research, C. Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(9):1240–52.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Brockman SF, et al. Does an Acute Surgical Model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis? ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(10):744–7.PubMed Brockman SF, et al. Does an Acute Surgical Model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis? ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(10):744–7.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Tan WJ, et al. Alvarado score: a guide to computed tomography utilization in appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(10):748–52.PubMed Tan WJ, et al. Alvarado score: a guide to computed tomography utilization in appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(10):748–52.PubMed
54.
go back to reference Poortman P, et al. Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(3):434–41.CrossRefPubMed Poortman P, et al. Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(3):434–41.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(5):1006–12.CrossRefPubMed Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(5):1006–12.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Schuh S, et al. Properties of serial ultrasound clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected appendicitis and related computed tomography use. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(4):406–14.CrossRefPubMed Schuh S, et al. Properties of serial ultrasound clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected appendicitis and related computed tomography use. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(4):406–14.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Mallin M, et al. Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(3):430–2.CrossRefPubMed Mallin M, et al. Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(3):430–2.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):1765–73.CrossRefPubMed Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):1765–73.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Kessler N, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology. 2004;230(2):472–8.CrossRefPubMed Kessler N, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology. 2004;230(2):472–8.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Terasawa T, et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):537–46.CrossRefPubMed Terasawa T, et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):537–46.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Koseekriniramol V, Kaewlai R. Abdominal wall thickness is not useful to predict appendix visualization on sonography in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(5):269–76.CrossRefPubMed Koseekriniramol V, Kaewlai R. Abdominal wall thickness is not useful to predict appendix visualization on sonography in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(5):269–76.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Leeuwenburgh MM, et al. Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e147–55.CrossRefPubMed Leeuwenburgh MM, et al. Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e147–55.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Carroll PJ, et al. Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;205(1):102–8.CrossRefPubMed Carroll PJ, et al. Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;205(1):102–8.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Bhangu A, et al. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(8):779–86.CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A, et al. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(8):779–86.CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Collaborative S, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):557–63. Collaborative S, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):557–63.
66.
go back to reference Singh P, et al. Safety assessment of resident grade and supervision level during emergency appendectomy: analysis of a multicenter, prospective study. Surgery. 2014;156(1):28–38.CrossRefPubMed Singh P, et al. Safety assessment of resident grade and supervision level during emergency appendectomy: analysis of a multicenter, prospective study. Surgery. 2014;156(1):28–38.CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278–87.CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278–87.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, Piccinini BA, Catena F, Biscardi A, Tugnoli G. How reliable is Alvarado score and its subgroups in ruling out acute appendicitis and suggesting the opportunity of nonoperative management or surgery? Annals of Surgery. 2016. June 8, 2016 published ahead of print. Di Saverio S, Piccinini BA, Catena F, Biscardi A, Tugnoli G. How reliable is Alvarado score and its subgroups in ruling out acute appendicitis and suggesting the opportunity of nonoperative management or surgery? Annals of Surgery. 2016. June 8, 2016 published ahead of print.
69.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, et al. The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):109–17.CrossRefPubMed Di Saverio S, et al. The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):109–17.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Svensson JF, et al. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):67–71.CrossRefPubMed Svensson JF, et al. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):67–71.CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Salminen P, et al. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2340–8.CrossRefPubMed Salminen P, et al. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2340–8.CrossRefPubMed
72.
go back to reference Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1937–43.CrossRefPubMed Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1937–43.CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Teo AT, et al. Institutional review of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(6):420–4.CrossRefPubMed Teo AT, et al. Institutional review of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(6):420–4.CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Stahlfeld K, et al. Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency? Am Surg. 2007;73(6):626–9. discussion 629–30.PubMed Stahlfeld K, et al. Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency? Am Surg. 2007;73(6):626–9. discussion 629–30.PubMed
75.
go back to reference Livingston EH, et al. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):886–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Livingston EH, et al. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):886–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
go back to reference Teixeira PG, et al. Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):538–43.CrossRefPubMed Teixeira PG, et al. Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):538–43.CrossRefPubMed
78.
go back to reference Ingraham AM, et al. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2010;145(9):886–92.CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, et al. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2010;145(9):886–92.CrossRefPubMed
79.
go back to reference Busch M, et al. In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis. World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1626–33.CrossRefPubMed Busch M, et al. In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis. World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1626–33.CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Ansaloni L, et al. Surgery versus conservative antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg. 2011;28(3):210–21.CrossRefPubMed Ansaloni L, et al. Surgery versus conservative antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg. 2011;28(3):210–21.CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Liu Z, et al. Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(6):362–70.CrossRefPubMed Liu Z, et al. Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(6):362–70.CrossRefPubMed
82.
go back to reference Wei B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1199–208.CrossRefPubMed Wei B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1199–208.CrossRefPubMed
83.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10, CD001546.PubMed Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10, CD001546.PubMed
84.
85.
go back to reference Wei HB, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):266–9.CrossRefPubMed Wei HB, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):266–9.CrossRefPubMed
86.
go back to reference Jaschinski T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaschinski T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87.
go back to reference Tzovaras G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2987–92.CrossRefPubMed Tzovaras G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2987–92.CrossRefPubMed
88.
go back to reference Ward NT, Ramamoorthy SL, Chang DC, Parsons JK. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer than open appendectomy in an elderly population. JSLS. 2014;18(3):e2014. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2014.00322. Ward NT, Ramamoorthy SL, Chang DC, Parsons JK. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer than open appendectomy in an elderly population. JSLS. 2014;18(3):e2014. doi:10.​4293/​JSLS.​2014.​00322.
89.
go back to reference Yeh CC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2932–42.CrossRefPubMed Yeh CC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2932–42.CrossRefPubMed
90.
go back to reference Tiwari MM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):927–32.CrossRefPubMed Tiwari MM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):927–32.CrossRefPubMed
91.
go back to reference Southgate E, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(6):557–62.CrossRefPubMed Southgate E, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(6):557–62.CrossRefPubMed
92.
go back to reference Ciarrocchi A, Amicucci G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(1):4–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ciarrocchi A, Amicucci G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(1):4–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
93.
go back to reference Dasari BV, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;13:250–6.CrossRefPubMed Dasari BV, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;13:250–6.CrossRefPubMed
94.
go back to reference Jackson H, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):1917–27.CrossRefPubMed Jackson H, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):1917–27.CrossRefPubMed
95.
go back to reference Wilasrusmee C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1470–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilasrusmee C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1470–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
96.
go back to reference Cheng HT, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in pregnancy: a population-based analysis of maternal outcome. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1394–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheng HT, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in pregnancy: a population-based analysis of maternal outcome. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1394–9.CrossRefPubMed
97.
go back to reference Cox TC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):593–602.CrossRefPubMed Cox TC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):593–602.CrossRefPubMed
98.
go back to reference Walker HG, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. Int J Surg. 2014;12(11):1235–41.CrossRefPubMed Walker HG, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. Int J Surg. 2014;12(11):1235–41.CrossRefPubMed
99.
go back to reference Markar SR, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(10):1993–2004.CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(10):1993–2004.CrossRefPubMed
100.
go back to reference Wang CC, et al. Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7), e68662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang CC, et al. Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7), e68662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
101.
go back to reference Masoomi H, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(12):2226–31.CrossRefPubMed Masoomi H, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(12):2226–31.CrossRefPubMed
102.
go back to reference Isaksson K, et al. Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1173–7.CrossRefPubMed Isaksson K, et al. Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1173–7.CrossRefPubMed
103.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, et al. A cost-effective technique for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes and costs of a case–control prospective single-operator study of 112 unselected consecutive cases of complicated acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):e51–65.CrossRefPubMed Di Saverio S, et al. A cost-effective technique for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes and costs of a case–control prospective single-operator study of 112 unselected consecutive cases of complicated acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):e51–65.CrossRefPubMed
104.
go back to reference Moore CB, et al. Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg. 2011;77(1):78–80.PubMed Moore CB, et al. Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg. 2011;77(1):78–80.PubMed
105.
go back to reference St Peter SD, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):581–5.CrossRefPubMed St Peter SD, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):581–5.CrossRefPubMed
106.
go back to reference Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T. Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(7):534–7.CrossRefPubMed Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T. Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(7):534–7.CrossRefPubMed
107.
go back to reference Akkoyun I, Tuna AT. Advantages of abandoning abdominal cavity irrigation and drainage in operations performed on children with perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1886–90.CrossRefPubMed Akkoyun I, Tuna AT. Advantages of abandoning abdominal cavity irrigation and drainage in operations performed on children with perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1886–90.CrossRefPubMed
108.
go back to reference Schein M, Rogers P, Assalia A. Schein's Common Sense Emergency Abdominal Surgery: an Unconventional Book. 3rd ed. Springer; 2010. p. 456. Schein M, Rogers P, Assalia A. Schein's Common Sense Emergency Abdominal Surgery: an Unconventional Book. 3rd ed. Springer; 2010. p. 456.
109.
go back to reference Motson RW, Kelly MD. Simplified technique for laparoscopic appendectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(4):294–5.CrossRefPubMed Motson RW, Kelly MD. Simplified technique for laparoscopic appendectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(4):294–5.CrossRefPubMed
110.
go back to reference Naguib N. Simple technique for laparoscopic appendicectomy to ensure safe division of the mesoappendix. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(1):73–4.CrossRefPubMed Naguib N. Simple technique for laparoscopic appendicectomy to ensure safe division of the mesoappendix. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(1):73–4.CrossRefPubMed
111.
go back to reference Aydogan F, et al. A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195(2):277–8.CrossRefPubMed Aydogan F, et al. A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195(2):277–8.CrossRefPubMed
112.
go back to reference Yang HR, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15(4):353–6.CrossRefPubMed Yang HR, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15(4):353–6.CrossRefPubMed
113.
go back to reference Sucullu I, et al. The effects of LigaSure on the laparoscopic management of acute appendicitis: "LigaSure assisted laparoscopic appendectomy". Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(4):333–5.CrossRefPubMed Sucullu I, et al. The effects of LigaSure on the laparoscopic management of acute appendicitis: "LigaSure assisted laparoscopic appendectomy". Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(4):333–5.CrossRefPubMed
114.
go back to reference Diamantis T, et al. Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today. 2006;36(10):908–13.CrossRefPubMed Diamantis T, et al. Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today. 2006;36(10):908–13.CrossRefPubMed
115.
go back to reference Lee JS, Hong TH. Comparison of various methods of mesoappendix dissection in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(1):28–31.CrossRefPubMed Lee JS, Hong TH. Comparison of various methods of mesoappendix dissection in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(1):28–31.CrossRefPubMed
116.
go back to reference Kazemier G, et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1473–6.CrossRefPubMed Kazemier G, et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1473–6.CrossRefPubMed
117.
go back to reference Sahm M, et al. Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(1):124–9.CrossRefPubMed Sahm M, et al. Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(1):124–9.CrossRefPubMed
119.
go back to reference Swank HA, et al. Endostapler or endoloops for securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):576–83.CrossRefPubMed Swank HA, et al. Endostapler or endoloops for securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):576–83.CrossRefPubMed
120.
go back to reference Lukish J, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: use of the endoloop vs the endostapler. Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):58–61. discussion 62.CrossRefPubMed Lukish J, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: use of the endoloop vs the endostapler. Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):58–61. discussion 62.CrossRefPubMed
121.
go back to reference Rakic M, et al. Analysis of endoloops and endostaples for closing the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Today. 2014;44(9):1716–22.CrossRefPubMed Rakic M, et al. Analysis of endoloops and endostaples for closing the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Today. 2014;44(9):1716–22.CrossRefPubMed
122.
go back to reference Sajid MS, et al. Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, et al. Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed
123.
go back to reference Safavi A, Langer M, Skarsgard ED. Endoloop versus endostapler closure of the appendiceal stump in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg. 2012;55(1):37–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Safavi A, Langer M, Skarsgard ED. Endoloop versus endostapler closure of the appendiceal stump in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg. 2012;55(1):37–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
124.
go back to reference Street D, et al. Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123(6):689–90.CrossRefPubMed Street D, et al. Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123(6):689–90.CrossRefPubMed
125.
go back to reference Niemineva K. The pioneer of operative gynecology in Finland. Nord Med. 1970;84(46):1449–52.PubMed Niemineva K. The pioneer of operative gynecology in Finland. Nord Med. 1970;84(46):1449–52.PubMed
126.
go back to reference Lavonius MI, et al. Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1996;85(3):222–4.PubMed Lavonius MI, et al. Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1996;85(3):222–4.PubMed
127.
go back to reference van der Graaf YOH. Simple ligation better than invagination of the appendix stump; a prospective randomized study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992;136(31):1525.PubMed van der Graaf YOH. Simple ligation better than invagination of the appendix stump; a prospective randomized study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992;136(31):1525.PubMed
128.
go back to reference Allemann P, et al. Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis--the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(1):63–8.CrossRefPubMed Allemann P, et al. Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis--the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(1):63–8.CrossRefPubMed
129.
go back to reference Narci A, et al. Is peritoneal drainage necessary in childhood perforated appendicitis?--a comparative study. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(11):1864–8.CrossRefPubMed Narci A, et al. Is peritoneal drainage necessary in childhood perforated appendicitis?--a comparative study. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(11):1864–8.CrossRefPubMed
130.
go back to reference Siribumrungwong B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siribumrungwong B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
131.
go back to reference Henry MC, Moss RL. Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(8):625–30.CrossRefPubMed Henry MC, Moss RL. Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(8):625–30.CrossRefPubMed
132.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Cassar Delia E, Davidson BR. Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal operations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7, CD010424.PubMed Gurusamy KS, Cassar Delia E, Davidson BR. Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal operations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7, CD010424.PubMed
133.
go back to reference Swank HA, et al. Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(11):1214–21.CrossRefPubMed Swank HA, et al. Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(11):1214–21.CrossRefPubMed
136.
go back to reference van den Broek WT, et al. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg. 2001;88(2):251–4.CrossRefPubMed van den Broek WT, et al. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg. 2001;88(2):251–4.CrossRefPubMed
137.
go back to reference Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K. Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(5):392–4.CrossRefPubMed Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K. Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(5):392–4.CrossRefPubMed
138.
139.
go back to reference Strong S, et al. How good are surgeons at identifying appendicitis? Results from a multi-centre cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;15:107–12.CrossRefPubMed Strong S, et al. How good are surgeons at identifying appendicitis? Results from a multi-centre cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;15:107–12.CrossRefPubMed
140.
go back to reference Hamminga JT, et al. Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1594–600.CrossRefPubMed Hamminga JT, et al. Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1594–600.CrossRefPubMed
141.
go back to reference Shafi S, et al. Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):884–7.CrossRefPubMed Shafi S, et al. Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):884–7.CrossRefPubMed
142.
go back to reference Gomes CA, et al. Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(5):463–6.CrossRefPubMed Gomes CA, et al. Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(5):463–6.CrossRefPubMed
143.
go back to reference Gomes CA, et al. Lessons learned with laparoscopic management of complicated grades of acute appendicitis. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(4):261–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Gomes CA, et al. Lessons learned with laparoscopic management of complicated grades of acute appendicitis. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(4):261–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
144.
go back to reference Simillis C, et al. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery. 2010;147(6):818–29.CrossRefPubMed Simillis C, et al. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery. 2010;147(6):818–29.CrossRefPubMed
145.
go back to reference Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppaniemi A. Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):237–42.CrossRefPubMed Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppaniemi A. Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):237–42.CrossRefPubMed
146.
go back to reference Weber DG, Di Saverio S. Letter to the Editor: Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? Ann Surg. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. Weber DG, Di Saverio S. Letter to the Editor: Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? Ann Surg. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
147.
go back to reference Hall NJ, et al. Is interval appendicectomy justified after successful nonoperative treatment of an appendix mass in children? A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(4):767–71.CrossRefPubMed Hall NJ, et al. Is interval appendicectomy justified after successful nonoperative treatment of an appendix mass in children? A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(4):767–71.CrossRefPubMed
148.
go back to reference Deakin DE, Ahmed I. Interval appendicectomy after resolution of adult inflammatory appendix mass--is it necessary? Surgeon. 2007;5(1):45–50.CrossRefPubMed Deakin DE, Ahmed I. Interval appendicectomy after resolution of adult inflammatory appendix mass--is it necessary? Surgeon. 2007;5(1):45–50.CrossRefPubMed
149.
go back to reference Carpenter SG, et al. Increased risk of neoplasm in appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy: single-institution experience and literature review. Am Surg. 2012;78(3):339–43.PubMed Carpenter SG, et al. Increased risk of neoplasm in appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy: single-institution experience and literature review. Am Surg. 2012;78(3):339–43.PubMed
151.
go back to reference Daskalakis K, Juhlin C, Pahlman L. The use of pre- or postoperative antibiotics in surgery for appendicitis: a systematic review. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(1):14–20.CrossRefPubMed Daskalakis K, Juhlin C, Pahlman L. The use of pre- or postoperative antibiotics in surgery for appendicitis: a systematic review. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(1):14–20.CrossRefPubMed
152.
go back to reference Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3, CD001439.PubMed Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3, CD001439.PubMed
153.
go back to reference Mui LM, et al. Optimum duration of prophylactic antibiotics in acute non-perforated appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(6):425–8.CrossRefPubMed Mui LM, et al. Optimum duration of prophylactic antibiotics in acute non-perforated appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(6):425–8.CrossRefPubMed
154.
go back to reference Allo MD, et al. Ticarcillin/clavulanate versus imipenem/cilistatin for the treatment of infections associated with gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Am Surg. 1999;65(2):99–104.PubMed Allo MD, et al. Ticarcillin/clavulanate versus imipenem/cilistatin for the treatment of infections associated with gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Am Surg. 1999;65(2):99–104.PubMed
155.
go back to reference Hopkins JA, Wilson SE, Bobey DG. Adjunctive antimicrobial therapy for complicated appendicitis: bacterial overkill by combination therapy. World J Surg. 1994;18(6):933–8.CrossRefPubMed Hopkins JA, Wilson SE, Bobey DG. Adjunctive antimicrobial therapy for complicated appendicitis: bacterial overkill by combination therapy. World J Surg. 1994;18(6):933–8.CrossRefPubMed
156.
157.
158.
go back to reference Berne TV, et al. Meropenem versus tobramycin with clindamycin in the antibiotic management of patients with advanced appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182(5):403–7.PubMed Berne TV, et al. Meropenem versus tobramycin with clindamycin in the antibiotic management of patients with advanced appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182(5):403–7.PubMed
159.
go back to reference Taylor E, et al. Complicated appendicitis: is there a minimum intravenous antibiotic requirement? A prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 2000;66(9):887–90.PubMed Taylor E, et al. Complicated appendicitis: is there a minimum intravenous antibiotic requirement? A prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 2000;66(9):887–90.PubMed
161.
go back to reference SMM de Castro, CUnlu, EP Steller, et al. Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012;36:1540–1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral SMM de Castro, CUnlu, EP Steller, et al. Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012;36:1540–1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis
Authors
Salomone Di Saverio
Arianna Birindelli
Micheal D. Kelly
Fausto Catena
Dieter G. Weber
Massimo Sartelli
Michael Sugrue
Mark De Moya
Carlos Augusto Gomes
Aneel Bhangu
Ferdinando Agresta
Ernest E. Moore
Kjetil Soreide
Ewen Griffiths
Steve De Castro
Jeffry Kashuk
Yoram Kluger
Ari Leppaniemi
Luca Ansaloni
Manne Andersson
Federico Coccolini
Raul Coimbra
Kurinchi S. Gurusamy
Fabio Cesare Campanile
Walter Biffl
Osvaldo Chiara
Fred Moore
Andrew B. Peitzman
Gustavo P. Fraga
David Costa
Ronald V. Maier
Sandro Rizoli
Zsolt J Balogh
Cino Bendinelli
Roberto Cirocchi
Valeria Tonini
Alice Piccinini
Gregorio Tugnoli
Elio Jovine
Roberto Persiani
Antonio Biondi
Thomas Scalea
Philip Stahel
Rao Ivatury
George Velmahos
Roland Andersson
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1749-7922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1/2016 Go to the issue