Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Hip-TEP | Research article

Ellipse method for measuring Liaw’s anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Kuei-Lin Yeh, Tai-Yin Wu, Hsuan-Hsiao Ma, Sheng-Mou Hou, Chen-Kun Liaw

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several cup anteversion measurements for post-operative total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery have been described. We developed the standardized Liaw’s trigonometric method to eliminate the influence of patient position, which is the most accurate method for cup anteversion measurement. We then developed an ellipse method using the Elliversion software and reported an interobserver error reduction in 2013. In this study, we attempted to apply this ellipse method in the clinic and compared its accuracy with the standard trigonometric version.

Methods

In the present study, we attempted to incorporate the ellipse method with Liaw’s standardized anteversion in the simulated cup position. We measured standardized Liaw’s anteversion for 434 radiographs in the clinic using the ellipse method. Repeated standard deviation (RSD) was calculated for accuracy evaluation. Furthermore, paired t-test was used for comparison with the interobserver and intraobserver errors.

Results

We found that the standardized Liaw’s anteversion measured using the ellipse method showed lower RSD than the radiographic version. RSD was 0.795 in the standardized Liaw’s anteversion with ellipse method group. The p-values of the paired t-test were all higher than 0.05 when measuring the interobserver and intraobserver errors. It indicated that the ellipse method was a precise and simple tool for cup anteversion measurement.

Conclusion

We believe that this ellipse measurement can assist surgeons while placing the acetabulum cup into the precise position and enable early diagnosis of acetabulum loosening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Liaw CK, et al. A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:134–9.CrossRef Liaw CK, et al. A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:134–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gandhi R, et al. Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):593–7.CrossRef Gandhi R, et al. Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):593–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nomura T, et al. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(5):597–603.CrossRef Nomura T, et al. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(5):597–603.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(3):387–90.CrossRef Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(3):387–90.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Arai N, et al. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(2):263–7.CrossRef Arai N, et al. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(2):263–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(3):252–60.CrossRef Olivecrona H, et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(3):252–60.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liaw C-K, et al. A simple mathematical standardized measurement of acetabulum Anteversion after Total hip Arthroplasty. Computational Mathematical Methods Med. 2008;9(2):105–19.CrossRef Liaw C-K, et al. A simple mathematical standardized measurement of acetabulum Anteversion after Total hip Arthroplasty. Computational Mathematical Methods Med. 2008;9(2):105–19.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee GC, et al. Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):586.CrossRef Lee GC, et al. Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):586.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liaw C-K, et al. Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - a precision study using synthetic and real radiographs. Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery. 2013;18. Liaw C-K, et al. Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - a precision study using synthetic and real radiographs. Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery. 2013;18.
10.
11.
go back to reference Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1295–306.CrossRef Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1295–306.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kennedy JG, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998;13(5):530–4.CrossRef Kennedy JG, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998;13(5):530–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002;17(3):282–8.CrossRef Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002;17(3):282–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):815–21.CrossRef Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):815–21.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;72:7–21.PubMed Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;72:7–21.PubMed
16.
go back to reference D'Lima DD, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(3):315–21.CrossRef D'Lima DD, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(3):315–21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Biedermann R, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):762–9.CrossRef Biedermann R, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):762–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:206–9. Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:206–9.
19.
go back to reference Kalteis T, et al. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58(2):294–300.CrossRef Kalteis T, et al. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58(2):294–300.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McArthur B, et al. Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2810–8.CrossRef McArthur B, et al. Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2810–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Park YS, et al. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):66.CrossRef Park YS, et al. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):66.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.CrossRef Lewinnek GE, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Marx A, et al. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(7):487–92.CrossRef Marx A, et al. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(7):487–92.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Penney GP, et al. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(7):1342–8.CrossRef Penney GP, et al. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(7):1342–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nho JH, et al. Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(1):32–6.CrossRef Nho JH, et al. Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(1):32–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:174–9.CrossRef Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:174–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ellipse method for measuring Liaw’s anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty
Authors
Kuei-Lin Yeh
Tai-Yin Wu
Hsuan-Hsiao Ma
Sheng-Mou Hou
Chen-Kun Liaw
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03669-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue