Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Vaccination | Research

Real world outcomes of distributing Lucira Check-It® COVID self-tests in Ontario, Canada: the GetaKit COVID study

Authors: Lauren Orser, Janet E. Squires, Alexandra Musten, Nikki Ho, Jennifer Lindsay, Nitika Pant Pai, Patrick O’Byrne

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Ontario, Canada we developed and implemented an online screening algorithm for the distribution of HIV self-tests, known as GetaKit. During the COVID pandemic, we adapted the GetaKit algorithm to screen for COVID based on population and infection data and distributed COVID rt-LAMP self-tests (using the Lucira Check-It®) to eligible participants.

Methods

GetaKit/COVID was a prospective observational study that occurred over a 7-month period from September 2021 to April 2022. All potential participants completed an online registration and risk assessment, including demographic information, COVID symptoms and risk factors, and vaccination status. Bivariate comparisons were performed for three outcomes: results reporting status, vaccination status, and COVID diagnosis status. Data were analysed using Chi-Square for categorial covariates and Independent Samples T-Test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous covariates. Bivariate logistic regression models were applied to examine associations between the covariates and outcomes.

Results

During the study period, we distributed 6469 COVID self-tests to 4160 eligible participants; 46% identified as Black, Indigenous or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Nearly 70% of participants reported their COVID self-test results; 304 of which were positive. Overall, 91% also reported being vaccinated against COVID. Statistical analysis found living with five or fewer people, having tested for COVID previously, and being fully vaccinated were positive factors in results reporting. For COVID vaccination, people from large urban centers, who identified their ethnicity as white, and who reported previous COVID testing were more likely to be fully vaccinated. Finally, being identified as a contact of someone who had tested positive for COVID and the presence of COVID-related symptoms were found to be positive factors in diagnosis.

Conclusions

While most participants who accessed this service were vaccinated against COVID and the majority of diagnoses were identified in participants who had symptoms of, or an exposure to, COVID, our program was able to appropriately link participants to recommended follow-up based on reported risks and results. These findings highlight the utility of online screening algorithms to provide health services, particularly for persons with historical barriers to healthcare access, such as BIPOC or lower-income groups.
Literature
6.
go back to reference O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Inamdar G, Grayson M-O, Jones C, et al. At-home HIV self-testing during COVID: implementing the GetaKit project in Ottawa. Can J Public Health. 2021;112(4):587–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Inamdar G, Grayson M-O, Jones C, et al. At-home HIV self-testing during COVID: implementing the GetaKit project in Ottawa. Can J Public Health. 2021;112(4):587–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Buckingham S. Automated STI/HIV risk assessments: testing an online clinical algorithm in Ottawa, Canada. Int J STD & AIDS. 2021;32(14):1365–73.CrossRef O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Buckingham S. Automated STI/HIV risk assessments: testing an online clinical algorithm in Ottawa, Canada. Int J STD & AIDS. 2021;32(14):1365–73.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Obeid JS, Davis M, Turner M, Meystre SM, Heider PM, et al. An artificial intelligence approach to COVID-19 infection risk assessment in virtual visits: a case report. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;8:1321–5.CrossRef Obeid JS, Davis M, Turner M, Meystre SM, Heider PM, et al. An artificial intelligence approach to COVID-19 infection risk assessment in virtual visits: a case report. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;8:1321–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yusof MK, Hamzah W, Rusli NSM. Efficiency of hybrid algorithm for COVID-19 online screening based on its symptoms. Indo J Electric Eng and Comp Sci. 2022;25(1):440–9. Yusof MK, Hamzah W, Rusli NSM. Efficiency of hybrid algorithm for COVID-19 online screening based on its symptoms. Indo J Electric Eng and Comp Sci. 2022;25(1):440–9.
13.
go back to reference Baumgart DC. Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada’s largest integrated digitalized healthcare system. NPJ Digit Med. 3:114–18. Baumgart DC. Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada’s largest integrated digitalized healthcare system. NPJ Digit Med. 3:114–18.
15.
go back to reference Kemei J, Olanlesi-Aliu A, Tunde-Byass M, Salami B. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on black communities in Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1580.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kemei J, Olanlesi-Aliu A, Tunde-Byass M, Salami B. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on black communities in Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1580.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Ezezkia O, Girmay B, Mengistu M, Barrett K. What is the health impact of COVID-19 among black communities in Canada? A systematic review. Can J Public Health. 2022;114:62–71.CrossRef Ezezkia O, Girmay B, Mengistu M, Barrett K. What is the health impact of COVID-19 among black communities in Canada? A systematic review. Can J Public Health. 2022;114:62–71.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones McMaughan D, Oloruntoba O, Smith ML. Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Front Public Health. 2020;8:231.CrossRef Jones McMaughan D, Oloruntoba O, Smith ML. Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Front Public Health. 2020;8:231.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Loignon C, Hudon C, Goulet E, Boyer S, De Laat M, Fournier N, et al. Perceived barriers to healthcare for persons living in poverty in Quebec, Canada: the EQUIhealTHY project. Int J Equity Health. 2015;17:24–32. Loignon C, Hudon C, Goulet E, Boyer S, De Laat M, Fournier N, et al. Perceived barriers to healthcare for persons living in poverty in Quebec, Canada: the EQUIhealTHY project. Int J Equity Health. 2015;17:24–32.
21.
23.
go back to reference Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. 2018;13:91–101. Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. 2018;13:91–101.
25.
go back to reference Campbell J, Nathoo A, Chard S, Messenger D, Walker M, Bartels SA. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and or queer patient experiences in Canadian primary care and emergency departments: a literature review. Cult Health Sex. 2023;15:1–18. Campbell J, Nathoo A, Chard S, Messenger D, Walker M, Bartels SA. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and or queer patient experiences in Canadian primary care and emergency departments: a literature review. Cult Health Sex. 2023;15:1–18.
Metadata
Title
Real world outcomes of distributing Lucira Check-It® COVID self-tests in Ontario, Canada: the GetaKit COVID study
Authors
Lauren Orser
Janet E. Squires
Alexandra Musten
Nikki Ho
Jennifer Lindsay
Nitika Pant Pai
Patrick O’Byrne
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Vaccination
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue